China and Japan

Home > Other > China and Japan > Page 34
China and Japan Page 34

by Ezra F. Vogel


  mands, which would have given Japan the right to establish schools and re-

  ligious institutions anywhere in China.

  Yuan had no intention of keeping the negotiations confidential and

  he began using a weapon of the weak— global public opinion. He enlisted an

  able young gradu ate of Columbia University, Wellington Koo (Gu Weijun),

  to communicate with the foreign diplomats and the press corps in Beijing to

  generate sympathy for China. Koo, very effective in this assignment, met

  frequently with the Westerners, and as the weeks passed, the image spread

  of a cunning and aggressive Japan taking advantage of a weak China. Once

  the news had gotten out, Yuan started sending groups of Chinese spokesmen

  to New York, Chicago, Washington, London, and elsewhere to speak at

  foreign- affairs gatherings, chambers of commerce, and po liti cal gatherings.

  This model of public diplomacy was followed by Yuan’s successors and

  evolved into what became known as the “China lobby.”

  The U.S. ambassador to Beijing at the time, Paul Reinsch, an academic

  and a devout Christian appointed by Woodrow Wilson, took up the cause

  for China with a passion and became an equally impassioned critic of Japan.

  But the United States was not prepared to do anything except make mor-

  alistic pronouncements. The best efforts by Reinsch resulted in nothing

  more than an official statement: “The United States cannot recognize any

  agreement or undertaking which has been entered into or which may be

  entered into between the government of Japan and China impairing the

  rights of the United States and its citizens in China.” From this time through

  the 1930s, the world came to understand that American criticism would

  not be backed up by action.

  The Chinese publicity campaign was effective, even in Japan, where it

  gave ammunition to Kato’s numerous adversaries, including Hara Takashi.

  Kato’s critics, many of whom learned about the negotiations from the em-

  barrassing articles in the foreign press, tended to focus on the bungled tactics

  rather than the substance of the demands. Many shared the view that Japan

  should solidify its interests in areas such as Liaodong, particularly since Yuan

  seemed so unpredictable. Even some foreign observers noted that the de-

  mands were conventional within the context of the diplomacy of the time.

  However, all factions, including the genro and po liti cal leaders like Hara,

  recognized that Kato had unnecessarily provoked the Chinese and, in

  turn, the United States, thereby isolating Japan in international affairs.

  . 213 .

  china and japan

  Versailles, 1919

  Many in the Chinese government pinned their hopes on the Versailles peace

  conference to block Japan’s expansion into China. Woodrow Wilson’s

  speeches about national self- determination and his opposition to colo-

  nialism had raised the hopes of China’s leaders.

  The first issue for China was determining who would go to Paris, and

  the second issue was how to fund the trip. In all, China sent fifty delegates,

  including several non- Chinese advisers. Some of the key Chinese delegates

  would become familiar faces as they represented vari ous Chinese govern-

  ments and factions over the years. They included Wellington Koo, who was

  then ambassador to Washington from the Beijing government of warlord

  Duan Qirui; Alfred Sze, who had been educated at Cornell and was serving

  as minister to London; and C. T. Wang, a gradu ate of Yale, originally from

  Shanghai, who was in Washington representing a rival faction from Guang-

  zhou. The funding came from a loan taken out by Duan Qirui. Although

  the group was highly fragmented, the Chinese were united in their goal to

  recover the German territories from the Japa nese.

  In the end, the Chinese failed. No Asia issue was a high priority at the

  peace conference, particularly for the Americans. The Japa nese del e ga tion

  was defeated in its efforts to incorporate a clause into the Covenant of the

  League of Nations prohibiting racial discrimination, although the Chinese

  delegate Wellington Koo supported Japan on this issue. Then, when some

  members of Japan’s del e ga tion threatened to bolt from the conference if they

  were not allowed to take over German rights in Shandong, the American

  del e ga tion supported the Japa nese for fear their most impor tant achieve-

  ment, the League of Nations, would come unraveled without Japan. Because

  China lost its rights in Shandong, it was the only country that did not sign

  the Treaty of Versailles that concluded World War I. After China’s efforts

  failed, Ambassador Reinsch, Wilson’s appointee in China, resigned from

  his position, declaring, “The Chinese trusted Amer i ca, they trusted the fre-

  quent declarations of princi ple uttered by President Wilson, whose words

  had reached China in its remotest parts. . . . It sickened and disheartened

  me to think how the Chinese people would receive this blow which meant

  the blasting of their hopes and the destruction of their confidence in the

  equity of nations.”

  . 214 .

  Po liti cal Disorder and the Road to War, 1911–1937

  When word reached Beijing and Shanghai that China had lost its rights

  in Shandong, Chinese youths demonstrated in protest, sparking a move-

  ment of young intellectuals that many saw as the birth of a new China. The

  demonstrations in Beijing continued for weeks and spread to other cities.

  The eruption of public gatherings and the writings that followed after May 4

  flourished in an environment of new institutional developments, especially

  the establishment of new universities, that had taken place in China in the

  years before 1919. The modern universities that were opened in China as

  the old examination system was eliminated had attracted large numbers of

  students, who lived together, interacted, and, as in other countries with large

  universities, developed a sense of camaraderie and a youth culture. Assem-

  bled together and studying new ideas, it was easy for students to or ga nize

  and take to the streets. China’s defeat at Versailles led to a breakthrough,

  as young Chinese intellectuals began expanding their public involvement

  in national issues.

  The Washington Conference, Hara Takashi,

  and Shidehara Kijuro

  After the Versailles Treaty brought an end to World War I but failed to

  address China’s issues or Asia generally, the United States or ga nized the

  Washington Conference, the brainchild of Charles Evans Hughes, U.S. sec-

  retary of state under the Harding administration. The goals of the confer-

  ence were to rein in the expensive race among the world’s naval powers to

  build new ships and “to address misunderstandings which could lead to

  military conflict, particularly in China.”

  Washington Conference, 1921–1922

  It was a huge conference, with 100 to 150 delegates taking part from each of

  the participating countries: Belgium, Britain (with representatives from

  Australia, Canada, India, and New Zealand), China, France, Italy, Japan,

  the Netherlands, Portugal, and the United States. The conference lasted


  from November 12, 1921, to February 6, 1922. Germany and Rus sia were not

  participants, and some criticized the conference as an Anglo- Saxon– led

  venture.

  . 215 .

  china and japan

  The Chinese participants welcomed the conference as an opportunity

  to right the wrongs of the Versailles Treaty. As at Versailles, the decision

  about who should represent China was complex. In May 1921 a rump par-

  liament in Guangzhou had elected Sun Yat- sen as president of China, and

  when Secretary of State Hughes suggested that Beijing and Sun Yat- sen’s

  government should both send representatives, Sun refused, claiming that

  his government was the only true government of China. More than 100 Chi-

  nese representatives from the Beijing government attended the conference,

  including, once again, Wellington Koo and Alfred Sze. But it was not clear

  how much of China the Beijing government controlled, nor was it clear who

  was in charge in Beijing. When the del e ga tion departed China, the govern-

  ment was headed by the warlord Duan Qirui, but midway through the con-

  ference Duan was deposed by the Manchurian warlord Zhang Zuolin.

  Although the Chinese delegates were accorded the re spect and dignity of

  diplomats, it was known that they could not lay claim to representing a uni-

  fied China.

  Many in the Japa nese government initially viewed the Washington Con-

  ference with suspicion. Some had criticized President Woodrow Wilson’s

  style as “moralistic aggressiveness,” and they had not yet figured out the new

  Republican administration under Warren Harding. But Prime Minister

  Hara endorsed the goals of the conference and saw it as an opportunity to

  soften the blow of the Twenty- One Demands by returning the German ter-

  ritories to China and also to improve Japan’s standing with the United

  States. Hara welcomed the chance to cut military expenditures as well. He

  appointed Admiral Kato Tomosaburo to serve as head of Japan’s del e ga-

  tion. Kato was a hero of the Russo- Japanese War and a person with enough

  clout to get military support for arms limitations. A key participant was

  Shidehara Kijuro, who was serving at the time as ambassador to the United

  States.

  According to agreed- upon conference procedures, any agreement by

  the conference required the consent of all; for the China portion of the con-

  ference, nine nations had to agree. Elihu Root, a former U.S. secretary of

  state and senator, drafted a resolution regarding China that was sufficiently

  abstract that all nine nations agreed. The nations resolved that they would:

  re spect the sovereignty, territorial, and administrative integrity of China;

  provide the fullest opportunity for China to develop and maintain itself as

  . 216 .

  Po liti cal Disorder and the Road to War, 1911–1937

  an effective stable government; aim to maintain equal opportunity for com-

  merce and industry for all nations throughout the territory of China; and

  refrain from taking advantage of the pre sent conditions in China to seek

  special rights or privileges that would abridge the rights of the subjects or

  citizens of friendly states, or countenance actions inimical to the security

  of the states.

  At the conference, Wellington Koo and Alfred Sze established good

  working relationships with Shidehara Kijuro and his assistant, Saburi

  Sadao. They had originally become acquainted at the Paris Peace Confer-

  ence, and the intense four months they spent together in Washington helped

  solidify their relationship. Saburi observed that in contrast to Paris, where

  participants were looking out for their respective national interests, in Wash-

  ington they were more of a cross- national team trying to resolve mutual

  prob lems. Like Shidehara, Saburi was a well- trained young diplomat who

  had held several postings in China. He was married to the daughter of dip-

  lomat Komura Jutaro, a former classmate of Theodore Roo se velt at Har-

  vard who had negotiated the Portsmouth Treaty to end the Russo- Japanese

  War. During the conference, Shidehara became ill, so Saburi covered for

  him in many of the meetings with Koo and Sze.

  Prior to the Washington Conference, under Prime Minister Hara’s guid-

  ance Shidehara made plans to negotiate the return of the Shandong Pen-

  insula and Qingdao to China. Together with the Chinese team, the two

  sides agreed on a six- month timetable, with compensation to come from

  the Chinese for Japan’s infrastructure improvements. The British announced

  that if Japan gave up its rights in Qingdao, Britain would give up its rights

  in nearby Weihaiwei. The conference participants did not succeed in com-

  pletely dismantling the complex system of unequal treaties but they made

  pro gress, and the discussions at the conference served to set the agenda for

  the remainder of the 1920s on issues such as tariff autonomy. Shidehara put

  together a team, including Saburi and also Yada Shichitaro, that continued

  to work on China- related issues after the conference. Yada, who had served

  in several positions in China, is quoted as saying that the prob lems of Japan

  and China could not be solved until the unequal treaties, an affront to Chi-

  nese sovereignty, were removed. The one issue that the Japa nese were not

  willing to put on the agenda was Manchuria, including Japan’s rights in the

  Liaodong Peninsula.

  . 217 .

  china and japan

  The Washington Conference was a success, with some qualifications.

  The large naval powers agreed to stop their race to build huge, expensive

  battleships, but they continued to build lighter destroyers, frigates, and sub-

  marines. Aircraft carriers were also still being developed. The powers with

  interests in China came to some agreement on basic issues, such as tariff

  structures, postal ser vices, and contested areas like the Shandong Penin-

  sula. Issues that were impor tant for Chinese sovereignty, such as legal ju-

  risdiction and the presence of foreign military and foreign police, were doc-

  umented but not solved. The common caveat used by Japan and the

  Western powers was that the unequal treaties could not be fully rescinded

  until China regained unity and control of its territory and could guarantee

  the safety of foreigners living within its borders. The assertion that China

  was not unified was both the cause and the excuse for treating China as less

  than a fully sovereign nation.

  Hara’s Uncompleted Agenda

  Tragically, Prime Minister Hara was shot and killed by an assassin in

  November 1921, just when the del e ga tion was departing Japan to attend the

  Washington Conference. Japan, a country that does not produce many

  strong charismatic politicians, was robbed of one of its best at a crucial

  moment. Prior to becoming prime minister in 1918 at the age of sixty- two,

  Hara had been a diplomat, had served in several cabinet- level posts, and had

  chaired Japan’s first major po liti cal party. After years of “transcendental cabi-

  nets” in which the prime minister was chosen by the emperor and the genro,

  not by the Diet, Hara’s was the first “
normal cabinet,” meaning a cabinet in

  which the prime minister and most of the cabinet members were members

  of the majority party, in this case the Seiyukai Party. Hara had said he could

  have done much more to improve the governance system established by the

  Meiji Constitution if he had become prime minister ten years earlier.

  Hara had several objectives during his administration that were reflected

  in the way he managed preparations for the Washington Conference. First,

  immediately prior to becoming prime minister Hara took a private study

  tour to the United States and China. He was surprised by the dynamism

  of the United States and shocked by the strong anti- Japanese sentiment in

  China. He de cided that Japan should try to develop good relations with the

  . 218 .

  Po liti cal Disorder and the Road to War, 1911–1937

  United States and ameliorate its bad relations with China. Second, he

  wanted to establish civilian control of the military and break the ability of

  the army or the navy to topple a cabinet by withdrawing its minister. For

  this reason, when he appointed Admiral Kato as chief delegate to the Wash-

  ington Conference, Hara appointed himself as interim minister of the

  navy. It was a significant move in the context of the Meiji Constitution, and

  Hara made sure that he had Yamagata Aritomo’s full support for the deci-

  sion. As another step toward civilian control, Hara changed the governor-

  generalship in Taiwan from a military to a civilian position.

  In 1922, the year after Hara was assassinated, Yamagata Aritomo, the

  father of Japan’s modern military, died. These two deaths left a hole in Japan’s

  governing structure nearly as large as that left by the death of the Meiji em-

  peror. Even though the two men were very diff er ent in personality and ide-

  ology, they had developed a solid working relationship, and Hara was skil ed

  at convincing Yamagata, the stubborn field marshal, to cooperate in ad-

  dressing some of the weaknesses of the Meiji system, such as the need to

  strengthen civilian control and the military chain of command. Unfortu-

  nately, their reforms were still incomplete when they died, and the weaknesses

  that they left behind became prob lems, particularly for Japan’s China policy.

  From Shidehara Diplomacy to Preparations for War

  After Hara’s assassination, Finance Minister Takahashi Korekiyo was ap-

 

‹ Prev