Penny le Couteur & Jay Burreson

Home > Other > Penny le Couteur & Jay Burreson > Page 20
Penny le Couteur & Jay Burreson Page 20

by Napoleon's Buttons: How 17 Molecules Changed History


  12. MOLECULES OF WITCHCRAFT

  FROM THE MIDDLE of the fourteenth until the late eighteenth century, a group of molecules contributed to the doom of hundreds of thousands of people. It can never be known exactly how many, in almost every country in Europe during these centuries, were burned at the stake, hanged, or tortured as witches. Estimates range from forty thousand to millions. Though accused witches included men, women, and children, aristocrats, peasants, and clergy, mostly the fingers were pointed at women—often poor and elderly women. Many reasons have been advanced for why women became the main victims of the waves of hysteria and delusion that threatened whole populations for hundreds of years. We speculate that certain molecules, while not wholly responsible for the centuries of persecution, played a substantial role in this discrimination.

  Belief in sorcery and magic has always been part of human society, long before witch-hunts began at the end of the Middle Ages. Stone Age carvings of female figures were supposedly venerated for their magical powers of fertility. Legends of all ancient civilizations abound in the supernatural: deities that take on animal form, monsters, goddesses who cast spells, enchanters, specters, goblins, ghosts, fearsome creatures who were half animal and half man, spirit-beings, and gods who lived in the sky, in forests, in lakes, in the ocean, and underground. Pre-Christian Europe, a world full of magic and superstition, was no exception.

  As Christianity spread throughout Europe, many old pagan symbols and festivals were incorporated into the rituals and celebrations of the Church. We still celebrate as Halloween the great Celtic festival of the dead, marking the beginning of winter on October 31, although November 1, All Saints’ Day, was the Church’s attempt to divert attention away from the pagan festivities. Christmas Eve was originally the Roman feast day of Saturnalia. Christmas trees and many other symbols (holly, ivy, candles) that we now associate with Christmas are pagan in origin.

  TOIL AND TROUBLE

  Before 1350 witchcraft was regarded as the practice of sorcery, a method of trying to control nature in one’s own interest. Using charms in the belief that they could protect crops or people, casting spells to influence or provide, and invoking spirits were commonplace. In most parts of Europe sorcery was an accepted part of life, and witchcraft was regarded as a crime only if harm resulted. Victims of maleficium, or evil-doing by means of the occult, could seek legal recourse from a witch, but if they were unable to prove their case, they themselves became liable for a penalty and trial costs. By this method idle accusations were discouraged. Rarely were witches put to death. Witchcraft was neither an organized religion nor an organized opposition to religion. It was not even organized. It was just part of folklore.

  But around the middle of the fourteenth century a new attitude toward witchcraft became apparent. Christianity was not opposed to magic, provided it was sanctioned by the Church and known as a miracle. But magic conducted outside the Church was considered the work of Satan. Witches were in league with the devil. The Inquisition, a court of the Roman Catholic Church originally established around 1233 to deal with heretics—mainly in southern France—expanded its mandate to deal with witchcraft. Some authorities have suggested that once heretics had been virtually eliminated, the Inquisition, needing new victims, set its sights on sorcery. The number of potential witches throughout Europe was large; the potential source of income for the inquisitors, who shared with local authorities the confiscated properties and assets of the condemned, would also have been great. Soon witches were being convicted not for performing evil deeds but for supposedly entering into a pact with the devil.

  This crime was considered so horrendous that, by the mid-fifteenth century, ordinary rules of law no longer applied to trials of witches. An accusation alone was treated as evidence. Torture was not only allowed, it was used routinely; a confession without torture was seen as unreliable—a view that seems strange today.

  The deeds attributed to witches—orgiastic rituals, sex with demons, flying on broomsticks, child murdering, baby eating—were, for the most part, beyond rationality but were still fervently believed. About 90 percent of accused witches were women, and their accusers were just as likely also to be women as men. Whether so-called witch-hunts revealed an underlying paranoia aimed at women and female sexuality is still being argued. Wherever a natural disaster struck—a flood, a drought, a crop failure—no lack of witnesses would attest that some poor woman, or more likely women, had been seen cavorting with demons at a sabbat (or witches’ gathering) or flying around the countryside with a familiar (a malevolent spirit in animal form, such as a cat) at their side.

  The mania affected Catholic and Protestant countries alike. At the height of witch-hunt paranoia, from about 1500 to 1650, there were almost no women left alive in some Swiss villages. In regions of Germany there were some small villages where the whole population was burned at the stake. But in England and in Holland the witch craze never became as entrenched as in other parts of Europe. Torture was not allowed under English law, although suspected witches were subjected to the water test. Trussed and thrown into a pond, a true witch floated, to be retrieved and properly punished—by hanging. If the accused sank and drowned, she was considered to have been innocent of the charge of witchcraft—a comfort to the family but little use to the victim herself.

  A Delft tile from the Netherlands (first part of the eighteenth century) showing a witch trial. The accused on the right, only her legs visible above the water, is sinking and would be proclaimed innocent. Satan’s hand can be seen supporting the accused woman floating to the left, who—her guilt now proven—would be pulled from the water to be burned alive at the stake. (Courtesy of the Horvath Collection, Vancouver)

  The witch-hunt terror faded only slowly. But with so many people accused, economic well-being was threatened. As feudalism retreated and the Age of Enlightenment dawned, as the voices of brave men and women who themselves risked the gallows and the stake to oppose the madness became louder, the mania that had swept Europe for centuries gradually abated. In the Netherlands the last execution of a witch took place in 1610 and in England in 1685. The last witches executed in Scandinavia—eighty-five elderly women burned at the stake in 1699—were convicted solely on the basis of statements from young children who claimed to have flown with the women to sabbats.

  By the eighteenth century, execution for witchcraft officially ceased: for Scotland in 1727, France in 1745, Germany in 1775, Switzerland in 1782, and Poland in 1793. But although the Church and the state no longer executed witches, the court of public opinion was less ready to give up the fear and loathing of witchcraft acquired by centuries of persecution. In more remote rural communities old beliefs still held sway, and many a suspected witch met a nasty, if unofficial, fate.

  Many of the women accused of witchcraft were herbalists, skilled in the use of local plants to cure disease and provide relief from pain. Often they could also be relied upon to supply love potions, to cast spells, and to remove hexes. That some of their herbs did have healing powers would have seemed as magical as the incantations and rituals surrounding the rest of the ceremonies they would perform.

  Using and prescribing herbal medicines would have been then—as it is now—a risky business. Different parts of a plant contain varying levels of effective compounds; plants gathered from different locations can vary in their ability to cure; and different times of the year can change the amount of a plant needed to produce an appropriate dose. Many plants in an elixir might be of little benefit, while others might contain medications that would be extremely effective but also deadly poisonous. The molecules in these plants could enhance the reputation of an herbalist as a sorcerer, but the very success of these molecules might eventually prove deadly for these women. Those herbalists whose healing skills were the greatest might be first to be branded a witch.

  HEALING HERBS, HARMFUL HERBS

  Salicylic acid, from the willow tree and the meadowsweet plant common throughout Europe, was known centuri
es before Bayer and Company began marketing aspirin in 1899 (see Chapter 10). The root of wild celery was prescribed to prevent muscle cramps, parsley was believed to induce a miscarriage, and ivy was used to relieve symptoms of asthma. Digitalis, an extract from the common foxglove Digitalis purpurea, contains molecules that have long been known to have a powerful effect on the heart—the cardiac glycosides. These molecules reduce the heart rate, regularize heart rhythm, and strengthen heartbeat, a potent combination in inexperienced hands. (They are also saponins, very similar to those found in sarsaparilla plants and wild Mexican yams from which the birth control pill norethindrone was synthesized; see Chapter 11.) An example of a cardiac glycoside is the digoxin molecule, one of the most widely prescribed drugs in the United States and a good example of a pharmaceutical based on folk medicine.

  In 1795 a British physician named William Withering used extracts of foxglove to treat congestive heart failure after hearing rumors of the plant’s curative abilities. But it was well over a century before chemists were able to isolate the molecules responsible.

  The structure of the digoxin molecule. The three sugar units are different from those in the sarsaparilla or Mexican yam plants. The digitoxin molecule lacks the arrowed OH group on the steroid ring system.

  In the Digitalis extract there are other very similar molecules to digoxin; for example the digitoxin molecule, which lacks only the OH, as indicated in the structure drawing. Similar cardiac glycoside molecules are found in other plants, usually members of the lily and ranunculus families, but foxglove is still the main source for today’s drug. Herbalists have had little difficulty finding heart tonic plants in their own gardens and in local meadows. Ancient Egyptians and Romans used an extract from the sea onion, a member of the hyacinth family, as a heart tonic and (in larger doses) as a rat poison. We now know that this sea onion also contains a different cardiac glycoside molecule.

  These molecules all have the same structural feature, which is therefore likely to be responsible for the cardiac effect. All have a five-membered lactone ring attached to the end of the steroid system and an extra OH between the C and D rings of the steroid system, as shown here:

  The nonsugar portion of the digoxin molecule with the heart-affecting extra OH and the lactone ring arrowed. This lactone ring is also found in the ascorbic acid molecule (vitamin C).

  Molecules that affect the heart are not found only in plants. Toxic compounds that are similar in structure to the cardiac glycosides are found in animals. These molecules do not contain sugars, nor are they used as heart stimulants. Rather, they are convulsive poisons and of little medical value. The source of these venoms is amphibians; extracts from toads and frogs have been used as arrow poisons in many parts of the world. Interestingly, the toad is, after the cat, the most common animal attributed in folklore as a familiar to a witch. Many potions prepared by so-called witches were said to contain parts of toads. The molecule bufotoxin is the active component of the venom of the common European toad, Bufo vulgaris, and is one of the most toxic molecules known. Its structure shows a striking similarity at the steroid ring system to the digitoxin molecule, with the same extra OH between the C and D rings and a six-membered, instead of five-membered, lactone ring.

  The bufotoxin from the common toad is structurally similar to digitoxin from the foxglove around the steroid portion of the molecule.

  Bufotoxin, however, is a cardiac poison rather than a cardiac restorative. Between the cardiac glycosides of foxglove and venoms from toad, supposed witches had access to a potent arsenal of toxic compounds.

  In addition to their penchant for toads, one of the most abiding myths about witches is that they were able to fly, often on broomsticks, to attend a sabbat—a midnight tryst, supposedly an orgiastic parody of the Christian mass. Many accused witches confessed, under torture, to flying to such sabbats. This is not surprising—we too would probably make such a confession if we were subject to the same horrific agonies perpetrated in the search for truth. The surprising thing is that a number of accused witches confessed, before torture, to the impossible feat of flying to a sabbat on a broomstick. As such a confession would not likely have helped these victims escape torture, it is quite possible that these women truly believed they had flown up the chimney on a broomstick and indulged in all sorts of sexual perversions. There may be a very good chemical explanation for their belief—a group of compounds known as alkaloids.

  Alkaloids are plant compounds that have one or more nitrogen atoms, usually as part of a ring of carbon atoms. We have already met a few alkaloid molecules—piperine in pepper, capsaicin in chili peppers, indigo, penicillin, and folic acid. It can be argued that, as a group, alkaloids have had a larger effect on the course of human history than have any other family of chemicals. Alkaloids are often physiologically active in humans, usually affecting the central nervous system, and are generally highly toxic. Some of these naturally occurring compounds have been used as medicines for thousands of years. Derivatives made from alkaloids form the basis of a number of our modern pharmaceuticals, such as the pain-relieving molecule codeine, the local anesthetic benzocaine, and chloroquine, an antimalarial agent

  We have already mentioned the role that chemical substances play in protecting plants. Plants cannot run away from danger and cannot hide at the first sign of a predator; physical means of protection such as thorns do not always stop determined grazers. Chemicals are a passive but very effective form of protection from animals as well as fungi, bacteria, and viruses. Alkaloids are natural fungicides, insecticides, and pesticides. It has been estimated that, on average, each of us ingests about a gram and a half of natural pesticide every day, from the plants and plant products in our diet. The estimate for residues from synthetic pesticides is around 0.15 milligrams daily—about ten thousand times less than the natural dose!

  In small amounts the physiological effects of alkaloids are often welcomed by humans. Many have been used medicinally for centuries. Acrecaidine, an alkaloid found in betel nuts from the betel palm, Areca catechu, has a long history of use in Africa and the East as a stimulant. Crushed betel nuts are wrapped in the betel palm leaves and chewed. Betel users are easily recognized by their characteristic dark-stained teeth and by their habit of spitting copious amounts of dark red saliva. Ephedrine, from Ephedra sinica or the ma huang plant, has been used in Chinese herbal medicine for thousands of years and is now used in the West as a decongestant and bronchodilator. Members of the vitamin B family, such as thiamine (B1), riboflavin (B2), and niacin (B4), are all classed as alkaloids. Reserpine, used in the treatment of high blood pressure and as a tranquilizer, is isolated from the Indian snakeroot plant, Rauwolfia serpentina.

  Toxicity alone has been enough to ensure fame for some alkaloids. The poisonous component of the hemlock plant, Conium maculatum, responsible for the death of the philosopher Socrates in 399 B.C., is the alkaloid coniine. Socrates, convicted on charges of irreligion and the corruption of the young men of Athens, was sentenced to death by drinking a potion made from the fruit and seeds of hemlock. Coniine has one of the simplest structures of all the alkaloids, but it can be just as lethal a poison as more complicated alkaloid structures such as that of strychnine, from the seeds of the Asiatic tree Strychnos nux-vomica.

  The structures of coniine (left) and strychnine (right)

  In their “flying salves”—greases and ointments that supposedly promoted flight—witches often included extracts from mandrake, belladonna, and henbane. These plants all belong to the Solanaceae or nightshade family. The mandrake plant, Mandragora officinarum, with its branched root said to resemble the human form, is native to the Mediterranean region. It has been used since ancient times as a means of restoring sexual vitality and as a soporific. There are a number of curious legends surrounding the mandrake plant. When pulled from the ground, it was said to emit piercing screams. Whoever was in the vicinity was in danger from both the associated smell and the unearthly cry. That such a characteristic was c
ommon knowledge is reflected in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, where Juliet says: “… with loathsome smells, and shrieks like mandrakes’ torn out of the earth, / That living mortals, hearing them, run mad.” The mandrake plant was rumored to grow beneath a gallows, springing to life from the released semen of the condemned men hanged there.

  The second plant used in flying ointments was belladonna or deadly nightshade (Atropa belladonna). The name comes from the practice, common among women in Italy, of dropping juice squeezed from the black berries of this plant into their eyes. The resulting dilation of the pupil was thought to increase their beauty; hence belladonna, Italian for “beautiful lady.” Greater amounts of deadly nightshade taken internally would eventually induce a deathlike slumber. It was probable that this was also commonly known and possible that this was the potion drunk by Juliet. Shakespeare wrote (in Romeo and Juliet) “through all thy veins shall run/A cold and drowsy humour, for no pulse shall keep,” but eventually “in this borrow’d likeness of shrunk death/Thou shalt continue two and forty hours, / And then awake as from a pleasant sleep.”

  The third member of the nightshade family, henbane, was probably Hyoscyamus niger, though other species might also have been used in witch’s potions. It has a long history as a soporific, a pain reliever (particularly for toothache), an anesthetic, and possibly a poison. The properties of henbane also seem to have been well known: Shakespeare was again only reflecting the common knowledge of his time when Hamlet was told by his father’s ghost that “thy uncle stole, / With juice of cursed hebona in a vial, / And in the porches of mine ears did pour / The leperous distilment.” The word hebona has been ascribed to both the yew and ebony trees as well as henbane, but from a chemical viewpoint we think henbane makes more sense.

 

‹ Prev