A Companion to the American Short Story

Home > Other > A Companion to the American Short Story > Page 44
A Companion to the American Short Story Page 44

by Alfred Bendixen


  women by 1920); near universal school attendance (enrollments reached 86 percent

  by 1920); the passing between 1900 and 1916 by most states of minimum working

  age laws (and limitation of hours of work to less than ten); the Pendleton Civil Service

  Short Fiction and Social Change

  197

  Act (1883), which rooted out corruption in the Civil Service; the Interstate Commerce

  Act (1887), which created the fi rst true federal regulatory agency; the New York State

  Tenement House Act (1901); the Pure Food and Drug Act (1906); the Meat Inspec-

  tion Act (1906); the Antiquities Act (protection of Native American “ antiquities ” )

  (1906); the Mann Act (1910; formally known as the “ White - Slave Traffi c Act ” ), which

  criminalized transportation of women across state lines “ for the purpose of prostitution

  or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose ” ; the 16th Amendment (income tax)

  (1913); the 17th Amendment (popular election of Senators) (1913); the Federal

  Reserve Act (1913); the Federal Trade Commission Act (1914); the Clayton Antitrust

  Act (1914); the Child Labor Act (1916, though overturned in 1918 by the Supreme

  Court), which prohibited products of child labor to be sold across state lines; the

  Adamson Act (1916), which instituted an eight - hour work day for railroad workers;

  the 18th Amendment (Prohibition) (1919); and the 19th Amendment (Women ’ s

  Suffrage) (1920).

  One of the most powerful genres of social change fi ction in this period was anti -

  capitalist fi ction, which focuses on such topics as industrial working conditions, the

  exploitation of farmers, the corrupt practices of industrialists, and life in the tene-

  ments. Stylistically, such stories appear in dystopian, utopian, and realist form.

  Perhaps the era ’ s most successful writer of such radical short fi ction was Jack London,

  whose stories often parallel the arguments of his many lectures on socialism – lectures

  that inspired such headlines as, “ One of the World ’ s Great Authorities on Socialism

  Analyses Campaign Made in Behalf of Eugene V. Debs

  ”

  (

  San Francisco Examiner

  November 10, 1904: 3) – and whose fi ction was highly praised by Lenin, Trotsky,

  Debs, Big Bill Haywood, and Bukharin. Such stories fi t several genres, ranging from

  science fi ction and horror to realism. 22 Among the most well - known of these is “ The

  Apostate ” (1906), partly based on London ’ s experience working in a jute mill at age

  16. The protagonist, Johnny, is turned into both machine and beast by industrial

  work; he is an exploited child forced into the world too soon, prematurely old, yet

  never having been allowed to grow up. Although only a few years older than his

  siblings, having gone to work in a factory aged 7, at 16, he was “ very old, while they

  were distressingly young ” ( “ Apostate ” 124). Johnny, in fact, was born among machines,

  on the factory fl oor, foreshadowing his destiny, “ drawing with his fi rst breath the

  warm moist air that was thick with fl ying lint. He had coughed that fi rst day in order

  to rid his lungs of the lint; and for the same reason he had coughed ever since ” (122);

  here London echoes Melville, in “ Tartarus of Maids, ” when the latter describes how

  in the paper factory “ the air swam with the fi ne poisonous particles [of lint], which

  from all sides darted, subtilely [ sic ] … into the lungs ” (Melville, “ Tartarus ” 222).

  From “ the perfect worker [Johnny] had evolved into the perfect machine. … There

  had never been a time when he had not been in intimate relationship with machines ”

  ( “ Apostate ” 121 – 2). Johnny, naturalistically shaped by his environment, embodies

  the dehumanizing, yet highly effi cient mode of work that Frederick Winslow Taylor

  called for fi ve years later in The Principles of Scientifi c Management : “ All waste move-

  ments were eliminated. Every motion of his thin arms, every movement of a muscle

  198

  Andrew J. Furer

  in the thin fi ngers, was swift and accurate … his mind had gone to sleep … He was

  a work - beast ” (127, 128, 129).

  Throughout the story, London describes him as either brute or machine, the two

  poles of the inhuman. 23 Johnny is stunted both physically and mentally; when he

  fi nally rebels, and leaves the factory to become a hobo, as London himself did in 1894,

  all of his humanity has been drained out of him by industrial work. The eloquence

  of London ’ s call for child labor reform is perhaps most evident in his fi nal description

  of Johnny, a description that also could easily be applied to Davis ’ s steelworkers: “ He

  did not walk like a man. He did not look like a man. He was a travesty of the human.

  It was a twisted and stunted and nameless piece of life that shambled like a sickly

  ape, arms loose - hanging, stoop - shouldered, narrow - chested, grotesque and terrible ”

  (134). Our sympathy is roused for Johnny ’ s plight here not primarily through senti-

  mental or domestic techniques, but rather by London ’ s directly confronting us with

  the dehumanizing effects of industrial labor. Although Johnny, unlike such later

  London anti - capitalist protagonists as Ernest Everhard or Freddie Drummond, does

  not violently resist the forces of capital, his heretical abandonment of it is as much

  of a direct confrontation (hence his mother ’ s horror and shock) as throwing a bomb

  or beating a scab would be.

  Other notable anti - capitalist stories of London ’ s include “ The Dream of Debs ”

  (1909/1914) , “ South of the Slot ” (1909/1914) , and “ The Strength of the Strong ”

  (1911/1914) . The fi rst describes through the eyes of a wealthy man a successful general

  strike that paralyzes the country; at the end he states, “ I never want to see another

  one. It was worse than a war … the brain of man should be capable of running industry

  in a more rational way ” ( “ Debs ” 1277 – 8). The second shows the conversion of a

  repressed, upper middle - class sociology professor, Freddie Drummond, into his fi ery

  working - class alter ego, Bill Totts. Drummond at fi rst adopts this persona as a dis-

  guise to further his research into labor – capital disputes; eventually, however, he leaves

  his former self behind, disappearing “ into the labor ghetto ” ( “ Slot ” 1594), symbol-

  izing the superior vigor and eventual triumph of the working classes over their oppres-

  sors. In later years, “ no more lectures were given in the University of California by

  one Drummond and no more books on economics and the labor question appeared

  over the name of Frederick A. Drummond. On the other hand, there arose a new labor

  leader, William Totts ” (1594). London implies that forever after, Drummond/Totts

  will violently resist the oppression of capitalism, beating up scabs and capital ’ s enforc-

  ers, the police, at every turn: “ A rush of three [policemen] … locked with Bill Totts

  in a gigantic clinch, during which his scalp was opened up by a club, and coat, vest

  and half his starched shirt were torn from him. But the three policemen were fl ung

  far and wide … and … Totts held the fort ” (1593). The third story is a socialist

  parable that answers Rudyard Kipling ’ s anti - socialist story �
�� Melissa ” (1908) by

  showing that the “ strength of the strong ” is not that of the “ superman, ” but rather

  that of cooperation: when such cooperation is achieved, says a member of the tribe,

  “ ‘ nothing will withstand us, for the strength of each man will be the strength of all

  men in the world ’ ” ( “ Strong ” 1578). All of these stories exploit the masculinist tropes

  Short Fiction and Social Change

  199

  of battle and confl ict – rather than those of domesticity – to show their readers the

  most effective path to social change, namely to fi ght for one ’ s beliefs.

  Other writers of Progressive Era anti - capitalist fi ction include Hamlin Garland,

  whose Main - Traveled Roads (1891) contains a number of anti - capitalist stories, such

  as “ Under the Lion ’ s Paw, ” which illustrates the greed endemic to capitalist specula-

  tion. Haskins, a farmer, having been rescued by a fellow farmer, Council, works hard

  to improve a farm leased to him by Butler, a local speculator: “ no slave in the Roman

  galleys could have toiled so frightfully and lived … There is no despair so deep as

  the despair of a homeless man or woman … It was the memory of this homelessness,

  and the fear of it coming again, that spurred … Haskins and Nettie … to such fero-

  cious labor during that fi rst year ” (234 – 5). After their work has substantially improved

  the farm, Butler nearly doubles the purchase price and gives Haskins no credit for his

  improvements, baldly declaring, “ ‘ the land has doubled in value, it don ’ t matter how.

  … Never trust anybody, friend. … Don ’ t take me for a thief. It ’ s the law. The reg ’ lar

  thing. Everybody does it ’ ” (239). Under capitalism, the “ lion, ” Garland is saying,

  such exploitation of the downtrodden is routine.

  As suggested above, one of the major issues addressed in workers ’ rights stories

  was the living conditions of the poor, some of which, like the London texts previously

  discussed, or those in James Oppenheim ’ s Pay Envelopes (1911) , indict the capitalist

  system, and others of which, like those in Jacob Riis ’ s Neighbors: Stories of the Other

  Half (1914) , and Children of the Tenements (1903) , suggest the need for change, but

  within the system. Riis deliberately blurs the line between fact and fi ction, a powerful

  rhetorical strategy for convincing the reader of the urgency of social change. Both of

  his fi ction collections include prefaces that stress that – for the most part – he has

  merely changed individual and place names in his texts. He expects that his readers

  will be more likely to be infl uenced by “ true stories ” (a common stratagem in reform

  fi ction), than they were by his wildly successful journalistic expos é , How the Other Half

  Lives (1890) . 24

  In

  “

  The Problem of the Widow Salvini,

  ”

  from

  Neighbors

  , Riis emphasizes the

  intractability of tenement life and its dominant form of work, sweated labor, which

  he calls “ industrial slavery ” ( “ Salvini ” 57), describing three “ curses of the tenement ”

  (59): home sweat work, lodgers crammed into tiny apartments, and child labor. In

  “ What the Christmas Sun Saw in the Tenements ” from his 1903 collection, he pounds

  home the grimness and tragedies of life among the tenements through several vignettes,

  including that of a little girl, “ barefooted and in rags ” (Riis, “ Sun ” 134) sent to procure

  a pint of beer for her mother, clearly a corruption of domestic purity. Later, she returns

  to a tenement apartment, “ windowless, airless, and sunless, but rented at a price that

  a millionaire would denounce as robbery ” (136). As the narrator notes, “ There are no

  homes in New York ’ s poor tenements ” (139). Continuing with a miniature fi ctional-

  ized version of his tenement travelogue in How the Other Half Lives, he then vividly

  depicts young white girls enslaved to the opium pipe in Chinatown (142), concluding

  his story with a view of Potter ’ s Field, implying the premature, nameless end to tene-

  ment lives, through “ the shadows of countless headstones that bear no names, only

  200

  Andrew J. Furer

  numbers ” (148). He thus both draws in his readers through reference to a common

  and usually joyous, experience, Christmas, and then savagely undermines their expec-

  tations, hoping to propel them to clamor for reform. These are conventional senti-

  mental representations of the powerless poor, quite different from London ’ s Johnny.

  Working - class life is grim in both texts, but Johnny is not helpless; he acts. London

  – unlike Riis – wants to rely not merely on the goodwill of the middle class, but also

  on workers ’ own actions.

  Oppenheim ’ s Pay Envelopes collection is often equally melodramatic. Its preface,

  “ Troubles of the Workshop, ” baldly states the critique dramatized by its stories: “ the

  murder of men through twelve - hour days, child labor, and unprotected machinery;

  the struggle between labor and capital; the fi ghts for sanitation ” ( “ Troubles ” 11), and

  proclaims the necessity for fi ction dedicated to social change, a need convincingly

  illustrated by many of the writers we have been discussing: “ In America, we must

  interpret one race to another; one class to another; one type to another, before we will

  ever feel that all have the same essential humanness ” (14). In Oppenheim ’ s view –

  supported by many writers ’ use of the tropes previously discussed (domesticity, for

  example) – stories aimed at social change engage in acts of class translation to bring

  middle - class readers into the working - class ’ s world.

  For Oppenheim, such interpretation can involve the provoking of both sympathy

  and fear in the reader. In “ The Great Fear, ” Oppenheim elicits readers ’ sympathies by

  telling the tale of a young couple with a new baby (an effective subject for reform

  fi ction, as we saw in Butler ’ s “ Emma Alton ” ) devastated by unemployment, leading

  them to the verge of what Jack London calls the “ social pit ” in works such as The

  People of the Abyss (1902). The author continues to use well - worn tropes of the domestic

  to engage his readers, yet he also begins to add masculine tropes of at least the threat

  of violence. The couple ’ s “ great fear ” is the fear of unemployment and starvation, yet

  the story also conveys the idea that, according to the husband, workers are “ ‘ slaves

  – slaves ’ ” ; and that, if changes aren ’ t made, “ ‘ this country better look out ’ ” (26). This statement reveals a double meaning in the title: the workers fear unemployment, but

  so should middle - and upper - class readers, lest they be confronted by Riis ’ s “ Man

  with a Knife ” ( Other Half 207).

  Many writers of the period produced short stories meant to address problems of

  race and ethnicity in a society that was becoming ever more rapidly multicultural.

  Interestingly, in addition to many non - Protestant or non - white writers invested in

  interpreting their own cultures for a predominantly Protestant Euro - American audi-

  ence, one of the most eloquent voices of anti - racism – despite his reputation otherwise

&nbs
p; – is Jack London. Indeed, he seems to have written nearly as many anti - racist stories

  as anti - capitalist ones; London ’ s protest fi ction, like his work as a whole, covers mul-

  tiple topics, on multiple levels. 25

  As I have discussed at length in “ ‘ Zone - Conquerors ’ and ‘ White Devils ’ : The

  Contradictions of Race in the Works of Jack London, ” London ’ s attitudes towards

  race are complex and confl icted. London was, as it were, constituted by a series of

  contradictions: superman socialist, racist/anti - racist, etc. In many of his stories (and

  Short Fiction and Social Change

  201

  it is more often in his stories than his novels that this is the case), he displays profound

  sympathy, and even outrage, at the ways in which Euro - Americans have exploited,

  and often destroyed, non - whites. Among his nine or so anti - racist stories, several of

  the most notable are “ Chun Ah Chun ” (1912/1914) , “ Koolau, the Leper ” (1909/1912)

  and “ The Mexican ” (1911/1913) . 26

  The fi rst of these explodes the kind of anti - Chinese attitudes manifested by the

  Chinese Exclusion Acts, by illustrating the brilliance and power of its title character:

  “ He was essentially a philosopher, and whether as coolie, or multi - millionaire and

  master of many men, his poise of soul was the same ” ( “ Chun Ah Chun ” 1455). A man

  of great vision, Chun imagines Honolulu as a modern city with electricity while it is

  still a primitive sandblasted settlement set on a coral reef. London also shows that,

  contrary to popular belief, the Chinese can become part of the American melting pot;

  while Chun Ah Chun himself retires to China, his children, among whom “ the blend

  of races was excellent ” (1458), go to Harvard, Oxford, Yale, Mills College, Vassar,

  Wellesley, and Bryn Mawr, living the American dream.

  In “ Koolau, the Leper, ” another Hawaiian tale, London illustrates the devastating

  effects on native peoples of Western colonialism and imperialism, producing a text

  that is both anti - racist and anti - imperialist. Koolau states: “ Because we are sick they

  take away our liberty. We have obeyed the law. We have done no wrong. And yet

  they would put us in prison. Molokai is a prison. … They came like lambs, speaking

 

‹ Prev