Writing for Kenya

Home > Other > Writing for Kenya > Page 17
Writing for Kenya Page 17

by Wangari Muoria-Sal


  the confl ict over loyalties during the crisis of the Mau Mau had torn

  the country apart and created deep splits within and between commu-

  nities, splits that particularly aff ected the Kikuyu. Identifi cation with

  tribe remained strong in the fi rst decades aft er independence among

  Kenyans, but it was intersected with investment in the nation and the

  continent of Africa—historically confi gured spaces that increasingly

  became meaningful and worth fi ghting for in the course of the 20th

  century. Muoria’s appropriation of the pen from the colonizers and

  his activities—writing and publishing in the service of enlightenment,

  as he saw it—exemplify a particular trajectory of great and continuing

  importance in Kenya’s political culture: one which has celebrated a

  modifi ed modernity, dialogue and democracy.

  Like countless other families in Kenya, the Muorias were shaped

  by these economic, social and political forces. Both men and women

  embraced what colonial modernity had to off er—education, Christianity,

  96

  chapter two

  individual autonomy, urban living, changed relations between the sexes

  and between young and old. Th

  eir extended family consolidated itself

  in nuclear units, but kept and cultivated features from a diff erent and

  more collective familial organization: the possibility of having several

  persons in charge of the primary care of children, a special relation-

  ship between grandparents and grandchildren, and cohesion within age

  groups. In certain ways colonialism was a helper more than an enemy.

  It furthered the subversion of older structures of social organization that

  had muted women and the young. However, the Muoria family were

  Kikuyu and nationalist, and during the struggle for independence, the

  British unequivocally became the enemy of the Muorias as they did to

  the Kikuyu and more broadly the African population of Kenya.

  Th

  e fate of the Muoria family from the outbreak of the First World

  War to the end of the century is in certain ways typical, in other ways

  exceptional. It was exceptional in that Henry Muoria was a public fi gure

  and furthermore in that he had the support of his wives in his anti-

  colonial political work—not only in his private life but also in his public

  activities. For this the whole family was punished. Ruth and Henry’s

  British exile was ironic—having to seek protection from British racism

  and colonialism in the heart of the colonial capital. Against their wishes,

  the couple, already used to rural-urban mobility, became pioneers of

  transnational living, fi nding ways to keep up social and aff ective bonds

  between family members separated by great distance.

  As for millions of Kenyans, distance and mobility are also elements in

  the mode of life of the broader family. To those of Muoria’s children and

  grandchildren who reside in London, Nairobi and Oakland, urban living

  is a matter of course. What many of them have lost is the easy access to

  the rural resources and values that were available to earlier generations.

  Some members of the family, those who live in an urban slum, which

  is what Pumwani has become, have found it hard to get a Kenyan pass-

  port. Th

  ey may be proud of belonging to a talented transnational family

  and of being Africans and Kenyans, but they have diffi

  culties in getting

  together enough wealth to become properly married, and in obtaining

  day-to-day cash for school fees, medicine and doctors’ bills. Structural

  inequalities mean that they are not in an economic and social position

  to reap the benefi ts of political independence, which their grandparents

  fought for. Th

  eir cousins, aunts and uncles who are in charge of the

  Muoria land in Kiambu, work around the clock, irrigating fi elds some-

  times in the middle of the night because of erratic electricity supplies,

  in order to make farming profi table. Th

  ey travel to Nairobi in matatus

  the muorias in kenya

  97

  to market their fresh vegetables at the break of dawn. Sometimes they

  miss the social and economic opportunities of urban life. However, like

  all Muorias they have a wider perspective: they are strong Christians

  and deeply engaged in the religious life of the community. Rural-urban

  traffi

  c is still going on, although sometimes travelling between Nairobi

  and Kiambu in ramshackle matatus on eroded roads is a greater hazard

  than air travel between London and Nairobi. Transnational mobility

  comes more easily, but is restricted to family members who are in an

  economic position to benefi t from it. Th

  ose who are not may be more

  limited in their physical and social mobility than earlier generations,

  but they have greater possibility of mental mobility and of knowing

  about the world. Access to education is given, not something to be

  fought for as it was to Muoria and his wives.

  Does the founding father hold the transnational Muoria family

  together? Is it true as Rosabell said, referring to the living memory of

  her father, that ‘a person does not go away like smoke’?62 Stories about

  the ideas and deeds of the great man have indeed spun a web that has

  upheld connections between family members. Th

  e stories link and

  make sense of the many worlds that Henry Muoria brought together

  in his life and works. Th

  ey contribute to reconciling the paradoxes that

  were characteristic of his life: he was born into a Kikuyu traditionalist

  family and embraced Christianity. He grew up in the countryside, but

  chose the city as his place of work. He invested in both urban and rural

  property and cultivated a large plot of land in his home area with the

  assistance of his wives and descendants. He was a wealthy man who

  came to know poverty in London. He was unwavering in his trust in

  the importance of his families, both in Kenya and Great Britain, but

  the political and social upheavals which surrounded him and which he

  was part of meant that he had diffi

  culties in sustaining connections to

  all their members, while living as he did in far-away London. He loved

  his country, detested racism and was cosmopolitan in his outlook and

  knowledge of the world. He fought for independence, but independence

  did not need him aft er it had been consolidated—he was never off ered

  a suitable job or a political role in independent Kenya. His writings

  will, however, keep Henry Muoria’s memory alive and create a place

  for him in the dramatic history of independent Kenya’s victory over

  British colonialism.

  62 Interview with Rosabell Wambui Mbure, Nairobi, November 1999.

  98

  chapter two

  3. Wedding photo of Henry Muoria and his fi rst wife Elizabeth Th

  ogori,

  best man Mr Charles Karau and his wife Mrs Karau as maid of honour, 1932

  the muorias in kenya

  99

  n, 1954.

  ndoo

  ria in Lou

  y M

  enr

 
s Hin

  una jo

  th NuR

  4.

  100

  chapter two

  5. Henry Muoria and Elizabeth Th

  ogori with their two fi rst-born children

  (John Mwaniki and Peter Kigia)

  the muorias in kenya

  101

  ui b

  am

  d Wn

  igia a

  er Ket

  , P

  ikin

  wa

  n MhJo ay)we (ikrbssed ato pao

  wh

  d his mon

  en a

  ildrh

  ria, his cou

  y M

  enrH

  6.

  102

  chapter two

  ter h

  ugda

  her d

  ani kjoN

  race G

  er th

  mo

  i n

  her

  oth

  na, u

  Nthu istine GaRChr

  men: owi

  ob

  air

  f Nos n

  tio

  genera

  ree

  7. Th

  the muorias in kenya

  103

  en in

  hildrdcn

  d gran

  en a

  ildrh

  th, cdiu

  d Jn

  h aetb

  liza

  i, 1975

  ob

  ves, E

  airN

  rst wi

  o fi

  y his tw

  ved b

  ecei

  ria rou

  y M

  enrH

  8.

  104

  chapter two

  9. Henry Muoria greets his mother-in-law, Grace Njoki, Nairobi, 1975

  CHAPTER THREE

  THE MUORIA FAMILY IN LONDONA MEMORY

  Wangari Muoria-Sal

  (with Bodil Folke Frederiksen)

  Th

  e only safe way to happiness is to love

  Th

  e whole race of mankind

  Wherever they may be

  But true love starts from one’s family

  Th

  e abode of untold sweetness

  At seeing one’s little ones at home

  With plenty to eat and drink

  And a roof over their heads

  To keep them warm and well satisfi ed

  Arriving and settling in London

  My father, Henry Muoria, arrived in England in September 1952,

  initially to stay for three to six months. Before he went to England

  he had consulted his friend Jomo Kenyatta, whose political work he

  supported in his Gikuyu newspaper, Mumenyereri, now in its seventh

  successful year of publication. Kenyatta recommended that he should

  go to Great Britain to gain more experience. With a thriving printing

  and publishing business my father’s aim was to learn about English

  methods of newspaper production and distribution. He also planned

  to buy an automatic printing press.

  Kenya was a troubled country. A state of emergency was declared

  one month aft er my father left , following the assassination of a chief

  loyal to the colonial government. More than a hundred political arrests

  followed. My father’s second wife, Judith Nyamurwa, who was run-

  ning his newspaper in his absence, informed him that it had been shut

  down and banned by the government. Concerned about his family

  and the business, my father promptly bought himself an air ticket to

  return to Kenya. However, when he went to say goodbye to his friends,

  they advised him not to return to Kenya, because he would almost

  certainly be picked up by the colonial authorities. Several of his friends

  106

  chapter three

  and associates there had been arrested, including Jomo Kenyatta. He

  decided to write to the Chief Native Commissioner (C.N.C.) enquiring

  whether he was accused of any crime and was therefore a wanted man

  in Kenya. Th

  e C.N.C. reassured him that no one had accused him of any

  crime, but added that owing to the Emergency regulations that were in

  operation, he would recommend that he should not return to Kenya at

  that time. My father had also applied to the Registrar of Printing Presses

  for renewal of his licence to run his printing fi rm, as he still had people

  working for him in Kenya, and this was where income was generated

  for his family. However, the Registrar sent a ‘Notifi cation of Refusal’

  of a licence to my father, giving as a reason that he was ‘likely to keep or use the printing presses for the printing of a document prejudicial

  to, or incompatible with, peace or good order in the Colony.’ Th

  is was

  dated November 12th, 1952—exactly two months aft er my father’s

  arrival in London.

  My father was not able to get work as a journalist in England, as

  he had hoped, because he did not belong to a Trade Union. However,

  with the help of friends, Frank and Cicely Watson, he found employ-

  ment with the railways on account of his previous experience with the

  railway profession in Kenya. Th

  is helped him to get out, meet people,

  and forget his loneliness. Initially, my father was in agony over being so

  far away from home during this fateful crisis, and hearing Africans in

  Kenya maligned as barbaric and bloodthirsty in the British press. Also

  he missed his family. Th

  is is how he described this unhappy period in

  his life in an unpublished autobiographical essay:

  I found myself sitting in the small room I had rented . . . spending a lot of six pences to keep myself warm by the gas fi re. Th

  e news published in the

  English newspapers of the Kikuyu tribe being composed of murderous

  thugs who were hacking white and black men with pangas made [me]

  feel more distressed in a manner not easy to put into words.1

  Later Peter, my brother, trying to understand our father’s experience,

  described his situation like this:

  He had to read all the stuff , which came over while he was here. It was

  vilifying Kenyatta and all the people who were fi ghting for independence.

  It was a terrible thing, as far as the British press was concerned, these

  terrible Mau Mau, you know, natives getting restless and taking stuff

  1 Th

  e British and my Kikuyu Tribe, 1982.

  the muoria family in london—a memory

  107

  which was not theirs. It was appalling. One can imagine what that must

  have done to him to read that. He never hated the British.2

  Aft er two years in London my father earned enough money from his

  job with the London Underground to send for his wife. He fi rst asked

  his second wife, Judith, to join him, as she was a trained teacher and

  would probably be able to fi nd work in England. However, due to other

  circumstances, she refused. He, therefore, asked my mother, Ruth Nuna,

  his third wife, to join him. She had four daughters and a son with her

  in Nairobi, but decided to go. Before she went, she lost her young son

  to measles because no injections were available. She left her young

  daughters with her mother—my grandmother Grace—who was the

  owner of houses, land and businesses in the African areas of Nairobi.

  My mother left Kenya in August 19
54 to join her husband. Th

  is is how

  she remembers the events that were to turn her life upside down:

  Henry was feeling lonely, missed the children. I got the passport, it cost

  twenty shillings. He sent money for the ticket. He told me to sell one of

  his cars. Judith had sold the Citroen because of education for the children.

  Now I had to sell the other one. We went with a plane carrying twenty-

  six people. It took three days. We did not travel at night, but stopped at

  the airport in Malta and Nice. When we got to London my husband and

  Munyua Waiyaki, who is now an MP, were waiting at Hyde Park.

  She recalled that she had a premonition that she might follow her hus-

  band already when he left for Great Britain, two years earlier:

  It is funny. When my husband left and was going to London for six

  months, people at the airport asked me, “why don’t you go,” and I said,

  “I’ll follow”. Why did I say that? My husband was not going to stay in

  London. He was only going to stay for six months or less than that.

  Why did the word come, “I’ll follow”? And that’s what I did, didn’t I?

  I followed aft er that. It is funny to pick a work like that which I didn’t

  expect to say.3

  My mother’s fi rst impressions of London were positive; she observed

  that the white people were friendly, very diff erent from the hostile colo-

  nials in Kenya. However, aft er a while, my parents began to encounter

  racism in England, especially when they were looking for places where

  they could stay together. Th

  ey were confronted with notices that stated,

  ‘No blacks, no children or pets’. My father was staying in Lancaster Gate

  2 Interview with Peter Mwaniki, London, July 2000.

  3 Interview with Ruth Muoria, London, July 2000.

  108

  chapter three

  in a place for male students only. Th

  e Greek owner allowed my mother

  to stay while they looked for alternative accommodation. Eventually

  they found rooms in Kentish Town, close to Camden Town Under-

  ground station. Th

  is was where I was conceived. However, when the

  landlord discovered that my mother was pregnant they had to move,

  as no children were allowed. Th

  eir third home, a basement fl at at 2,

  Huddleston Road, was owned by two Nigerians. Th

  ey did not mind chil-

  dren. Th

  is place was extremely cold in winter as there was no heating.

 

‹ Prev