Ethnic Apocalypse

by Guillaume Faye

  Anti-racism has become a self-destructive concept, not only because it can be applied to virtually anything but, most importantly, because it leads to anti-White racism and hatred for France’s European identity. Moreover, it is one of the main factors contributing to the decline of freedom of expression and the judicialisation of debates, which brings us closer to the situation of totalitarian countries, whose taboos and protected dogmas one is forbidden to transgress. Yet again, through a heterotelic kind of backlash, anti-racism results in the opposite effect to the one intended, fostering the resurgence of racist theories that come across as being nonconformist. Braving the intelligentsia, Pascal Bruckner writes: ‘Anti-racism ends up delegitimising the very idea of a fight against racism, a fight that takes on a disproportionate attitude and contradicts its own terms’. The exclusion of white people is not considered a sign of racist discrimination, since white men themselves are obviously the source of all discrimination and racism…

  What is alarming is that our courts accept these masquerades and investigate the accusations, complaints and lawsuits filed by the members of pro-immigration, vindictively Muslim and Islamo-leftist anti-racist back rooms, with the notion of our indigenous population’s unbearably racist Islamophobia always lurking in the background.

  A Highly Charged Society

  Undergoing Gradual Racialisation

  In doing so, our unjust justice system is exacerbating passions. The rise of racial tensions is visible within the immigrant and Muslim population (having practically become synonymous with it in France), which is especially true of its youths. It is a population that is now increasingly aware — within its secretly hateful and dissenting conscience — of its belonging to a non-white world engaged in a struggle against a France deemed scornful and hostile. The racist contagion of this hatred will lead to a war which, in addition to its ethnic and cultural character, will also be of a racial nature. It will, furthermore, involve non-Muslims such as black Africans or mixed-race individuals that often convert to Islam not for religious reasons, but for racial ones. Such is the solidarity of inferior peoples against the ‘white oppressor’ (who welcomed them on his own soil, but what does that matter, right?).

  Speaking of those immigrants and people of colour one encounters everywhere, a friend of mine, who happens to be a professor of sociology (the discipline that prefers observation to speculation), recently pointed out to me that what they basically do is ‘raise their heads, act arrogantly and proceed to provoke us. For many years now, their attitude in public spaces has been both aggressive and irritable. They constantly demand our “respect”’.

  In this deeply racialised society pervaded by a detestable anti-racist vulgate that exclusively targets white racism, Islam enjoys an abnormal status: it is increasingly accepted as both the religion and the emblem of coloured people, i.e. of the eternally oppressed (yet largely aided, privileged and subsidised), at a time when massacres and oppressive actions are gleefully carried out in its name. It is all part of a pathological paradox in which the executioner presents himself as the condemned.

  Destroying Marxist

  Discourse before It Destroys Us

  I would not want to make matters any more difficult for my editor than they already are with regard to this book, whose mere title could be enough to have us imprisoned by the 17th criminal chamber.138 Believe me when I say that I have thus far been refraining from stating what is truly on my mind. My hatred for the false discourse of leftist academics does, however, deserve — at least — a sub-chapter of its own.

  I am a normal person, and I see what I see. Having perceived things as they are, I describe what I have witnessed, only what I have witnessed, and everything I have witnessed. There are no frills and no emphasis involved. To me, and to all normal people, a cleaner is above all a housekeeper; a small person, a dwarf; and a person of colour, one who can also be said to be black, since it is a shorter and more accurate description.

  When a Marxist thinker appears on a TV set in order to express his opinion (and such people are constantly invited by TV presenters that share their ideas), it is for the sole purpose of intellectualising, blurring and thus rendering unsolvable the daily problems experienced by our French natives, who are forced to live among non-Whites. This open-eyed nightmare of theirs is repeated day in, day out. Our rulers impose immigration upon each and every one of us, as sociologists, psychologists, philosophers and other accomplices are seen on television in their fancy clothes and lovely little brown-nose glasses, telling us that it is all actually a blessing. The process of ethnic replacement is underway, but all is well, no problemo…

  Of course, the more time passes, the greater the immigrant presence becomes, and the more difficult it is to abide by the fanciful claim that ‘what the French and the foreigners feel for one another is great love!’ To smother our genuine suffering and legitimate anxieties, the floor is exclusively given to self-proclaimed experts whose aim is to euthanise our people’s anger while attempting to artificially shift its focus.

  Speaking on a programme that is no longer aired,139 Thomas Guénolé, a pretentious political scientist serving the interests of La France Insoumise (a fact that already says enough about him), made me realise just how dangerous all economic discourses can be when used as deus ex machina argumentation to nip any hope of debate in the bud.

  During his glorious propagandic performance, this degenerate with the face of the perfect son-in-law told us all about the famous ‘social diversity’. Here already, we are faced with a lie and a travesty of the truth aimed at making the latter more palatable: what we are dealing with is not social diversity, since the suburbs are typically inhabited by proletarians and one can thus hardly speak of such a notion. No, what we have here is a situation of ethnic diversity. Indeed, these ‘tough neighbourhoods’ (another expression used by leftists to avoid using the term ‘shitholes’) comprise a chaotic mixture of Blacks, Arabs, and Whites trying to subsist amidst this fauna without being slaughtered. Remaining calmly impassive, this gentleman proceeded to explain to us that ‘social diversity is merely the side effect of a policy whose purpose is to reduce inequalities’. Oh, now I get it — when the powers-that-be send non-Europeans to live amongst the French in their own villages, they do so in an attempt to reduce inequalities and out of sheer philanthropy, you see. At a later point, he finally expanded on his theory: ‘I would like to warn everyone against the intellectual scam epitomised by the issue of identity within the sphere of political debate’. This is where Thomas Guénolé stops beating around the bush and uses straightforward language to ensure that his postulate is perfectly understood.

  In the eyes of those irredeemable masturbators of cosmopolitan thought, if Arabs and Whites cannot stand one another, it is not because they are too culturally or genetically different, but only because they are poor. Always the same ridiculous utopia. Thomas Guénolé and all those who hold a similar discourse really expect us to believe that if Mokhtar labels your daughter a ‘whore’ and tries to rape her behind a dustbin, it is merely because this kind-hearted Momo is poor and a little frustrated, definitely not because he is a Muslim; and especially not because he is Maghrebian…

  If such Sunday Times analysts spoke with simpler words, without jargon and without systematically saying one thing instead another, most viewers would realise that their words are almost always utter nonsense. I am now convinced that these braggarts of the anti-racist Left deliberately resort to Marxist phrasing and convoluted structures so as to give their speech an illusory veneer of intelligence and impose their conclusions upon a public that remains necessarily respectful of all famous writers and columnists appearing on TV!

  In order to be victorious, it shall be necessary to prove, over and over again, that people such as Guénolé are enemies of France. Imagine yourself at a table in a restaurant: you order fish, only to be brought a rotten fish that stinks from several meters’ distance. Well, there would always be a Guénolé w
aiting in the corner, explaining to you that the situation is perfectly normal and that there is no reason to be alarmed since things have always been like this, throughout the ages. Knowing perfectly well that something is wrong, you resign yourself to the situation and simply eat your fish. Well, the very same process is taking place with regard to immigrational invasion. Two-thirds of our French people question this development but unplug their brains the moment neo-Marxist celebrities tell them that their existence within this multicultural jungle is actually fabulous. It is allegedly enough to say it in order to be convinced: our lives in occupied France are simply wonderful! Tell me then, what are you complaining about?

  And yet a glimmer of hope is still rekindled in me when I consider the path that some leftist figures have taken towards us. I’m thinking of Franck Lepage in particular, a man who offers people treatment for their ‘political cant afflictions’ in the form of sketches. Driven mad by the inconsistency of his own side’s political leaders, Lepage embraced dissent several years ago, in the primary sense of the word. In a rather hilarious performance, this humourist has shown that some catchall phrases can be used, linked and combined in any direction, to say absolutely anything and the very opposite.140 Such words are what our rotten politicians constantly use, and some leftists have taken a step towards this salutary cause of ours.

  Although I have already talked about her, YouTuber Tatiana Ventôse has also come a long way since her first videos. She now expresses, ever more often, her annoyance at the very high level of insecurity characterising the Parisian region. On her YouTube channel, one can watch many videos dealing with Islam, of which she speaks in not very laudatory terms. Last but not least, it is not uncommon for one to see her virulently criticise the thinkers of our most despicable anti-French Left, including Moroccan-born scum Jean-Luc Mélenchon.

  Of course, I can only deplore the fact that these people lack the courage — or, due to their genuine convictions, the actual desire — to cross the racialist Rubicon so as to finally understand and state that if certain populations behave one way or another, it is because that is what they are like deep inside. Race does indeed account for everything.

  Before the coming civil war (or perhaps even during it), different groups will clash within the Left itself, a Left that will undergo gradual disintegration, especially because of Islam. Some men and women openly committed to the Left will no longer be able to bear the presence of Islamo-leftist traitors among them. In his recent book entitled Et la gauche devint la putain de l’islam,141 Pierre Cassen has successfully highlighted the schism that is now taking place between collaborationist leftism and the real patriotic Left. We sincerely hope that our dear old opponents, who once idolised Trotsky, Lenin or Marx and have now understood that the path of identitarian struggle is the only one worth taking (in addition to realising that what their peers are preaching is the abolishment of our borders and the unrestrained welcoming of immigrants), will fight alongside us when the time is right.

  For we shall require all of our brothers and sisters if we are to emerge victorious from the coming war. Every single one of them.

  Chapter XI:

  How the War Shall Unfold — Possibilities and Predictions

  The coming racial civil war is likely to be triggered in accordance with the model of the 2005 riots, meaning that it shall no longer be restricted to a single area of our territory but, in harmony with an accretion of ethnic solidarity, involve riots scattered synchronically across France, making the latter difficult to control. In comparison with the events of 2005, however, the intensity will be much higher this time round, with much more coordination between the different hotbeds.

  Just like in 2005, everything will be set in motion using a self-victimising pretext — the accidental death of young Afro-Maghrebian Muslims implicated, as always, in various acts of delinquency, as a result of a mistake or any other doing that could serve as a motive and involve the police, if possible. It is never those poor people’s fault; they are simply always dragged into the worst situations by chance.

  Although a less likely development, the flare-up could also come about following the death of some black African scum. Just think back to the tumult that France experienced at the time of the Theo affair, which had already set suburbs ablaze all over France. And now that we mention it, let us not forget the outcome of this minor news event: the amiable, wide-arsed Theo had, in fact, provoked the police first (the CCTV cameras have since enabled their vindication), not to mention the fact that he and his entire family had also committed fraud offences amounting to tens of thousands of euros. One would be inclined to believe that these people only enjoy life by violating the laws of the Western states that welcome them. Gratitude is clearly not part of their vocabulary.

  The Architects of the Civil War Are Now Ready

  It is quite possible that some vaguely Muslim agitators and strategists — espousing Islam either through real faith or because of their hatred of Europeans, and enjoying ties to well-established cultural and religious associations — are now preparing the necessary scenarios for the coming insurrectional riots, with the purpose of ensuring that the latter last a long time and are fraught with violence, involving, whenever possible, spectacular deaths in their own ranks so as to fuel the martyrology that has allowed this sect to survive for centuries on end. All in an effort to exert pressure upon the French authorities, whose members are as impressionable and emotional as their public opinion, and to make them yield, retreat, negotiate and fulfil various demands.

  It is quite possible that the Muslim countries that have fallen prey to the Salafist cancer (namely Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Morocco, Algeria, and Turkey) and are thus very interested in fuelling the invasion and Islamisation of Western Europe — whether officially or, at least, through ‘private’ forces — shall provide the tenacious future rioters and saboteurs with the required advice, guidance, and financial and military means to achieve this.

  Expecting an Extreme Level of Violence

  The coming events shall reach a much higher level of brutality compared to those of 2005. There are nowadays more Muslims in France than back then, and more Blacks as well, with French people themselves having reached an alarming saturation stage.

  One cannot exclude the possibility that the very intensity and relentlessness of this civil war between different peoples on the same soil shall rival that of sixteenth-century European wars of religion, the French Revolution or the Commune. One shall, for instance, witness the destruction of private homes and public buildings through arson; the ravaging of urban centres; forest fires; countless looting offences targeting department stores and housing facilities; and the destruction of infrastructures, administrative buildings and public utilities, including, above all else, our police stations and gendarmeries. Such is the logic of raids, one that remains ever so dear to these people and for which we had a small dress rehearsal on the evenings of 14th–15th July, 2018, when our black-black-black national football team won the world cup. As is always the case with Islam and its followers, rioting and political guerrilla warfare are inextricably linked to everyday crime.

  For the first time ever, we shall also experience deaths among our own indigenous population, within a context of gigantic demonstrations. Our law enforcement forces will often find themselves overwhelmed, and the rioters’ constantly increasing use of firearms will no longer be seen as something exceptional. A new limit shall thus be crossed. The riots, which will take on the shape of armed, devastating and deadly guerrilla warfare, shall extend across our whole territory and leave no private home unaffected, as individuals are attacked at home. The events shall be all the more ruthless and hateful since they shall be driven by a psyche of frustration, resentment and revenge exacerbated by an omnipresent racial mental complex.

  It is also to be expected that, not having anything else to do with their lives, many leftist-anarchist troublemaker groups will rush to the aid of the Afro-Maghrebi
an rioters and soldiers of Islam in order to stimulate them and spur them on in their acts of violence. None of them shall, however, be rewarded for their behaviour. Should the allogeneic side emerge victorious, the collaborators will not be given the position they hope for in this future society. Instead, what awaits them is death, humiliation, beatings and a state of modern slavery.

  The Civil War May Yet Prove to Be Counterproductive from the Rioters’ Perspective

  This unbridled violence may obviously turn out to be largely counterproductive for the Muslim-Arab strategists behind the insurrections — for it is likely to trigger an uncontrollable chain of events: not only could our public opinion shift to the disadvantage of these immigrants, but the indigenous population playing an active role in the war could, just like the police, switch to an attitude of defensive counter-violence that would lift many taboos.

  Due to the destructive and sometimes sanguinary nature of this civil war, the audio-visual dissemination of shocking images, especially on social networks, may yet arouse repulsion towards our non-European aggressors, who would then be seen for what they really are and no longer as the victims of racist oppression. This development could lead to a change of mentality reaching far beyond the borders of France.