SJWs Always Double Down: Anticipating the Thought Police (The Laws of Social Justice Book 2)
Page 19
Definitions are nebulous for you, and you don’t hesitate to redefine words in order to suit your immediate needs during a discussion. If someone quotes the dictionary and it disagrees with your definition, that means they are arguing unfairly. Also, the dictionary is wrong.
When you are finally shown that you are conclusively wrong about something, it is personally devastating to you, you remember the terrible experience for years, avoid the place and the people involved as much as possible, and consider your time spent there to have been a personal failure.
You can’t even take a mild ribbing from other men about anything outside of a few harmless topics, and will immediately fly into a barely-controlled rage if you are successfully lampooned by anyone. Afterwards, you will look for opportunities to seek vengeance on them for the indefinite future. This isn’t based on the normal male desire to best the competition, but upon hatred of the other guy, and you will tend to avoid that person and speak badly of them to others.
In contrast you will sit idly by and meekly accept it when a woman openly mocks you. You consider accepting contempt from women as an expected duty of being a nice guy.
In the last year, you can recall multiple women cracking jokes at your expense, pubicly mocking you, talking you down to their friends, and otherwise holding you in low regard without any fear of consequences.
The mere thought of being at the center of a comedy roast fills you with dread.
You think width of knowledge is more important than depth of knowledge.
You are an expert on everything and are always ready to give your opinion even when you aren’t sure you actually know what you are talking about. If you have read about something on Wikipedia once, you consider that to be sufficient for your opinion on the subject to be relevant and respected.
If someone says they aren’t interested in your opinion you take it as a personal slight. This lack of interest in your opinion means they aren’t interested in you, and they probably hate you as well.
If someone tells a story, you immediately have to follow up that story with one of your own, which may or may not be related to the topic, and of course is more interesting, more important and longer. If you don’t have a good story, you’ll just say something snarky in response in order to diminish the other story in some way.
You constantly throw out flippant remarks with the expectation that they are always amusing, appropriate, and witty.
When telling an anecdote to a group and someone mentions they have already heard it, you go ahead and tell it again because you aren’t sure if everyone else has heard it. And besides, they will probably enjoy hearing it again.
You routinely quote movies, comics, and television shows, complete with funny voices, in your everyday conversation.
You genuinely believe that quoting Monte Python and the Holy Grail is the sign of a witty, intelligent, and well-educated individual. The more often, the better.
When a movie or story is brought up, you explain the entire plot and all of the details regardless of whether the people you are with asked for the information, or even said they liked it.
You sit out nearly all group competitions because you always have better things to do, and anyway, you’d just rather talk to your friends.
At a group event you never voluntarily take part in any sport if you can avoid it.
If you start to lose at any game you find a way to quit if you can. Afterwards, you save face by putting down the game or the other players.
If someone defeats you at a game or in a competition, you can’t look them in the eye afterwards and will try to avoid them if possible.
If you win at a competition, you explain to your opponent all of the things they did wrong, whether they they asked for the critique or not.
You have at least one good female friend and are always looking for more.
You are always willing to take that 2 AM call from a female friend who isn’t looking to meet up with you, but is seeking late-night emotional support.
You tend to focus on a single dream girl to the exclusion of all others, and will spend months waiting for the perfect time to ask her out and planning the perfect way to do it. In most cases, your dream girl is obviously out of your league.
You think women are good and innocent creatures, and those who do wrong or behave badly have been corrupted by the evil men in their lives.
Fixing a woman with a lot of problems is a noble effort, and you are always ready for the challenge..
You permit women to use your old mistakes and bad choices to instill guilt in you in order to get their way.
You must justify all of your actions and thoughts to the woman you are with, usually in excruciating detail.
You believe it is always wrong to fight back against a violent woman no matter what the circumstances are.
You know you could be more successful with women if you tried, but doing so would require being a jerk or a dude-bro, and you respect women too much to do that. It is more important for you to be true to yourself. Besides, the right woman will respect that about you and be attracted to your strength of character.
Feelings should routinely be shared, and others should always take your feelings into account when making decisions.
You routinely lie about small, personal matters whenever you know you can get away with it.
If you see a couple arguing, your first instinct is to assume the man is wrong and that the woman may be in need of your help.
If you see an attractive woman in in a bad state, your interest in her is immediately piqued. Now that she has been taken down a notch or two, you have a better chance with her.
You often babble semi-coherently and move on to a new, tangentially-related subject before you’ve completed whatever thought it was that you started talking about."
You attempt to dominate the conversation without seeking to actually engage the other’s interest or determine if he is interested in your opinion. You frequently leave people wondering “what on Earth is he going on about?”
You have a serious problem providing direct answers to questions. You will answer five different questions that you think they might have asked, or should have asked, while somehow failing to answer the one question that was actually asked.
Appendix C: Code of Merit
Code of Merit
The project creators, lead developers, core team, constitute the managing members of the project and have final say in every decision of the project, technical or otherwise, including overruling previous decisions. There are no limitations to this decisional power.
Contributions are an expected result of your membership on the project. Don’t expect others to do your work or help you with your work forever.
All members have the same opportunities to seek any challenge they want within the project.
Authority or position in the project will be proportional to the accrued contribution. Seniority must be earned.
Software is evolutive: the better implementations must supersede lesser implementations. Technical advantage is the primary evaluation metric.
This is a space for technical prowess; topics outside of the project will not be tolerated.
Non technical conflicts will be discussed in a separate space. Disruption of the project will not be allowed.
Individual characteristics, including but not limited to, body, sex, sexual preference, race, language, religion, nationality, or political preferences are irrelevant in the scope of the project and will not be taken into account concerning your value or that of your contribution to the project.
Discuss or debate the idea, not the person.
There is no room for ambiguity: Ambiguity will be met with questioning; further ambiguity will be met with silence. It is the responsibility of the originator to provide requested context.
If something is illegal outside the scope of the project, it is illegal in the scope of the project. This Code of Merit does not take precedence over governing law.
>
This Code of Merit governs the technical procedures of the project not the activities outside of it.
Participation on the project equates to agreement of this Code of Merit.
No objectives beyond the stated objectives of this project are relevant to the project. Any intent to deviate the project from its original purpose of existence will constitute grounds for remedial action which may include expulsion from the project.
This document is the Code of Merit (http://code-of-merit.org), version 1.0.
Science Fiction
Awake in the Night Land by John C. Wright
City Beyond Time: Tales of the Fall of Metachronopolis by John C. Wright
Somewhither: A Tale of the Unwithering Realm by John C. Wright
The Corroding Empire 1: Corrosion by Johan Kalsi
Back From the Dead by Rolf Nelson
Hyperspace Demons by Jonathan Moeller
Mutiny in Space by Rod Walker
Alien Game by Rod Walker
Young Man's War by Rod Walker
QUANTUM MORTIS A Man Disrupted by Steve Rzasa and Vox Day
QUANTUM MORTIS Gravity Kills by Steve Rzasa and Vox Day
QUANTUM MORTIS A Mind Programmed by Jeff Sutton, Jean Sutton, and Vox Day
Victoria: A Novel of Fourth Generation War by Thomas Hobbes
Fantasy
One Bright Star to Guide Them by John C. Wright
The Book of Feasts & Seasons by John C. Wright
Iron Chamber of Memory by John C. Wright
Moth & Cobweb 1: Swan Knight's Son by John C. Wright
Moth & Cobweb 2: Feast of the Elfs by John C. Wright
Moth & Cobweb 3: Swan Knight's Sword by John C. Wright
Moth & Cobweb 4: Daughter of Danger by John C. Wright
Moth & Cobweb 5: City of Corpses by John C. Wright
Moth & Cobweb 6: Tithe to Tartarus by John C. Wright
Arts of Dark and Light 0: Summa Elvetica: A Casuistry of the Elvish Controversy by Vox Day
Arts of Dark and Light 1: A Throne of Bones by Vox Day
Arts of Dark and Light 2: A Sea of Skulls by Vox Day
A Magic Broken by Vox Day
The Wardog's Coin by Vox Day
The Last Witchking by Vox Day
The Altar of Hate by Vox Day
The War in Heaven by Vox Day
The World in Shadow by Vox Day
The Wrath of Angels by Vox Day
Military Science Fiction
There Will Be War Vol. I ed. Jerry Pournelle
There Will Be War Vol. II ed. Jerry Pournelle
There Will Be War Vol. III ed. Jerry Pournelle
There Will Be War Vol. IV ed. Jerry Pournelle
There Will Be War Vol. V ed. Jerry Pournelle
There Will Be War Vol. VI ed. Jerry Pournelle
There Will Be War Vol. IX ed. Jerry Pournelle
There Will Be War Vol. X ed. Jerry Pournelle
Plague Wars 0: The Eden Plague by David VanDyke
Plague Wars 1: Reaper's Run by David VanDyke
Plague Wars 2: Skull's Shadows by David VanDyke
Galactic Liberation 1: Starship Liberator by David VanDyke and B.V. Larson
Galactic Liberation 2: Battleship Indomitable by David VanDyke and B.V. Larson
Riding the Red Horse Vol. 1 ed. Tom Kratman and Vox Day
Fiction
An Equation of Almost Infinite Complexity by J. Mulrooney
Hitler in Hell by Martin van Creveld
Loki's Child by Fenris Wulf
The Ames Archives 1: Brings the Lightning by Peter Grant
The Ames Archives 2: Rocky Mountain Retribution by Peter Grant
The Missionaries by Owen Stanley
The Promethean by Owen Stanley
Non-Fiction
4th Generation Warfare Handbook by William S. Lind and LtCol Gregory A. Thiele, USMC
A History of Strategy: From Sun Tzu to William S. Lind by Martin van Creveld
Equality: The Impossible Quest by Martin van Creveld
Clio & Me: An Intellectual Autobiography by Martin van Creveld
Four Generations of Modern War by William S. Lind
On War: The Collected Columns of William S. Lind 2003-2009 by William S. Lind
MAGA Mindset: Making YOU and America Great Again by Mike Cernovich
The Nine Laws by Ivan Throne
Appendix N: A Literary History of Dungeons & Dragons by Jeffro Johnson
Transhuman and Subhuman: Essays on Science Fiction and Awful Truth by John C. Wright
Astronomy and Astrophysics by Dr. Sarah Salviander
Compost Everything: The Good Guide to Extreme Composting by David the Good
Grow or Die: The Good Guide to Survival Gardening by David the Good
Push the Zone: The Good Guide to Growing Tropical Plants Beyond the Tropics by David the Good
SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police by Vox Day
Collected Columns, Vol. I: Innocence & Intellect, 2001—2005 by Vox Day
Collected Columns, Vol. II: Conceit & Crisis, 2006—2009 by Vox Day
Collected Columns, Vol. III: Failure & Freedom, 2010—2012 by Vox Day
Cuckservative: How “Conservatives” Betrayed America by John Red Eagle and Vox Day
On the Existence of Gods by Dominic Saltarelli and Vox Day
On the Question of Free Trade by James D. Miller and Vox Day
Do We Need God To Be Good? by C.R. Hallpike
The LawDog Files by LawDog
The LawDog Files: African Adventures by LawDog