But resistance to this proposed genocide is stirring. I have no doubt that Providence, acting through good men and women, through you and those who your efforts awaken, enthuse and mobilise, will work the same sort of miraculous turn around in Europe as we have already seen in Russia and Syria. Forza Nuova will be there, just as other national revolutionary parties will be there in other countries at their moment of greatest danger. And, together, we will make history once again.
Together! There is a key word. Already, in its short time in existence, the Alliance for Peace and Freedom has been helping to bring people together. Helping to spread ‘best practice’ throughout nationalist movements across our continent. Bringing nationalists from across disputed old borders to sit down and break bread together and to understand each other’s past and so to begin to draw the poison from it.
It doesn’t matter that, at some point in the future, the Brussels bureaucracy might find an excuse to shut us out. Rest assured, the time will come when we will close their version of Europe - the Europe that betrays, kills and devours its own children - down for good!
This “European-level political party” of ours is, maybe for the first time, giving us the chance to act according to a common strategy. At a time of dynamic, tectonic political shifts, such co-ordination is hugely important. Because when a Slovakian region has been liberated, all the European regions are going to be liberated. When a patriotic government becomes possible in one place, it becomes possible in others too. When we work together to publicise and defend a nationalist advance in one country, we defend and speed the nationalist advances that will come in our own. Because the future is now on our side, and we are on the side of the future.
So be brave and determined. The time of ‘losing’ is over. Maybe we are already much closer to victory than we can at present see. Yes important and costly sacrifices will still be needed. Surely there will be casualties. There will still be people who surrender. But surely there will also be people, more people, men and women, activists, who will have the strength to reach the goal. Then as a boy wrote while Budapest was burning: “After the night there is always the dawn”. And, coming as it will after such a long, bitter night, ours will be the most beautiful there has ever been!
RECONQUISTA: THE 100 YEARS WAR - AND THE ONLY WAY TO WIN IT
Nick Griffin
The passion and wisdom of nationalist leaders past and present are a vital source of inspiration to each rising generation of new activists. But such ideas are only of use if they not only inspire but are also applicable in the here and now and, especially, in the future.
In the past, it was a fairly safe bet that they would be, because when all was said and done, apart from the development of seemingly ever greater technological advances and complexity, the circumstances of each new generation were not in general so very different to those of previous ones. The familiar rhythm of human life went on. Yes, there might be war, plague or famine, but natural human fertility always restored the balance, returning things to ‘normal’, while, similarly, the ideas and practical proposals of yesteryear invariably served as a good guide for the future.
Today, however, this old certainty is gone. For we do not live in a natural society. Rather, we live in one so deeply unnatural that almost no-one has been able to grasp just how destructive it is. I am not writing here about the destructive work of various elite groups and vested interests in undermining the nation state. I am not even referring primarily to the genocidal intention behind, and impact of, mass Third World immigration. The real core of the problem, the real crisis, is even more profound.
Because the success of the various elite projects to destroy the nations and the peoples of Europe is only a symptom of a far deeper, far more basic and dangerous problem. It comes down to this: If you dig a large hole, there’s really no point complaining when it fills up with water.
The hole in Europe is demographic. Now, when nationalists talk of ‘demography’ they are generally talking about immigration and the supposedly ‘high birth rate’ of the immigrants. Unfortunately, this is only half of the real story. Because the brutal truth is that the immigrants do NOT have ‘high birth rates’. They have something approaching normal birth rates. The only reason they appear ‘high’ is in comparison with OUR birth rate, which is catastrophically, suicidally low!
Yes, I’ve heard a thousand variations on the standard excuse: “we can’t afford to have a family”. Nonsense! Let me translate that: “We can’t afford to have children and holidays, and all the other consumer baubles without which our friends will consider us ‘losers’. So we have a small dog instead of children. And when we see the local school filling up with immigrants we’ll either pretend it’s a wonderful thing or we’ll demand that the politicians do something about it, and in either case, we’ll move away as quickly and as far as possible.”
No-one forces the physically and mentally healthy majority of the enormous heterosexual populations of the nations of Europe to be childless, or to have just one child, or to stop at two – which is still below replacement level. Yes, there are economic problems but they don’t stop immigrant populations reproducing at our tax expense, and no-one in Western Europe has to exist at anything like the level of real poverty in which most of our forebears in the 19th century reared families in which nine or ten children were considered entirely normal (as indeed they are).
Yes, our TV screens and education system overflow with leftist, white genocide propaganda about overpopulation and guilt. Yes, we all face a daily avalanche of capitalist marketing which tries to convince us that we simply cannot live without the latest needlessly created want. But it is OUR decision to allow ourselves to be infected by this poison.
And Europeans have done so by the hundreds of millions. Our demographic winter is caused not by black and brown babies, it’s about the lack of white ones. From Vladivostok to Lisbon, from the Arctic Circle to Lampedusa, the cradles are empty, the nurseries are silent, except for the ticking of the clock as time runs out for our kind and for the materially brilliant society which we created and have now thrown away. And the same is true in the New World.
Many patriots and all nationalists understand that ‘we’ are being replaced in our own homelands. The better informed can debate long into the night exactly which gang of anti-white globalist criminals has played the key role in the decision to push this ‘Great Replacement’, but they’d do better to spend much less time debating and complaining, and much more time looking for spouses and making babies.
The maternity wards and schools can only fill up with immigrant children because they are already empty of our own. Faced with a shortage of young consumers and homegrown workers, capitalism and the welfare state alike actually have no choice but to look abroad for replacements.
If our birth rate was actually remotely ‘normal’ then the anti-white, anti-Christian minorities could plot and lie as much as they always have and always will, but most of their plans would be smashed on the rocks of fact – when you have a large, young and growing population, there simply isn’t physical room to bring in ‘others’, or psychological space for the ideologies of guilt and collective suicide.
As it is, if every non-European immigrant simply vanished tomorrow then - with the exception of Ireland – there is not a single European nation which could avoid catastrophic economic collapse over the next few decades.
Not so much on account of what the immigrants produce, but because of what they buy and consume. Their disappearance or removal would save the vast amounts of taxes and social and security problems imposed on our societies by the failed multi-cultural experiment. But the ‘loss’ of so many young consumers (even though many of them only consume thanks to liberal state handouts of our taxes) would have drastic economic consequences; the resulting crash in demand for consumer goods would plunge us into a deep economic recession. And in most of Europe there are already too few you
ng women to have enough children to fill the gap twenty years later.
This is not alarmism or speculation, it is a simple demographic and material fact. Even if the nationalist parties which exist in every one of our countries were elected on a mandate of sending every last immigrant back to their lands of ethnic origin, then the highly advanced, comfortable, modern societies which we have come to regard as normal, would still all cease to exist within our lifetimes.
The birth rates in our various countries differ. In much of southern Europe, the average native birth rate is around 1 child per woman of childbearing age. These countries are already caught in what demographers know as the 4:2:1 trap – four grandparents had two children who have one child. The result is that there are already so few young girls in the population that the only way to save those societies from economic and social collapse would be for each of them to have an impossible average of 20 children.
Once one accepts the points above as true and inescapable, the most pertinent question is this: How can the problem have become so shatteringly serious without people noticing and why is it not obvious? Basically because people in their fifties and sixties still make a big contribution to society, but their child-producing days are over. So the shortage of children takes decades to show up.
The nations with these birth rates are poised on the cusp of a catastrophic population decline, because the post-war Baby Boom generation are starting to die like flies in autumn. The social impact on a society in which fewer and fewer young workers have to fund and care for more and more old people will be shattering. And the economic impact, hitting everything from property prices to GDP and taxes, will be disastrous.
Having one child per family may seem unexceptional and undramatic, but the habit has already taken hold. As a result the population of these countries is already so much older than what is normal in any human society that it is now inevitable that, by the end of this century, their total population will be a mere 10% of what it is now. Not a 10% drop, but a population just 10% of what it is now. The drop will be 90%, and – short of a three generation Total War breeding programme which placed demands on the entire population which are totally ‘unsaleable’ in any society, let alone a democracy – there is nothing that anyone can do to stop it.
In North West Europe, some nations have what appears a somewhat healthier birthrate, but strip out the fast-breeding African and Muslim communities and the real native figure is similar to the more immediately obviously doomed (former) Catholic south. The difference between Italy, and England and Germany is that, assuming external circumstances do not produce a change in migration patterns to fill the vacuum (actually a very unwise assumption), then Italy will remain Italian but be empty, whereas England and Germany will be full but no longer English or German.
Take your pick as to which you think is worse, but don’t think you can – like the old Anglo-Danish king Canute – try hold back the demographic tide by pretending that the Iron Law of Population has miraculously ceased to apply. (“The people of any country that refuses to have children will be replaced by the children of countries that do”)
Even in central and eastern Europe, where recent political developments speak very clearly of a collective rejection of the European Union’s “suicide-through-immigration” policy, there is a demographic disaster in the making.
Several countries have had the sense and good fortune to elect governments which understand the demographic situation sufficiently that they are producing policies and funds explicitly designed to encourage their young people to marry and have large families. But it is not yet anything like enough.
Thus, in nations such as Hungary and Belarussia, there is some hope that the central/eastern European average of 1.7 children per woman will creep upwards. It needs to, because while the long-term impact of this sort of figure is only half as bad as having just one child, the statistical inevitability if this goes on is that the population will fall by nearly 80% by the end of the century.
The remaining 20% will have a ‘choice’ between living in a socially and economically failed state, or turning their countries into African breeding colonies and hoping that, by some miraculous process of ethno-cultural osmosis, the newcomers will magically acquire the ability to maintain the advanced modern society which they have so singularly failed to do in their own homelands since achieving independence in the 1960s.
Further east still, Russia, rather like the USA and Great Britain, now has a superficially ‘healthy’ demographic pulse rate. In the case of Putin’s state, this is partly because of quite generous incentives to couples to have children. But despite increasing criticism from the Orthodox church, Russia’s abortion rate remains part of a demographic as well as moral catastrophe. Russia is woefully underpopulated, as a direct result of the use of abortion as a form of barbaric contraception.
What has been done in the West by the Pill has been done in Russia by the abortionist. More than 100 million abortions in horrifying fact – the same death toll as four Great Patriotic Wars.
With this continuing even now, the recent reversal in Russia’s demographic decline has happened largely because Russia is the world’s biggest in-migration state, now welcoming more immigrants every year even than the United States, with its virtually open border to Mexico. Russia, like the West, is turning Muslim. True, Russia’s Muslims have a long-established historical place within the history and sentiments of the Russian Empire. Seen, at least, from afar, they seem much better integrated, but even if that remains the case, Russian civilisation is centred on the Orthodox Christian faith, so it is inconceivable that it could survive if the current demographic trend continues and so turns Russia into a majority Muslim nation.
Muslims have a traditional place in, and a value to Russian civilisation, but if they were to become the majority it would cease to be Russian civilisation.
There have been times in the past when individual European nations suffered sustained low birth rate crises, but these were localised and were dealt with through large scale immigration from neighbouring countries, with the result that they were quickly resolved, leaving no noticeable consequences save a change in surnames.
The partial vacuum left in France by the mass murders of the French Revolution and the annihilation of Napoleon’s armies in Russia and at Waterloo, was filled by decades of quiet immigration from Italy, Greece and Spain.
The English middle class slashed its birth rate at the end of the Victorian era. The damage was duly compounded by the First World War, but was largely concealed by the impact of continued migration from Scotland and especially Ireland.
In terms of “white Christian babies” the collapse in the indigenous British birth rate is now being partially masked by the large numbers of Polish and other East European couples having children in UK hospitals. But this is a ‘last gasp’ impact, since the birth rates of the eastern ‘donor’ countries are simply too low for the flow to continue in large enough numbers to make up for the widening population black hole in the West.
Indeed, the new campaigns by several eastern European states to persuade some of their young émigrés to come home are only the first beginnings of what will inevitably become intense competition between aging nations for energetic, intelligent and fertile young immigrants from culturally and ethnically assimilable stock.
Whether to Eastern Europe or the New World, the West will lose out heavily in this competition as the economic problems caused by a rapidly ageing population are compounded by the social and economic failure of the programme to replace the missing indigenous youngsters with Third World immigrants. The further growth of Wahhabi terrorism among those populations will add to the temptation for young people in the West to leave for the homogenous peace and growing economies of the East.
Meanwhile, campaigns by countries such as Australia, New Zealand and Argentina to attract young Brits, Spaniards, Italians and so on will becom
e increasingly aggressive and compelling. The gaps will have to be filled somehow.
Thus everyone involved – capitalists wanting consumers as well as cheap labour, young people wanting others to share the tax burden of supporting so many pensioners, and old people needing affordable care workers – will have very compelling reasons to back the ideologically motivated mania of various elite groups for continued mass immigration.
Robotisation (the route being taken by Japan to deal with the same crisis) undoubtedly has a role in reducing the need for unskilled and repetitive labour, but robots will not buy consumer goods. So they are of limited utility in a capitalist society with a debt-based fiat money system which relies on economic growth to function.
Furthermore, robotisation would do nothing to fill the most deadly vacuum of all in a demographically dying society – empty houses and empty land, just begging to be used by the tired and hungry masses of less happier lands, whose wide-eyed, innocent, desperate children would be a constant source of reproach and propaganda for a relaxation of the rules (and a return to the suicide-by-immigration policy of Western elites today).
All this – and particularly the necessity to radically reform the financial system - does at least provide radical nationalism with genuine grounds to claim that it is the only political ideology even theoretically capable of providing a peaceful and stable transition to the new society that now has to emerge as a result of a demographic crisis already too far advanced to turn around and go back to ‘normal’.
“All” that is required to secure the survival of any West European nation is now the coming to power of a government which is able:
Winds of Change Page 8
