Book Read Free

International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Page 22

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  include, but are not limited to, the nature of the item, its role (or function) within the

  business activities conducted by the entity, and how it is measured. [CF 7.7].

  Classifying dissimilar assets, liabilities, equity, income or expenses together can obscure

  relevant information, reduce understandability and comparability and may not provide

  a faithful representation of what it purports to represent. [CF 7.8].

  10.2.1

  Classification of assets and liabilities

  Classification is applied to the unit of account selected for an asset or liability (see 7.1.1

  above). However, it may sometimes be appropriate to separate an asset or liability into

  components that have different characteristics and to classify those components

  separately. That would be appropriate when classifying those components separately

  would enhance the usefulness of the resulting financial information. For example, it

  could be appropriate to separate an asset or liability into current and non-current

  components and to classify those components separately. [CF 7.9].

  10.2.1.A Offsetting

  Offsetting occurs when an entity recognises and measures both an asset and liability as

  separate units of account, but groups them into a single net amount in the statement of

  financial position. Offsetting classifies dissimilar items together and therefore is

  generally not appropriate. [CF 7.10].

  The IASB’s Conceptual Framework 101

  Offsetting assets and liabilities differs from treating a set of rights and obligations as a

  single unit of account (see 7.1.1 above). [CF 7.11].

  10.2.2

  Classification of equity

  To provide useful information, it may be necessary to classify equity claims separately

  if those equity claims have different characteristics (equity is discussed at 7.4 above).

  [CF 7.12].

  Similarly, to provide useful information, it may be necessary to classify components of

  equity separately if some of those components are subject to particular legal, regulatory

  or other requirements. For example, in some jurisdictions, an entity is permitted to

  make distributions to holders of equity claims only if the entity has sufficient reserves

  specified as distributable. Separate presentation or disclosure of those reserves may

  provide useful information. [CF 7.13].

  10.2.3

  Classification of income and expenses

  Classification is applied to:

  • income and expenses resulting from the unit of account selected for an asset or

  liability; or

  • components of such income and expenses if those components have different

  characteristics and are identified separately. For example, a change in the current

  value of an asset can include the effects of value changes and the accrual of interest

  (see Figure 2.3). It would be appropriate to classify those components separately if

  doing so would enhance the usefulness of the resulting financial information.

  [CF 7.14].

  Recognised changes in equity during the reporting period comprise:

  • income minus expenses recognised in the statement(s) of financial performance;

  and

  • contributions from, minus distributions to, holders of equity claims. [CF 5.3].

  A particularly important facet of classification is determining whether items of financial

  performance should be considered part of profit and loss or as other comprehensive income.

  10.2.3.A

  Profit or loss and other comprehensive income

  Income and expenses are classified and included either:

  • in the statement of profit or loss; or

  • outside the statement of profit or loss, in other comprehensive income. [CF 7.15].

  The statement of profit or loss is the primary source of information about an entity’s

  financial performance for the reporting period. That statement contains a total for profit

  or loss that provides a highly summarised depiction of the entity’s financial performance

  for the period. Many users of financial statements incorporate that total in their analysis

  either as a starting point for that analysis or as the main indicator of the entity’s financial

  performance for the period. Nevertheless, understanding an entity’s financial

  performance for the period requires an analysis of all recognised income and expenses,

  including income and expenses included in other comprehensive income, as well as an

  analysis of other information included in the financial statements. [CF 7.16].

  102 Chapter

  2

  Because the statement of profit or loss is the primary source of information about an

  entity’s financial performance for the period, all income and expenses are, in principle,

  included in that statement. Indeed, the Board observes that its intention in establishing

  this principle was to emphasise that the statement of profit or loss is the default location

  for income and expenses. [CF 7.17, BC7.24].

  However, in developing standards, the Board may decide in exceptional

  circumstances that income or expenses arising from a change in the current value of

  an asset or liability are to be included in other comprehensive income when doing

  so would result in the statement of profit or loss providing more relevant

  information, or providing a more faithful representation of the entity’s financial

  performance for that period. [CF 7.17].

  Income and expenses that arise on a historical cost measurement basis (see Figure 2.3)

  are included in the statement of profit or loss. That is also the case when income and

  expenses of that type are separately identified as a component of a change in the current

  value of an asset or liability. For example, if a financial asset is measured at current value

  and if interest income is identified separately from other changes in value, that interest

  income is included in the statement of profit or loss. [CF 7.18]. This use of more than one

  measurement basis is discussed at 9.3.5 above.

  In the view of the Board, if the statement of profit or loss is the primary source of

  information about financial performance for a period, the cumulative amounts included

  in that statement over time need to be as complete as possible. As a consequence,

  income and expenses can only be excluded permanently from the statement of profit

  or loss if there is a compelling reason in to do so in any particular case. [CF BC7.29]. In

  principle, therefore, income and expenses included in other comprehensive income in

  one period are reclassified from other comprehensive income into the statement of

  profit or loss in a future period when doing so results in the statement of profit or loss

  providing more relevant information, or providing a more faithful representation of the

  entity’s financial performance for that future period.

  However, if, for example, there is no clear basis for identifying the period in which

  reclassification would have that result, or the amount that should be reclassified, the

  Board may, in developing standards, decide that income and expenses included in other

  comprehensive income are not to be subsequently reclassified. [CF 7.19].

  10.3 Aggregation

  Aggregation is the adding together of assets, liabilities, equity, income or expenses that

  have shared characteristics and are included in the same classificat
ion. [CF 7.20].

  Aggregation makes information more useful by summarising a large volume of detail.

  However, aggregation conceals some of that detail. Hence, a balance needs to be found

  so that relevant information is not obscured either by a large amount of insignificant

  detail or by excessive aggregation. [CF 7.21].

  Different levels of aggregation may be needed in different parts of the financial

  statements. For example, typically, the statement of financial position and the

  statement(s) of financial performance provide summarised information and more

  detailed information is provided in the notes. [CF 7.22].

  The IASB’s Conceptual Framework 103

  11

  CHAPTER 8: CONCEPTS OF CAPITAL AND CAPITAL

  MAINTENANCE

  The concept of capital maintenance is concerned with how an entity defines the capital

  that it seeks to maintain. It is a prerequisite for distinguishing between an entity’s return

  on capital (that is, profit) and its return of capital. In general terms, an entity has

  maintained its capital if it has as much capital at the end of the period as it had at the

  beginning of the period. Any amount over and above that required to maintain the

  capital at the beginning of the period is profit. [CF 8.4, 8.6].

  The Framework identifies two broad concepts of capital maintenance:

  • financial capital maintenance (see 11.1 below); and

  • physical capital maintenance (see 11.2 below).

  The principal difference between the two concepts of capital maintenance is the

  treatment of the effects of changes in the prices of assets and liabilities of the entity.

  [CF 8.6]. The selection of the appropriate concept of capital by an entity should be based

  on the needs of the users of its financial statements. [CF 8.2].

  The concept of capital maintenance chosen by an entity will determine the accounting

  model used in the preparation of its financial statements. Most entities adopt a financial

  concept of capital. It is explained that different accounting models exhibit different

  degrees of relevance and reliability, and it is for management to seek a balance between

  relevance and reliability (see 5 above for a discussion of the qualitative characteristics

  of useful financial information). [CF 8.9].This use in Chapter 8 of the Framework of the

  term ‘reliability’ seems to be a drafting error – the term was used in the 1989 Framework

  but was replaced in the 2010 Framework with the term ‘faithful representation’. As the

  text concerned has been carried forward unchanged from the 1989 Framework to the

  current one, the failure to update this reference seems to us to be an oversight. The

  Framework notes that the IASB does not prescribe a particular model other than in

  exceptional circumstances, such as in a hyperinflationary economy (see Chapter 16).

  This intention will, however, be reviewed in the light of world developments. [CF 8.1, 8.9].

  The Framework notes that the revaluation or restatement of assets and liabilities gives

  rise to increases or decreases in equity that meet the definition of income and expenses,

  but – under certain concepts of capital maintenance – are included in equity as capital

  maintenance adjustments or revaluation reserves. [CF 8.10].

  11.1 Financial

  capital

  maintenance

  Under a financial concept of capital, such as invested money or invested purchasing

  power, capital is synonymous with the net assets or equity of the entity. Under this

  concept a profit is earned only if the financial (or money) amount of the net assets at the

  end of the period exceeds the financial (or money) amount of net assets at the beginning

  of the period, after excluding any distributions to, and contributions from, owners

  during the period. [CF 8.1, 8.3(a)].

  Financial capital maintenance can be measured in either nominal monetary units or units

  of constant purchasing power. [CF 8.3(a)]. The financial capital maintenance concept does

  not require a particular measurement basis to be used. Rather, the basis selected depends

  upon the type of financial capital that the entity is seeking to maintain. [CF 8.5].

  104 Chapter

  2

  Where capital is defined in terms of nominal monetary units, profit represents the

  increase in nominal money capital over the period. This has the implication that

  increases in the prices of assets held over the period, conventionally referred to as

  holding gains, are conceptually profits. They may not be recognised as such, however,

  until the assets are disposed of in an exchange transaction. [CF 8.7].

  When the concept of financial capital maintenance is defined in terms of constant

  purchasing power units, profit represents the increase in invested purchasing power

  over the period. Thus, only that part of the increase in the prices of assets that exceeds

  the increase in the general level of prices is regarded as profit. The rest of the increase

  is treated as a capital maintenance adjustment and, hence, as part of equity. [CF 8.7].

  11.2 Physical capital maintenance

  Under this concept a profit is earned only if the physical productive capacity (or

  operating capability) of the entity (or the resources or funds needed to achieve that

  capacity) at the end of the period exceeds the physical productive capacity at the

  beginning of the period, after excluding any distributions to, and contributions from,

  owners during the period. [CF 8.3(b)]. The physical capital maintenance concept requires

  the current cost basis of measurement to be adopted. [CF 8.5].

  Because capital is defined in terms of the physical productive capacity, profit represents

  the increase in that capital over the period. Price changes affecting the assets and

  liabilities of the entity are changes in the physical productive capacity of the entity,

  which are therefore treated as capital maintenance adjustments within equity and not

  as profit. [CF 8.8].

  12 MANAGEMENT

  COMMENTARY

  Over a number of years, a number of individual countries have issued regulations or

  guidance requiring or encouraging the preparation of narrative ‘management

  commentary’ to accompany the financial statements.

  In December 2010 the IASB published its first guidance on management commentary –

  Management Commentary – A Framework for Presentation – as a non-binding ‘IFRS

  Practice Statement’. The introduction to the Practice Statement clarifies that it is neither

  an IFRS nor part of the Framework. However, it has been prepared on the basis that

  management commentary meets the definition of other financial reporting in the

  Preface to International Financial Reporting Standards, and is therefore within the

  scope of the Framework. Consequently, the Statement should be read ‘in the context

  of’ the Framework. [MC.IN2, IN4].

  Management commentary is described as a narrative report that relates to financial

  statements that have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs. Management

  commentary provides users with historical explanations of the amounts presented in

  the financial statements, specifically the entity’s financial position, financial

  performance and cash flows. It also provides commentary on an entity’s prospects and

  other information not presented in the financial
statements. Management commentary

  also serves as a basis for understanding management’s objectives and its strategies for

  achieving those objectives. [MC Appendix]. For many entities, management commentary is

  The IASB’s Conceptual Framework 105

  already an important element of their communication with the capital markets,

  supplementing as well as complementing the financial statements. [MC.IN3].

  The Practice Statement is intended to set out a broad framework for the preparation of

  management commentaries, to be applied by management of individual reporting

  entities to their own specific circumstances. [MC.IN5]. However, the IASB believes that

  that all management commentary should:

  • provide management’s view of the entity’s performance, position and progress; and

  • supplement and complement information presented in the financial statements.

  [MC.12].

  Management commentary should include information that is forward-looking and has

  the qualitative characteristics referred to in the Framework. [MC.13].

  The IASB also envisages that any management commentary will include the following

  elements:

  • the nature of the business;

  • management’s objectives and strategies for meeting those objectives;

  • the entity’s most significant resources, risks and relationships;

  • the results of operations and prospects; and

  • the critical performance measures and indicators that management uses to

  evaluate the entity’s performance against stated objectives. [MC.24].

  106 Chapter

  2

  References

  1 W. A. Paton and A. C. Littleton, An Introduction

  Concepts and Standards for External Financial

  to Corporate Accounting Standards, Monograph

  Reports, Statement on Accounting Theory and

  No. 3, American Accounting Association, 1940.

  Theory Acceptance, 1977. The 1977 report

  2

  See, for example: American Accounting

  concluded that closure on the debate was not

  Association, Executive Committee, ‘A Tentative

  feasible, which is perhaps indicative of the

  Statement of Accounting Principles Affecting

  complexity of the problem.

  Corporate Reports’, Accounting Review, June

 

‹ Prev