Book Read Free

Key Thinkers of the Radical Right

Page 38

by Mark Sedgwick (ed)


  (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013), 175.

  58. American Renaissance, “We Are at the End of Something— A Conversation

  with Alain de Benoist,” accessed December 14, 2017, https:// www.amren.com/

  features/ 2013/ 11/ we- are- at- the- end- of- something/ .

  59. Greg Johnson, “Recommended Reading: Six Essential Works on White

  Nationalism,” accessed December 14, 2017, https:// www.counter- currents.com/

  2016/ 04/ six- essential- works- on- white- nationalism/ .

  60. Greg Johnson, “The Muslim Problem,” accessed December 14, 2017, https://

  www.counter- currents.com/ 2015/ 01/ the- muslim- problem/ .

  61. Johnson, “Tom Sunić Interviews Greg Johnson.”

  62. Greg Johnson, “Vanguardism, Vantardism, and Mainstreaming,” accessed

  December 14, 2017, https:// www.counter- currents.com/ 2014/ 10/ vanguardism-

  vantardism- and- mainstreaming/ .

  63. Irmin Vinson, Some Thoughts on Hitler and Other Essays (San Francisco: Counter-

  Currents 2012), v.

  64. Ibid., viii.

  65. Ibid., 43, 51, and 54.

  66. Johnson, “Between Two Lampshades.”

  67. Greg Johnson, “Dealing with the Holocaust,” accessed December 14, 2017,

  http:// www.theoccidentalobserver.net/ 2012/ 07/ 20/ dealing- with- the- holocaust/ .

  Predictably, this argument alienated diehard revisionists and deniers,

  see Carolyn Yeager, “Nationalism and the Holocaust: A Reply to

  Johnson,” accessed December 14, 2017, https:// carolynyeager.net/

  nationalism- and- holocaust- reply- johnson.

  68. Singal, “Undercover with the Alt- Right.”

  69. Vinson, Some Thought of Hitler, 6.

  70. Greg Johnson, “The Burden of Hitler, 2013,” accessed December 14, 2017,

  https:// www.counter- currents.com/ 2013/ 04/ the- burden- of- hitler- 2013/ .

  71. Johnson, “Greg Johnson Interviewed by Laura Raim.”

  23

  Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents

  223

  72. Counter- Currents Radio, “Podcast no. 14— Interview with Charles Krafft, Part 1,”

  accessed December 14, 2017, http:// www.counter- currents.com/ 2012/ 04/

  interview- with- charles- krafft- part- 1/ .

  73. Trevor Lynch’s White Nationalist Guide to the Movies, ed. Greg Johnson (San

  Francisco: Counter- Currents 2012).

  74. Johnson, “Tom Sunić Interviews Greg Johnson.”

  75. Greg Johnson, “Homosexuality and White Nationalism,” accessed December

  14, 2017, http:// www.counter- currents.com/ 2010/ 10/ homosexuality- and- white-

  nationalism/ .

  76. Greg Johnson, “Gay Panic on the Alt Right,” accessed December 14, 2017.

  https:// www.counter- currents.com/ 2016/ 03/ gay- panic- on- the- alt- right/ .

  77. Greg Johnson, “Does the Manosphere Morally Corrupt Men?” accessed

  December 14, 2017, https:// www.counter- currents.com/ 2015/ 02/

  does- the- manosphere- morally- corrupt- men.

  78. Greg Johnson, “Gay Panic on the Alt Right.”

  79. Voice of Reason, “The Sunic Journal: Dr. Greg Johnson on the New Right,”

  accessed December 14, 2017, http:// reasonradionetwork.com/ 20110809/

  the- sunic- journal- dr- greg- johnson- on- the- new- right.

  80. Greg Johnson, “Punching Right,” accessed December 14, 2017, https:// www.

  counter- currents.com/ 2016/ 12/ punching- right/ .

  81. Greg Johnson, “The Alt Right: Obituary for a Brand?” accessed December 14,

  2017, https:// www.counter- currents.com/ 2016/ 11/ the- alt- right- obituary- for- a-

  brand/ .

  82. Arktos, “The Attacks on Arktos,” last accessed December 14, 2017, https://

  altright.com/ 2017/ 06/ 17/ the- attacks- on- arktos/ ; “Boatsinker,” “Greg Johnson, Daniel Friberg and What Happened before Scandza Forum,” accessed December

  14, 2017, https:// forum.therightstuff.biz/ topic/ 48716/ greg- johnson- daniel-

  friberg- and- what- happened- before- scandza- forum?page=1 and Greg Johnson;

  “Reply to Daniel Friberg,” accessed December 14, 2017, https:// www.counter-

  currents.com/ 2017/ 06/ reply- to- daniel- friberg/ .

  83. Johnson, “New Right vs. Old Right.”

  24

  14

  Richard B. Spencer and

  the Alt Right

  Tamir Bar- On

  B O R N I N B O S T O N in 1978, Richard Bertrand Spencer is the presi-

  dent of the National Policy Institute,1 a “white nationalist” think tank

  founded by William Regnery II, the multimillionaire who also funded

  the Charles Martel Society, the publisher of the Occidental Quarterly.2 In a

  2015 YouTube video titled “Who Are We?” Spencer notes that people are

  reasserting their identities, and he asks peoples of white European ex-

  traction to return to their ancestral identities, to end their attachment to

  liberal multiculturalism (a “fate worse than death,”) to become “seekers”

  rather than “wanderers” of the “rootless” internationalist and cosmopol-

  itan variety.3 Spencer also points out that man does not live for “freedom”

  (which, he insists, equals “shopping” in liberal societies), but rather “for

  a homeland, a people and its future.” Finally, he also asks a primordial

  question in respect of identity: “Are we ready to become who we are?” For

  Spencer, white Americans must define themselves as white Europeans as

  well as promote a politics of white racial solidarity.

  In this video, we can see the contours of Spencer’s Alt Right world-

  view: use of the internet as a main vehicle for provoking both conservatives

  and liberals with politically incorrect language and ideas; a rejection of

  liberal multiculturalism; a disdain for capitalism because of its ten-

  dency to homogenize diverse peoples and cultures; support for political

  communities wedded to white, European identities; a challenge to “he-

  roic,” white, and European elites to create a revolution in mentalities and

  values (i.e., a right- wing metapolitical struggle) against multiculturalism

  25

  Richard B. Spencer and the Alt Right

  225

  and immigration; and a desire to create white, homogeneous ethnostates

  (“homelands”) on both sides of the Atlantic. Greg Johnson has suggested

  that these ethnostates could be erected in “European colonial societies”

  such as the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and even Uruguay and

  Argentina.4

  For Spencer, white homelands are rejected by liberals and conservatives

  alike, thus suggesting that the Alt Right is as much about hatred for all

  established and “cosmopolitan” elites as for the traditional liberal Left

  “enemies.” Moreover, Spencer believes that the racialist and anti- Semitic

  agendas of the Old Right can be attained through metapolitical, legal, and

  nonviolent methods. In this sense, Spencer’s Alt Right is heavily indebted

  to the French New Right’s metapolitical framework, although Spencer

  is more openly racialist and anti- Semitic compared to the French New

  Right’s leader Alain de Benoist. Thus, the Alt Right aims to unite different

  elements of the Right from white nationalists and racists to conservatives

  and others beyond the radical Right, which seek to stem the tide of liberal

  multiculturalism, advance the interests of the white race through concrete

  m
easures such as halting nonwhite immigration, and end “Jewish influ-

  ence” in politics.

  A few weeks after the 2016 presidential election, at a National Policy

  Institute conference, Spencer declared: “Hail Trump, hail our people,

  hail victory!”5 while some of his supporters gave the Nazi salute. Spencer

  brushed off the incident as a moment of “irony” or exuberance, yet he

  also called Donald Trump’s presidential election win “the victory of

  will,” echoing Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will (1935), a Nazi propa-

  ganda film.6 The desire to break political taboos about Fascism, Nazism,

  anti-

  Semitism, and issues of white racial identity also informs the

  Weltanschauung of Spencer and the Alt Right. So, for example, whereas

  whites historically engaged in ethnic solidarity through colonialist

  practices, the creation of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) or apartheid in South

  Africa, Spencer endorses Jared Taylor’s argument that today’s whites lack

  ethnic solidarity and that “nonwhite ethnic solidarity is an entrenched part

  of the political landscape.”7

  Spencer has been dubbed a “neo- Nazi,” “white supremacist,” and

  “ethnic nationalist.” The Southern Poverty Law Center called him “a

  suit- and- tie version of the white supremacists of old, a kind of profes-

  sional racist in khakis.”8 Spencer, however, denies that he is a white su-

  premacist, fascist, or neo- Nazi because he neither supports the use of

  extraparliamentary violence or colonialism, nor does he want to impose

  2

  6

  226

  E M E R G E N T T H I N K E R S

  his societal model on other peoples.9 Like Johnson and Taylor, Spencer

  believes that white racial consciousness and political solidarity can be

  attained without violence, continuing the French New Right’s “right- wing

  Gramscianism,” which was promoted by de Benoist and Guillaume Faye.10

  Spencer has argued that whites are victims of cultural “disposses-

  sion” in their own lands because of orthodoxies such as racial equality

  and multiculturalism. He has called Western immigration and refugee

  policies a “proxy war” against white Europeans. He has also advocated

  “peaceful ethnic cleansing” and longs for the erection of “a new society,

  an ethno- state that would be a gathering point for all Europeans. It would

  be a new society based on very different ideals than, say, the Declaration

  of Independence.”11 In short, Spencer’s Alt Right is not merely conserv-

  ative. In their desire to smash liberalism, administrative equality, mul-

  ticulturalism, and capitalism, as well as create ethnically homogeneous

  “homelands,” Spencer’s Alt Right is indeed revolutionary. This point is

  corroborated by George Hawley, author of Making Sense of the Alt- Right,

  who argues that, unlike mainstream conservatives, the Alt Right conceives

  of the immigration issue through a racial lens based on a core defense of

  white identity; rejects two sacred American values, namely, equality and

  liberty; and wants to, at minimum, end mass immigration to the US.

  Spencer is self- described as an “identitarian.”12 The identitarian move-

  ment has French and European origins and advocates rights for members

  of specific European ethnocultural groups. Some of their thinkers include

  Fabrice Robert and Markus Willinger. Spencer claims to be the inventor

  of the term “Alt Right,”13 a term that has also been welcomed by Daniel

  Friberg, Greg Johnson, Jack Donovan, and Taylor. In a Radix interview,

  Spencer noted that he coined the term “alternative Right” in 2008 in

  order to differentiate himself from “mainstream American conservatism”

  and pass down European “ancestral traditions” to new generations.14 Paul

  Gottfried argues that both he and Spencer jointly created the Alt Right

  term.15 For Spencer, as one can read in the “Alt- Right manifesto,”16 those

  “ancestral traditions” are racial preference for white Europeans and anti-

  Semitism— both decidedly Old Right staples.

  Despite his anti- Semitic and pro- Nazi comments, Spencer’s key in-

  tellectual influences are largely those thinkers concerned with winning

  the “cultural war” against egalitarianism, liberal democracy, capitalism,

  socialism, and multiculturalism: the German philosopher Friedrich

  Nietzsche, French New Right intellectuals such as de Benoist and Faye,

  Conservative Revolution theorists such as Carl Schmitt, Ernst Jünger, and

  27

  Richard B. Spencer and the Alt Right

  227

  Martin Heidegger, European theorists like Julius Evola, Francis Parker

  Yockey, and Alexander Dugin, and a collection of US right- wingers with a

  penchant for race- driven politics or anti- Semitism, including Sam Francis,

  Jared Taylor, and Kevin B. MacDonald. In contrast to parliamentary poli-

  tics and extraparliamentary violence, Spencer’s focus on the cultural realm

  makes his thought far more threatening for the system and highlights

  the important evolution of the radical Right on both sides of the Atlantic.

  That is, the radical Right understands that in an antifascist, antiracist, and

  anticolonial epoch, conspicuous displays of violence, support for coloni-

  alism, or overtly racist language are not acceptable. As Spencer stated,

  “We have to look good” because few would want to join a movement that

  is “crazed or ugly or vicious or just stupid.”17

  Life and context

  Spencer is “an icon for white supremacists”18 and a controversial star on

  the university lecture circuit. Yet his path to mass media stardom was

  not predictable. He neither suffered materially nor did he have major life

  crises. He is the son of Rand Spencer (an ophthalmologist) and Sherry

  Spencer (née Dickenhorst), an heiress to cotton farms in Louisiana. He

  grew up in Preston Hollow in Dallas, Texas. In high school, he was not in-

  tellectually brilliant, yet he did mature intellectually. In 2001, he received

  a BA in English Literature and Music from the University of Virginia. By

  2003, he gained an MA in the Humanities from the University of Chicago.

  From the summer of 2005 into 2006, he was at the Vienna International

  Summer University, thus cementing his links to European culture, iden-

  tity, and history— key Spencerian themes. From 2005 to 2007, he was a

  PhD student at Duke University in Modern European intellectual history.

  He joined the Duke Conservative Union, where he met Stephen Miller,

  later Donald Trump’s senior policy advisor. Spencer’s former website

  claims that he did not complete his PhD at Duke in order “to pursue a life

  of thought- crime,” thus suggesting that universities are laboratories for

  dogmatic thought.

  In 2007, Spencer was the assistant editor at the mainstream conserv-

  ative magazine the American Conservative. He was allegedly fired from it

  because his views were considered extremist. From 2008 to 2009, he was

  the executive editor of Taki’s Magazine, a libertarian online politics and

  culture magazine published by the Greek paleoconservative journalist and

  socialite Taki Theodoracopulos.
r />   28

  228

  E M E R G E N T T H I N K E R S

  By 2010, Spencer had charted his own intellectual direction. He mocked

  both established political parties in the US, especially the Republican

  establishment. In March 2010, he founded AlternativeRight.com,

  a website which he edited until 2012. In 2011, he became owner and ex-

  ecutive director of Washington Summit Publishers. In that same year, he

  also became president and director of the National Policy Institute. In

  2012, he founded Radix Journal as a publication of Washington Summit

  Publishers. Contributors have included white nationalist thinkers such as

  Kevin MacDonald, Alex Kurtagić, and Samuel T. Francis. He also hosts a

  weekly podcast called Vanguard Radio. In short, Spencer has focused on

  using various media outlets to disseminate his views to ordinary people in

  an accessible manner.

  In 2014, Spencer was deported from Budapest, Hungary, after trying

  to organize the National Policy Institute conference, ironically as Hungary

  then had one of the most nationalist regimes in Europe under President

  Victor Orbán,19 and Spencer’s ultranationalist, anti-

  immigrant, and

  antirefugee views dovetail with Orbán’s.

  On January 15, 2017 (Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday), Spencer

  launched AltRight.com, a key website for Alt Right supporters. The date

  was not selected accidentally. If Martin Luther King is the symbol of racial

  equality, liberal multiculturalism, and desegregation, Spencer is the voice

  for racial inequality, white nationalism, and segregated white ethnostates.

  A key contributor on AltRight.com is Jared Taylor, the author of the sem-

  inal white nationalist tract White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 20th

  Century.

  It should also be mentioned that Spencer is married to Nina

  Kouprianova, who has translated numerous books written by Alexander

  Dugin.20 Those books have been published by Spencer’s Washington

  Summit Publishers.

  Work and thought

  Spencer is more known for his YouTube videos, tweets, television and

  newspaper interviews, and university speaking engagements than for any

  substantive body of intellectual work. In this respect, he differs from de

 

‹ Prev