i) To persuade the public to stump up to pay, one way or another, for the repatriation of all or at least a large majority of the non-European population, a significant minority of which is in most countries already happily intermarried with the natives;
ii) To do so in the teeth of inevitable resistance by some of those immigrants and all of the political left, who between them would raise hell and make many urban areas ungovernable;
iii) To suppress what would become a well-funded and well-organised attempt by the entire liberal world to create a Coloured Revolution against the government;
iv) To persuade the middle class not merely to accept the economic consequences of the resulting drastic fall in demand for goods and services, but also a crash in house prices and the end of cheap labour;
v) To persuade the entire population, including the business sector, to take the leap of faith involved in the nationalisation and total reconstruction of the entire banking system and of the consumer society;
vi) To explain to the people – as at some point they must – that to keep the economy going despite the rapidly ageing population, certain sacrifices would be unavoidable. As a minimum: An end of unemployment benefits and most disability benefits; no retirement until at least 75 years of age;
vii) To impose on the entire population the measures needed to boost the birth rate to at least four and preferably ten children per woman of child-bearing age: The abolition of the right of young women to go into higher education until they have had at least three children; punitive taxes on all those – of either sex and whatever sexuality - who chose to remain childless; ruthless action to ban all propaganda or lifestyle choices which reduce the birth rate; the abolition of contraception and abortion save in cases of genuine medical need. Finally, population controls to prevent those who do not accept such measures simply emigrating;
viii) To explain to the people that the pain of this ageing population crisis will have to continue for at least 25 years, and that it will actually get worse as large numbers of initially non-productive children have to be funded;
ix) The deployment of heavily robotised armed forces with standing orders to shoot to kill any outsiders trying to crash their way into a society which, it would quite quickly become apparent, is shaping up to survive the even greater strains and chaos emerging in countries trying to solve the same crisis by means of permitting mass immigration from the utterly backward parts of the world which are the only ones producing surplus children;
x) To export this revolution to a defining number of other European nations before the various factions of the globalist elite – who would recognise in such a state a mortal threat to their very existence – were able to produce a causus belli and deal with it in the same way that Nato crushed Serbia when that Christian nation moved to defend its own people in their own heartland from the violence of Islamist ethnic cleansing attacks by the terrorist Kosovan Liberation Army. To quote General Wesley Clarke, ‘justifying’ Nato’s brutal assault on Serbia; “There is no room for mono-ethnic states in modern Europe”
Please note: I am not saying that these things should be done, still less that they could be done. I am merely saying these are among the measures which would now be needed to reverse the demographic crisis.
Now let us be realistic: This is a programme which has absolutely no chance even of being attempted, let alone kept going for a minimum of 25 and up to 75 years.
The decisions and actions needed to transform current Western societies into a new system capable of surviving the indigenous demographic crash, while simultaneously reversing the tide of immigration, are simply impossible without a revolution for which there would be no support. Which is why it will not happen and why the salvation of Europe will have to happen the hard way, which will take 100 years.
Of course, there will be strong populist pressure to find the ‘right sort’ of immigrants, rather than adopting the suicidal approach of Angela Merkel in opening the door to hundreds of thousands of male, potential Jihadists from Sunni Muslim failed states. But the demographic facts are that the world’s population as a whole is ageing rapidly.
Even the Mahgreb countries, Turkey and Mexico will run out of demographic steam in another twenty years – though not before they have provided Christendom with a further dose of mass Muslim immigration large enough to complete the Balkanisation of the whole of Western Europe, and disunited the States of America.
Apart from the actual birthrate, the most telling statistic is the average age of women in each country. In Europe the average woman is over 40 years old – effectively past child-bearing age. The figure in France and the Czech Republic is 41, Belgium 43 and Germany – even with all those young Turks – 46. In North Africa and Mexico, the average woman is aged between 30 – 35, but some are as low as 27 in Algeria and 25 in Egypt, so there are plenty of bogus ‘refugees’ to come over the next few decades. Long term, however, look to Pakistan, average age just 22, and above all to sub-Saharan Africa, where the average female is between 14 and 20 years old.
So the only part of the world with a population young enough and fast-growing enough to replace the vast numbers missing in “the North” thanks to routine contraception, mass abortion and the promotion of homosexuality and a ‘culture’ that sees babies as a burden, is sub-Saharan Africa. But anyone who believes that we can assimilate untold millions of Africans – thoroughly decent folk though many of them are as individuals - and use them to maintain ‘normal’ levels of efficiency and civilisation, has clearly never been to Africa.
The liberal and capitalist elites saw the demographic deficit coming decades ago. And for a variety of reasons they decided that the solution was The Great Replacement – something now so far advanced they no longer even bother to deny it.
The irony that the crisis is a direct result of their own ideologies and policies goes largely unnoticed, while even a debate as to what extent the Death of the Industrial West is suicide or murder is largely now a matter of academic interest, because it is already a fait accompli.
Nothing like this has been seen since the Collapse of the Roman Empire. The die-back rate over one short century will be nearly three times as bad as the Black Death – and this in highly complex societies much more vulnerable to systemic collapse than the simple, largely self-sufficient mediaeval village.
Thus we are caught between a jagged rock and a hard place. Allow continued mass Third World immigration (or even stop it but leave the existing fast-breeder colonies in place) and see it dissolve our countries in crushing societal incompetence and multi-way civil and religious wars.
Or stop and reverse it, which, even if it became politically possible – which, sadly, is extremely unlikely - would involve us watching our economies and societies implode as the top-heavy age pyramid collapses under its own weight and the refusal of its people to accept the sacrifices and terrifying uncertainty of the revolutionary programme needed to overcome the crisis.
Whatever or whoever has caused it, the whole process is unstoppable and irreversible. Society as we know it, our nations as we know them, are dying. The only question is what will replace them?
Let me reiterate once more: This is not alarmism, it is simple demographic fact. It is not avoidable. We cannot choose an alternative future, because the only possible alternative is so drastic that there is absolutely no chance of it even being attempted, let alone carried through. So this civilisational collapse is going to happen as sure as the sun will set this evening. THIS is the Decline of the West, or more accurately, the white north. Any discussion of the problem of the Islamisation of Europe or of resistance to Third World immigration, let alone of ‘Reconquista’, which fails to start from this factual base is so much hot air.
But the moment we accept reality and look at future options in its cold, hard light, the future actually becomes clearer, even brighter. Not for us or for the comfortable, familiar worl
d in which we all grew up, but for the long-term survival of the people who created that remarkable world.
The Age of Ease and Comfort, the mass society of capitalist industrialism, is doomed to collapse, just as all human societies before it have collapsed. But the collapse of a society, while it invariably involves much suffering, does not automatically mean the extinction of the entire people who produced that society; it ‘merely’ transforms the way the survivors and their descendants live their lives. A new form of society emerges from the rubble, perhaps simpler, but life goes on.
We all know that the ‘modern world’ is destroying our people – socially, culturally and genetically. We also know that nationalism is based on the long-term view. The importance of what happens in the present is largely based on the fact that the Present is the link between the Past and the Future of the Nation. The long-term survival of our kind, of our culture and of our core values is what really counts.
That being the case, why should nationalists be disquieted by the fact that the disastrous, diseases of liberalism and liberal capitalist society face certain, catastrophic collapse within the next few decades?
Uncomfortable, even deadly, though the process will undoubtedly be for most of us individually, from a collective, racial perspective, what is about to happen can be seen as the global equivalent of the Great Fire of London, which destroyed most of England’s capital in 1666, but in the process also brought an end to the Great Plague, by destroying the conditions so suitable to the rats that carried the fleas that carried the plague.
The very process of the coming demographically-driven collapse of the ‘modern world’ opens up the possibility that our people, the race which created that world, will emerge on the other side of the catastrophe tougher, wiser and with the long-term future of our race once more secure.
Let us follow things through logically: We have already seen that the capitalist West cannot survive socially or economically without mass immigration, and that it cannot survive socially or politically with it.
The only question is whether the resulting collapse will be an incremental slide into chaos over some years, or if something ‘snaps’ and leads to a paradigm overnight drop into the abyss. There is at present no way of telling, though we’ll find out soon enough.
It is important to understand, however, that human beings are extraordinarily adaptable. A failed state takes many individuals to the grave with it but for many, as already noted, life will go on, albeit much less comfortably and much more insecurely than before.
Let us move on to consider what sort of insecurity there is going to be:
1) The economic strain of fewer and fewer working taxpayers having to sustain more and more pensioners, and to service more and more debt. This makes ever deeper cuts in government spending inevitable. A homogeneous community might react to such pressure by coming together, but one already divided by ethnic differences and by the growth of Islamic fundamentalism will simply fall apart.
2) The coming die-off of the old (white) baby-boomer generation is going to coincide with an equally dramatic explosion in the number of children of immigrant communities reaching the age when they set up homes of their own. The indigenous community will see and feel the process as one of ‘ethnic cleansing’, reacting to it politically and even physically, with enough impact to do huge damage to already strained community relations, but without any prospect of actually turning back the natural tide.
3) Radical Islamism will feed, and feed on, these tensions. For very different reasons, Salafist Muslims and neo-con Zionist elements within the West’s existing power structure both want to incite ethno-religious conflict on the streets of Europe. Frankly, the only surprise is that it hasn’t already exploded. But everyone knows it will. Predictions of ‘civil war’, which used to come only from figures on the political ‘far-right’, are now increasingly made by senior police and intelligence officers. All know it is now not a question of ‘if’, but ‘when’. The same can probably also be said for the United States of America.
4) Even with extensive controlled media censorship, the power of the Internet and social media is now such that serious trouble only has to flare in one place for it to spread much faster than wildfire to every part of the world with similarly unstable ethno-religious mixes. Even before any such technology existed, revolutions and great political upheavals in Europe have always tended to take place in waves that sweep across vast swathes of the continent. The coming storm will do so even quicker and with even greater intensity.
5) Geo-politics. The rapid development of the Russian-Chinese partnership, and its appearance as a pole of attraction for other fast-modernising powers in Eurasia, poses a deadly threat to the global economic hegemony of the USA. The completion of China’s “One Belt, One Road” project of high-speed railways linking not just Asia and Russia but also Germany and the rest of central and western Europe, the Mediterranean and the Atlantic, would spell the end of the short century of American global dominance.
That is unacceptable to the ‘American’ elite, which has already taken steps to plant massive landmines at key points along the route, including Ukraine, the Balkans and – with the help of Angela Merkel – in the German powerhouse. Even if the victory of Donald Trump does end up destroying the imperialist aggression of the Anglo-Zionist Establishment, thos land-mines are already in place, and they will detonate by themselves, just as many of the social and cultural timebombs planted by Communist subversuves in the West before 1989 went on to explode after the fall of the Soviet Union.
These factors make it almost inevitable that the final collapse of the West will be bloody, a civil war in which the superior technical skills and higher average intelligence and capability of discipline of the indigenous side are set against the youthful vigour and ever-growing numbers, and eagerness to die of so many of the newcomers, who will rally around the black banners of Wahhabi Islam to plunge the West into chaos and darkness.
The explosion will unavoidably cause massive casualties among unprepared and softened European populations, with young men particularly targeted for mass murder and young women seized as sex slaves.
But it will also mean the end of liberalism and of the welfare state and effective medical care. All of which will combine with the higher birth rate which is the natural response to war and ethnic conflict, to produce a baby boom in the European enclaves which will emerge as the continent is Balkanised.
Many nationalists take comfort in the idea that “once our people are forced to fight everything will turn around very quickly”. Unfortunately, the demographics tell a different story. We cannot “take back Europe” in the course of a few years of all-out civil war, for the simple reason that there are not enough Europeans to settle and hold the resulting living spaces.
Look at our major cities, many of which are already huge Third World colonies. True, you will find large numbers of their former, indigenous inhabitants living in retirement in the suburbs, or in holiday areas, or in expat communities in rural France and on the Spanish coast. But London, Paris, Brussels and Berlin are already largely foreign cities not because the previous inhabitants have moved, but primarily because they failed to replace themselves and have already died. The shrunken, ageing population will not “take back” the lost cities and lands, because it is physically impossible to do so.
We are already entering the third generation of geometric population decline. And the resulting crisis cannot possibly take less than three generations of geometric growth to reverse. Which is why the Reconquista is going to take one hundred years.
The same will be true if the process of European decline and dispossession happens relatively peacefully, with a slow decline leading to the eventual collapse. In that case, the largest minority will still be Europeans. And, old though their population is, they will still produce children.
Whether it happens rapidly by force or more slowly by weig
ht of numbers and conviction, domination by Islam is inevitable, as is the fact that the process will spark a reaction and increasing division into rival ethnic blocks.
Even if the process is more or less peaceful, the ‘Third Worldisation’ of Europe will mean the end of the welfare state, which means that the only reliable form of security in old age is to have large numbers of children and grandchildren. Thus those Europeans who do still exist will not only become more ethnically aware, but will also be driven to begin to breed once again.
But regardless of exactly how the collapse comes about, the most important element in the subsequent revival of European demographics will not be those who are forced by circumstances, or bribed by far-sighted central European nations to have more children, but those who CHOOSE to do so. Which is where long-sighted nationalist movements could really have an impact.
As you know only too well, genuine nationalists are being edged out from even the margins of conventional political power by the Establishment’s new and highly successful tactic of promoting civic nationalist safety valve parties. Our efforts broke the ice for them. We can recruit from them. We can infiltrate our ideas into them. But we cannot compete with them in the ballot box for what is going in any case to be a rapidly shrinking white vote.
Denied any effective conventional role, we urgently need to find new ways of being relevant and of offering realistic hope and worthwhile activities to those who understand what is going on. Failure to do so will inevitably lead to a desperate minority losing their heads and drifting down the road to nihilism and counter-productive and morally indefensible terrorism.
Fortunately, the same power of geometric progression which has led to this whole crisis also contains the solution. Suppose that, instead of fixating on unwinnable elections, the nationalist minority set itself the task of changing the reproductive behaviour of just 1% of the present generation just entering its childbearing years.
Winds of Change Page 9
