Shepherds and Butchers

Home > Other > Shepherds and Butchers > Page 48
Shepherds and Butchers Page 48

by Chris Marnewick


  I took a deep breath before I went back inside to find the staircase, and it felt like an impossibly long time before I was back at the front entrance, waiting for Wierda and Dr Shapiro. I was glad they hadn’t seen me. My hands were cold and clammy. I sat down on a rock with my eyes closed, my face turned to the sun.

  When they didn’t come out I went back inside. I walked slowly from display to display, taking my time to study the past. Did I have ancestors in the events depicted here? I couldn’t be sure. It struck me that Cell 6 and this edifice were both monuments to freedom fighters. The battle scenes in the friezes of the monument had their counterpart in literary form on the walls of Cell 6, yet the inscriptions on the walls of Cell 6 told me that the oppressed who had built this monument had become oppressors in turn.

  The photographs in the exhibits I saw in court flashed before my eyes, the seven black men, hardly out of their boyhood, lying in the debris of the storm, and again, naked on the mortuary slab. And superimposed on that was the image of Leon Labuschagne being taken away from court to be hanged by the neck until he was dead.

  I went outside again to wait for Wierda and the American.

  ‘I’ve never experienced an atmosphere like that, except maybe once,’ said Dr Shapiro. ‘Have you ever been to Masada?’ he asked back at the car.

  ‘I have,’ I said when Wierda didn’t respond.

  ‘Well,’ he said, ‘then you will know what I mean. You can’t walk on Masada without feeling a presence. There is a higher presence there, and I think it’s partly the presence of the dead and the presence of God.’

  ‘I felt like that when I visited Jerusalem,’ said Wierda, ‘at the Wailing Wall, at the Dome of the Rock and at the Greek Orthodox Church on Golgotha. It was exactly like the monument, at all three of those places.’

  I had been to Jerusalem too and had experienced the same sensations, but I kept it to myself. I also didn’t mention that I had felt the same presence at the Taj Mahal and the Great Pyramid of Giza. What if all that those edifices had in common was human suffering that could be felt across generations?

  What if what I had thought was vertigo or claustrophobia was something completely different, the fear of death, or the presence of the dead, or of God?

  ‘Did you see that manifesto in the newspaper in the museum?’ Dr Shapiro asked me. ‘They promised to treat everyone they met on their trek north fairly and equally. And then almost every frieze shows them subjugating the African tribes they encountered by force of arms, most brutally, without mercy. And ultimately you ended up with apartheid.’

  I didn’t answer. What could I say? I remembered reading somewhere that Verwoerd had made an announcement shortly after he had been appointed Minister of Native Affairs. His party, he’d said, had developed a policy that granted to other races what it claimed for whites and was calculated to provide the same opportunities to everyone within his own race group. This was the policy of apartheid, which had discrimination on the ground of race at its core, and was enforced with a single-minded viciousness that would destroy the fabric of the nation.

  I didn’t hear much of the heated debate between Wierda and Dr Shapiro, and I don’t know why I asked Wierda to stop at the reservoir on the way back. We walked across the rough terrain to a spot due south above Maximum. The three legs of A Section glistened in the sun. The gallows building towered over the other buildings. There was no sign of life.

  Behind us the monument looked down on the reservoir.

  Wierda dropped me off at my sister’s. Annelise looked at me askance where I stood at her door with my suitcase in my hand. I had forgotten to phone her to ask if I could stay the night.

  ‘Come in,’ she said. ‘Where is Pierre?’

  I wiped my feet and followed her into the house. ‘I thought he would be here.’

  ‘I haven’t seen him since early in the morning. He said he was going to court.’

  I didn’t know what to say. I could not recall seeing Pierre at court. When I thought back to the events of the morning I remembered that I had not gone into the courtroom at all. I had stood outside talking to James Murray while they went through the formalities of remanding the case.

  ‘You are just in time for dinner,’ Annelise said. ‘I think you might like what I have prepared.’

  The smell was familiar and harkened back to earlier times when we were little, but I could not quite place it. It turned out to be oxtail prepared according to my mother’s recipe. We were about to sit down when we heard a car at the gate and doors slamming. Pierre stepped onto the porch with heavy feet and I could hear him cursing as he tried to find the keyhole. I went to the door and opened it for him. He was drunk and fell against me.

  I sat him down at the table and Annelise dished up for him. He looked at us from under belligerent eyebrows.

  He stared at the food on his plate.

  Annelise would not meet my eyes. We sat in silence for a time. Eventually I stood up and took Pierre by the arm.

  ‘Let’s go for a walk,’ I suggested.

  Pierre jerked his arm away but stood up anyway and led the way to the door. I glanced over my shoulder at Annelise; she had her hands over her eyes.

  We walked for miles and miles through the suburbs. If it wasn’t for the fact that Pretoria was laid out in a square grid I would have been lost very quickly. The further we walked, the less agitated Pierre became. In due course he started talking, at first rambling on about perceived slights and persecution, but ultimately about death and killing.

  ‘You wanted to know about killing and dying and death,’ he said. ‘Well, let me tell you a few things about that.’ I said nothing and let him speak.

  ‘Where do you think I have been all day?’ he asked.

  He did not wait for an answer. ‘We did a job in Maputo today. We killed some people today. We bombed their house. They were bad people, and we killed them.’

  ‘What are you talking about?’ I said. ‘You are on sick leave.’

  My brother-in-law stopped and put his hand on my chest when I turned to face him. He drunkenly waved a finger under my nose.

  ‘That is just a ruse,’ he said. ‘I’m on a special assignment. I take the killers to the people who need to be killed, and then I bring them home again. That’s what I do.’

  ‘If it is your job to do it, why are you crying?’ I asked.

  At first he did not answer. A couple of blocks later he mumbled. ‘I think we bombed the wrong house.’ He was sobbing now. ‘I think we bombed the wrong house. I heard women and children inside.’

  He was inconsolable. I put my arm around his shoulders and we walked and walked and walked.

  He jabbered on and on until we arrived back at the house hours later. Our food was in the oven and Annelise had gone to bed.

  I didn’t sleep well that night and was wide awake at four o’clock. An argument on extenuating circumstances played over and over in my mind without ever reaching completion. I kept running into unpersuasive, hollow-sounding submissions and then abandoned the line of argument to start from the beginning.

  I went for a run at five o’clock. The city was only beginning to stir and the roads were all but deserted. This time the freshness of the day and the sweet smell of the jacaranda flowers did not produce any inspiration or new ideas.

  Palace of Justice

  62

  I went to court early because I still needed to talk to Labuschagne about the likelihood of his being found guilty. I went up the thirteen steps at the main entrance on the Square. The main atrium was deserted except for the security officers at the front desk. The smell of dust and detergent hung heavily in the air and shiny particles floated in the streams of sunlight coming through the large skylights overhead. The echoes of my footsteps followed me up the staircase to the robing room. I left my luggage in the robing room. I fully intended to leave as soon as I could get away.

  Court C was equally deserted and I put my papers down at the defence table. I took one last look around t
he room. The dock was cold and impersonal. I went to look for Labuschagne and walked past the prosecutors’ table before I took the staircase to the cells below. Below the court there was no comfort. Everything was cold and grey, damp brick and mortar, cold cement on the bare floors and walls. There was no one in Cell 6 either. The door was open, so I entered through the narrow doorway bending my knees slightly. I went to look for the cell sergeant and found other equally cold cells and sparsely equipped toilets down the passage. The cell sergeant was nowhere to be found downstairs. Upstairs the security men told me the cell sergeant had left to fetch the prisoners for the day’s cases. I went down again and sat down in Cell 6 and considered the best way to tell Labuschagne that he might be found guilty and that we needed to plan for that outcome. There was no easy way to tell him.

  Wierda and I had already concluded that there was no further evidence available to us; we would have to argue the matter on the evidence already given. If the Court found that the evidence we had produced was insufficient to create a reasonable doubt, then we hoped to persuade the Court that the evidence in any event established extenuating circumstances sufficient to avoid the mandatory death sentence. But seven deaths were not easy to ignore. If we couldn’t persuade the Court that the circumstances and events in Maximum had turned Labuschagne into an automaton at the reservoir we would have to argue that those same circumstances and events were sufficient to render his actions less blameworthy; that from a moral perspective they were, somehow, less reprehensible. But again, seven deaths were as difficult to justify as they were to explain.

  I paced up and down in the cell. The graffiti provided an escape from the depressing business of the trial, and I again felt myself drawn to the scribbles in so many different hands.

  MANDELA

  SAYS NO EASY

  WALK TO FREEDOM

  We certainly had not had an easy road to travel either. It was difficult to imagine freedom at its end.

  EK SIEMON IS NIE SKELAG NIE

  Perhaps there was some hope, a possibility of an outright acquittal. I checked my watch. Court was due to start in a few minutes and there was still no sign of the cell sergeant. I went back up and found that the courtroom was filling up rapidly. I beckoned Wierda to follow me down to Cell 6.

  ‘If he is convicted, I’ll argue extenuating circumstances immediately, as we’ve planned,’ I told him. ‘And then I plan to leave as soon as the sentence has been passed. We can talk about appeals later. It will be your job to take care of him after he has been sentenced.’

  Wierda nodded and then pointed at an inscription on the graffiti-covered wall behind me. It was an extract from the Freedom Charter:

  THE PREAMBLE OF THE CHARTER

  AND THE WORLD TO KNOW, THAT SOUTH AFRICA BELONGS TO

  ALL WHO LIVE IN IT, BLACK AND WHITE, AND THAT NO

  GOVERNMENT CAN JUSTLY CLAIM AUTHORITY

  UNLESS IT IS BASED ON THE WILL OF ALL

  THE PEOPLE O’POVU FIRST

  I looked at the words and wondered. Would Nelson Mandela, if he were ever to be sworn in as our first black President, keep its fundamental promise, or would it turn out to be empty political rhetoric like that of the Voortrekkers and Verwoerd?

  We waited for Labuschagne to arrive, but eventually had no choice but to return to the courtroom.

  ‘How long will it be before they hang him, do you think?’ Wierda asked me as we took our seats.

  I did not have the strength to answer. Six months to a year.

  Court started ten minutes late; there had been some trouble with the prisoners at the police cells, delaying their transport to court, and I never got the chance to speak to Labuschagne.

  Roshnee took her seat at her usual place behind Wierda and me, with Marianne Schlebusch and Dr Shapiro on either side of her. The atmosphere in the courtroom was very solemn, almost funereal. Sanet Niemand came over to speak to Wierda to reach agreement about the fate of the exhibits after the verdict had been announced. In case of a conviction Labuschagne’s gun would be forfeited to the State, but if he were by any chance to be acquitted the gun would be returned to him.

  When she entered the courtroom, the registrar came directly to me where I was sitting at the defence table and made me a whispered offer.

  ‘I’ve made arrangements with the security staff so that you can take him out through the back entrance when the verdict has been announced,’ she said. I felt the heat of her breath in my ear.

  Before I could discuss the significance of the registrar’s offer with Wierda, Judge van Zyl and his Assessors were escorted into the courtroom.

  ‘The defendant may be seated,’ said Judge van Zyl when he had made himself comfortable. ‘The judgment will take some time.’

  He waited for Labuschagne to sit down before he continued.

  ‘We are not united in our findings on the facts and there will be a majority verdict. I shall read the judgment of the majority first. Their verdict will be the verdict of the Court. After that, I shall read the opinion of the dissenting member of the Court. I would ask the spectators to remain calm and behave with the decorum that they have maintained until now in this very difficult case.’

  Wierda swallowed hard next to me. I was about to put him out of his misery, but when I turned towards him he had his pencil between his teeth again.

  Tap, tap, tap.

  I didn’t listen to the judgment with any degree of attention. The winner only wants to know that he has won. The loser, on the other hand, wants to know the reasons why he has lost. I busied myself with the Death Sentence Registers dating back to 1902. They were full of curious details, and as the Judge neared the end of the judgment, my finger found my friend Oupa’s murderer in the register:

  NO. DATE NAME OF PRISONER JUDGE PLACE OUTCOME DATE

  1266 7.2.63 Johannes Hendrik Buchling (E.M.) De Vos Pretoria Executed 24.5.63

  Through the skylights I could still see banks of clouds moving slowly across the city. When I turned to watch the spectators they were straining to hear; Judge van Zyl was making no effort to ensure that they could hear him in the last rows of the gallery. There were nods of agreement when the Judge dealt with particular facts or events, when he recorded the Court’s acceptance or rejection of items of evidence, and when he noted the Court’s impressions of the demeanour and credibility of the most important witnesses. From time to time the spectators made their views heard. There were sighs of assent every so often, and murmurs of dissent, but otherwise the courtroom was quiet, eerily so, with the clouds outside dictating the mood below the skylights and the copper chandelier within.

  The judgment ended with the words, ‘Mr Labuschagne, please stand up.’ Labuschagne stood up but kept his eyes on the floor. The Judge addressed him directly. ‘Mr Labuschagne, we therefore find, by a majority, that the State has not proved that your actions at the reservoir were the voluntary acts of a conscious mind, and you are found not guilty and you are discharged. You are free to leave. The Court is adjourned.’ When Judge van Zyl and the Assessors had left, Wierda jumped up and went over to the dock. His handshake ended in a huge hug. Labuschagne’s parents and Antoinette joined him in an emotional scrum. Eventually Wierda broke loose and came back to his seat.

  ‘You didn’t tell me what we would do if he was found not guilty.’

  ‘I’m going home. You can take care of it from here,’ I said.

  I stayed in my seat and pretended to fuss with my papers until the courtroom had emptied. Antoinette came back to give me a hug. My tears stained the collar of her blouse.

  I found James Murray in the robing room, stuffing his robes into his bag.

  ‘Well done,’ he said, extending his hand.

  I didn’t know what to say. When he released my hand, he added, ‘I wouldn’t have thought anyone could pull that off.’

  ‘I suspect it would have been very different if the Warrant Officer hadn’t gone and killed himself,’ I ventured.

  ‘For sure,’ he said.

  �
��But you know,’ he added, ‘in a way I’m glad. Pretoria can’t afford a case like this.’

  I asked Murray to accompany me to the Judge’s chambers to say goodbye. I had been a visitor to his jurisdiction and I had to pay homage to convention.

  Judge van Zyl was not very talkative. The Assessors were filling in their claim forms for submission to the Chief Registrar’s office. They were being paid per day for their participation and were to be reimbursed for expenses.

  I saw a blank death warrant on the Judge’s side table.

  We shook hands and James Murray and I left.

  ‘Who do you think was the dissenter?’ I asked him when we had returned to the robing room.

  ‘The Judge,’ he said.

  ‘Really?’ I was stunned. Usually the Judge is able to persuade the Assessors to his view. ‘What makes you think so?’

  ‘I know.’ He let the answer hang in the air.

  Murray and I parted company with another handshake.

  After a while I slipped out through the back entrance, leaving Wierda with Labuschagne to brave the gauntlet of flashbulbs and television cameras on the front steps. In the street behind the Palace of Justice I found a taxi driver who was prepared to take me to the airport. I closed my eyes when the door slammed shut behind me.

 

‹ Prev