Robert also took us to see the Folly in his Range Rover. He drove incredibly badly, taking no notice of other drivers, then careering off the road and onto a muddy track, banging carelessly over holes while smoking and talking. We arrived at the top of a hill and slithered to a halt in front of some surprised dog-walkers. Robert pointed through the clump of pine trees to a looming brick tower. ‘Gerald built it for my twenty-first birthday,’ he announced. ‘I told him I’d have preferred a horse.’ Robert produced a key and we ascended the rackety wooden steps to a small windowed room and then through a trap-door onto the crenellated observation platform. The 360-degree view above the treetops was astonishing. We gazed out over several counties, from the Cotswolds in the north to the Berkshire Downs in the south, where the chalky outline of a vast prehistoric creature is visible galloping across the green hills – the White Horse of Uffington.
In the early evening, we all changed for dinner. The unmarried couples were given separate quarters and I was put in the Crystal Room, which had a four-poster with glass columns and was hung with crystals and creamy chiffon. I lay on the velvet counterpane, taking in the strangeness of occupying a bed that had probably had people like Igor Stravinsky or Nancy Mitford sleeping in it. Mitford adored Gerald Berners and Faringdon, and fictionalised them in The Pursuit of Love as Lord Merlin and Merlinford. ‘It was a house to live in,’ she wrote, ‘not to rush out from all day to kill enemies and animals. It was suitable for a bachelor, or a married couple with one, or at most two, beautiful, clever, delicate children.’ My room was at the front of the house, looking onto swathes of green lawn, mown in perfect stripes, leading to the church. Rooks cawed from the spindly Scots pines as the light softened into evening. I had my own tiny bathroom covered in Rousseau-like murals and containing a pink bath and basin. When I lay in the scented bathwater, I seemed to be inside a bamboo hut, looking out at a jungle fantasy of tropical flowers and birds, with a friendly black face peering in and a nineteenth-century lady-explorer making her way through the foliage.
CECIL BEATON’S PORTRAIT OF GERALD, ROBERT, VICTORIA AND JENNIFER, IN THE DRAWING ROOM AT FARINGDON, 1943
At some point over that first weekend I saw the large photograph album that contained pictures from the 1930s and ’40s stuck in somewhat haphazardly and without explanations or names. I didn’t recognise most of the faces that stared out, though there were clearly many celebrities and beauties among them, some in bathing costumes on Italian beaches, others in evening dress at Faringdon, still more posed whimsically up ladders or behind plants. It was obvious that they were having an exceptionally good time. It was another photograph, however – one that wasn’t in the album – that really struck me. By Cecil Beaton, a regular visitor, the black-and-white picture is a formal family portrait taken at the green end of the drawing room. Jennifer is moodily glamorous in a fitted summer dress, something like Ava Gardner, with dark, styled hair and painted lips. Robert is gazing past the photographer, casually handsome in sweater and gumboots, as though just in from the stables. He is holding a small lace-clad baby. A wedding ring shows on his finger. Over to one side in the shadows is a rounded, grandfatherly figure with a gnomic profile. Wearing a skullcap, suit and slippers, he sits on a sofa, apparently absorbed in a book. The impression is of a privileged family portrait: cut flowers, a portrait of Henry VIII, gilt-framed mirrors on dark walls, and a golden cockerel artfully placed in the foreground like a symbol of flamboyance, arrogance or perhaps infidelity.
It is a truism that photographs lie, but the extent to which this picture is misleading is staggering. It is 1943, though you wouldn’t guess that it was wartime and that the house was occupied by the US Army. The ‘grandfather’ is Lord Berners and the father is the Mad Boy who had already been his lover for over ten years. Their differences were flagrant. Gerald was a stout, sensitive, intellectual older man with a monocle and spats, born in Victorian times. You can see he’d be at home in embassies, society salons and the creative world of theatre and ballet. Robert, on the other hand, was a wildly physical, unscholarly young hothead who was known to gallop about on his horse naked, and who preferred cocktails and nightclubs to cerebral activities. If the two men made an unlikely couple at a time when homosexuality was illegal, the addition to the household in 1942 of a pregnant Jennifer Fry was even more astounding. One of the high society belles de nuit who frequented Soho’s Gargoyle Club, she was known for her style and charm. David Niven said he never saw a better pair of legs among Hollywood’s stars. I’d heard that once, when leaving the Ritz, her knicker elastic snapped and she simply stepped out of the underwear and left the silken scrap on the pavement. Like Robert, Jennifer was reckless and fond of sexual adventures. Even so, what could have brought her to marry a man who was wary of close relationships and evidently preferred men to women? What could it have been like to go to live in a ménage à trois with him and Gerald at Faringdon? In later years, Jennifer preferred not to speak about her short marriage or her time at Faringdon, though she said that Gerald was ‘very kind’.
While I remember how dazzled I was by entering the strange and sparkling world my long-lost grandfather lived in, I now wonder what Robert made of me. Dressed in quirky vintage dresses and plimsolls, with waist-length hair, it must have been immediately obvious that I was from a very different background to him. After my parents’ divorce when I was eleven, I lived with my father, who created the first British electronic music studio in our family house in Putney. I would get back from school to find famous pop groups of the 1970s or avant-garde composers from around Europe in our kitchen finishing a long lunch, or making their way to the basement studio. Amplified squawks and wailing sounds would emerge from computers the size of small cars and prototype synthesisers with hundreds of knobs and wires. All my childhood holidays, winter and summer, were spent on a remote Hebridean island in a house without electricity or telephone, where we read a lot, went on long walks, looked for fossils (my father had once been a geologist), and went camping on deserted islands. I was a funny mix – the kind of girl who got into trouble for being ‘naughty’ at school, who smoked behind the bike sheds and wore safety pins as earrings, but who also played Schubert on the piano, read Dostoevsky and could knock out any number of pies from my Russian grandmother’s cookery book.
I had no experience of country estates or of Robert’s life of horses, hunting and shooting. Nor was I impressed by the fact that my grandfather was rich and privileged, the Lord of the Manor with all the obscure rights and duties that went with that position. Nevertheless, I was deeply intrigued. Entering the gates at Faringdon took me into an unfamiliar yet hugely seductive realm. It was a version of passing through the fur-coat-filled wardrobe into Narnia; there were strange creatures and outlandish delights and preoccupations. At the end of my first stay, I signed my name in the visitors’ book with no idea whether I would ever visit the place again. It would have been almost impossible to imagine that within eight years Robert would be dead and I would inherit his estate.
HEN ROBERT DIED, Faringdon seemed a place almost overwhelmed by the spirits of its past inhabitants; Gerald was its self-evident genius loci, but I was drawn to the mystery of what had happened to bring Robert and Jennifer together under his roof. And whether I like it or not, I have become part of their history. It has taken twenty-five years to reach the point where I wanted to tell this story, to get beyond the fish bag and the old photos. Gerald, Robert and Jennifer were all rebels of a sort, eager to escape and dismiss the old codes and expectations of their parents. None had a conventional education, but all were clever in different, sometimes surprising ways. Nevertheless, all three are in danger of being seen as caricatures. Playful and self-indulgent in ways that are no longer possible, it would be easy to dismiss them from our more egalitarian vantage point. Like the brittle Bright Young Things of the 1920s, the Faringdon crowd could be seen as deservedly extinct – irrelevant to today’s preoccupations and values. Lord Berners is easily reduced by his tag as the wea
lthy dilettante, an eccentric in masks, a witty host surrounded by artifice, frivolity and famous friends. Yet he was also a sensitive, introverted, hard-working artist who was prone to depression, and a former diplomat who, at a time when it was illegal, chose as his life-companion a madly sexy, disastrously unreliable man less than half his age.
Robert is in even more danger of being seen as a clown. He had no obvious achievements to his name and was never a part of Gerald’s cultivated, artistic milieu. On closer examination, however, Robert was steadfastly dedicated to the estate he inherited and deeply serious about preserving and improving Gerald Berners’s extraordinary legacy. Jennifer is easiest to dismiss as the glamorous party girl who was only ‘passing through’ during her short time at Faringdon. But in reality, she was an intelligent, captivating woman. She brought a feminine (and family) element to a male-dominated world, and by producing a daughter and acquiring a granddaughter, she allowed this change to continue down the generations.
The crazy, pleasure-seeking world of Faringdon House in the middle part of the twentieth century sometimes looks like a wild, even farcical comedy. But somebody said that comedy is usually tragedy viewed at a distance, and the triangle my grandparents formed with Gerald Berners can be seen from either end of the telescope. Whichever way it goes, passing through the gates to Faringdon is still like stepping through the looking glass – the entry point to an extraordinary world where the unexpected is as fundamental as its beauty.
CHAPTER TWO
Behind the Rocking Horse
ERALD BERNERS met Robert Heber-Percy at a house party in 1931 or ’32; nobody seems quite sure. At forty-eight, Gerald was already a well-established aesthete, known in high society for his witty charm, wide-ranging intelligence and his intriguing music. He was short and solidly built, his hair only barely there, and he sported a well-clipped moustache over a sensualist’s lips. A monocle, a raised eyebrow and what he claimed were ‘kind eyes’. His quietly observant gaze was contrasted with a mildly flustered fluttering of the hands that reminded one friend of Lewis Carroll’s White Rabbit.2 Robert was twenty and was only known for behaving badly. Slim and of medium height, his muscular grace was that of an athletic risk-taker. He had a long-jawed but handsome face, dark hair and eyes, and the unrestrained appeal of a gypsy, albeit with a public-school accent. He gave the impression that anything might happen. In an era where unusual pets were fashionable – lemurs or lions that might bite you or shred your curtains, but which were ‘entertaining’ – Robert had the allure and potential danger of a young leopard. Gerald liked to be amused, and this mad boy was irresistible.
The two men, so different in age, appearance and interests, were both staying with Sir Michael Duff in North Wales. Aged twenty-four, Michael had known Robert since childhood and, like him, was to marry twice, although he was believed to favour relationships with men. Unconventional, lanky and a stammerer, Michael was the owner of the huge Vaynol estate, which, despite its remoteness, was famous for its luxury and its outrageous parties. In the rhododendron-filled park, a collection of exotic animals, including a giraffe and a rhinoceros, gathered at the lake, miserable in the damp, Welsh cold. The house was decorated in eau de Nil, white, gold and pink by the fashionable Syrie Maugham, and the bedrooms, which slept thirty guests, all had the unusually lavish addition of their own bathroom.3 Gerald had long been a friend of Lady Juliet Duff, Michael’s tall, somewhat cold mother, and as a consequence Michael knew many of the younger men who formed part of Gerald’s circle, such as Cecil Beaton and Peter Watson. A lifelong worshipper of the royal family, Michael’s party piece was cross-dressing as Queen Mary, encouraging his butler to play along and address him as ‘your Majesty’.
What passed between Gerald and Robert that first time at Vaynol is unknown. Robert somehow mistook the older man for a South African gold magnate. ‘Then people told me he knew about art.’4 Almost certainly he would have made him laugh with his knowing jokes and ruthless gossip. Though Gerald was a wonderful friend to many people, men and women, he had never been known to have an intimate relationship with anyone. He may, of course, have been skilful in his secrecy; certainly it would seem unlikely for an emotional, passionate man to have reached his age without a love affair of some sort. Robert, on the other hand, was highly sexual, and, though he preferred men, also had periodic involvements with women. Though there is no record of how the two men reacted to one another, it was clearly a catalytic point in both their lives. Those who knew Gerald described it as a coup de foudre. Not long after their meeting, they started living together.
ITLED, TALENTED AND RICH, Gerald risks being viewed only as Lord Berners, the eccentric joker, the ‘versatile peer’. Like Nancy Mitford’s minor though colourful character Lord Merlin, he can be blithely summed up by his facades and foibles, his glamorous parties and dyed doves. His image looks as managed as that of a contemporary celebrity, with a trademark style and the manipulation of publicity smoke and mirrors to create a personal myth. Hiding behind dark glasses and under hats, he went to parties in fantastical dress and posed for photographs wearing all sorts of masks, including a First World War gas mask; he was not afraid of the grotesque. He loved theatrical scenery, wind-up toys and decorated screens, and was well aware of the transformative and liberating nature of altering one’s appearance and the power of creating the right surroundings.
Many of his famous and affluent friends mentioned Gerald in their memoirs and, though his artistic creativity is acknowledged, he tends to play a humorous cameo role, often as a generous, gourmand host. Harold Acton described him as bubbling over ‘with private jokes and farcical inventions’, but, more revealingly, that by ‘constantly changing his skin, as it were, he revelled in mystification’.5 Even friends like Siegfried Sassoon, who wanted to get beyond social niceties, were sometimes frustrated by ‘the monocled peer, bowler-hatted, and imperturbable’. In his 1921 diary, Sassoon wrote, ‘He wears the same mask (it is a mask, and is, to me, consistently inhuman and unfailingly agreeable).’6 Sassoon later revised this opinion, but Gerald’s disguises and superficiality became effective screens for the complex, thoughtful man behind them. Even his fascinating social circles and the good-looking women and men with whom he liked to surround himself sometimes appear like another protective layer. All the beauty and merriment make it harder to get through to the intimate sides of his character.
Given the decorative barricades that Gerald became increasingly expert at erecting around himself, it is important to uncover the thin-skinned, lonely boy and emotional, creative youth who made the man. First Childhood and his three other memoirs (A Distant Prospect, The Château de Résenlieu and Dresden) provide many clues, even if they sometimes sacrifice objective facts in favour of a good story. Additionally, two excellent books about Lord Berners have gone a long way to confounding the stereotypes and are fundamental reading for anyone wanting to know more about Gerald’s life: Mark Amory’s Lord Berners: The Last Eccentric and Peter Dickinson’s Lord Berners: Composer, Writer, Painter.
Gerald embraced the twentieth century’s iconoclasm and its love of experimental art forms, but he was a child of the nineteenth century. Throughout his life, he was characterised by a mixture of conformity and rebelliousness – a love of luxury and ease combined with a disciplined work ethic, an ability to play the fool while caring deeply about his creativity.
His early years bore many of the hallmarks of upper-class Victorian life that emerge in his novels and short stories, with critical or remote parents, nannies and servants at the heart of the household, and the oppressions of austere Christianity. It is an environment in which he pokes fun at vicars, well-heeled ladies and their pampered lapdogs, a contained world of rigid class barriers where everyone knows their place and where Gerald can do the subverting.
First Childhood manages to be both revealing and obfuscating: Gerald claims to be grateful for not having had childhood traumas, or if he did, ‘they lie buried in my subconscious and I can only be thankful t
hat they do not seem to have given rise to any very serious complexes, inhibitions or repressions’. However, his book paints a picture of an isolated little boy who suffered because of his parents’ problems and was deeply unhappy at school. It is tempting to surmise that Gerald’s lack of intimate relationships as an adult was linked to his parents’ distance from one another and what he felt was their lack of warmth towards him.
Gerald Hugh Tyrwhitt was born in 1883, the only child of a marriage between two neighbouring Shropshire families. His mother, Julia Foster, was thirty-one when she married a naval captain, Hugh Tyrwhitt (pronounced ‘Tirrit’), who was four years younger. Julia’s face is stern and, despite the heavy-lidded eyes, uncompromising. Gerald suspected it was her money rather than her charms that attracted his indebted father. Hugh might have been viewed as a catch on account of his titled ancestors; his mother inherited the Berners barony, an unusual title that could pass through the female line.
Julia and Hugh’s ambitions were not enough to make a success of their marriage. According to their son, they were ‘like two cogwheels that for ever failed to engage’.7 Gerald rarely saw his father, who was away at sea a great deal: Hugh was decorated for his part in the Nile Expedition of 1884–5 to relieve General Gordon at Khartoum. Admiring his father’s wit and elegance, Gerald noted how, despite his small stature, he had the ‘imposing swagger’ of someone who could be taken for ‘minor royalty’. Hugh was ‘worldly, cynical, intolerant of any kind of inferiority, reserved and self-possessed’. He apparently took little interest in his son’s education or well-being, to the extent that the young boy felt almost disappointed when, after some misdemeanour, his father said he could not be bothered to spank him.
The Mad Boy, Lord Berners, My Grandmother, and Me Page 2
