by Nancy Lieder
year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran. In the absence of a massive
popular outcry, the only constraints on what's going to happen will come from the federal bureaucracy
and perhaps the military. They may have had enough. They may not go along with it.
We have warned, almost on a weekly basis on the GLP live chats, that there is a confrontation building between the
Bush White House and those in the government who know the White House to be a criminal enterprise, one that is
also illicit due to voter fraud in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. Fitzgerald has massive amounts of
documented evidence that has already been presented to the Judicial system. There is a growing contingent in the
Judicial system, the US military, the Congress, and the FBI who are of the opinion that the entire White House should
be arrested. What holds them back? As we have repeatedly mentioned, they fear the reaction by the American public.
They fear shock, dismay, debate and argument, rebellion, confusion, and a halted economy. Not having been prepared
for such an announcement, the public is expected to be confused as to which leader to follow, and thus the entire
nation put at odds with itself. Recent attempts at establishing martial law include the June 26, 2007 Emergency Action
Notification attempt and the Rayburn Building shootout the year before. These are only a couple of examples known to the public, but hundreds have occurred behind the scenes. Bush has ordered the military to bomb and invade Iran,
but his orders have been blocked and ignored. He has likewise ordered martial law many times and likewise been
blocked and ignored.
Bush sees time running out on his administration, all the while the noose tightening. He is desperate to declare himself
President for Life, via declaring martial law such that elections can be canceled. It's not for lack of attempts on his part
that this has not been put before the American public. There are blocks on what the media can transmit during press
conferences, delayed responses, so if he were to publicly announce martial law during a press conference there would
be "technical difficulties", with the transmission stopped. Where it is assumed that the White House can dictate to the
media what they print, in fact this is a one-sided road where they can only dictate what cannot be printed by claiming
the material a national security issue. Any discussion of Planet X viewed in the skies is, for instance, considered a
national security issue and forbidden. But they cannot dictate what the media is to print. They can only request. When
the media gets contradictory statements from official sources on what not to print, they go on the safe side and print
nothing. This stops Bush and Cheney from sending little notes to the media telling them to give front page coverage to
a martial law announcement. This would be questioned. What kind of stature does a president have if he must use this
route? A press conference where Bush might attempt an announcement would have the president's microphone go dead
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta387.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:30 AM]
ZetaTalk: Executive Orders
halfway into such a sentence, with some announcement about "electrical problems and the need to sweep the area for
bombs" ending the press conference, with Bush escorted indoors under guard.
If the White House is being blocked to such an extent, what next? There is steady erosion of the White House stance
by the press, questions about Bush's sanity made increasingly. There is also an increase in investigations into past
criminal activity by Cheney, who could be charged by Fitzgerald almost instantly, putting him out of operation as a
replacement president. The fall-back option is to have both Bush and Cheney, or one or the other, assassinated. These
and many other options are being discussed daily by the contingent that knows the White House to be a criminal
enterprise. We have mentioned that when the crimes are so huge, that it is difficult to broach the subject. Nixon merely
was complicit in breaking and entering. Bush, Cheney and Rove stole national elections, and when this was known to
many in the federal government, the government said nothing! Bush and Cheney started an illicit war, knowingly lying
about the cause for war, a treasonous affair. Yet for years the Republican Congress ignored this and defended the
criminals. 911 was surely not done by a group of Arabs with box cutters, the evidence on other insiders assisting them
overwhelming, yet the Justice Department conducts no investigations. More difficult than explaining why Bush and
Cheney must be removed will be explaining why nothing was done about it for years! Does one go into blackmail and
pedophilia? Does one arrest everyone who knew and did nothing?
Impeachment proceedings are not brought for two reasons. One is that they would take months to complete, and there
are enough Republicans in Congress to prevent success via this route. They would claim political motives for the
charges, so all the dirty laundry would have to be aired to gain more votes, and this is something no one wants to do.
Second, such proceedings might cause Bush or Cheney to act abruptly, and it is hoped that quietly blocking them will
continue as the status quo. Thus the contingent that is blocking Bush and Cheney feels they must select out some
criminal activity, but not reveal all. Just when this will happen, or if it will happen at all, is in the hands of man and
could go in many directions. Blocking Bush and Cheney may occur all the way until the pole shift or the 2008 election
puts new management in charge. Cheney may have a fatal heart attack, with someone more compliant to the rule of
law placed into the VP position. Bush may simply give up, falter in the fight, and become an outright drunk, needing
to be replaced. There are many options. A public arrest of the White House criminals is unlikely to happen unless the
fight breaks out into the public view, which given the urgency Bush feels, just might happen!
White House Tells CIA To Resume Secret Prison Interrogation "Methods"
July 21, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/21/
The White House said Friday that it had given the Central Intelligence Agency approval to resume
its use of some severe interrogation methods for questioning terrorism suspects in secret prisons
overseas. With the new authority, administration officials said the CIA. could proceed with an
interrogation program that had been in limbo since the Supreme Court ruled last year that all
prisoners in American captivity be treated in accordance with Geneva Convention prohibitions
against humiliating and degrading treatment. The new list of techniques has been approved by the
Justice Department as not violating the Geneva strictures, a step that Congress insisted on last
October when it passed the Military Commissions Act, which formally authorized the CIA program.
Court Tells U.S. to Reveal Data on Detainees at Guantánamo
July 21, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/21/us/21gitmo.html?hp
A three-judge panel of the federal appeals court in Washington unanimously rejected a government
effort to limit the information it must turn over to the court and lawyers for the detainees.
Expanding Claim of Executive Authority, White House Official tells Paper Staff can't be Charged
July 20, 2007
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/White_House_to_Congress_You_cant_0720.html
Administration officials argued yesterday that Congress has no power to force a U.S. at
torney to
pursue contempt charges in cases, such as the prosecutor firings, in which the president has
declared that testimony or documents are protected from release by executive privilege. Officials
pointed to a Justice Department legal opinion during the Reagan administration, which made the
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta387.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:30 AM]
ZetaTalk: Executive Orders
same argument in a case that was never resolved by the courts. What this statement is saying is the
president's claim of executive privilege trumps all.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta387.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:30 AM]
ZetaTalk: Bush Power Grab
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Bush Power Grab
written Jan 15, 2006
We have stated that Martial Law is unlikely to be instigated in countries such as the US where the populace is used to freedoms and would resist. Such maneuvers succeed only for a short time, and in the presence of a real emergency
calling for such draconian measures. But what if this were the Bush plan, and Bush proceeded according to plan?
What if a frightened Bush reacted like a cornered animal, going for the ultimate stance, declaring Martial Law and himself as a President who does not need to listen to the courts or the Congress? How would this play out?
First, one should not negate the Puppet Master's influence. When he set about to decapitate the Bush administration, he certainly envisioned such a scenario, a frightened Bush not going quietly into the night. To counter a Bush move to
preemptively call Martial Law and assume kingship of the US and its military, or make a play for this position, he
would be unlikely to utilize assets within the US for this. He would use foreign powers, against US assets abroad,
placing the US Military in the uncomfortable position of having to make choices. What if Russia were to make moves
toward the vast Alaska lands, oil rich, and closer to Russian territory than to the central states? What if Hawaii, Guam,
and in particular the Middle East oil fields were being threatened? The Military is already stretched too thin, and could
hardly keep peace at home and fight other fronts as well as keep a foothold in Iraq. The oil grab would be the first to
go, with the oil fields in Alaska on the lines. Thus, Martial Law would likely be ended, immediately, by the Bush
cabal, a quick about face, with the hope of returning to the previous status quo.
Second, given that there is rebellion in Congress and the US Military, with talk of impeachment on more lips than the
media admits to, there would hardly be whole hearted cooperation. Where it is assumed that countering such an
Executive Order imposing Martial Law would require patriots standing in the streets with their rifles waved about, a
quiet lack of cooperation would be the norm. Orders would be delayed, lost, not understood, or endlessly discussed. It
would be a time when the schools would be out, jobs not attended to, transportation at a halt, TV and radio stations
broadcasting a stage with few actors and these confused. Civilization, in the United States, would grind to a halt while
the public stayed glued to their TV sets, awaiting the next step. Does one order the public to go back to work in a free
society? Does the public risk going out on the streets when they have been told that lack of cooperation with the edict
will get them shot, or jailed, with no recourse? Without a clear, and real, crisis as the excuse for Martial Law,
everyone but the Bush White House would soon see this as unworkable, and a simple refusal to go along with any of
the edicts would be the emerging result.
Third, there is a very real likelihood of an open rebellion in Congress and the courts should such a power play be
made. Immediate impeachment proceedings might be started, adding to the confusion in the military as to whom they
should be following. Even with packing the Supreme Court with what he hopes will be cooperative allies, Bush cannot
change the Constitutional right of the Congress to impeach, and impeachable offenses are already laid out before them
in the NSA spying scandal. Thus, all within the Beltway in Washington DC would be paralyzed by argument and legal
challenges. This places any such move by Bush and company into the role of actually expediting the decapitation
process, not preventing it. Nor would such a situation be reversible, as trust would have been lost, polarized positions
taken, lukewarm cooperation in the past now revealed to be smoldering rebellion, and heated debate the continuing
course of each day, for months. Complete paralysis at the helm of the federal government, no motion in any direction
possible, just endless debate and argument. Point and counter point. Thrust and parry. Deadlock and rage.
Fourth, although endlessly anticipated, no fake terrorism attacks will occur within the US, just as none since 911 have
been allowed to occur, nor have weapons of mass destruction been allowed to be planted in Iraq. We stated that benign
aliens, ourselves and others, have prevented this from happening, although such maneuvers have been tried hundreds of times. Thus, the only emergency likely to emerge would be geological, quakes, horrific flooding, storms assaulting
the coastlines, or volcanic explosions. The stage in such an event would be taken from Bush, and given to those
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta258.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:31 AM]
ZetaTalk: Bush Power Grab
involved in rescue and recovery. As with Katrina, Bush would be dragged along behind, like a rag doll tied to the rear
bumper of a speeding car, only able to make an appearance when the car finally stops, mission accomplished. Issues
Bush would like attended to, like jailing anyone opposing his agendas, would be ignored, as clearly, this is not the
reason for calling Martial Law. We would shortly be back to point two, above, with the broad expectation that Martial
Law be temporary, and if not withdrawn, then moving to point three, above, to force this.
Fifth, and a very real possibility, is assassination, disguised as poor health or death by heart attack. The Bush
administration has not made friends in the CIA, using them as scapegoats, and any mercenaries such as Blackwater
Security employed by the military for work in Iraq or the home front as likely to be paid to go against Bush as work
for him, such are their ethics. Given the very divided loyalties even of the ethical, all manner of personal agendas
might emerge. Bush is a drunk, known to use cocaine, evidence of this abundant for the media to discover to embellish
any suicide or mental breakdown. That he has been on anti-depressants is well known and in the public record. Cheney
is so close to death from his heart conditions, which can only be ameliorated, not corrected, that the public would
hardly be surprised if such excitement tipped him over the edge. Bush knows this, has seen his support in the military
eroding, not growing, has seen embarrassing leaks like the NSA spying issue emerging steadily with no signs of slacking. Thus, Bush would almost have to be in a suicidal rage to call Martial Law, given this.
Signs of the Times #1532
Bush could seize absolute control of U.S. government [Jan 13] 'President George W. Bush has
signed executive orders giving him sole authority to impose martial law, suspend habeas corpus and
ignore the Posse Comitatus Act that prohibits deployment of U.S. troops on American streets. This
would give him absolute dictatorial power over the government with no checks and balances. The
authority to declare what is or is not a national emergency rests entirely with Bush who does not<
br />
have to either consult or seek the approval of Congress for permission to assume absolute control
over the government of the United States.'
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta258.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:31 AM]
ZetaTalk: SARS
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: SARS
Note: written during the Apr 26, 2003 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session
We predicted early in the start of ZetaTalk that increasing illness would be a phenomena that would occur as the pole
shift approached, just as erratic weather and increasing quake frequency and strength will. We stated at that time that
this would be due to carrier, insects or whatever, on the move to fresh locations as well as dropped immune systems.
Early indications were increased workload in clinics and hospitals, but until recently when whole cruise ships became
ill with something as simple as a stomach flu were in the news, little of this was demonstrable. In the last year, not
only several cruise ships, but whole US military bases were afflicted with Strep infections, a common infection. Now
SARS has made its appearance, similar to existing viruses that afflict mankind, and spreading rapidly. This is an
example of an existing, but little known, virus spreading to new areas.
In former times, a virus such as SARS would affect a village, make them ill as with flu, and all would either recover or
die and the virus fail to spread further. Now with reduced immune systems, more are getting ill enough to need care in
hospitals, the first source of carriers as health care workers interface with many! All it took for this existing virus to
move about between countries was for today’s travel to spread it. In the past, a traveler might be ill, but not infect
another as the others immune system was strong, but no longer. Thus, is it a combination of factors that have created
the SARS situation.
Will the governments in the know about the coming shift use SARS to restrict travel? Certainly, but they hardly need
this excuse to create restrictions. Look to the restrictions that have been put in place as a result of terrorism threat.
