Saving Grace (What Doesn’t Kill You, #1): A Katie Romantic Mystery

Home > Mystery > Saving Grace (What Doesn’t Kill You, #1): A Katie Romantic Mystery > Page 60
Saving Grace (What Doesn’t Kill You, #1): A Katie Romantic Mystery Page 60

by Pamela Fagan Hutchins

How did the Bradys do it?

  Blendering Principle #1: It’s hard to get anywhere if you don’t know where you’re going.

  Most of the members of my generation know all we need to know about blended families from the Brady Bunch, right?

  Not.

  Please, folks. That was just a sappy television show, and didn’t Florence Henderson have an affair IRL with one of the TV sons? Sounds a lot like incest to me. We clearly need a new set of role models, yet I'd be vacationing in Fiji right now if I had a nickel for every time someone said to me, "Oh! You're just like the Brady Bunch!"

  The Bradys wove their magic through engaging scripts and clever sets, cute young actors and the star power of Florence Henderson. Eric and I didn’t have those crutches to lean on. Neither will you.

  Real blended families start with two adults who want to pledge their troth, which in English means they want to marry. Or at least cohabitate with commitment. Oh, hell, maybe not even that. But that conundrum brings us to the genesis of our blended family success, and IMHO, a critical element.

  Each of our kids had already endured one familial breakup. Were we ready to provide them stability and an example of enduring love? If not, why would we knowingly put them through sure trauma again? Nothing is certain in life, but Eric and I were all in. Not only were we all in, but we both had a consuming desire to demonstrate to our children the type of relationship we dreamed of for them, and neither of us felt like we had done so in our past lives. Scratch that. We absolutely knew we had not done so in our past lives.

  So, we were madly in love and promised forever. Believed forever. Were confident in forever.

  Still, this left a lot up to chance.

  Pretend for a second that you married a touchy-feely HR consultant. Imagine that she had a penchant for things like mission, vision, and values statements. Picture her love of goal-setting and accountability. Some of you have mentally drawn up your divorce papers already.

  Eric didn’t. He and I created a relationship operating agreement (ROA) for ourselves as a couple. I may or may not have promised years of sexual favors to secure his participation, but his attitude about the project was good. Now, this isn’t a relationship book. Well, it is, in a way. It is a book about our relationships with our children within a blended family. But it is not a couples’ relationship book, so I’ll spare you the gory details behind the ROA.

  While we entered into our ROA to make our great relationship stronger, we did so knowing it would set the framework for co-parenting. Why? Because our kids were the most important things to each of us, besides one another. And since most second marriages break down over issues of stepparenting, money, or sex. Hell, many first marriages crash and burn on those issues. We had less than ideal co-parenting relationships with our exes, for sure.

  So here’s how our ROA looks:

  Our (Exceptionally Wonderful) Marriage

  Mantra: Make it all small stuff.

  Our relationship’s purpose is to create a loving, nurturing, safe environment that enables us to

  1make a positive, joyful difference in each other’s lives,

  2respect each other’s needs and differences,

  3encourage each other’s spiritual, emotional, and physical needs and development,

  4practice caring, open communication,

  5role-model loving relationships to our children,

  6and

  7work as partners when we parent and make major decisions.

  Because we recognize that life is not always about the incredible highs, we are committed to these strategies:

  1Stop, breathe, and be calm.

  2Allow ourselves to cherish and be cherished.

  3Be positive. Assume a positive intent and give a positive response. Speak your mind as positively as possible.

  4Be reasonable. Am I being oversensitive? Am I dragging my own issues in unnecessarily?

  5Be considerate. Is there anything to gain from what I am about to say? Is this the right time to say it?

  6Be respectful. Don’t mope, don’t name-call, don’t yell, don’t be sarcastic.

  7Be open. Explain your intent.

  8Be present. Don’t walk away, physically or emotionally.

  9Be aware of time and energy. After 60 minutes, stop talking. Schedule another conversation for 24 hours later if there’s no resolution.

  10Make it safe to cry "calf rope."

  11Be it. Do the behaviors you’re seeking in each other within an hour of the first conversation.

  12Be loving. Don’t go to bed angry or with things unresolved.

  He asks of her:

  2Trust and have faith that I love you, enough that we don’t have to solve everything the second it happens.

  3Assume a positive intent.

  4Listen, don’t interrupt.

  5Don’t be sarcastic.

  She asks of him:

  3Come back to me faster and don’t drag things out, because I need you.

  4Speak your mind assertively, and don’t be sarcastic.

  5Don’t assume the actions I take are always because of you.

  6Assume a positive intent.

  We didn’t get this smart on our own. Both of us were trained to draft this type of agreement in our work lives, one of us more than the other. I specialize in working with hyper-competitive, confident-bordering-on-egomaniacal executives who are somewhat lacking in people skills, so I’ve spent years mediating, soothing, recalibrating, and at times walloping high-level business people into line. One of the best tools to get all the warring co-workers from different backgrounds to reach détente is an operating agreement. Even better? An operating agreement grounded in shared values, vision, and mission.

  This worked so well for me with one of my problem executives that we ended up married. In fact, you just read our operating agreement.

  Blendering Principle #2: Your mom was almost right: Do unto others as they would have done unto them.

  So we addressed parenting, but more importantly, we addressed how we would handle ourselves in situations of higher stress and greater conflict. All of our commitments about behavior applied equally to the parenting context. Now, when a parent/stepparent decision point arose, we could act in accordance with pre-agreed principles.

  Or we could try.

  Execution got a little sloppy at times. When it did, we always had the agreement to return to, a touchstone, a refocusing point, a document which reminded us that for all we didn’t agree on, there was oh-so-much-more that we did.

  We filtered our day-to-day co-parenting decisions through this model. Chores, allowances, length of skirts, cell phones—you name it, we used it. Even better, we used it when we designed our family structure and plan. Did I mention I believe in planning? I believe in plans. And I believe in modifying the plan within the context of agreed principles when new circumstances arise. We got the chance for a lot of planning and re-planning, right from the start.

  When Eric and I first married, his eldest son Thomas had graduated from college and had a real job, Eric’s middle daughter Marie was entering college in the South, and his youngest daughter Liz lived with her mother on the East Coast. My Susanne was in elementary school, and my ADHD son Clark was in middle school; they split their time between their father and me. Our original parenting plan called for the two youngest kids to live mostly with us, for Liz to visit frequently, and for us to see Marie and Thomas as often as possible.

  We envisioned all of our children, and someday their children, in our home as frequently as we could get them there. We bought a house in a great school district in Houston, with a veritable dormitory of four bedrooms upstairs and our master bedroom on the far side of the downstairs—because we love our kids even more from a distance. And how could we resist this house? It has a lush back yard with a three-level pond full of fat goldfish and koi that reminds us of the home we left behind on St. Croix in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

  Just as this is not a book about couples’ relationships
, it is also not a book about divorce or custody battles. I could dish on those, but I won’t, because even though I’ve changed the names of all parties in this little tome to protect the innocent[, some things should and will remain private. They were painful. Isn’t that the case in all divorces? You don’t divorce because the relationship exceeded your expectations. You don’t divvy up with a light heart the time you will spend with children you cherish. Most of you don’t, anyway, and we sure didn’t.

  So, for whatever reason, within four months of “I do,” Liz had taken up primary residence with us in Texas, and a year later Marie transferred to a university two hours away. I had never pictured myself taking a role of such primacy with two teenage stepdaughters. Teenage girls get a bad rap for good reason. It’s not the easiest time in their lives, or the easiest time for the people that love them, even with great girls like Liz and Marie. Yet this new arrangement fit the model we envisioned. We just needed to flex. A lot.

  I held onto my husband’s hand for dear life and sucked in one deep, cleansing breath after another. We could do this. I could do this. We would have no regrets or remorse, we would give our kids the best we could, and be damn happy doing it. Yeah!

  And so, very carefully and very cautiously, we began to blender.

  Click here to continue reading How To Screw Up Your Kids.

  ~~~

 

‹ Prev