Germany, and Bormann’s post-1945 plan included reconnecting
with sympathetic elements within the Anglo-American banking and
195 Joseph P. Farrel , The SS Brotherhood of the Bel , 39, 167–170.
196 Nick Cook, The Hunt for Zero Point, 198–199.
197 Joseph P. Farrel , The Nazi International, 172.
198 Ibid., 69.
199 Ibid., 65–66, 78.
200 Ibid., 81.
201 Ibid., 304.
386
jason reza jorjani
corporate elite that had been cut off from their German contacts
after the American declaration of war in 1941.202 It is more than
a coincidence that the Chase Bank logo remains, to this day, a
swastika.
High finance was not the only target for infiltration within the
United States. Perhaps even more significantly, both the vast and
deep state intelligence apparatus set up by the National Security
Act of 1947 and the military-industrial complex were – from
their inception – so deeply penetrated by unprosecuted (and
unreconstructed) elites of the Reich that the later could even be said to have co-constituted these structures. This is the true and hidden
context for Former Supreme Allied Commander Europe, President
Dwight Eisenhower’s famous farewell speech warning the American
people about an occulted state within the state ostensibly tasked
with National Security but actual y posing a mortal danger to the
United States.
In the late 1930s Allen Dulles was a lawyer for, and board
member of, a German-Anglo-American corporate consortium
called Schröder, Rockefeller, and Company, that Time magazine described as “the economic booster of the Rome-Berlin Axis.”203
Avery Rockefeller in New York, nephew of Chase Bank’s John D.
Rockefeller, owned 42% and the Europe-based Fascists owned
47%. Dulles would, of course, go on to serve the OSS, America’s
wartime intelligence agency, which he transformed into the Central
Intelligence Agency under authorization granted by the National
Security Act of 1947. What few people know is that what essential y
transformed the OSS into the CIA was Dulles’ assimilation and
incorporation of the Fremde Heere Ost or Foreign Armies East,
which was under the command of General Reinhard Gehlen and was
consequently also known as the Gehlenorg.204 This was the rabidly anti-Russian Nazi German espionage network in increasingly Soviet-202 Joseph P. Farrel , Saucers, Swastikas, and Psyops (Kempton, IL: Adventures Unlimited Press, 2011), 158–159.
203 Ibid., 159.
204 Joseph P. Farrel , Roswell and the Reich, 346–347.
387
lovers of sophia
occupied Eastern Europe, which consisted of Czechs, Lithuanians,
Estonians, Belarusians, and Ukrainians.
A deal brokered with General Gehlen in 1945, by then OSS
Zurich station chief Allen Dulles, allowed these extraterritorial
German assets to continue operating in a fashion that assisted
the Americans in a common cause against Russian Communism
but that did not require these assets to work “for” or “under” the
Americans; in fact, the agreement explicitly stated that “should the
organization at any time find itself in a position where the American
and German interests diverged, it was accepted that the organization
would consider the interests of Germany first.”205 What ‘Germany’
are we even talking about at this juncture, amidst the smoldering
rubble of 1945? An extraterritorial ‘Germany’ in Fascist Spain and
Argentina, in Antarctica, and even deep within the American
military-industrial complex.
IV.
Sometime in 1944 SS Colonel Otto Skorzeny, who was the ace
commando in charge of all false-flag and Black Ops in the Reich,
was shown the Bell and associated Saucer aircraft. According to
testimony obtained through the American interrogation of his
commandos, at this point Skorzeny lost interest in his mission of
carrying out acts of sabotage behind enemy lines in Europe. Instead,
after having seen “the wonder weapon” he became maniacal y
“possessed” by the idea of using it in a Sonderkampf or special operation behind enemy lines in America that was sure to win the war, the real war – of worldview.206 Weltanschauungskrieg does not mean a conflict between different subjective views or ideologies
contending over control of an objectively existent world, including
not just Nature but also a fixed human nature. Rather, it is a concept based on the insight of Heraclitus into strife as integral to the
205 Ibid. , 347.
206 Joseph P. Farrel , Saucers, Swastikas, and Psyops, 94–95.
388
jason reza jorjani
creative process of the Cosmos and the related perspectival thought
of Nietzsche. Weltanschauungskrieg determines the way that the world reveals itself out of a predominating occultation. The strife
of conflicting vital perspectives or existential standpoints does not
solely concern political constitutions in the derivative legal sense but the very constitution of the world of a folk.
One of the operative principles of this war of the worlds over
Earth, is to capture or captivate the enemy on an existential level by inculcating fear without a definite object and attendant hopelessness
in the target population while at the same time offering a salvific
sense of direction and promise of security to people whose trust
in established authority has been shattered.207 The aim is to create
a matrix of perception and interpretation that only leaves certain
lines of thought and avenues of action open to the target population,
not by hiding others but by making them disappear.208 A key means
to accomplish that is the use of false alternatives or the deliberate
polarization of the target’s decision-making process in such a way
that two alternative ideologies or interpretive paradigms, which are
both false constructs, are designed to dialectical y drive the enemy
towards a third position that remains occulted.209
Ultimately, anyone who cannot think outside of binaries
such as “good and evil” can be manipulated by the use of such a
methodology to lure them into a simulacrum, a false world that
has been crafted to encompass their existential horizon like a total
work of art. Throughout the course of history, the lore of any folk
has served as the fundamental architectonic for both their mundane
crafts and monumental constructions. Weltanschauungskrieg had
taken place only on an unconscious level, as strife between divergent
cultures or what Samuel Huntington cal s the clash of civilizations.
What was different about the idea that possessed Skorzeny was the
deliberate use of folklore or the engineering of mythology for the
purpose of bringing forth a new world order.
207 Ibid., 95–96.
208 Ibid., 98–99.
209 Ibid., 99–100.
389
lovers of sophia
What is most interesting about this diabolical stroke of genius
is that it presupposes the ability, not to stand outside of any and all worldviews, which is not possible, but to be able to assume a variety
of different existential standpoints or vital perspectives to the end
/>
of not being captivated by any one of them, including that of one’s
‘own culture.’ Nietzsche understood this well and identified it as one of the characteristics of the Superman.210 It also lies at the core of Heidegger’s conception of abbau or “deconstruction”, which is very Nietzschean. This term, which has become synonymous with the
passive nihilism of postmodern ‘thought’ original y had a much
more active and archeo-futuristical y postmodern meaning.
If we were to want to retain the designation ‘postmodern’ we
would have to conclude that Nazi Germany was the first attempt a
postmodern political system. From the viewpoint of its own leaders,
however, it was the culmination of the “modern” in the German
sense of Der Neuzeit or “the New Age”. From this standpoint,
Neo-Cartesian Rationalism and Materialism were an incomplete
or imbalanced reaction against the medieval Judeo-Christian
Scholasticism that began to be overcome in the Renaissance. Even
more than Mussolini, with his vision of a Second Italian Renaissance,
the Nazis forwarded the occult current of the Renaissance epitomized
by Giordano Bruno in their vision of a new post-Judeo-Christian
age. What made this age “new” is that it would reconnect with the
primordial Āryan wel spring of Western civilization after having
withstood its uniquely destined encounter with the destructive
and yet essential y revealing force of technological instrumentality.
This fiery alchemical force is, after al , a product of the Promethean genius of Āryan Man.
It is as a deconstructive thinker in the vanguard of postmodernity
that, in one of his arcane lectures on logic and the essence of language, Heidegger explains that World War I was not “the true world war”
if one takes it to have ended in 1918.211 Likewise, the true World War 210 Friedrich Nietzsche, The Will to Power (New York: Random House, 1968), 149–150, 267, 330.
211 Martin Heidegger, Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language 390
jason reza jorjani
did not end in 1945. The only real world war is the war of the worlds
over the Earth, the Weltanschauungskrieg, and unlike Nietzsche who could only prophesy it, Heidegger knew that although this war had
begun in his time, he would not live to see the end of it. This is that war of which Nietzsche wrote in Ecce Homo:
I know my fate. One day my name will be associated with the
memory of something tremendous – a crisis without equal on
earth, the most profound collision of conscience, a decision
that was conjured up against everything that had been believed, demanded, hallowed so far. I am no man, I am dynamite.
…The concept of politics will have merged entirely with a war
of spirits; all power structures of the old society will have been
exploded – all of them are based on lies: there will be wars
the like of which have never yet been seen on earth. It is only
beginning with me that the earth knows grand politics.212
Dynamite, indeed. War of spirits, indeed.
What Nietzsche, qua apocalyptic prophet, is seeing through
a glass darkly here and what was adopted as a plan of action by
Skorzeny and his comrades is something that I would conceptualize
as Abbauende Aufbruch ins Weltanschauungskrieg. Heidegger was right that some things can only be thought in German. Abbau is the term “deconstruction” from Heidegger’s thought, so that Abbauende
literal y means “un-building” or dismantling. But through its
connection with the “destruction of the history of ontology”
that was the projected aim of Being and Time, and in light of the socio-political y dangerous implications of such dynamiting of
the paradigmatic principles of a world-epoch, I suggest rendering
Abbauende as “destructive” which carries within it the sense of de-structuring. The idea of Aufbruch has a rich philosophical and literary history in modernist German thought. It is alternatively
(Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009), 41.
212 Walter Kaufmann (translator), “Ecce Homo” in Basic Writings of Nietzsche (New York: The Modern Library, 2000), 782–783.
391
lovers of sophia
translated as “breakup” in the sense of a breaking-with or divorce, or
“breakthrough” in the sense of a revolutionary discovery rather than
an incremental increase in knowledge, and final y, as “breakaway”
in the sense that such discoveries can represent a rupture wherein
something or someone heads out of bounds in a different direction.
In other words, a “breakout” or “departure.”
Thus my concept for what Skorzeny, Kammler, Gehlen,
Bormann and company did indeed, even if it remained imprecisely
conceptualized, could be loosely translated as “destructive departure
in worldview warfare.” Although, based on the alternative meaning
of the terms, it is also possible to translate it as “deconstructive
breakthrough in psychological warfare” or “dismantling breakaway
in the worldwide ideological war.” This is the worldwide constitutive
or emergent state of a breakaway civilization. It is based both on
a breakthrough in the positive sense and on a negative breaking-
down and a breaking away. This allows those who have broken
through to come back and conquer what they have broken-down
in a way that is Kriegsentscheidend for the Weltanschauungskrieg.
Recall that this term, Kriegsentscheidend or “war-decisive”, was a classification at the highest level above Top Secret uniquely given to Project Chronos.
Otto Skorzeny initiated his special operation against the United
States from Spain. By design, the alien contact mythos has been so
built up over the past 70 years that hardly anyone remembers that
when flying saucers first invaded the skies over the United States in
1947, it was being speculated that they were of German construction
and being launched from Fascist Spain. Moreover, consider the fact
that President Truman’s policy regarding the flying saucers would
have been colossal y stupid if the US intelligence actual y believed
them to be alien spacecraft. According to Air Force information
officer, Lt. Colonel Moncel Monts, as reported by news wire services
as the time, the Truman administration policy was that: “The jet
pilots are, and have been under orders to investigate unidentified
objects and to shoot them down if they can’t talk them down.”213 Rather 213 Joseph P. Farrel , Roswell and the Reich, 368–369.
392
jason reza jorjani
than assuming that Truman was willing to risk an interplanetary
war with a superior race of extraterrestrials, it makes much more
sense to recognize that at the highest levels it was believed that these UFOs represented terrestrial enemy aircraft.
Two classified memorandums speculate on German technology
as the matrix for UFOs. The first is a September 23, 1947 letter of
General Nathan Twining to Brigadier General George F. Schulgen,
widely known as the Twining-Schulgen Memorandum.214 The
second is an October 28, 1947 intelligence collection memorandum
prepared by General Schulgen in response to General Twining’s
analysis, recommendations, and request for further study.215 It
should be noted that, with great relevance t
o the issue of concern
here, a faked version of the second of these documents was widely
circulated within the Ufology research community. This forgery
both interpolated lines not in the original and censored text from
the original in order to make it appear as if Schulgen and the USAF
were considering an extraterrestrial or “interplanetary” origin of
flying saucers.216
In fact, both memoranda clearly indicate German aeronautical
engineering and propulsion research and development as the most
likely source for the UFOs, with specific concern about the post-war
whereabouts of the Horten Brothers. While Twining’s summary of
the USAF technical analysis of the craft certainly involves futuristic concepts in the context of 1945 technology, all of them are stil
within the theoretical scope of terrestrial engineering. Although
Schulgen speculates that Russia may be the geographical point of
origin for this presumably captured German technology, this seems
to be only because the other possibility is even more terrifying –
namely the postwar survival of an independent, extraterritorial
Reich of some sort.217 Stil , if one reads between the lines, Schulgen remains open to this possibility since he is especial y concerned
214 Ibid., 404–405.
215 Ibid., 375–387.
216 Ibid., 388–389.
217 Ibid., 409.
393
lovers of sophia
with determining, based on the aircraft’s landing gear, what kind of
terrain they might be taking off from.218
The headline of the Denver Post for November 9, 1947 reads
“Spies Bid for Franco’s Weapons: Agents Ascribe ‘Flying Saucer’ to
New Rocket.”219 The article explains that “German scientists working
under the personal sponsorship of Generalissimo Francisco Franco
have developed” saucer shaped ‘rockets’ that are “responsible for the flying saucers seen over the North American continent last summer
and for at least one and perhaps two hitherto unexplained accidents
to transport aircraft.” Journalist Lionel Shapiro, writing from Geneva, goes on to reveal that according to his sources these “weapons” were
first flown in the presence of Franco on the south coast of Spain,
just east of Gibraltar, early in the summer of 1947. Note the date. The saucer-shaped “rockets were directed over North America…”220
Lovers of Sophia Page 49