Anger and Forgiveness

Home > Other > Anger and Forgiveness > Page 54
Anger and Forgiveness Page 54

by Martha C. Nussbaum


  Bible, the

  and confession 70

  Hebrew 60n7, 75

  and penance 68–9

  New Testament

  and retribution 72–3

  against anger 42

  and the Dies Irae 67–8. See also

  transactional forgiveness in

  Dies Irae

  66–7, 76–8

  and the inner realm 70–1, 73

  Index

  305

  and unconditional love. See love,

  in Desmond Tutu’s vision 59,

  unconditional

  237–8, 241–3

  compared to Jewish

  consequentialism. See welfarism

  tradition 66–71

  contempt 50–1

  God in

  cosmic balance, ideas of 5, 24–5,

  anger of 41–3

  74, 178, 184, 190

  as a model of interpersonal

  criminal justice system. See

  relationships 72–3

  law and criminal

  as represented in Mahler. See

  justice system

  Mahler, Gustav

  criminals

  as represented in the

  anger directed at 194–5

  Gospels 78–81

  as a despised subgroup 49–50

  compared to Jewish

  equal dignity of 180, 182

  thought 69–74

  families of 195

  transactional forgiveness of

  11, 67–9, 76–8

  Dante Alighieri 23, 50n83, 71n43

  the harshness of forgiveness

  Dickens, Charles 98, 169, 210

  of 73–5

  Dies Irae

  unconditional forgiveness

  on forgiveness 67–8

  of 75–7

  translation of 89–90

  unconditional love of. See

  dignity. See human dignity, equal

  love, unconditional

  discrimination 28–9, 49n82, 152,

  Protestantism 69

  164, 199–200

  the Gospels. See Bible, the

  disgust 48–50, 52, 55, 181–2

  Chrysippus 18, 28n44, 142, 142n8

  down- ranking

  colleagues. See workplace, the

  and discrimination 28–9

  compassion

  and culture 19–20, 140, 147

  as a positive motive 120, 131–3

  and status- injury 20–1

  compared to mercy 206

  and the law 178, 197

  compassionate hope and the

  and voluntariness 21

  Transition 31, 36

  as the focus of anger 21, 25–7, 51

  distinguished from feeling 252

  in Aristotle 5, 15, 17, 19–20

  in Adam Smith 16, 18–9

  the normative problem with

  in the legal system 177, 256

  focusing on 15, 28,

  nature of 22–4, 22n34

  49, 54, 93

  confession

  Duff, R. A. 188–90

  and exomologésis 72

  as condition of

  Eliot, George 119–20

  forgiveness 10–12

  emotions. See also eudaimonism

  in Christian tradition 68–74, 76

  and feelings 252–3

  in Jewish tradition 62–3, 65,

  and the body 252

  68, 86. See also Jewish

  analysis of 16–7, 19–20, 251–2

  thought

  compared to moods 254

  306 Index

  emotions ( Cont.)

  compared to King, Mandela and

  content of 253

  Nehru 218–9, 224–5

  development of 254

  his non- attachment 223–5

  in Upheavals of Thought 251–5

  as self- anger 225

  negative. See anger; contempt;

  his rejection of status 223

  envy; hate; jealousy;

  his remarks on Hitler and

  resentment

  Japan 219

  situational 252

  his thesis of nonviolence

  social influences on 253–4

  39, 218–9

  envy 51–2

  on the future 223

  equality. See human dignity, equal

  the non- passive element in his

  Erikson, Erik 225

  theory 211, 221–2

  eudaimonism 16, 19–20, 25

  gender 43–6, 92, 119, 121–3, 254.

  Eumenides. See Aeschylus

  See also manliness

  genealogical explanations 58–9

  Fairbairn, W. R. D. 129–30

  generosity

  family. See relationships, intimate

  between persons 12–3, 65, 106,

  forgiveness

  121, 130. See also love,

  as inquisitorial and normatively

  unconditional

  problematic 10–2, 73–4,

  in institutions 172–3, 200, 203

  76–7, 96–7, 106, 206

  in revolutionary justice 212–2,

  as virtue 9, 63, 88–9

  217–8, 222, 226–32,

  compared to the Transition

  235–7, 243

  76–8, 118

  gentle temper, 3–4, 11, 52–6,

  Griswold’s treatment of. See

  67–8, 167–8

  Griswold, Charles

  God. See also Christian thought;

  in Christian thought. See

  Jewish thought

  Christian thought

  anger of 40–2

  in Jewish thought. See Jewish

  as modeling parent- child

  thought

  relationships 98

  its absence in Greco- Roman eth-

  emotions of 42

  ics 9, 11, 209

  inhabiting payback wishes 208, 214

  its cultural popularity 10

  Gospels, the. See Bible, the

  transactional 10–12, 33, 58–60,

  gratitude

  66, 74, 89

  and Stoicism 46

  unconditional 12, 75–8, 81, 86–7,

  as a reactive attitude 46–7

  96, 106, 125

  gratuitous 160–4

  Foucault, Michel 59, 70

  in intimate relationships 113–4

  in the Middle Realm 161–4

  Gandhi, Mohandas

  grief

  and acknowledgment of wrongs 238

  and vulnerability 105

  and non- anger 8, 175, 212, 218,

  compared to anger 17–18, 23,

  222, 236, 247

  37–8, 47–8, 102

  Index

  307

  in intimate relationships 4, 7–8,

  honor cultures 19–20. See also

  23, 92, 94–6, 102–3, 126–7

  down- ranking

  in marital breakups 122–3

  human dignity, equal

  Griswold, Charles 57–8, 60,

  anger as allegedly necessary for

  64, 88–9

  the protection of 8, 47,

  guilt. See also remorse;

  91, 211

  retributivism

  as a central concern for institu-

  and creativity 131

  tions 27, 182, 196

  and moral development 129–32

  distinguished from relative

  and moral dilemmas 134–5

  status 27–8, 173

  and moral motivation 131–2, 134

  in institutional response to

  and self- forgiveness 132–3

  wrongdoing 152–3,

  and the public sphere 133

  166, 172–3, 183, 192–3,

  and the Transition 129

  196–200, 204

  as confining and

  in revolutionary justice 213,
/>   restrictive 130–1

  227, 242–3

  as deterrent 133–5

  humor

  compared to positive

  as alternative to anger 102,

  reinforcement 132

  154–5, 160, 167–8

  compared to remorse

  in Seneca 145–6

  134–5, 134n

  Mandela’s 227n26, 235, 232, 242

  Christian roots 132

  distinguished from shame 128

  incarceration. See law and

  nature of 128–9

  criminal justice system;

  parallels with self- other

  punishment

  relations 129

  institutions, political. See also

  well- grounded 131

  law and criminal

  justice system

  Halbertal, Moshe 87

  as not motivated by retributiv-

  Hampton, Jean 26, 35, 191

  ist sentiments 3, 42, 166,

  Harriss, William 4n16, 247

  171–2, 178, 249

  hatred 50

  as modeling our best selves

  Heckman, James 181

  249, 249n5

  Hegel, G. W. F. 134–5

  equal human dignity as a con-

  helplessness

  cern for 27, 182, 196

  and anger 5, 29, 45, 47–8, 54–5,

  in revolutionary justice 213, 219,

  94–5, 208

  237, 245

  and women 45, 122–3

  mercy in. See mercy

  in love and intimacy 94–5, 104,

  their responsibility to respond

  116, 122

  to wrongdoing 1, 27,

  in parents- children

  166, 196

  relationships 100–5

  trust in 173, 177–8, 188, 196, 239

  Hinduism 14, 40, 175

  vulnerability in relation to 173

  308 Index

  Jansen, Jonathan 245–6

  and divine love 226

  jealousy 51–52. See also envy

  and down- ranking 28–9

  Jesus. See also Bible, the;

  and non- passivity 221–2, 238

  Christian thought; love,

  and nonviolence 39, 212, 218–19

  unconditional

  and personal attachments 224

  and anger and transactional

  and the Transition 31–33, 36,

  forgiveness 42–4, 72, 76

  38–9, 135–6

  and the inner realm 70

  on anger and non- anger 8, 118,

  and unconditional

  175, 212, 218, 221–2, 236

  forgiveness 75–7

  on cooperation 223, 249

  and unconditional love 78–81

  on violence 219–20

  Jewish thought. See also Bible,

  on retributivism

  the; God; Maimonides;

  on the future 222–3, 239

  Soloveitchick; Talmud,

  Klein, Melanie 129–30, 132, 134

  the; Yonah of Gerona

  God in 11, 61–5, 73–4

  Lactantius, 41–2

  Teshuva

  law and criminal justice system

  and the political 64–5

  and impartiality 166

  as transactional

  and intimate relationships 4,

  forgiveness 64–5

  8–9, 94

  dissident voices about 85–8

  and the Transition 166, 205

  human- God 60–3

  and victim impact

  human- human 63–6

  statements 194–7

  Joyce, James 67, 71, 89

  as liberating individuals from

  justice, impartial. See human dig-

  the burden of dealing

  nity, equal; institutions,

  with wrongdoing 4–5, 94,

  political; law and crimi-

  135–6, 141, 170

  nal justice system

  “closure” in 29, 196

  justice, revolutionary. See also

  corrupt and unjust 211, 214, 221

  Gandhi, Mohandas;

  expressing Transition- Anger 179

  King, Martin Luther Jr.;

  forward- looking 171, 178–9

  Mandela, Nelson

  in the Middle Realm 7–8,

  anger as awakening to 211–2

  140–1, 148

  and non- anger 8, 212, 225

  scope 153, 164–5, 175

  forward- looking spirit in 209

  incarceration. See also

  unconditional forgiveness and

  punishment

  love in 209

  and racism 181–2

  violence in 218–20

  anger as motivation for 182

  in a welfarist theory 192–3

  Kahan, Dan 198

  its failure to deter 177

  King, Martin Luther Jr.

  shame and dignity in 198

  and acknowledgment of

  the cost of 180–1

  wrongs 238

  limits of 94, 135

  Index

  309

  mercy in 206–8

  and the rugby team 234–6

  retributivist desires in 12, 29,

  and the Transition 229–31

  136, 175, 178, 196, 249. See

  on status 226–7, 245–6

  also retributivism

  on violence 219

  status injury in 176, 178

  manliness 26, 44–5, 175, 254

  Lazarus, Richard 16, 18, 20–22

  Markel, Dan 189–90

  Lerner, Harriet 107–9, 116–8

  marriage. See relationships,

  lex talionis. See retributivism

  intimate

  Lloyd- Jones, Hugh 1

  Medea. See Seneca

  love, unconditional

  mercy

  and mercy 209

  and Transition mentality 207

  and the Prodigal Son 78–81

  and criminal justice 207–9

  compared to forgiveness 81

  as combining ex ante and ex post

  in the case of Charleston Church

  perspectives 207

  shooting 77, 197

  compared to compassion 206

  in George Eliot’s

  compared to forgiveness 209

  Middlemarch 119–20

  egalitarian conception of 206

  in Mahler’s Resurrection

  God’s 75, 78

  Symphony 81–5

  in Greco- Roman thought 205–6

  in Philip Roth’s American

  in Nietzsche 208

  Pastoral 103–4, 106

  “monarchical” conception of 206

  Lucretius 40

  Middle Realm, the

  and anger 139–40, 165

  magical thinking 24–7, 33–4, 38–9,

  and false social values

  54, 112n, 127, 178, 183–5.

  139–40, 147

  See also cosmic balance,

  and gratitude 160–4

  ideas of

  and grief 139–40, 164–5

  Mahler, Gustav

  and status 147–8

  Resurrection Symphony 81–5

  and Stoic thought 139–47

  Maimonides (Rabbi Moshe Ben

  and Transition Anger 140–1,

  Maimon) 60–3, 69

  148, 150, 153

  Mandela, Nelson

  and the law 140–1, 164–7

  and forgiveness 10, 12

  deterrence in 141, 148, 167

  and forward- looking

  harms involving

  spirit 228–30

  stigmatization in 152

  and generosity 12, 226–32

  harms involving false accusa-

  and Kobie Coet see 232–3

  tions in 152–3

 
and non- anger 39, 218, 225

  forgiveness in 141, 149, 166–7

  and non- violence 39, 212, 219

  nature of 7, 138–9

  and personal attachments 234

  performance of anger in 150

  and respect 227

  provocation in 165–6

  and status anxiety 227

  the Middle of. See

  and the Anthem 233–4

  workplace, the

  310 Index

  Mill, John Stuart 30, 174–6, 190,

  and King 212, 218–9, 224,

  192, 200

  and Mandela 213, 218–9,

  Moore, Michael 184, 186–7

  224, 226–37

  Morris, Herbert 130, 132,

  in Stoicism 38, 44, 139, 142–5,

  184–6, 188

  161. See also Stoicism

  Murphy, Jeffrie 10

  toward the self 146

  Murray, Liz 110–2, 118, 136

  nonviolence 39, 212, 218–20,

  225, 230

  narcissism

  and anger 21, 25, 28–30, 38,

  Orwell, George 98–9, 224–5, 248n3

  52–4, 95

  and forgiveness 12, 87–8

  payback wishes. See anger; cosmic

  and guilt 131

  balance, ideas of; magical

  in infants and children 45,

  thinking; retributivism

  130, 132

  Paton, Alan

  in intimate relationships 97

  Cry, the Beloved Country

  in religious outlooks 11

  213–7, 222

  in the Middle Realm 147, 159–60

  prisons. See under law and crimi-

  narcissistic error, the 29, 38

  nal justice system

  of resentment 12

  privacy 256–7

  negative emotions. See emotions

  Prodigal Son, the 79–81, 83,

  New Testament. See Bible, the

  120, 235

  Nietzsche, Friedrich 12, 58, 60,

  provocation, reasonable 165–6, 176

  73–4, 131–2, 134, 208

  punishment. See also law and

  non- anger

  criminal justice system;

  as “feminine” and “weak” 44,

  retributivism

  46, 175, 220

  and anger 27, 145, 165–6, 172,

  as not entailing nonviolence 39,

  176, 195

  218–220

  and deterrence 27, 30, 42,

  in ancient Greece and Rome 44

  167, 171

  in intimate relationships 122

  and humiliation 27–8, 177–8,

  in the Middle- Realm 139, 149,

  183, 195, 198–9

  151, 154, 159–60, 162

  and mercy 205–10

  in law and criminal justice

  and proportional suffering 178

  system 174–5, 177, 193–4

  and rehabilitation 27

  and victim impact

  and reintegration 200–5

  statements 194–7

  and retributivism. See

  and dignity 197–200

  retributivism

  and confrontation and

  and violence 199

  reintegration 200–5

  by God 68

  in revolutionary justice 212–3,

  compared to ex ante methods of

  218–25, 236–7, 245, 248

  dealing with wrongdoing

  and Gandhi 212, 218–25

  8, 179–81, 183

  Index

 

‹ Prev