The Complete Memoirs of George Sherston 1 - Memoirs of a Fox-Hunting Man
Page 1
PENGUIN CLASSICS
MEMOIRS OF A FOX-HUNTING MAN
SIEGFRIED SASSOON was born in 1886 and educated at Clare College, Cambridge. While serving in the trenches during the First World War, he began to write poetry, and in 1917, while convalescing from wounds incurred during the fighting, he wrote a declaration against the war, for which he was sent to be treated for neurasthenia. Sassoon’s literary reputation grew after the war, and he is now known as one of the great World War I poets. His semiautobiographical George Sherston trilogy, which includes Memoirs of a Fox-Hunting Man (1928), Memoirs of an Infantry Officer (1930), and Sherston’s Progress (1936), was incredibly successful during his lifetime. He published several more volumes of autobiography before his death in 1967.
PAUL FUSSELL was born in 1925 and fought in World War II, where the death of a close friend on the battlefield next to him deeply affected his life and work, and eventually led to his writing the classic The Great War and Modern Memory, which won both the National Book Award for Arts and Letters and the National Book Critics Circle Award for Criticism. He edited Sassoon’s Long Journey for Oxford University Press and wrote or edited over twenty other books in his lifetime. He died in May 2012.
S I E G F R I E D S A S S O O N
Memoirs of a
Fox-Hunting Man
Introduction by
PAUL FUSSELL
PENGUIN BOOKS
PENGUIN BOOKS
Published by the Penguin Group
Penguin Group (USA) Inc., 375 Hudson Street,
New York, New York 10014, USA
USA | Canada | UK | Ireland | Australia | New Zealand | India | South Africa | China
Penguin Books Ltd, Registered Offices: 80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL, England
For more information about the Penguin Group visit penguin.com
First published in Great Britain by Faber and Gwyer Limited 1928
First published in the United States of America by Coward, McCann, Inc. 1929
This edition with an introduction by Paul Fussell published in Penguin Books 2013
Copyright Siegfried Sassoon, 1928
Copyright renewed Siegfried Sassoon, 1956
All rights reserved. No part of this product may be reproduced, scanned,
or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission.
Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials
in violation of the author’s rights. Purchase only authorized editions.
Introduction by Paul Fussell from Siegfried Sassoon’s Long Journey:
Selections from the Sherston Memoirs, edited by Paul Fussell (1983).
Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press (USA).
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA
Sassoon, Siegfried, 1886–1967.
Memoirs of a fox-hunting man / Siegried Sassoon ; introduction by Paul Fussell.
pages ; cm.—(Penguin classics)
ISBN: 978-1-101-59886-3
1. Fox hunting—Fiction. I. Title.
PR6037.A86M35 2013
823’.912—dc23 2013000420
Contents
Introduction by PAUL FUSSELL
MEMOIRS OF A FOX-HUNTING MAN
PART ONE Early Days
PART TWO The Flower Show Match
PART THREE A Fresh Start
PART FOUR A Day with the Potford
PART FIVE At the Rectory
PART SIX The Colonel’s Cup
PART SEVEN Denis Milden as Master
PART EIGHT Migration to the Midlands
PART NINE In the Army
PART TEN At the Front
Introduction
The First World War, which lasted more than four years and killed seventeen million people, scored across twentieth-century history a deep dividing line, ugly as the scar of its own trenches. Before the war, the world could seem safely stabilized by monarchies, religious certainties, and patriotic pieties. But afterwards, the world appears recognizably “modern,” its institutions precarious, its faith feeble, its choices risky, its very landscapes perverted into the Waste Land. No one contemplating the events of 1914–1918 in relation to the years preceding can quite escape this sense of experience divided into “before” and “after.” Thus J. B. Priestley comparing the First War with the Second: “I think the First War cut deeper and played more tricks with time because it was first…. If you were born in 1894, as I was, you suddenly saw a great jagged crack in the looking-glass. After that your mind could not escape from the idea of a world that ended in 1914 and another one that began about 1919, with a wilderness of smoke and fury, outside sensible time, lying between them.” One reason we understand so readily this scheme of before and after is that we have been taught it by the young writers who found in the First World War their first important literary material and who addressed it with the thrill of discovery that has kept their works fresh and powerful. Writing within their various national styles, Henri Barbusse in France, Erich Maria Remarque in Germany, and Hemingway in America earned their earliest reputations by exploiting this theme of before and after. In England, Edmund Blunden, Robert Graves, and Siegfried Sassoon did the same. All would agree with Priestley who says, “I left one world to spend an exile in limbo, came out of it to find myself in another world.”
Why does Siegfried Sassoon seem so quintessentially English? One reason, surely, is his almost erotic fondness for the pastoral countryside. Another is his devotion to horses and horse culture. Another is his being equally skilled in prose and verse while declining to raise a clamor in either. And finally, there is his preference for experience over abstract thought, or, to put it more bluntly, his lack of interest in ideas. “My brain,” he says, “absorbs facts singly, and the process of relating them to one another has always been difficult.” When a reviewer observed of his book of poems Counter-Attack (1918) that Sassoon seemed “entirely devoid of intellectual edge,” he commented: “But I could have told him that myself.” What interests Sassoon instead is appearances, the look of things, especially the look of things in a past affectionately remembered, or even ambiguously remembered: “Oh yes, I see it all, from A to Z!” he says of the front line, recalling it with mingled love and horror at the end of these memoirs. These books emphasize Sassoon’s distinction as an observer and evoker of visible objects, both in peace and war. If the war came close to exterminating Sassoon, it also educated him, teaching him, he writes, “one useful lesson—that on the whole it was very nice to be alive at all.” It also developed in him “the habit of observing things with more receptiveness and accuracy than I had ever attempted to do in my undisciplined past.”
The countryside he liked to feel alive in was the Weald of Kent, the wooded and agricultural part of that county southeast of London. He was born there in 1886, one of three brothers. His brother Hamo was to be killed at Gallipoli in 1915. The house of his well-to-do family stood at the edge of the green in the village of Matfield (here, in these fictionalized memoirs, “Butley”), a few miles from Tunbridge Wells. When Siegfried was five, his Spanish-Jewish father left his wife and died soon after. The boy grew up protected and encouraged by his mother, who had artistic and literary relatives. She knew critics and editors like Edmund Gosse and Edward Marsh, who interested themselves both in the boy and in his early verses. (The “Aunt Evelyn” of these memoirs is a fiction.) He went to Marlborough College (here, “Ballboro”), whose headmaster told him as he left, “Try to be more sensible.” He proceeded to Clare College, Cambridge, where h
e began reading law but shifted to history and finally to nothing at all, leaving after four terms and returning to Kent. Delighted to be reinstalled at home, far from demands that he think, he collected books, read (with heavy emphasis on the hunting whimsies of R. S. Surtees), played cricket and golf, fox-hunted, and mooned shyly about, versifying in the vague sentimental mode customary in pre-war minor poetry. Between the ages of nineteen and twenty-six he published privately nine volumes of dreamy romantic verse, a fact he omits entirely from the “outdoor” version of his life he presents here.
This idyll was ended by the outbreak of war on August 4, 1914. He was healthy, naïve, unthinkingly patriotic, and horsy, and by August 5 he was in the uniform of a cavalry trooper. He was twenty-eight years old. Soon he transferred to the infantry and became a second lieutenant in the Royal Welch Fusiliers. Before long he was in action in France, where his initial enthusiasm gradually yielded to outrage as he learned that the war was not at all the heroic, high-minded operation pictured by propaganda. He was a brave and able officer, and his men, with many of whom he was in love, liked him for his kindness to them. One remembers: “It was only once in a blue moon that we had an officer like Mr. Sassoon.” He turned fierce after his friend, fellow-officer David Thomas (“Dick Tiltwood”), was killed. Lieutenant D. C. Thomas had been Sassoon’s current ideal companion, a Galahad figure,
One whose yellow head was kissed
By the gods, who thought about him
Till they couldn’t do without him.
(“There is no doubt that I am still a Pre-Raphaelite,” Sassoon once wrote in his diary.)
Conceiving that the cause of David’s death was the Germans rather than the war, Sassoon set himself to avenge him by bolder and bolder forays against the enemy. These helped earn him the nickname “Mad Jack” from his platoon. He won the Military Cross for bringing in wounded under fire, and he was soon wounded in the shoulder himself. While convalescing at home, pity for his men grew on him, together with a conviction that the war was a fraud, a swindle practiced on the troops by bellicose civilians at home and their viceregents, the staff, safely ensconced back at the Base. He began writing anti-homefront poems satirizing the cruelty and complacency of those whose relation to the war was rather forensic than empirical. These poems were very different from the ones he’d written before the war. Then, he had been content to turn out courteous little verses like this:
NIMROD IN SEPTEMBER
When half the drowsy world’s abed
And misty morning rises red,
With jollity of horn and lusty cheer,
Young Nimrod urges on his dwindling rout;
Along the yellowing coverts we can hear
His horse’s hoofs thud hither and about:
In mulberry coat he rides and makes
Huge clamour in the sultry brakes.
Before the war his poems had celebrated Dryads, “roundelays and jocund airs,” dulcimers and shoon, daffodillies, shepherds, and “ye patient kine.” Indeed, as the eminent pastoralist Edmund Blunden once said, “No poet of twentieth-century England…was originally more romantic and floral than young Siegfried Sassoon from Kent.” But now he unleashed a talent for irony and satire and contumely that had been sleeping all during his pastoral youth:
“THEY”
The Bishop tells us: “When the boys come back
They will not be the same; for they’ll have fought
In a just cause: they lead the last attack
On Anti-Christ; their comrades’ blood has bought
New right to breed an honourable race,
They have challenged Death and dared him face to face.”
“We’re none of us the same!” the boys reply.
“For George lost both his legs; and Bill’s stone blind;
Poor Jim’s shot through the lungs and like to die;
And Bert’s gone syphilitic: you’ll not find
A chap who’s served that hasn’t found some change.”
And the Bishop said: “The ways of God are strange!”
(As Wilfred Owen noticed, “Sassoon admires Thos. Hardy more than anybody living.”)
In the blank verse in which formerly he had described rural delights he now delivered outdoor views of a different sort:
We’d gained our first objective hours before
While dawn broke like a face with blinking eyes,
Pallid, unshaved and thirsty, blind with smoke.
Things seemed all right at first. We held their line,
With bombers posted, Lewis guns well placed,
And clink of shovels deepening the shallow trench.
The place was rotten with dead; green clumsy legs
High-booted, sprawled and grovelled along the saps
And trunks, face downward, in the sucking mud,
Wallowed like trodden sand-bags loosely filled;
And naked sodden buttocks, mats of hair,
Bulged, clotted heads slept in the plastering slime.
And then the rain began—the jolly old rain!
Back home the recruiting posters depicted women proudly watching the troops march away (“Women of Britain Say—‘GO!’”), and Phyllis Dare’s music-hall song was heard everywhere:
Oh, we don’t want to lose you,
But we think you ought to go;
For your King and your Country
Both need you so.
We shall want you and miss you,
But with all our might and main
We will thank you, cheer you, kiss you,
When you come back again.
Sassoon’s response:
GLORY OF WOMEN
You love us when we’re heroes, home on leave,
Or wounded in a mentionable place.
You worship decorations; you believe
That chivalry redeems the war’s disgrace.
You make us shells. You listen with delight,
By tales of dirt and danger fondly thrilled.
You crown our distant ardours while we fight,
And mourn our laurelled memories when we’re killed.
You can’t believe that British troops “retire”
When hell’s last horror breaks them, and they run,
Trampling the terrible corpses—blind with blood.
O German mother dreaming by the fire,
While you are knitting socks to send your son
His face is trodden deeper in the mud.
Popular as poems like these were with the young avant-garde back in London, they scandalized the respectable. The critic John Middleton Murry found Sassoon’s performances “verses,…not poetry,” mere “violent journalism”: “He has no calm,” Murry wrote, “therefore he conveys no terror; he has no harmony, therefore he cannot pierce us with the anguish of discord.” Indeed, “Mr. Sassoon’s mind is a chaos.” Not certain whether to back this horse or not, Gosse straddled the critical fence, saying of Sassoon’s The Old Huntsman and Other Poems (1917): “His temper is not altogether to be applauded, for such sentiments must tend to relax the effort of the struggle, yet they can hardly be reproved when conducted with so much honesty and courage….” One might imagine that the scandal produced by Sassoon’s anti-war poems would have been noticed everywhere in lettered England. But two years after the Armistice Rider Haggard confesses that he’s never heard of Siegfried Sassoon and wonders whether he’s not just another “Jew of the advanced school,” like Bakst, Epstein, or Proust. Urged by an acquaintance to read Sassoon’s poems, he finally does so, to find them “feeble and depressing rubbish.”
But Sassoon was maturing an outrage more offensive than a few poems calling into question the official, sanitized view of the war. In July 1917, encouraged by H. W. Massingham (“Markington”), editor of the liberal weekly the Nation, and Bertrand Russell (“Thornton Tyrell”), he set off his own bombshell. He published his famous document “A Soldier’s Declaration,” in which he explained “his grounds for refusing to serve further in the army”:
I am making this statement as an act of wilful defiance of military authority, because I believe that the war is being deliberately prolonged by those who have the power to end it.