by Nancy Lieder
goal? Beyond weakening the Bush administration into virtual ineffectiveness, he wants the US out of Iraq, where it has
created a mess. As it stands, Iraq cannot settle into any kind of stable body, as the US continues to interfere. The
election has put the country into Shia hands, but Bush does not want Shia management. Nor would the Shia want US
bases in Iraq to sit on the oil fields and insure US interests prevail. The Puppet Master can parlay with Iran, and could
parlay with the eventual managers of Iraq's numerous oil fields, whether in Shia or Kurdish hands or broken into
multiple new Iraqi countries, but at present, no clear winners emerge as Bush stubbornly insists on having his way.
Thus, the Puppet Master is likely to create a financial crisis in the US to force the Congress to withdraw from Iraq, as
the tight cabal in the White House would prevent even assassinations at the top from accomplishing this withdrawal.
Dumping US dollars does not require an oil bourse in Iran, as it could occur at the request of the Puppet Master
instead. If it looks like the US is going to create a mess in Iran, by some devious means using the existing Iraq War to
spill over the borders, this is a card likely to be used.
The likely outcome is that the US will threaten and bluster, plant evidence against Iran that the US citizen and the
world does not believe, rumble tanks and planes up to the border of Iran, and there the conflict stops. There will
certainly be tense moments behind closed doors when the military is asked to take steps they refuse to take,
confrontations that will not come out in the media until later, as leaks. Support for the US debt will steadily drop, with
the US quietly going banana republic at least to some degree, while the 2006 elections take place and Congress
changes its face to a more aggressive stance against Bush. Talk of impeachment, once not dared to be uttered, will
increase, and an honest admission that Iraq may have to become several different countries in order to attain peace will
be increasingly seen as the solution in Iraq. The US public will suffer the consequences, keeping the pressure on to
stop the financial hemorrhage in Iraq that the US can no longer afford. Congress will take over, running the nation if
only by blocking Bush at every front. The military will come home, not only because funding for Iraq will be
withdrawn, but because of natural disasters that will afflict every country in the months ahead. Although this is in the
hands of man and man has free will, and thus any predictions must be predicated on this, we predict that
Bush will not succeed in invading or bombing Iran, though orders may be given to the military to do so,
will not publicly declare martial law in the US in order to dictate his ways, though may write executive orders to this effect which will be ignored by any but the tight cabal surrounding him,
will not be assassinated or impeached because the tight cabal around him prevents alternative leadership from
stepping up to the plate, but rather
Bush and those he has pulled close around him will be treated as irrelevant as the Earth changes overtake the
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta268.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:36 AM]
ZetaTalk: Iran Boondoggle
attention of the nation, with the branches of government attending to emergencies and ignoring the orders the
pretender barks from the Oval Office.
Who will lead, in this vacuum? Is it assumed that the President actually leads? Government in a democracy is by
consensus, with someone pronouncing the consensus in a speech. The US will become a country where the media
identifies a spokesperson for a trend or issue and the President is ignored. Press conferences, speeches, where the
President can commandeer the TV cameras and attempt to sell the public on an idea or announce initiatives are given
by the media, as a gift, but are not mandated by law. Nor is coverage in the newspapers mandated by law. The Puppet
Master, in fact, has more influence than the White House, in this regard. Who has been a charismatic spokesperson of
late, on issues that relate? Gore, or Finegold, or Murtha, are examples, but the Earth changes that will afflict the nation
will find many new spokespersons emerging. During times of trouble, natural leadership emerges, and pretenders are
ignored.
Signs of the Times #1567
Dubya Clings to Failed Policy of Pre-emptive Strikes [Mar 17] http://www.capitolhillblue.com/
President George W. Bush clung to his doomed doctrine of using preemptive force against threats of
weapons of mass destruction despite his failure in Iraq, claiming Iran may be America's biggest
security challenge. [and from another] Petrodollar Warfare: Dollars, Euros and the Upcoming
Iranian Oil Bourse [Aug 3, 2005] The Bush administration is prepared to undertake a desperate
military strategy to thwart Iran's nuclear ambitions, while simultaneously attempting to prevent the
Iranian oil Bourse from initiating a euro-based system for oil trades. Such an event would create
pressure for OPEC and Russia to move towards a monopoly petroeuro system in an effort to cripple
the U.S. dollar and thwart the U.S. global military presence. [and from another]
http://www.infoplease.com/ Total oil production 1. Saudi Arabia 10.37, 2. Russia 9.27, 3. United
States 8.69, 4. Iran 4.09, 5. Mexico 3.83, 6. China 3.62, 7. Norway 3.18, 8. Canada 3.14, 9.
Venezuela 2.86, 10. United Arab Emirates 2.76, 11. Kuwait 2.51, 12. Nigeria 2.51, 13. United
Kingdom 2.08, 14. Iraq 2.03 [and from another] http://www.infoplease.com/ Greatest Oil Reserves
by Country, 2005 1. Saudi Arabia 261.9, 2. Canada 178.81, 3. Iran 125.8, 4. Iraq 115.0, 5. Kuwait
101.5, 6. United Arab Emirates 97.8, 7. Venezuela 77.2, 8.Russia 60.0, 9. Libya 39.0, 10. Nigeria
35.3
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta268.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:36 AM]
ZetaTalk: Hezbollah Attack
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Hezbollah Attack
written July 15, 2006 on the live GodlikeProduction Radio show.
Israel was battling with Hamas in Palestine. Then another front opened with the Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Now Israel is giving ultimatums to Syria, claiming they are working with Hezbollah. Israel and the US are
even blaming Iran. Is this going to lead to WW III?
Why would Hezbollah suddenly decide to enter the fray, kidnapping Israeli soldiers and lobbing missiles into Israel? Is
it an alliance with the embattled Hamas? Was is some offense against Hezbollah, perpetrated by Israel? All seemed
peaceful until this sudden explosion. Israel has used the violence and suicide bombing done by Palestinians as an
excuse to push them off their land and retain what land they have already grabbed. The issue of Palestine could be easily solved by Israel if it were only reasonable and fair, so the matter is in their hands. What led into the situation
where Hammas kidnapped an Israeli soldier? The Hammas government was squeezed financially, Israel holding back
funds rightfully Palestine's, and Israel encouraging other nations to financially starve Palestine too. This finally
exploded, as it was expected to explode. But there was no such recent incitement with Lebanon, so what caused an
explosion there?
We have often mentioned that things are not what they seem. The Iraq insurgents creating an unstable situation in Iraq are often British soldiers, who have been caught dressed as Arabs with bombs in their cars, arrested by the Iraqi police,
and then sprung from jail by the Brits. Once incited, fingers point in all directions and the street fighting and retaliation
is assured. The Berg beheading was not done by Arabs at all, as could be seen by a simple analysis of the dress and mannerisms of the executioners. The Golden Mosque was bombed by the US, to incite civil war in Iraq, which the US
hoped would spill over into Iran, avoiding a need to get approval from a now reluctant US Congress for such a war expansion. But civil war in Iraq has fallen back to a simmer, with the new Iraqi government taking steps the US does
not want. They plan to call the insurgents resistance fighters, and give them amnesty. This would bring the Sunni
closer to the new Shia government, as partners, reducing the street fights. They plan to ask the US to leave Iraq,
entirely, with a time line established. As a sovereign and elected government, Iraq will demand the occupation end,
and has the right to rescind any oil contracts handed out to the US before they were elected. None of this is going the
way the Bush Administration expected.
Is the sudden Israeli confrontation with Lebanon incited? Look at the rhetoric from the mouths of spokespersons for
the US and Israel. Iran and Syria must stop their activities! Lebanon attacks, and now we are engaging Syria and Iran!
Just what the Bush Administration and Israel wanted! While the reluctant US military is stuck in Iraq at present, trying
to bring the troops home and slip away as quickly as possible, the Bush Administration is trying to force them into a
war with Iran. A move to invade and control the oil fields in Saudi is only a step away, with the excuse that the Middle
East is now further destabilized and the oil fields need protection. Bush and those who put him into power in the White
House are arrogant, and determined to carry out their plans. If a civil war in Iraq didn't spill the conflicts over into Iran,
then what to do? Kidnap a few Israeli soldiers, with the cooperation of Israel, and demand Lebanon produce them! Can
they do this when they don't have the soldiers? Hezbollah has been infiltrated, as one might imagine, by Israeli agents,
and why would it not? In the past it has been a major headache for Israel. This was an Israeli arranged kidnapping,
with the soldiers in the hands of Israeli agents.
How will this end? Will escalation occur until the entire Middle East is in flames, Israel using their nuclear arsenal?
One should remember that any nuclear activity in lands bordering Israel pollutes Israel too. One does not defecate in
one's own bed. The hope is that Iran and Syria will engage, will give the US and Israel an excuse so the US Military
can invade those countries. But this requires that Syria and Iran cooperate with this game plan, and that the US
Military will allow themselves to be pushed to take steps they are reluctant to take. If Syria or Iran attacked Israel, then
the ploy might work, but if they are restrained, the ploy will fail. In the meantime, Israel has weakened itself, by
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta305.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:37 AM]
ZetaTalk: Hezbollah Attack
opening up a second front, battling both Hamas and Hezbollah and on both ends of the country. What will this mean
for Israel if the US if forced to withdraw troops from Iraq and go home? They've stirred up a hornets nest, and are
sitting in the middle of an angry swarm! Such is karma!
Signs of the Times #1621
Hezbollah Drone Attacks Israeli Warship [Jul 14] Hezbollah rammed an Israeli warship with an
unmanned aircraft rigged with explosives and set it ablaze Friday, after attack jets smashed
Lebanon's links to the world one by one and destroyed the headquarters of the Islamic guerrilla
group's leader. The attack on the warship off Beirut's Mediterranean coast - which left four sailors
missing - was the most dramatic incident on a violent day in the conflict that erupted suddenly and
appeared to be careening out of control despite pleas from world leaders for restraint on both sides.
[and from another] Syria calls for Hezbollah cease fire [Jul 14] http://www.jpost.com/servlet/ In a
significant move, the Syrian ambassador to London, in an interview with the BBC, called on
Hezbollah to stop firing missiles at Israel. [and from another] Israel gives Syria ultimatum [Jul 15]
http://www.ynetnews.com/ Israel gave Syria 72 hours to stop Hezbollah's activity.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta305.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:37 AM]
ZetaTalk: Warning
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Warning
Note: written during the Dec 14, 2002 IRC Session
We have speculated that the Scandinavian countries, such as Sweden, would warn their citizens in the week or so
before the shift. Sweden is a country that is isolated from others by water, and is limiting immigration today as it is
considered a desirable social democracy in which to live. When rotation stops, there can hardly be any doubt of our
warnings, so announcements will not be presumed to induce panic. Panic is already in place! Sweden is also in a good
position for doing right by their citizens as they have high country as well as shorelines, and already do ocean fishing.
A simply announcements, to avoid the shorelines and move upland, during the warm spring when this warning would
be issues, would not be out of line. Nor would parsing out any supplies the country has, among the hungry, directly
after the shift.
In countries where there is no upland to go to, no warning would be issued, as in India.
In countries where the elite establishment cares not for the public, such as in Indonesia, no warning would be
given as the elite are escaping to Australia, and part of their bargain is to delay alerting their populace so as to
reduce survival and hordes landing on the shores of Australia.
In countries such as Brazil, where the establishment has mixed roots to the populace and the elite, rumors will
spread like wide fires and many will flee, or attempt to flee, to safety. Such flight will meet the same fate
whether warning is given early or late, as the roadways will clog, cars break down, planes fail to take off or land
properly, and the eventual hills such desperate land upon fail to feed them for long.
Thus, is it not just the warning, but where those warned can go, and what can be done to feed or care for them
afterwards, that matters. A warning given to those who can scarcely survive is a warning that can only, in truth,
prepare the warned for death. Where survival is possible, warnings are more likely to be given.
All rights reserved: [email protected]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g178.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:38 AM]
ZetaTalk: Nuclear Shutdown
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Nuclear Shutdown
Note: written on Dec 15, 2001
Among those in power, which are primarily the industrialized giants and the economic giants including those in the
banking system, this is often discussed. Should the governments come clean, at the last minute, and tell the public
what is about to occur? If so, what is the moment to do so? An hour ahead, a week? This is a heated subject, with
anyone seeming too sympathetic with the public being harshly warned not to leak information, and an occasional
accidental death announced grimly as a reminder that this enforcement can and is easily used. Bill Cooper is a recent
example. He warned about inoculation plans, for Anthrax, in the past, and this brought a quick knee-jerk reaction
when Anthrax became a problem. He was out and about with a gun in his hand, having sensed this was about to occur.
Thus, his "arrest" resulted in his death.
As the earlier agreem
ents between the US and the former Russian indicate, deactivating nuclear bombs has been in
process for some time. The public is not told just how far this has gone, so the deterrent still exists. It is far beyond the
schedule announced, as neither country wants to see itself poisoned by what it keeps in its bed. Power plants are
another matter, as to turn them off or deactivate them would be a clear clue to a watching public that something was
amiss! Thus, this step can be expected only after rotation has stopped, in the week prior to the shift. The public should
prepare for panic in the administration, such that this might get overlooked. The turn-off plans are known to many, and
access to these plants afforded to a number of individuals, such that no single individual is key to deactivating a
nuclear power plant. Thus, bringing this subject up when it is clear the shift is approaching, to those in government in
a broad setting so many ears can hear the concerns, will be the best insurance that this does occur. Nuclear power
plants will not be reactivated, due to disruption of the mechanisms during the shift. Few are constructed to withstand
earthquakes, few placed on fault lines for this reason.
All rights reserved: [email protected]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g133.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:38 AM]
ZetaTalk: Kosovo
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Kosovo
Note: written on Jun 15, 1999
When you are approaching cataclysmic changes, such as will occur in 2003 [Note: see 2003 Date explanation], there are
predictable changes. As we predicted in 1995, you will have 3 years of crop failure going into the pole shift, and in
1999 you are already experiencing this. This is still, in 1999, considered a local affair, with this country or that country
having a crop failure. Primarily these are commercial operations that fail, not family gardens which are tended
carefully and watched. Large commercial operation are mechanized and therefore are more vulnerable. This will
increase, by the year 2000, to the point where this is considered devastating, and the food stores will be run through.
