Zinc was never rare. We mine millions of tons a year of it. But the supply is finite and the demand is infinite, and that's bad news. Even copper, as I noted above, is deemed to be at risk. We humans move to and fro upon the earth, gobbling up everything in sight, and some things aren't replaceable.
Solutions will be needed, if we want to go on having things like television screens and solar panels and computer chips. Synthesizing the necessary elements, or finding workable substitutes for them, is one obvious idea. Recycling these vanishing elements from discarded equipment is another. We can always try to make our high-tech devices more efficient, at least so far as their need for these substances goes. And discovering better ways of separating the rare elements from the matrices in which they exist as bare traces would help—the furnace-flue solution. (Platinum, for example, always in short supply, constitutes 1.5 parts per million of urban dust and grime, which is ever-abundant.)
But the sobering truth is that we still have millions of years to go before our own extinction date, or so we hope, and at our present rate of consumption we are likely to deplete most of the natural resources this planet has handed us. We have set up breeding and conservation programs to guard the few remaining whooping cranes, Indian rhinoceroses, and Siberian tigers. But we can't exactly set up a reservation somewhere where the supply of gallium and hafnium can quietly replenish itself. And once the scientists have started talking about our chances of running out of copper, we know that the future is rapidly moving in on us and big changes lie ahead.
Copyright (c) 2008 Robert Silverberg
[Back to Table of Contents]
* * *
Poetry: WAR GODS
by Bruce Holland Rogers
1. Problem Child
At the first clatter of spears, Ares would race from Olympus to join in. He didn't care who won, but killed warriors on either side, evening the odds to keep the game alive.
Wounded, he always came to his father. Zeus bound up the injuries of this perverted god, his child, the cursed fruit of his union with Hera. Is it any wonder that their marriage bed was cold?
* * * *
2. The Case for War
To kneeling priests, the taloned god spelled out his terms:
A great sun temple.
Constant flower wars for captives.
One warrior sacrificed for every temple step.
War for planting. War for harvest. War everlasting, in Huitzilopochtli's name. “Do this, and I will protect you.”
“Protect us from what, Great Lord?”
“From those gods who are even worse than I am.”
The priests trembled to think of it, and obeyed.
* * * *
3. Theogeny
Skanda, god of war, slew the demon Taraka, the Invincible. There was peace at last.
“Ha! Did you see him wielding six weapons?” said Agni, god of fire. “That's my boy!”
“I saw him fight brilliantly,” answered Shiva, “if you mean my son, Skanda.”
“My son, Skanda,” said Agni.
“Skanda, my child,” insisted the Destroyer, picking up his trident.
Agni readied his fire dart. The other gods chose sides.
—Bruce Holland Rogers
Copyright (c) 2008 Bruce Holland Rogers
[Back to Table of Contents]
* * *
Department: ON THE NET: SON OF GALLIMAUFRY
by James Patrick Kelly
nostalgia
As I burned in deadline hell while struggling to put this installment together, it occurred to me that I had been writing “On The Net” for quite some time now. How long? When I pulled up my bibliography, my jaw dropped. We began our magical mystery tour of cyberspace ten years ago to the day. A decade.
Time freaking flies!
I just reread my initial column, entitled “Start,” for the first time since it was published in June of 1998 and was struck by a couple of things. I spent a lot of space laboring to make the rhetorical point that the net was very much like science fiction—since it hadn't really happened yet. I whined that the hardware was excruciatingly slow and unreliable, the software was buggy and that most of the sites were “Under Construction.” Remember those goofy yellow animated gifs of guys with shovels [mikesfreegifs.com/main4 /page9.html]? They were everywhere back then! Here's how I ended my argument:
I bring this up not to complain (well, sort of to complain), but to make the point that whatever it is that we've got now, it isn't the net. Not yet. What we've got is the first paragraph of the first draft of a projected decology.
I'd say today that we're at least up to page 107 of Volume II. Is there any question that the net is on its way to being the most important communications medium on the planet?
The other thing about that initial effort that jumps off the screen at me is that I was very much finding my way as a columnist, never having done anything of the sort before. What exactly was I supposed to be typing? All Sheila and Gardner had said was that I should write about the web with a genre slant. At first, I took that to mean that I should come up with interesting websites that you could click. Those earliest installments were just that: nothing more than a random walk through my favorites list. The truth is that back then I doubted I could squeeze out more than a dozen or so columns before I'd use up all the good sites. But as I got the hang of columnizing, my focus changed. I didn't want to write about which sites were interesting so much as I wanted to discuss why were they interesting. IMHO[acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/IMHO], that is. And thus a monster pundit was created. I sometimes cringe as I'm writing these columns and notice that I've nattered on for hundreds of my allotted seventeen hundred words and haven't yet given a URL.
Which is why I will now stop waxing nostalgic and, well, start waxing nostalgic in a different way. In a column I wrote five years ago called “Gallimaufry"—I just love that word, look it up!—I explained that one of the problems with writing themed columns was that I kept discovering terrific sites that didn't quite fit into an essay. And so, in the spirit of the dawn of “On the Net,” here's a selection of some of my current faves that have no relation whatsoever to one another.
* * * *
good clicks
Science fiction lost one of its most lively websites in 2006 when the Hugo Award winning fanzine Emerald City [emcit.com] posted its final issue. But now the folks who brought you Emcit, Cheryl Morgan [cheryl-morgan.com] and Kevin Standlee [kevin-standlee.livejournal.com] are back with The Science Fiction Awards Watch [sfawardswatch.com]. As they write, “The science fiction and fantasy industry has lots of awards. We watch them, we report on them, we talk about them. Simple.” When I first heard about SFAW I wondered how Cheryl and Kevin could sustain interest in a site that is aimed at a niche in the genre. But their concept for the site has been proved, at least to my satisfaction. They list sixty-two separate awards programs that touch on our genre, and it seems as if there is usually news and/or controversy swirling around all of them. One intriguing feature of SFAW is the book discussion forum, where from time to time the editors assemble a distinguished panel of writers and editors to kick the tires of potential award contenders. What makes this different from the standard review is that the critics on the panel are in dialogue—and sometimes in disagreement—with one another. A new addition to the site is the SF Editors wiki. Now that there are Hugo Awards for Best Editor (Long Form) and (Short Form), informed voters will need to keep track of which editor bought what book or story. This data is not easy to come by except to industry insiders, and the wiki is intended to make it available to everyone.
While we're on the subject of awards, the Hugos [thehugoawards.org] have a spiffy new home where you can look up past winners, explore the intricacies of the preferential voting method, read about the history of the award, and, in case you haven't poked a stick in a hornet's nest recently, discover how to propose changes to the rules.
As I write this, the short fiction review website Tangent Onl
ine [tangentonline.com] has been on sabbatical for almost four months. Luckily for fans of the short form, a new site, The Fix [thefix-online.com], has arrived on the scene. Andy Cox, of TTA Press [ttapress.com], publisher of Interzone and Black Static, and Eugie Foster [eugiefoster.com] have created a site that is visually pleasing and intellectually stimulating. The size of their staff of columnists and reviewers is impressive. I counted over fifty; most are themselves working or aspiring writers. Of course, the skill and style of the reviewers vary; for the most part they give plot summaries and in some cases offer a critical, or at least a personal, reaction to the story. The intent would seem not so much to pass judgment as to describe stories that a reader might want to look for. The columns are quite astute—I can particularly recommend James Van Pelt's [sff.net/people/james.van.pelt] The Day Job and Scott Danielson's [scottddanielson.blog spot.com] Audiobook Fix. The Fix is one of the most promising new sites of 2007.
The Atlas of the Universe [atlas oftheuniverse.com] will make you feel insignificant—in a good way. Although the idea of this site, created by astrophysicist Richard Powell, is simple, the execution is elegant. It features a series of nine star maps, beginning with one that shows our nearest neighbors in space, the thirty-three stars that are within 12.5 light years of our solar system. The next map shows stars that are 250 light years from our sun, the one after that shows those that are five thousand light years away, and the one after that shows the entirety of the Milky Way, a loose spiral disc of two hundred billion stars, the farthest of which is fifty thousand light years distant from us. And that's just the beginning of the journey this wonderful site will take you on. By the time you open the last map, you are looking at the entire visible universe, thirty billion trillion stars that span fourteen billion light years. One insight that this science fiction writer takes away from the atlas is that, although faster than light travel seems more fantasy than science fiction, if we ever should build a starship it is inconceivable that we won't bump into other life forms.
This summer my wife and I decided to cut back our cable TV to the basic minimum of twenty channels (gasp!) and rely on our Netflix [net flix.com] account for most of our media consumption. So far, no regrets. But I'd be hard pressed to decide what to add to my queue if I didn't have Rotten Tomatoes [rotten tomatoes.com] as a guide. This is a compendium of movie reviews—ranging from big print media like the New York Times and the Boston Globe to the savvy members of the Online Film Critics Society. Of course, many of you have already clicked RT—5.2 million readers do every month—but in case you haven't, join the crowd! What I like best about this site is that they give grades based on the critical consensus. By the time you read this, most of the movies that are now in theaters will be out on DVD—for example, I Am Legend, which got just a 64 percent, and Beowulf, which got a 70 percent. (I saw Beowulf in a 3D theater and would give it another 6 or 7 percent for some very special effects.) Check out some of our SF classics that are rated on the site: The Day the Earth Stood Still earns a 93 percent, while Forbidden Planet gets a well-deserved 94 percent. And my all-time guilty pleasure, Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein, gets an 89 percent. Take that, Will Smith!
SFScope [sfscope.com] is SF's newest news site. Edited by Ian Randal Strock, SFScope wants to be your source for news about science fiction, fantasy, and horror. It's a little like Locus Online [locusmag.com], only more wide-ranging and a little like SciFi Wire [scifi.com/scifiwire], only stronger on news of the print world and not so media-centric. The reporting is succinct, the interface is clean and easy to navigate. SFScope has become one of my daily must-clicks.
The daily online comics anthology Act-I-Vate [community.livejournal.com/activate] is currently my favorite online graphic novel source. This is a collaborative of twenty-three talented artists who are making their bleeding edge work available to the world for free. Many of them have more mainstream projects going, but feel the need to push boundaries. As Dan Goldman said in an interview, “I look at Act-I-Vate as a kind of a laboratory. I'm doing stuff that I don't know if anyone would publish—just yet anyway.” I can particularly recommend Goldman's Kelly (no relation, that's for sure), Dean Haspiel's Immortal, and Mike Caravallo's Parade, although there is something for everyone at this immense site. Warning: Don't even think of sampling the fare here if you have anything important to do in the next eight hours.
* * * *
exit
There you have it: a potpourri, a mishmashed medley, a gallimaufry, if you will, of sites to celebrate our decade of clicking URLs together. Let's plan to do this for another ten years, shall we? Who knows what volume of the decology we'll be up to by then.
Copyright (c) 2008 James Patrick Kelly
* * * *
VISIT OUR WEBSITE
www.asimovs.com
Don't miss out on our lively forum, stimulating chats, controversial and informative articles, and classic stories.
Log on today!
[Back to Table of Contents]
* * *
Novelette: CALL BACK YESTERDAY
by Nancy Kress
Nancy Kress has three books appearing in 2008: Nano Comes to Clifford Falls and Other Stories, a collection from Golden Gryphon; and two novels, Dogs (Tachyon) and Steal Across the Sky (Tor). All of those concern genetic engineering in one way or another, but the following story deals with a much older and more mysterious idea: what changes time can, and cannot, make in human lives.
Call Back Yesterday
This morning the bathroom mirror shows only a lone person—besides Caitlin herself, of course. Caitlin's hair is dirty and there's no time to wash it before Group, which starts in seven minutes. Time is always a problem for Caitlin; she's not good at it. She washes her face, brushes her teeth, and tries the effect of pinning her dirty hair on top of her head. She looks like a dork. More of a dork.
The woman in the mirror ignores Caitlin. Another person, the pre-adolescent boy, wanders out of the gray mist from wherever they live when they're not in her mirror. The woman and the boy also ignore each other. They always do.
“Fuck off,” Caitlin says experimentally. They don't look at her, but the woman frowns and the boy grins at empty space. That's the most that Caitlin has ever been able to affect any of them: the odd cuss word or the funny one-liner. Not that she's any good at jokes, or at cussing. She will never be Seena.
Usually Caitlin avoids looking in mirrors at all in the morning because a crowd of people that early is just too hard to take. But two people seem ... if not manageable, at least bearable. She studies them both through the toothpaste flecks.
The woman is maybe thirty-five. Too heavy but not really fat, dressed in wide-leg khaki pants and a yellow sweater. She carries an infant on one arm and may or may not be pregnant with another. Her hair is cut in a 1940's style, side-parted with a wave falling over one eye. The boy wears what appears to be purple garbage bags strung with tiny glowing wires. His eyes are startlingly, aggressively blue, bluer than any sky Caitlin has ever seen. Otherwise, he looks like—
“Group in five minutes,” calls Hardin, rumbling down the hall like a snow plow. “Josh, Caitlin, Seena, five minutes.”
“Screw you,” Seena calls back from her room. That'll lose her ten points, maybe even risk a session in the time-out room, but Seena won't care. Caitlin drags the comb once more through her hair and tries tucking it behind her ears. No better.
“Four minutes,” Hardin brays, plowing back in the other direction.
Time. "Had we world enough and time...” “Time is money.” “You can't fool all of the people all of the time.” Quotations slide through Caitlin's head, like pearls on a string. Where do they come from? How does she know all this stuff ?
She scrubs a spot of toothpaste off her sweater and picks at a hangnail. Briefly, for just a second, the woman with the baby on her hip looks outward and her gaze meets Caitlin's. The woman shows no recognition. The boy in the purple garbage bags has disappeared, but a man in a silver brocade waistco
at, knee breeches, and elaborately tied white cravat strolls into the mirror, calling over his shoulder to someone hidden in mist.
“Caitlin!” Hardin bellows.
“Coming!”
She turns her back on the mirror just as the maternal woman and the knee-breeched man pass through each other like ghosts.
* * * *
“Let's review what we know about Cathcart Syndrome,” Dr. Jensen says, and everybody groans.
“Again?” Josh says. “Like we don't already have this stuff coming out of our asses?”
“Language,” Dr. Jensen says mildly. She's a tiny, middle-aged woman in a white doctor coat. Caitlin, lying in bed at night, can somehow never picture Dr. Jensen's features. Along with so much else she can't picture.
Josh drawls, “Are you asking what language ‘ass’ is?”
Dr. Jensen ignores this, saying, “Let's review the information for Seth,” and everybody looks at Seth, who blushes.
Asimov's SF, June 2008 Page 2
