Lovers of Sophia

Home > Other > Lovers of Sophia > Page 24
Lovers of Sophia Page 24

by Jason Reza Jorjani


  it would open an evolutionary niche to be filled by ever larger, more

  complex insects to dominate the Earth and build their cities high

  upon the ruins of ours. A similar course of events may have taken

  188

  jason reza jorjani

  place on other planets, or there may be planets where asteroid

  impacts or any one of a million other environmental conditions

  favored the rise of social insects rather than of reptilian or hominid life forms.

  Even now, here on Earth, the social structure of insects is such

  that their collective problem solving capacity is second only to

  that of human beings, although each individual ant or termite

  is far less intelligent than an individual chimp or dolphin.67 In

  the following, I will draw from Simon Conway Morris’ extended

  discussion of the collective intelligence of insects in his book on

  convergent evolution, entitled Life’s Solution.68 Morris, a professor of evolutionary paleobiology at Cambridge University, believes that life

  forms similar to these insects may, on other planets, have evolved

  to be as intelligent and industrious as humans.69 He notes that, for

  example, the Acromyrmex and Atta ants of Central Asia and South America engage in every essential aspect of the activity that we

  call “agriculture”. They maintain gardens, transport plant material,

  weed their crop, apply herbicides extracted from plant material,

  deliberately fertilize their crops with manure, and exchange crop

  cultures.

  The often observed leaf cutting procedures carried out above

  ground by these ants is impressive enough, but the highly complex

  farming techniques take place in underground chambers where

  the attine ants harvest mushrooms. The ants clear and pave roads

  that run from the sites where they cut leaves to their underground

  chambers, and they set up a complex division of labor between leaf

  cutters, secondary leaf cutters who bring the plant material to the

  road, and road travelers who carry the material back to a further

  series of specialized workers underground. Aside from three distinct

  castes, there are also miniaturized versions of these attine ants called

  “minims”. These minims ride on the larger ants to groom and clean

  them, they patrol the edges of trails to warn of approaching dangers,

  67 Simon Conway Morris, Life’s Solution (Cambridge University Press, 2003).

  68 Ibid., 197-229.

  69 Ibid., 229.

  189

  lovers of sophia

  and final y, they are also found riding on top of the transported

  leaf fragments in order to defend the leaf-carriers from attack by

  parasitoid flies. Upon arrival within the entryway to the nest itself, one finds the soldier caste on guard against foreign invasions by

  other insects.

  Within the fungus farm, the leaves are first licked clean of their

  waxy film, so as to prevent infection of the crop by associated

  microorganisms. Then the ants shred the leaf to a pulp and apply

  it to the fungus, which breaks down the plant material and releases

  the cel ulose into fungus, turning it into a crop that can be eaten by the ants. Infected parts of the crop are weeded, first being loosened

  by the minima and then moved away by the larger ants. The minima

  are also tasked with removing alien spores. The ants move the fungi

  around their underground enclosure based on small changes in

  temperature and humidity that might inhibit growth at one location

  but not another. Knob-like ends of the fungus, which are rich in

  proteins and sugars, are specifical y removed from the crop for

  separate consumption. The ants prevent pathogens from invading

  the crop by applying something like an herbicide to the crop, one

  that derives from bacteria that grows on their own bodies and acts

  like an antibiotic.70 These ants also use their excrement as fertilizer, and they do this deliberately. Only some of their waste is used as

  fertilizer for the crop, and at that in a careful y measured manner.

  We know this because they also build vast waste management pits

  that are manned by older workers who are nearing the end of their

  functionality and are not allowed to leave the nest.71

  The constant food supply provided by the agricultural activities

  of these ants allows each colony to grow to include seven million

  members.72 This size is, however, exceeded by more aggressive army

  ant colonies, where the population of a single colony can reach 20

  million. These army ants are as collectively intelligent in waging war as the attine ants are in farming. Their relentless mobile columns can 70 Ibid., 198-200.

  71 Ibid., 205-206.

  72 Ibid., 207.

  190

  jason reza jorjani

  extend tens of meters in length, and they may defy terrain obstacles

  to the advancing front by building bridges using their own bodies.

  Their coordinated action allows them to attack and dismember

  comparatively large prey and carry its pieces back to the nest, prey

  so large that it would be utterly impossible for one or a few ants to

  dismember and transport.73

  The industrious capabilities of termites exceed even those of

  these attine ants. Outside of human engineering, termite nests are

  the most impressive artificial constructions on Earth. Temporary

  and comparatively shoddily built access tunnels from the surface

  lead down into a maze of very careful y constructed branching

  tunnels with few crossroads. The wal s of these tunnels are smoothly

  modeled and curve upwards in the middle at sharp bends, as if to

  form archways. The deep tunnels can run for several kilometers

  in length, with 50 meter tunnels extending up to the surface as

  access routes to foraging areas. The termites apparently cultivate

  fungus, but not to eat it as the attine ants do. Rather, they allow the fungus to break down foraged food into a more digestible form.74

  Experimental set ups have also noticed the construction of latrines

  for waste disposal.75

  The termites construct a complex system of ventilated passages

  that cleanse the mound of excess carbon dioxide and waste gases

  and allow the circulation of fresh oxygen. The size and shape of

  these passages are precisely corrected by worker termites, in order

  to careful y calibrate oxygen levels. The temperature inside the hive

  is also collectively regulated by the termites, who despite being cold blooded, col aborate to regulate their body temperatures to provide

  just the right amount of ambient heat for the good of the group. These termite cities can be up to 18 feet in height. If a termite were the size of a human, as a termite-like creature might evolve to be on a planet

  with a lower gravity, such structures would be 4,000 feet in height,

  73 Ibid., 201.

  74 Ibid., 209.

  75 Ibid., 208.

  191

  lovers of sophia

  some three times taller than the Empire State Building.76 Termites

  do not use tools, other than their limbs, to help them excavate their

  hil s into these complex structures. However, if larger termite-

  like creatures were to evolve on another planet, their size would

  permit them to use tools and possibly to develop advanced tool-

  ma
king techniques that require mining, iron forging and smelting.

  Empowered by technology, an industrious termite-like group mind

  could produce veritable cities of such scale and complexity that our

  metropolises on Earth would look like shantytowns by comparison.

  Whereas collectively, this alien intelligence may far exceed that

  of homo sapiens, on an individual level, such beings might be far

  inferior to the average human – both mental y and physical y. For

  example, each ant hardly has any directional sense of its own. Its

  directional preferences are conditioned by tactile signals and trail

  pheromones col ated and amplified across an ant swarm.77 A human

  being, once raised to adulthood, can do a fair job of surviving on

  her own, but ant-like or termite-like alien intelligence in isolation

  from its Collective may only be capable of unreflectively carrying

  out a limited range of stereotyped actions.78 It might even be helpless in reacting to its environment if deprived of the ‘eyes’ and ‘ears’ of other members. Given that ants have only vestigial eyes and are

  effectively blind, it has been surmised that an ant colony perceives

  its environment through its member units. The whole swarm of

  ants forms a single compound “eye” with hundreds of thousands of

  facets, each ant contributing two lenses to form the swarm’s 10 to 20

  meter wide field of vision.79

  If an intelligent, technological y advanced, hive mind were to

  evolve out of a species like Earth’s social insects, we could expect

  its sense of morality to be entirely different from ours. In fact, in

  the absence of a conflict of interest between individual persons there might be no need for social negotiation, so such a species may lack

  76 Clifford Pickover, The Science of Aliens (Basic Books / Perseus, 1998), 37.

  77 Morris,

  Life’s Solution, 204.

  78 Pickover,

  The Science of Aliens, 37.

  79 Morris,

  Life’s Solution, 204.

  192

  jason reza jorjani

  morality altogether. In his layman’s guide to astrobiology, entitled

  The Science of Aliens, Clifford Pickover surmises that if insect behavior on Earth is to be any guide, the form of life of such an alien technological society (‘civilization’ is the wrong word here) would

  deeply offend even the most broadly shared human sentiments of

  what constitutes ethical conduct.80

  Collective insect intelligences are often divided into castes, with

  each caste having a specialized function. The worker drones among

  the bees or the soldiers among attine ants have no choice whatsoever

  as to the function that they perform. Unlike humans oppressed by

  a caste ideology that need not constrain their life possibilities, the intelligent insects’ caste status would indeed be a fact of nature for them. They could not even conceive of the ‘heretical’ mixing of

  castes and lament its allegedly ‘degenerative’ social consequences.

  The brahmanical Hindu might be persuaded to come over to a

  different view of the possibilities for his human life, but no ground whatsoever would give in the case of alien intelligences similar to

  the denizens of perfectly ordered beehives or ant colonies.

  What of the equal rights of the sexes? Females might eat their

  mates during sexual intercourse, as in the case of the praying mantis

  that can continue to copulate with the female of his species even after his head has been adoringly eaten away by her. The fly Serromiya

  femorata mates bel y-to-bel y and mouth-to-mouth with its partner, until at the end of the mating, the female literal y consumes the male, sucking out the entire contents of his body into her mouth. Certain

  insect species feature a huge size difference between female and male

  members of the species, with the males sometimes more than eight

  times smaller than the females.81 Beehives have long been taken as a

  model for science fictional societies of intelligent extraterrestrials.

  The complexity of behavior and cognitive processing abilities of bees, with memory that is sustained by periods of sleep, is comparable

  only to that of vertebrate animals.82 However, the male bee’s penis

  80 Pickover,

  The Science of Aliens, 123-124.

  81 Ibid., 35.

  82 Morris,

  Life’s Solution, 202.

  193

  lovers of sophia

  always breaks off once it is inserted into the Queen, so that he bleeds to death as a result of copulation.

  Orthodox Muslims might strongly reject the idea that women

  can enjoy the same rights and responsibilities as men, but any given

  person holding this view could potential y be persuaded to abandon it by changing his or her environment. A Muslim woman might

  renounce this dogma, inculcated in her from childhood, once she

  has been given the space and encouragement to act as freely and

  responsibly as she had once thought impossible. Similarly, a slave

  owner can come to appreciate the oppression and constraint on

  human potential that slavery represents, perhaps if he himself is

  bound up in chains and subjected to the whip for a sufficient period

  of time. But try telling some intelligent tool-using analog of a Queen bee that the males of her hive have a right to be ‘loved’ without being killed, or that the worker drones have a right to periods of rest and

  leisure and are entitled to due compensation for their labor. Could

  the technological y advanced equivalent of attine ants be made to

  understand that it is ungracious to condemn their elderly to waste

  disposal management simply because they are too weak and slow to

  continue performing other tasks?

  Laws against murder, torture, sexism, rape, and slavery mean

  different things to different human societies. However, we can debate

  them at all because they do mean something. To such species they would be nonsense. Who would we hold responsible for adherence to these standards anyhow? Some intelligent species with a group

  mind might not even have something like a Queen that oversees and

  directs the behavior of the hive. They might be more like termites

  than bees, where no one unit is in itself cognizant of the behavior of the whole group, and consequently where no one unit is responsible even for its ‘own’ behavior, which is after all determined by the group mind. It may be that only the entire ensemble is, distributively, self-aware of its behavioral patterns in response to its environment.83

  How this could possibly function is hard to imagine, but that is

  exactly the point. Nevertheless, it does function in social insects on 83 Pickover,

  The Science of Aliens, 39.

  194

  jason reza jorjani

  Earth, and some quadrant of the galaxy may already be colonized by

  more intelligent versions of such creatures.

  Clearly, such beings would not be capable of even conceiving of

  the happiness of others or their own perfection as individuals, let

  alone holding these as objects of the faculty of desire so that the

  attendant sentiments of doing so could provide a mediating incentive

  for making the moral law one’s own. Kant’s allegedly apriori universal ethics would seem to be invalidated by the empirical possibility of encountering even one species of alien intelligence of this type. Kant would protest that acting as if one belonged to a Kingdom of Ends cannot be based on the expectation of the empirical rea
lization of

  such a Kingdom of Ends.84

  In other words, within Kant’s theoretical framework, it is always

  possible that such a species could continue to evolve, or in his

  language, further its perfection, along lines that would eventual y

  allow its members to be sufficiently individuated so that they

  co-exist with us as responsible members of a Kingdom of Ends.

  However, practical y speaking, it utterly strains credulity to believe that an alien intelligence of the type evoked above, with a level

  of technical development hundreds of thousands or millions of

  years beyond our own, should be expected to take some radical y

  different evolutionary turn – and at that, in our direction – upon

  encountering us. Kant could perhaps also assert that such beings,

  although ‘intelligent’ in the sense of being capable of technological

  manipulation of the environment, are not “rational” beings. Such

  a desperate distinction between “intelligence” and “rationality” is

  vacuous and would only deepen his anthropomorphic prejudices.

  This does not mean that Kant’s universal ethics is a failure, only that it implicates a theory of the convergent evolution of all intelligent

  beings towards self-consciously individuated and responsible

  personhood.

  Now we can definitely answer the core question posed at the

  outset. We are to understand “an end in itself” with respect to the

  84 Kant, “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals” in Practical Philosophy, 4:439.

  195

  lovers of sophia

  existence of beings, as a claim that the world of sense exists only through and towards rational beings. They are the only ends in

  themselves insofar as they are the ends of everything that is. This is why Kant assumes that natural processes must always already

  end in persons, regardless of the great differences in the empirical conditions of diverse worlds throughout the cosmos. His claim, in

  Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens, that it would be absurd if the universe were not filled with intelligent life, is rooted in this. It is not a question of a waste of space, but of the fact that without rational beings to be conscious of their existence in it, there could be no universe – because nothing else in the universe properly

  exists (“properly” meaning exists for its own sake, as its own end).

 

‹ Prev