by Kerry Bolton
The State Department is recruiting, training and indoctrinating bellicose ethnic agitators to become the new ‘French governing elite.’
In a move that has been repeated many times in many states that have experienced ‘spontaneous’ (sic) ‘colour revolutions,’ across North Africa and the former Soviet bloc, the U.S. Embassy in Paris has ‘built up one of the best networks and contacts with minorities in civil society’. . . .[62]
Thus, in June 2010, the embassy co-sponsored a seminar for French participants on how to help minorities build a political base. For two days, Karen Finney, a communication strategist for the Democratic Party, and Cornell Belcher, who had worked as a pollster for the Democratic Party, coached seventy local elected representatives and members of associations on how to communicate, fund and manage a political campaign.[63]
This would seem to be a flagrant interference in the political process of a sovereign nation. The U.S. State Department is targeting certain ethnic political blocs, which— with Muslims forming 10 per cent of the population in France—can have a marked influence on electoral outcomes at all levels of society. Is the globalist strategy in France any different from that of the U.S. State Department, the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, Soros’ networks, etc., in training and funding agitators to foment the ‘colour revolutions’ across North Africa, Central Asia, Russia and Eastern Europe, to bring about ‘regime change’?
In addition to the IVLP that grooms potential leaders, the U.S. Embassy has also arranged trips to the United States by eight hip hoppers as part of a musical exchange programme with Harlem, and has assisted Reda Didi, founder and head of the think tank Graines de France, which aids ‘minority politicians,’ with a delegation to go to Chicago as guests of Senator William Burns, to learn about ‘community organising.’[64]
Garrett states that U.S. Embassies across Europe are under instruction to be ‘open to Muslims’ and ‘to court second- and third-generation immigrants.’[65] These are the bellicose, ghettoised youths that cause riots throughout Europe, which the U.S. seeks to ‘court.’ It would be naïve to think that the globalists intend this ‘courtship’ as a means of ‘taming’ these second and third generation ‘immigrants’ by assisting with their acculturation into the host society. Rather, they are being trained in techniques of ethnic agitation, sent to the United States to learn from Black street organisers, and returned to Europe as agitators against their hosts. They are being formed into a power bloc that is expected by the United States to become the new leadership of Europe. These second and third generation ‘immigrants’ have become rootless and deracinated. Hence they are ripe for inculcation with the bastardised subcultures that serve globalist interests, such as hip hop, which are far removed from the traditions of Islam, but are part of the ‘lethal culture’ described by Ralph Peters.
Le Figaro reported of the hip hop delegation that one of the delegation came back to France full of enthusiasm for the ‘American Dream,’ stating: ‘We’re back with another vision of the country. It is one thing to see the United States on television and another to come breathe the country, its energy, its movement. Everything is hip-hop here.’ In Harlem the youth felt that they were meeting their ‘ancestors.’ They were inspired by meeting the Black poet Abiodun Oyewole,[66] a veteran of the Black Panthers, an urban guerrilla group of the 1970s. Hence, the second and third ‘immigration’ generation in France see their hopes in the United States, and they feel kinship with Afro-Americans. Their traditional culture and authority of their elders is replaced by U.S. ghetto subcultures, lacking depth of tradition. It is a phenomenon that is gripping non-White ethnic minorities the world over, from the Maoris and Polynesians in New Zealand to the descendants of West Indians in Britain, who are becoming detached form tribal and ethnic roots and forming new youth subcultures formed in tandem between the American ghettoes and the global music and fashion corporations with the zealous aid of the U.S. State Department. They are on their way to becoming the next breed of humanity: Homo globicus.
The U.S. push in France and elsewhere in Europe comes at a time when other European leaders, such as then French President Sarkozy, German Chancellor Merkel and British Prime Minister David Cameron, have backtracked on the workability of multiculturalism, and have suggested reverting instead to the melting-pot of assimilation.[67] The U.S. strategy in Europe remains however to promote multiculturalism rather than assimilation into the host cultures. The aim of globalisation is to target unassimilated ethnic communities for inculcating not with their own heritage or with the heritage of the host community but with what Ralph Peters calls America’s ‘lethal culture’ of consumerism, MTV, Big Macs, and Coca-Cola, to create a new generation that belongs to nothing in particular and everything in general.
This vision of a multicultural ‘Europe’ is ‘Europe’ in name only, and perhaps one day the name will be changed altogether. U.S. Embassies throughout Europe have been given the lead from the Rivkin programme. The murals project in France was broadened with Deborah MacLean, public diplomacy officer at the U.S. Embassy in Copenhagen, using the programme ‘to reach out to ethnic minorities in Denmark,’ stating: ‘We wanted to encourage these youths to realize that it is okay to be different.’[68]
When expressions such as ‘okay to be different’ are used by the multiculturalists, it is important to realise that this is doublethink. What is being formed through multiculturalism is a uniform global culture based on production and consumption that is unhindered by ethnic, religious, moral and cultural traditions. What these ethnic minority youths are being encouraged to adopt is not the perpetuation of the ethnic traditions of their parents or grandparents, but primarily American-derived pseudo-culture, where young migrants of Third World descent adopt Martin Luther King and Barack Obama as role models and hip hop as their preferred art form, with all the manufactured accoutrements that go with it.
While the Rivkin programme and others of similar type across Europe are being promoted often with references to a strategy of pacifying the disaffected Muslim ghettoes, especially in France, as part of a cunning plan to thwart anti-Americanism, this is not the primary purpose. We have already seen the character of the multicultural ‘outreach’ programmes undertaken by the U.S. State Department, with Rivkin stating that the aim is to change the character of France itself and especially of French youth.
Gilles Kepel, a French academic and expert on Islam in the Paris suburbs, or banlieues, said of the U.S. programme, ‘that it was more than anti-Americanism among Muslims that concerned State Department officials.’[69] Kepel stated:
They [State Department] sort of thought that the French were characterized by a sort of political elite that was non-mixed, that was too white, too male, too old, and that if the country was not more pluralistic, then it would become weaker, and a weaker France was not good as an ally, so they started to reach out to the banlieues.[70]
Kepel is accurately perceiving that the U.S. strategy is to change the very character of the French nation and the French people and culture. Nicolas Dupont-Aignan, a centre-right Member of Parliament, perceptively asked:
How will answer the U.S. government if the French government decided to go in some suburbs of the United States to say to the people, ‘You are not very well treated by your government, and we are going to help you. You are going to travel in France, be agent for us.’ It is not acceptable.[71]
Benjamin Pelletier, a French commentator on international cultural influence, also pertinently asked: ‘What happens when you have a certain segment of the young population that has been influenced by another country acting in its own national interest? Isn’t there a risk of fracturing national cohesion?’[72]
Among the ‘activist’ groups assisted by the U.S. State Department is the Brigade Against Anti-Black Racism.’[73] This is a Black militant organisation that portrays France as a ‘Negrophobe state.’ Brigade ‘activis
ts’ were recently arrested for violence against police, when the ‘activists’ started a fracas outside a presidential event celebrating the abolition of Black slavery.[74] The Brigade is supported by the extreme Left in France,[75] being aligned with the African Socialist International, a revolutionary communist organisation.[76] The stated aim of the Brigade is to ‘focus on Hidden Racism Performed by the French state.’[77] The United States seems to be trying to encourage a strategy of tension in order to pressure France to self-destruct as a European nation. The United States is treating France like a state that is marked for ‘regime change.’
Elsewhere in Europe, in Bulgaria a Blues musician, Steve James, held ‘workshops on the benefits of embracing a multicultural society.’
‘America is a melting pot and nowhere is that more evident than in our artistic culture and in our music,’ said James. ‘Every form of pop music and folk music in America is a direct result of our being a multi-ethnic culture.’ James conducted master’s classes with students from the Music Academy in Plovdiv, Bulgaria, and workshops at three other Bulgarian schools, reaching out to students from ages 8 to 18. ‘Some of these people were really experienced and talented musicians, but they had never seen anyone play this kind of music.’[78]
Young Bulgarians learn how ‘hip’ it is to embrace American-style multiculturalism, with little or no understanding of the way the United States has for decades being falling apart at the seams with racial strife, ghettoisation, crime, infrastructural breakdown, and educational dysfunction where there is a large Black population; let alone the snare of having their own cultural identity replaced by the inherently rootless character of ‘pop music.’ It is also notable that Bulgaria is one of the ex-Soviet states where the globalist fear an upsurge in militant nationalism, and where institutions such as George Soros Open Society networks invest much largesse in ensuring that there is no resurgence of the ‘Right.’[79]
[1] ‘2010 France Country Dialogue,’ PCIP, http://www.pacificcouncil.org/page.aspx?pid=583.
[2] ‘2010 France Country Dialogue,’ ibid.
[3] Nicholas Kralev, ‘Being good at raising money doesn’t make you a good diplomat,’ The Atlantic, 19 March 2013, http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/03/being-good-at-raising-money-doesnt-make-you-a-good-diplomat/274148/.
[4] ‘Founded in 1995 in partnership with the Council on Foreign Relations,’ PCIP, Governance, http://www.pacificcouncil.org/page.aspx?pid=373.
[5] Corporate and Foundation funding: http://www.pacificcouncil.org/page.aspx?pid=513.
[6] France’s ghettoised Third World ethnics.
[7] Devorah Lauter, ‘U.S. envoy in France is making the most of his opportunity,’ Los Angeles Times, 24 April 2010, http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/24/world/la-fg-france-ambassador-20100425.
[8] K. R. Bolton, ‘Obama—cat’s-paw of international capitalism,’ [missing details]
[9] Producers of the Sesame Street series that inculcated multiculturalism into preschoolers, with funding from the Ford Foundation.
[10] Lauter, op. cit.
[11] Simon Berthon, Allies at War (London: Collins, 2001), 21.
[12] Aidan Crawley, De Gaulle: A Biography (London: The Literary Guild, 1969), 439.
[13] K. R. Bolton, ‘Twitters of the World Revolution: The Digital New-New Left,’ Foreign Policy Journal, 28 February 2011, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/28/twitterers-of-the-world-revolution-the-digital-new-new-left/.
Tony Cartalucci, ‘Google’s Revolution Factory—Alliance of Youth Movements: Color Revolution 2.0,’ Global Research, February 23, 2011, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23283.
[14] C. Rivkin, ‘Minority Engagement Report,’ U.S. Embassy, Paris, http://www.wikileaks.fi/cable/2010/01/10PARIS58.html.
[15] G. Pascal Zachary, op. cit.
[16] Rivkin, op. cit.
[17] K. R. Bolton, ‘The Globalist Web of Subversion,’ Foreign Policy Journal, 7 February 2011, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/07/the-globalist-web-of-subversion.
[18] Coined from the 2006 movie, Idiocracy, where the United States’ population has been dumbed-down dysgenically; the most intelligent pursuing careers rather than having families, while the idiots proliferate and are addicted to the banality of mass entertainment. The United States is led by a ghetto Black and his Cabinet includes a youngster who won the post in a game-show. ‘Advertising, commercialism, and cultural anti-intellectualism have run rampant and dysgenic pressure has resulted in a uniformly stupid society . . .’ ‘Idiocracy,’ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy.
[19] Rivkin, op. cit.
[20] Ibid.
[21] Ibid.
[22] Ibid.
[23] Ibid.
[24] ‘President Gerald R. Ford’s Message on the Observance of Black History Month,’ 10 February 1976, Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum, University of Texas, http://www.ford.utexas.edu/library/speeches/760074.htm.
[25] Citizenship and Immigration Canada, http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/multiculturalism/black/background.asp.
[26] Black History Month UK, http://www.black-history-month.co.uk/sitea/BHM_FAQ.html.
[27] ‘Spirit of Black Paris,’ http://spiritofblackparis.blogspot.co.nz/2013/02/whats-focus-of-black-history-month-in.html.
[28] Ibid.
[29] Monique Wells, ‘Black Paris and the Myth of a Colorblind France,’ Embassy of the Untied State, Paris, 9 February 2010, http://france.usembassy.gov/events100209.html.
[30] Ibid.
[31] Ibid.
[32] K. R. Bolton, The Psychotic Left (London: Black House Publishing, 2013), 190–92.
[33] M. Wells, op. cit.
[34] Anita Elash, ‘U.S. accused of meddling in France’s immigration policies,’ Globe & Mail, 17 February 2011, http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/europe/us-accused-of-meddling-in-frances-immigrant-policies/article1910663/?service=mobile.
[35] Ibid.
[36] Ibid.
[37] ‘A dialogue between local citizens, artists and urban spaces: Three murals are born in Bagnolet, Bondy and Villiers-le-Bel,’ U.S. Embassy in Paris, http://france.usembassy.gov/event090726.html.
[38] ‘Ambassador inaugurates in Paris suburbs Franco-American exchange program on mural art,’ U.S. Embassy in Paris, 19 September 2009, http://france.usembassy.gov/event090919.html.
[39] Martin Luther King, ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail,’ 1963, http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/resources/article/annotated_letter_from_birmingham/.
[40] ‘A Summing Up: Louis Lomax Interviews Malcolm X,’ 1963, http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/a-summing-up-louis-lomax-interviews-malcolm-x/. Here Malcolm X refers to Martin Luther King as an ‘Uncle Tom’ subsidised by ‘whites.’
[41] The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, vol. 1 (Boston: Historical Research Department, Nation of Islam, 1994).
[42] Anita Elash, ‘In France, U.S. advocacy for Muslim rights raises more than a few hackles,’ Christian Science Monitor, 17 February 2011, http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2011/0217/In-France-US-advocacy-for-Muslim-rights-raises-more-than-a-few-hackles?nav=topic-tag_topic_page-storyList.
[43] Ibid.
[44] Ibid.
[45] Jeff Steiner, “Americans in France: Culture: McDonalds in France,” http://www.americansinfrance.net/culture/mcdonalds_in_france.cfm.
[46] Elash, Globe & Mail, op. cit.
[47] Ibid.
[4
8] European Institute, ‘Mission,’ http://www.europeaninstitute.org/200905301/Welcome-and-Mission/welcome-and-mission.html.
[49] http://www.europeaninstitute.org/Board-Biographies/yves-andre-istel.html.
[50] ‘Board of Directors,’ http://www.europeaninstitute.org/200905302/Boards/boards.html.
[51] Garrett Martin, ‘In Smart-Power Shift, U.S. Now Actively Cultivating Muslim Minorities in the EU,’ European Affairs, April 2011, http://www.europeaninstitute.org/EA-April-2011/in-smart-power-shift-us-now-actively-cultivating-muslim-minorities-in-the-eu.html.
[52] Ibid.
[53] Ibid.
[54] Ibid.
[55] Ibid.
[56] K. R. Bolton, ‘What’s Behind the Tumult in Egypt?,’ Foreign Policy Journal, 1 February 2011, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/01/whats-behind-the-tumult-in-egypt/2/.
[57] Garrett, op. cit.
