“It’s a gamble I had to take. If they believe I’m the only conduit, being here today is my best guarantee to be kept in the investigation. I’m betting on their not being able to risk pushing me aside anymore.”
“Here they come!” said Charlie, attracted by the sudden influx through the gatehouse, led by the first group of equipment-burdened television and radio engineers. There was a bottleneck at the very entrance to the hall and almost immediate shoving.
Charlie looked away at Robertson’s entry, unexpectedly followed by Stout. Robertson said, “I want Reg on the platform with us.”
This wasn’t a last-minute move, Charlie knew. Any more than Stout’s earlier inclusion hadn’t belatedly occurred to the spy hunter. “I’m not allowing any questions about the bugging. It’s strictly limited to the murder,” he told the security chief.
“I’ve already made that clear,” intruded Robertson.
“I’m making everything even clearer,” said Charlie, still talking to the ex-army major. “Don’t get in the way by trying to involve yourself in any English exchanges.”
“What if there’s something I need to make clear?” asked Stout.
“Pass me a note,” ruled Charlie. “Unless I have your absolute guarantee that you’ll say nothing—just sit there—you’re not coming on to the platform.”
“Reg has got every official—” started Robertson.
“I’m setting the rules and this is what they are,” halted Charlie. “You don’t like it, you’re not coming on the platform, either.”
“I won’t try to contribute,” promised Stout.
Charlie remained staring at the man for several moments.
“That’s a positive order! One word that fucks up what I’m trying to achieve, you’re on tonight’s plane back to London.”
“I don’t think . . .” began the ex-soldier but abruptly stopped. Then he said, “I understand. I won’t say anything. Just be there.”
The confrontation was broken by the arrival of Harry Fish. The man said at once, “We didn’t build in enough time for all the gatehouse checks. There’s got to be at least fifty still waiting to be processed. And God knows how many more not yet in the hall . . .” He waved his hand toward the television screens. “Look at it!”
The jostling line outside stretched unbroken the complete length of the forecourt from the gatehouse to the hall, the inside of which was shown by the internal cameras still to be only half full. Despite Charlie’s insistence upon pooling same-country television and radio technicians, the area directly in front of the raised stage was already a thicket of trailing television cables and there was a hedge of station-identifying microphones running the entire length of the official table. From the number of chairs at the table Charlie realized a space had been set for Stout before their argument.
From beside him Pavel offered Charlie a slip of paper and said: “These are the two headquarter lines dedicated exclusively for any response we might get from today.”
“I’ll have them included on the list to be distributed,” said Charlie. “I’ll leave it to you to announce it, from the platform.”
Robertson turned from the television sets. “We need to announce a delay.”
“We’ll make it together,” insisted Charlie, telling Pavel what he was going to do as he moved toward the door, gesturing Robertson ahead of him. Directly outside, in the linking corridor, Charlie said, “What the fuck game are you playing?”
“It’s necessary,” said Robertson, awkwardly.
“What is? Why wasn’t I told?”
“It came up. There wasn’t time.”
“Bollocks! What is it?”
“I need to keep Stout on a leash. Harry thinks one of his tracking devices has picked up something. He and his guys want time.”
“I should still have been told,” repeated Charlie, sure Robertson had manipulated the episode to establish his seniority.
“You just have been told. Let’s get on with it, shall we?”
Charlie accepted, leading the way out into the hall. Charlie had expected the immediate eruption of noise but not the sunburst of blinding lights that almost made him stumble into the waiting, empty chairs. He gestured Robertson down beside him and said, “My senior colleague and I, on behalf of whom I speak, are delaying the start until everyone gets into the hall. We don’t expect that delay to be more than half an hour. We’re not imposing a time. Everyone will get their opportunity to ask their questions.”
There was an immediate protesting cacophony and Charlie rose, hearing words like “deadline,” and “murderer,” and “mafia,” and “spy,” and “Cold War,” and a lot more in several other languages. Robertson momentarily remained where he was, only rising at Charlie’s encouraging nudge and even then slowly, turning to put both of them facially beyond any camera focus. Few but someone of Charlie Muffin’s experience would have recognized Robertson’s look to be one close to hatred.
Back in the linking corridor Robertson said, “You just made me a bigger target than yourself, identifying me as your superior. I’m going to bring you down for that; do everything I can to destroy you.”
“You know the problem with bad gangster movies, Paul? They all have that sort of crap dialogue: turns them into comedies instead of being frightening.”
The noise at their reentry was an unintelligible roar, which visibly startled Stout and Pavel. Charlie managed to avoid the blinding brightness of the strobe lights. The three looked to Charlie for seating directions. Charlie put Robertson beside him, at the center of the table, with Pavel flanking him on his left and Stout on the other side of Robertson. It took several minutes for the uproar to subside and when it did, he still had to shout into his microphone, flapping waving-down motions with both hands. Charlie identified the three other men and insisted the conference was restricted solely to the murder of the one-armed man; any other questions on anything else would be refused. There would be simultaneous translation through the available earpieces into Russian, English, French, German, and Italian and within the hall were six embassy officials with handheld microphones for individual questioners: those questions would be amplified for the benefit of everyone. There would be no individual, one-to-one television interviews after the main conference. Nor would any photographs be released of the murder scene or of the body. Deferring to Pavel as he spoke, Charlie said the joint British and Russian investigation had so far been extremely productive, which would become obvious during the conference but that they were still seeking help from the public. To receive that help three dedicated telephone lines had been established at the embassy and two at the Petrovka headquarters of the Organized Crime Bureau: after slowly reciting each—and repeating each—Charlie said information sheets listing them would be available to everyone upon departure and he was asking that the phone numbers be printed in all newspapers, their Web sites, and repeated on television and radio broadcasts as well as being published on their Web sites, too. No identification of any caller would be publicly disclosed; anonymous calls could be made. There would be recording apparatus on every listed line.
Along with the telephone list would be separately printed information, which the joint investigation hoped would lead to the identification of the victim. Another sheet would illustrate the precise spot where the body had been found, showing its proximity to the hall in which they were assembled and its relationship to the main embassy building and the entry gate into the forecourt.
The victim was male, five feet eight inches tall, weighing 164 pounds, and was aged between forty-five and fifty. The left arm had been surgically amputated between ten and fifteen years earlier. He had been killed by a shot in the back of the head from a Makarov pistol, its bullet made to flatten on impact, to destroy all facial and dental features. He had also been tortured, and the fingers of his surviving right hand had been burned by acid to remove all fingerprints. All makers’ names had been removed from his Russian-manufactured clothing: a brown, polyester mass-produced s
uit, a blue shirt, and a red-and-black-striped tie. The lace-up shoes, which were well worn and also of Russian manufacture, were brown. All the suit pockets had been emptied. There was a red birthmark, affected by the acid burning, on the right hand, and the little finger of that hand had been distorted, possibly since childhood, by what forensic pathologists believed to be frostbite. In the past, again possibly in his childhood, the man has undergone an appendix operation. There had been traces of a barbiturate in the man’s blood.
“Let’s start the questioning,” invited Charlie.
There was an immediate burst of inaudible shouted questions, which Charlie had to again subdue by shouting louder and standing to gesture the noise down. Shielding his own microphone, Robertson said, “This is a farce, a waste of time.”
Needing his amplification, Charlie still had to yell. “This is going to be canceled right now if everyone doesn’t start behaving sensibly!”
A woman in the third row gestured for a handheld microphone, identified herself from The New York Times, and said, “Are you treating this as an assassination?”
Charlie deferred to Robertson, who appeared startled. Leaning hesitantly forward he said, “It is certainly one avenue of inquiry.”
“So the man could have been an informer—a Russian spy—pursued into the embassy by Russian security officers?” seized the woman, refusing to surrender the microphone.
To Charlie’s gesture, Pavel said, “We have been officially assured there is absolutely no involvement of any State security organization, so that is untrue.”
“You would be, wouldn’t you?” said the persistent woman, to isolated sniggers at the mockery.
“There is also no involvement of any British intelligence organization,” came in Charlie, to help Pavel.
“We’d be told that, too, wouldn’t we; have been told that already,” said a man in heavily accented English—an Italian, Charlie guessed—who reached across from his seat directly behind the woman to take the microphone.
“Nothing can be ruled in or out of the investigation until we get the victim’s identity,” said Charlie.
“So it is a possibility—a strong possibility—that it is an intelligence assassination?” persisted an NBC reporter from the middle of the hall.
“Nothing has been ruled in or out,” repeated Charlie, identifying Bundy next to the questioner, relieved at the comparative order that had finally settled. There’d be a publicity benefit from the inevitable concentration upon an intelligence-organized assassination.
As the thought came to Charlie another woman, this time from the London Times, demanded, “Which British intelligence organization do you, Mr. Robertson, and Mr. Stout represent?”
“That is not a question that will be addressed,” refused Robertson, without any prompting from Charlie.
“Why not?” pressed the woman.
“Next question,” insisted Robertson.
“MI6 or MI5?” came a shouted question, not needing amplification.
“Next question,” repeated Robertson.
Charlie had to listen intently to his own earpiece for the translation from German of the question. “What other lines of inquiry are you pursuing, apart from it being a State-approved killing of which, comparatively recently, there is evidence of the Russian authorities being prepared to sanction?”
After a momentary hiatus, Pavel said, “Regrettably, there is a great deal of organized crime in Russia, particularly in Moscow. Assassination of this sort is a very common method of settling gangland feud and disputes.”
“How many others have there been in the grounds of the British embassy?” immediately demanded the German, to more mocking laughter.
“None,” quieted Charlie. “But it would be a very effective way of misdirecting an investigation along the espionage lines that appears to be the media preference.”
“What’s your preference?” asked the determined German.
“I have none,” responded Charlie. “With my colleagues I am conducting this investigation with an open mind, with no preconceived impressions or theories.”
There was more disbelieving laughter, which brought a heavy sigh and a pointed sideways look from Robertson. Charlie was happy for the next question to move away from the espionage fixation, a demand for more evidence of the murder having been committed within the embassy grounds, which enabled him to expand upon the supposed discovery of part of a 9mm Makarov bullet and the score mark on the outside wall of the hall in which they now sat, which inevitably brought the question of how the killers and their victim got into the embassy grounds unseen.
“The killers weren’t unseen,” snatched Charlie, seeing the first opportunity to stage manage the event as he wanted. “Despite a partial malfunction of the entrance security cameras, the actual moment of the murder, by a number of men, was indistinctly recorded. The images are being scientifically enhanced and the hope is that such enhancement will be sufficient to identify the killers, although from the position in which the victim is shown, on his knees, no recovery of his features will be possible.”
The hall erupted into a far noisier outburst than any previously and it took Charlie a full five minutes to once more subdue the babble sufficiently to continue. The most obvious and frequent demand was for the CCTV and stills from it to be released for publication, which Charlie refused with the easy escape that as the film was in the process of being sharpened, hopefully to form the core evidence in a prosecution, any release was legally impossible. He refused, too, any verbal description of those featured on the loop, apart from saying that all appeared to be male. He—as well as Robertson and Pavel—were able to avoid any demands that didn’t serve their purpose by refusing to let the questioning go beyond the actual murder, despite determined and repeated attempts to get a response to the bugging. Charlie was, however, selective in his refusals, alert to whatever maximized his chances of getting that one essential, victim-identifying response.
When no opportunity presented itself after almost another hour, during which the predictable insistences expanded into the recurring possibility of the victim being a Russian intelligence officer killed at the point of an intended defection, Charlie decided to bait his own manufactured hook.
To a question that had been phrased in varying forms at least three times before—how endangered were relations between the United Kingdom and the Russian Federation—Charlie replied, “The successful conclusion of this investigation, toward which we are moving, ensures there is no risk whatsoever to that relationship.”
“What successful conclusion?” insisted the original questioner from The New York Times. “You’re asking for help: that doesn’t convince me you’re anywhere close to solving this!”
“I have already told you why we cannot release the surviving images on the CCTV film,” said Charlie. “You will surely understand and accept that there is other evidence we cannot make publicly available. We might be able to come some way towards providing more—making arrests even—once we have named the victim.”
The fresh outburst was less strident than those that preceded it. “You’ve already got enough for an arrest!” demanded the woman.
“The answer to that will have to wait for the next conference,” evaded Charlie, rising to bring the other three men up with him, to yet another protesting uproar.
“That was a disaster!” insisted Robertson, back in the anteroom.
“It did everything and more to achieve what I wanted,” rejected Charlie.
“What if you don’t get a name from it?” persisted Robertson.
“Today will bring something out of the woodwork.”
Robertson appeared, oddly, to become aware of Stout listening to the exchange. “Let’s hope so.”
“I’ll walk you to the gate,” Charlie told Pavel. As they went across the forecourt, Charlie spoke to the other man of his rejection of Robertson’s assessment, which he translated.
Pavel said: “He’s got every reason to be doubtful. To b
e honest, so am I.”
“We laid out enough bait,” insisted Charlie, wishing he sounded more confident.
“We need to establish undetected personal communication,” said Pavel. “What about individual cell phones?”
“We might as well stick tracking devices up our asses,” dismissed Charlie. “In England, we foiled dozens of Islamic terrorist plots before they had been mounted and captured the perpetrators of a lot more that we missed the first time through mobile phones. Once detected by scanners, they can be listened to and the users traced to within fifty yards by the electronic signals they emit. We’d be more discreet standing on street-corner boxes, with megaphones.”
Pavel lifted his shoulders in an awkward shrug. “Stay with phones at street kiosks then?”
“By far the safest.”
When they stopped, just before the gatehouse, the Russian suggested the already used café as another unmonitored meeting place, allowing an intervening gap of two days for incoming calls to begin on the publicly announced numbers. “During that time we can make our choice of telephone kiosks; get some numbers to exchange. From now on, Guzov’s people are going to permanently be just one step behind both of us, probably literally.”
“Which will make the Varvarka café an important test,” acknowledged Charlie, confident of his own trail-clearing ability but wondering about Pavel’s.
One of the designated telephones was ringing when Charlie entered his assigned embassy apartment and, for the briefest moment, he hesitated before snatching it up.
From the unexpected internal line Robertson said, “Something’s come out of the woodwork.”
17
Charlie Muffin was engulfed by a feeling of déjà vu on the threshold of the spy-catchers’ inquiry room. Paul Robertson occupied the chief inquisitor’s position from which he’d conducted Charlie’s interrogation, flanked by the same male and female team. The two polygraph technicians were at their momentarily quiet equipment, but looking far happier than during Charlie’s session and Charlie recognized on either side of the door the two heavy-handed guards who’d stood threateningly over him before he’d ridiculed his polygraph examination. Harry Fish was to the left of the judgemental bench; in front of him, the familiar white handkerchief upon which lay three pinhead bugs. As Charlie came fully into the room, Reg Stout, in the same chair upon which Charlie had sat, was saying vehemently, “I have only ever seen devices like these once before in my life, when the original six were discovered in the telephone relay box.”
Red Star Rising Page 18
