We Are the Children of the Stars
Page 24
“Obviously sex and the sexual system,” observes John A. Keel, “plays a mysterious role in these [UFO] manifestations.” He has been quietly conducting an extensive survey into the matter, he says, “hoping to develop a rational hypothesis before bringing such a delicate matter into the open.”
With all the sex-advice books on the market today, we might only half-facetiously suggest a new one – Sex, Outer-Space Style.
Yet all these sex fun and games in which the starmen indulge (but presumably for more serious purposes!) should not surprise us if we recall the chapter on “Sex Clues,” in which it was pointed out that our space sires are even “sexier that the human race.” In context with this subject, it is an established fact that more than 100,000 people utterly vanish from Earth each year.29 No trace is ever found by missing persons bureaus nor by the best detective hunts. Many UFOlogists surmise that these people are abducted by the starmen and whisked away from hints in both contactee writings and ESP messages from UFOs, the “victims” need not be pitied. Some are allegedly taken to the home world or worlds of the starmen to live a new life in a semi-utopian society. Perhaps they are “guinea pigs” but only in the sense of what their reactions are to such advanced civilizations. The starmen colonizers may be constantly testing out the state of the human mind to see when and if their earthly colonists can be ready to accept the shocking truth – that we humans are always under intelligent surveillance. Also to find out, perhaps, when the human psyche will be matured enough so that Earth and its denizens can be introduced to the vast brotherhood of civilized worlds throughout the galaxy.
We might bring in the UFO “flap” that occurred in 1973-74. Utterly confounding the air force, which abandoned its Project Blue Book because UFOs seemed more mythical than real, and also dismaying the Condon committee, which thought it had written off the flying saucers as something akin to poppycock, a great series of sightings swept the United States. Far too many impeccable and credible witnesses – including state governors, senators, pilots, mayors, police chiefs, scientists, and other dignitaries – reported seeing UFOs for the authorities to ignore.30
One wonders if the government, sooner or later, will not be forced into launching another scientific investigation, hopefully better than that of the Pentagon or University of Colorado.
Dozens of other cases of alleged sexual contact with aliens are on record, including women as well as men. Because of the intimate nature of such alien/human coital contacts, the people involved are anonymous except in the guarded files of various private organizations of good reputation that investigate all UFO reports.
One final look at the UFO controversy, to see if it can be resolved affirmatively or not and how valid this book's thesis is. One of the authors, Otto O. Binder, published a book in which he listed the main corroborative points that will sum up the grand concept of Earth being a deliberately planted colony of hybrid humans, in a galactic project going back millions of years.31
With some changes and additions, they are:
The many legends, from all over Earth among widely separated cultures, of “skymen” descending like gods and benefiting or guiding mankind.
The fact that Man himself is a misfit in the scheme of classical Darwinian evolution.
The vast prevalence of dwarfs, kobolds, trolls, pixies, fairies, gnomes, and other “little men” in human myth and literature, sounding very much like the many reported landings today of “little humanoids” three or four feet tall.
The Villas-Boas sex-seduction case, and those of other men and women, indicating biosexual experimentation still being carried out today by the saucermen.
The many “contactee” stories in which (if taken at face value and not yet proven utter hoaxes or hallucinations) the saucermen often claim to have visited Earth for untold eons, having a “vested interest” in the human race.
The perennial disappearance of thousands of people from Earth annually – as well as many animals – who could quite logically (with no other explanation available) have been spirited away by UFOs.
The many ships through the centuries, and modern planes, which have just as mysteriously vanished from Earth, tying in with the extraordinary number lost in the notorious Bermuda Triangle, which is haunted by UFOs.32
The long and endless list of saucer sightings (even if clothed in obscure language of old) that goes back to the first Sumerian and Egyptian written records,33 and undoubtedly could be continued back to Hominid times millions of years ago.
The unsolved astronomical sightings through telescopes, since the Seventeenth century, of gigantic objects in space crossing the sun or moon's disk and disobeying the laws of celestial mechanics for natural bodies, thus proving they are artificial and powered craft.34
The Bible, richest source of UFOs in disguised language as “chariots of fire” and “glowing clouds,” with visitations of “angels” (probably starmen).
The single significant biblical statement – that the Sons of God took unto themselves wives from the daughters of Earth.35
Hieroglyphics, carvings, and cave paintings of prehistoric times depicting obvious “astronauts” and spacecraft.36
The fantastic feats of ancient engineering – pyramids, giant statues, colossal stone temples – that were impossible for the primitive man to construct with Stone Age technology.37
The at least 1 million “earths” or habitable worlds that scientists concede must exist in our galaxy, from which the starmen could therefore have come.
The possibility of faster-than-light speeds, so that spacecraft from remote suns could reach Earth.
The very sudden uprise of civilization in Sumeria, and the universal legends of “sky people” bringing knowledge to Earth.
The highly advanced astronomical knowledge of ancient peoples – Chaldeans and Mayans, particularly – who had no telescopes.
The point-by-point analysis of how “slow motion” evolution could never have produced big-brained man in the short time between ape-men and humans.
The strong possibility that giants and monster-men really existed and were the abortive results of the starmen's interbreeding program.
The “life gap,” wherein no life existed in preCambrian times, as if living microorganisms were “seeded” on Earth.
The peculiar fact that desert species of plants have no fossil history at all, as if “imported” to Earth.
All the impressive list of physiological and anatomical attributes that are unique to Man and could never have come out of classical evolution.
The startling Piri Reis map, copied from ancient cartographic charts that only flying machines could have made, as early as 10,000 B.C.38
The giant UFO “landing fields” observable only from the air, dating back to ancient times.39
The pattern of worldwide surveillance of our planet by UFOs, including people, cars, planes, ships, and orbiting vehicles.
The pattern of “little humanoids” from landed saucers40 who are seen gathering specimens of plants, rocks, even animals.
The “green fireballs” of 1947-52 seen in the Southwest near our atomic installations, as if the saucermen are “watchdogs” against the outbreak of nuclear war.41
The inexplicable “waves” of UFO sightings – 1952-54, 1957-61, 1966-67, 1973-74, which may be “preconditioning” exercises to prepare earth people for the eventual appearance of the starmen in public.
Add to all this man's insatiable curiosity, exploration instincts, religious feelings, and amazing sense of destiny, and we have an enormous mass of anomalies and mysteries about man's body and psyche that science cannot explain in the least.
Only the theory of Hybrid Man and colony Earth can.
We seem exposed today to a vast unknown that Man's mind has not yet encompassed. We are perhaps on the verge of the greatest revelations known in history. We may learn, soon perhaps, that we are only one tiny part of a Grand Family of humans stretching to the remotest star.
If so, it should be me
t with revel and joy to know that we are citizens not of one world, but of the great and wondrous universe.
We rest our case.
Mankind is a Child of the Stars.
Notes
Introduction
1. Norman MacBeth, Darwin Retried, Gambit Inc., Boston, 1971.
2. Ibid., p. 149.
3. Lynn Rose, “The Censorship of Velikovsky's Interdisciplinary Synthesis,” Pensee, May 1972, p. 30.
4. Ibid., p. 44.
5. Ibid., p. 30.
Chapter 1
1. Life Magazine, October 19, 1949, p. 113.
2. Science News, August 19, 1972, p. 117.
3. Ibid., September 25, 1971, p. 204.
4. Ibid.
5. International Bible Students Association, Did Man Get Here by Evolution or By Creation? Watchtower Bible & Tract Society, 1967, p. 41.
6. Ibid., p. 42.
7. A. Bean, The Races of Man, The University Society, chap. 8.
8. Life Magazine, op. cit.
9. Ibid.
10. The Universal Standard Encyclopedia, vol. 6, Funk & Wagnalls, Unicorn, New York, 1962, p. 2245.
11. Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, Hurst & Co., New York, p. 624–.
12. Ibid., p. 64.
13. Loren Eisley, Darwin's Century, Doubleday, Anchor Books, Garden City, N.Y., p. 309.
14. Early Man, Life Nature Library series Time-Life Books, New York, 1971, p. 52.
15. Stewart Edward White, The Unobstructed Universe, E. P. Dutton, New York, 1940, p. 90.
16. Ivan Sanderson, ed., “Pursuit,” Journal of S. I. T. U., Columbia, N.J., January 1972, p. 11.
17. Saga, Gambi Publications, Brooklyn, N.Y., June 1970, p. 25.
18. The Primates, Life Nature Library series, Time-Life Books, New York, 1971, p. 177.
19. Early Man, op. cit., p. 176.
20. Otto O. Binder, Flying Saucers Are Watching Us, Belmont Books, New York, 1968, p. 121.
21. Eric Norman, Gods, Demons and UFO's, Lancer Books, New York, 1970, p. 12.
Chapter 2
1. Such eminent scientists as Professor Roland Puccetti, Willy Ley, Dr. Robert Bieri, and Dr. Joseph Kraus, along with others, have developed this “universal human” theory by scientific logic.
2. Science News, July 14, 1973, p. 30.
3. “Directed Panspermia,” a paper by Dr. Francis H. C. Crick, molecular biologist of Cambridge, and L. E. Lorgel, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego.
4. Science News, May 11, 1974, p. 301.
5. Ibid., November 27, 1971, p. 357.
6. Ibid., June 5, 1971, p. 383.
7. Ibid., June 26, 1971, p. 435.
8. Harlow Shapley, Of Stars and Men, Beacon Press, Boston, 1958, p. 85.
9. Science News, March 27, 1971, p. 210.
10. Ibid., June 26, 1971, p. 435.
11. Shapley, op. cit., p. 144.
12. I.S. Shklovski and Carl Sagan, Intelligent Life in the Universe, Holden-Day Inc., San Francisco, 1966.
13. National Enquirer, August 20, 1972, p. 30.
14. Otto O. Binder, “Are the Russians Secretly in Direct Communication With UFO's?” UFO Report, Saga, Spring 1974.
15. Ibid.
Chapter 3
1. Science News, August 26, 1972, p. 137.
2. Ibid., May 13, p. 313.
3. Ibid., June 24, 1971, p. 64.
4. Ibid., March 27, 1971, p. 210.
5. Earl C. Slipher, Mars, Sky Publishing Corporation, Cambridge, Mass., 1962, p. 29.
6. Ross E. Hutchins, Plants Without Leaves, Dodd, Mead & Co., New York, 1966, pp. 84–95.
7. Science News, June 24, 1972. p. 405.
8. Ibid., August 12, 1972, p. 105.
9. Ibid., January 22, 1972, p. 55.
10. Ibid., June 24, 1972, p. 405.
11. Ibid.
Chapter 4
1. Evolution, Life Nature Library series, Time-Life Books, New York, 1971, p. 149.
2. Ernest A. Hooton, Up From The Ape, rev. ed., Macmillan, New York, 1947, pp. 394–395, 630–631. (Also, Sir Arthur Keith, The Antiquity of Man, J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, 1925.)
3. Early Man, Life Nature Library series, Time-Life Books, New York, 1971, p. 47.
4. Science News, September 2, 1972, p. 152.
5. Ibid.
6. Maitland A. Edey, The Missing Link, Time-Life Books, New York, 1972, p. 52.
7. Ibid., p. 143.
8. Ibid., p. 144.
9. Ibid., p. 146.
10. Science News, op. cit.
11. Ibid.
12. B. Ernst & T. J. E. De Vries, eds., Atlas of the Universe, Thos. Nelson & Sons, New York, p. 131.
Chapter 5
1. Desmond Morris, The Naked Ape, Dell Books (paperback), New York, 1967, p. 18.
2. George Price, The Phantom of Organic Evolution, Revel Co. Ltd., London, 1924, p. 91.
3. Norman Macbeth, Darwin Retried, Gambit Inc., Boston. 1971, p. 121.
4. Ibid., p. 140.
5. Early Man, Life Nature Library series, Time-Life Books, New York, 1971, p. 51.
6. The Primates, Life Nature Library series, Time-Life Books, New York, 1971, p. 179.
7. Morris, op. cit., p. 35.
8. Ibid., p. 35.
9. Science News, November 18, 1972, p. 324.
10. Macbeth, op. cit., p. 159.
11. Ibid., p. 160.
Chapter 6
1. Early Man, Life Nature Library series, Time-Life Books, 1971, p. 107.
2. Ibid., p. 126.
3. Norman Macbeth, Darwin Retried, Gambit Inc., Boston, 1971.
4. Ibid., p. 46.
5. Ibid.
6. Ibid.
7. Ibid., p. 44.
8. Ibid., p. 48.
9. Ibid., p. 95.
10. Ibid., p. 77.
11. Ibid., p. 50.
12. Ibid., p. 94.
13. Ibid., Chapter 7.
14. Early Man, op. cit., p. 52.
15. Ernest A. Hooton, Up From The Ape, rev. ed., Macmillan, New York, 1947, p. 448.
16. Early Man, op. cit., p. 54.
17. Ibid.
18. Ibid.
Chapter 7
1. Nature, February 11, 1911, vol. 85, #2155, p. 59.
2. Desmond Morris, The Naked Ape, Dell Books (paperback), New York, 1967.
3. Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, 2nd ed., Hurst & Co., New York, 1874 and later, pp. 623–25.
4. Morris, op. cit.
5. Darwin, op. cit., p. 627. Man From the Farthest Past, Smithsonian Institution Series, 1930, p. 173.
6. Man From the Farthest Past, Smithsonian Institution Series, 1930, p. 173.
7. Spector, Handbook of Biological Data, W. B. Saunders Company. (It is pointed out that, though the brain is only 2.2% of the body weight, 14% of all bloodflow goes to the brain.)
8. Morris, op. cit., p. 38.
Chapter 8
1. Scientific American, #211, October 1964, pp. 78–86.
2. Ibid.
3. B. Ernst & T. J. E. De Vries, eds., Atlas of the Universe, Thos. Nelson & Sons, New York, p. 200.
4. Earl C. Slypher, Mars, Sky Publishing Corp., Cambridge, Mass., and Northland Press, Flagstaff, Ariz., 1962, pp. 31, 120.
5. John Lewis, Anthropology Made Simple, Doubleday, New York, p. 30.
6. There is one sole freakish exception to the rule: Along with Man, the extinct animal homalodotherium had no diastemata.
7. A. L. Kroeber, Anthropology, Harcourt Brace, New York, 1948, pp 12–13. (Also See William K. Gregory, The Evolution of Human Dentition, Williams & Wilkins Publishers, Baltimore, 1922, pp. 370–73.)
8. Desmond Morris, The Naked Ape, Dell Books (paperback), New York, 1967, p. 58.
9. Ibid., p. 57
Chapter 9
1. Today's Education, October 1970, p. 88.
2. Anne Morgan, Kinship of Animals & Man, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955, pp. 180–82.
3. Ibid.
4. Life Before Man, The Emergence of Man series, Tim
e-Life Books, New York, 1972, p. 14.
5. Ibid., p. 15.
6. Norman Macbeth, Darwin Retried, Gambit Inc., Boston, 1971, p.74.
7. Ibid., p. 89.
8. Ibid., p. 156.
9. Ibid., p. 101.
10. International Bible Students Association, Did Man Get Here by Evolution or by Creation? Watchtower Bible & Tract Society, New York, 1967, p. 35.
11. Macbeth, op. cit., p. 106.
Chapter 10
1. Desmond Morris, The Naked Ape, Dell Books (paperback), New York, 1967, p. 53.
2. Ibid.
3. Ibid., p. 46.
4. Ibid., p. 53.
5. Ibid., p. 62.
6. Ibid., p. 68.
7. Ernest A. Hooton, Up From the Ape, rev. ed., Macmillan, New York, 1947, p. 40.
8. Private communication from George Higer, who has dissected these animals, excepting the whale.
9. Ibid. (In seaport towns of England, one may occasionally see an old salt walking with a cane made from the penis bone of a large whale.)
10. Morris, op. cit., p. 67.
11. Ibid., p. 9.
Chapter 11
1. Leslie B. Arey, Developmental Anatomy, W. B. Saunders Co., p. 120.
2. Williams, Obstetrics, 12th ed., p. 131.
3. N. J. Berrill, Man's Emerging Mind, Oldboume Science Library, London, p. 293.
4. Loren Eisley, Darwin's Century, Doubleday, Anchor Books, Garden City, L.I., pp. 279, 368.
5. The Primates, Life Nature Library series, Time-Life Books, New York, 1971, p. 183.
6. Desmond Morris, The Naked Ape, Dell Books (paperback), New York. 1967, p. 92.
7. Schunk, The History of Man, Chilton Pubs., Philadelphia, pp. 228, 234. (See also, Weston La Barre, The Human Animal, The University of Chicago Press, p. 54.)