Book Read Free

International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Page 30

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  Presentation of financial statements and accounting policies 143

  (c) disposals of items of property, plant and equipment;

  (d) disposals

  of investments;

  (e) discontinued

  operations;

  (f) litigation settlements; and

  (g) other reversals of provisions. [IAS 1.98].

  This information may be given on the face of the statement of profit or loss, on the face

  of the statement of comprehensive income or in the notes. In line with the permissive

  approach taken to the format of the performance statements discussed above, the level

  of prominence given to such items is left to the judgement of the entity concerned.

  However, regarding (e) above, IFRS 5 requires certain information to be presented on

  the face of the statement of profit or loss (see Chapter 4 at 3.2).

  3.2.6.B Ordinary

  activities and extraordinary items

  IAS 1 states that an entity ‘shall not present any items of income or expense as

  extraordinary items, in the statement(s) presenting profit or loss and other

  comprehensive income, or in the notes.’ [IAS 1.87].

  This derives from the fact that earlier versions of the standard required a distinction to

  be made between ordinary activities (and the results of them) and extraordinary items.

  The basis for conclusions to IAS 1 explains that the removal of this distinction, and the

  prohibition on the presentation of extraordinary items, was made to avoid arbitrary

  segregation of an entity’s performance. [IAS 1.BC64].

  3.3

  The statement of changes in equity

  IAS 1 requires the presentation of a statement of changes in equity showing: [IAS 1.106]

  (a) total comprehensive income for the period (comprising profit and loss and other

  comprehensive income – see 3.2.1 above) showing separately the total amounts

  attributable to owner of the parent and to non-controlling interests;

  (b) for each component of equity, the effects of retrospective application or retrospective

  restatement recognised in accordance with IAS 8 (discussed at 4.4 and 4.6 below); and

  (c) for each component of equity, a reconciliation between the carrying amount at the

  beginning and the end of the period, separately disclosing changes resulting from:

  (i) profit

  or

  loss;

  (ii) other comprehensive income; and

  (iii) transactions with owners in their capacity as owners, showing separately

  contributions by and distributions to owners and changes in ownership

  interests in subsidiaries that do not result in a loss of control.

  The reconciliation in (c)(ii) above must show each item of other comprehensive income,

  although that detail may be shown in the notes. [IAS 1.106A].

  The amounts of dividends shown as distributions to owners and the amounts of dividends

  per share should be shown either on the face of the statement or in the notes. [IAS 1.107].

  It can be seen that (a) above is effectively a sub-total of all the items required by (c)(i)

  and (c)(ii).

  144 Chapter

  3

  For these purposes, ‘components’ of equity include each class of contributed equity, the

  accumulated balance of each class of other comprehensive income and retained

  earnings. [IAS 1.108].

  This analysis reflects the focus of the IASB on the statement of financial position –

  whereby any changes in net assets (aside of those arising from transactions with owners)

  are gains and losses, regarded as performance. In this vein, IAS 1 observes that changes in

  an entity’s equity between two reporting dates reflect the increase or decrease in its net

  assets during the period. Except for changes resulting from transactions with owners acting

  in their capacity as owners (such as equity contributions, reacquisitions of the entity’s own

  equity instruments and dividends) and transaction costs directly related to such

  transactions, the overall change in equity during a period represents the total amount of

  income and expenses, including gains and losses, generated by the entity’s activities during

  that period. [IAS 1.109].After taking account of total gains and losses and owner transactions

  in this way, any other changes in equity will result from the restatement of prior periods.

  Point (b) above reflects this. IAS 8 requires retrospective adjustments to effect changes in

  accounting policies, to the extent practicable, except when the transitional provisions in

  another IFRS require otherwise. IAS 8 also requires that restatements to correct errors are

  made retrospectively, to the extent practicable. These are discussed at 4 below. IAS 1

  observes that retrospective adjustments and retrospective restatements ‘are not changes in

  equity but they are adjustments to the opening balance of retained earnings, except when

  an IFRS requires retrospective adjustment of another component of equity.’ Point (b)

  above therefore requires disclosure in the statement of changes in equity of the total

  adjustment to each component of equity resulting, separately, from changes in accounting

  policies and from corrections of errors. These adjustments should be disclosed for each

  prior period and the beginning of the period. [IAS 1.110].

  The illustrative statement from the implementation guidance accompanying IAS 1 is set

  out below. [IAS 1 IG Part I].

  Example 3.9:

  Combined statement of all changes in equity

  XYZ Group – Statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2019

  (in thousands of currency units)

  Share Retained

  Trans- Investments Cash flow

  Re-

  Total

  Non-

  Total

  capital earnings

  lation of

  in equity

  hedge valuation

  controlling

  equity

  foreign instruments

  surplus

  interest

  operations

  Balance at

  1 January 2018

  600,000 118,100 (4,000)

  1,600

  2,000

  –

  717,700 29,800

  747,500

  Changes in

  accounting policy

  –

  400

  –

  –

  –

  –

  400 100

  500

  Restated balance 600,000

  118,500

  (4,000)

  1,600

  2,000

  –

  718,100 29,900

  748,000

  Changes in equity

  for 2018

  Dividends –

  (10,000)

  –

  –

  –

  –

  (10,000) –

  (10,000)

  Total comprehensive

  income for the year(1)

  – 53,200

  6,400

  16,000

  (2,400)

  1,600

  74,800 18,700 93,500

  Balance at

  31 December 2018

  600,000 161,700

  2,400

  17,600

  (400)

  1,600

  782,900

  48,600 831,500

  Presentation of financial statements and accounting policies 145

  Changes in equity

  Share Retained


  Trans- Investments Cash flow

  Re-

  Total

  Non-

  Total

  for 2019

  capital earnings lation of

  in equity

  hedge valuation

  controlling

  equity

  foreign instruments

  surplus

  interest

  operations

  Issue of share

  capital

  50,000

  –

  –

  –

  –

  –

  50,000 –

  50,000

  Dividends –

  (15,000)

  –

  –

  –

  –

  (15,000) –

  (15,000)

  Total

  comprehensive

  income for the

  year(2) –

  96,600

  3,200

  (14,400)

  (400)

  800

  85,800

  21,450

  107,250

  Transfer to retained

  earnings –

  200

  –

  –

  –

  (200)

  – –

  –

  Balance at

  31 December 2019

  650,000 243,500

  5,600

  3,200

  (800)

  2,200

  903,700

  70,050 973,750

  (1)

  The amount included in retained earnings for 2018 of 53,200 represents profit attributable to owners of the parent of 52,400

  plus remeasurements of defined benefit pension plans of 800 (1,333, less tax 333, less non-controlling interest 200).

  The amount included in the translation, investments in equity instruments and cash flow hedge reserves represent other

  comprehensive income for each component, net of tax and non-controlling interest, e.g. other comprehensive income related to investments in equity instruments for 2019 of 16,000 is 26,667, less tax 6,667, less non-controlling interest 4,000.

  The amount included in the revaluation surplus of 1,600 represents the share of other comprehensive income of associates

  of (700) plus gains on property revaluation of 2,300 (3,367, less tax 667, less non-controlling interest 400). Other

  comprehensive income of associates relates solely to gains or losses on property revaluation.

  (2)

  The amount included in retained earnings of 2019 of 96,600 represents profit attributable to owners of the parent of 97,000

  less remeasurements of defined benefit pension plans of 400 (667, less tax 167, less non-controlling interest 100).

  The amount included in the translation, investments in equity instruments and cash flow hedge reserves represent other

  comprehensive income for each component, net of tax and non-controlling interest, e.g. other comprehensive income related to the translation of foreign operations for 2019 of 3,200 is 5,334, less tax 1,334, less non-controlling interest 800.

  The amount included in the revaluation surplus of 800 represents the share of other comprehensive income of associates of 400 plus gains on property revaluation of 400 (933, less tax 333, less non-controlling interest 200). Other comprehensive income of associates relates solely to gains or losses on property revaluation.

  3.4

  The notes to the financial statements

  IAS 1 requires the presentation of notes to the financial statements that:

  (a) present information about the basis of preparation of the financial statements and

  the specific accounting policies used (see 5.1 below);

  (b) disclose the information required by IFRS that is not presented elsewhere in the

  financial statements; and

  (c) provide additional information that is not presented elsewhere in the financial

  statements, but is relevant to an understanding of any of them. [IAS 1.112].

  The notes should, as far as practicable, be presented in a systematic manner, determined

  in consideration of its effect on the understandability and comparability of the financial

  statements. Each item on the face of the primary statements should be cross-referenced

  to any related information in the notes. [IAS 1.113].

  There is, perhaps, a trade-off to be made between understandability and comparability,

  in that allowing entities to structure their notes to, for instance, reflect their business

  model or perceived importance may reduce the comparability between one entity and

  another. The standard does not prescribe a specific order, but in the Basis for Conclusions

  the consistency dimension of comparability is highlighted, and it is clarified that the

  ordering of the notes generally is not expected to be changed frequently. [IAS 1.BC76D].

  146 Chapter

  3

  Examples given in the standard of the systematic ordering or grouping of the notes are

  as follows:

  (a) giving prominence to the areas of its activities that the entity considers to be most

  relevant to an understanding of its financial performance and financial position,

  such as grouping together information about particular operating activities;

  (b) grouping together information about items measured similarly such as assets

  measured at fair value; or

  (c) following the order of the line items in the statement(s) of profit or loss and other

  comprehensive income and the statement of financial position, such as:

  (i) a statement of compliance with IFRS (see 2.5.2 above);

  (ii) significant accounting policies applied (see 5.1.1 below);

  (iii) supporting information for items presented on the face of the primary statements,

  in the order in which each statement and each line item is presented; and

  (iv) other disclosures, including: contingent liabilities, unrecognised contractual

  commitments

  and non-financial disclosures such as financial risk

  management objectives and policies. [IAS 1.114].

  The standard also allows that notes providing information about the basis of preparation

  of the financial statements and specific accounting policies may be presented as a

  separate section of the financial statements. [IAS 1.116].

  4 ACCOUNTING

  POLICIES

  The selection and application of accounting policies is obviously crucial in the

  preparation of financial statements. As a general premise, the whole purpose of

  accounting standards is to specify required accounting policies, presentation and

  disclosure. However, judgement will always remain; many standards may allow choices

  to accommodate different views, and no body of accounting literature could hope to

  prescribe precise treatments for all possible situations.

  In the broadest sense, accounting policies are discussed by both IAS 1 and IAS 8. Whilst,

  as its title suggests, IAS 8 deals explicitly with accounting policies, IAS 1 deals with what

  one might describe as overarching or general principles.

  4.1 General

  principles

  IAS 1 deals with some general principles relating to accounting policies, with IAS 8 discussing

  the detail of selection and application of individual accounting policies and their disclosure.

  The general principles discussed by IAS 1 can be described as follows:

  • fair presentation and compliance with accounting standards;

  • going concern;

  • the accrual basis of accounting;

  • consistency;

  • materiality and aggregation;

  �
� offsetting; and

  • profit or loss for the period.

  Presentation of financial statements and accounting policies 147

  These are discussed in 4.1.1-4.1.6 below.

  In September 2017 the IASB published Practice Statement 2 – Making Materiality

  Judgements. This is a non-mandatory statement and does not form part of IFRS. An

  overview of its contents is given at 4.1.7 below.

  4.1.1 Fair

  presentation

  4.1.1.A

  Fair presentation and compliance with IFRS

  Consistent with its objective and statement of the purpose of financial statements,

  IAS 1 requires that financial statements present fairly the financial position,

  financial performance and cash flows of an entity. Fair presentation for these

  purposes requires the faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other

  events and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria

  for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the Conceptual Framework

  (discussed in Chapter 2).

  The main premise of the standard is that application of IFRS, with additional disclosure

  when necessary, is presumed to result in financial statements that achieve a fair

  presentation. [IAS 1.15]. As noted at 1.1 above, an important point here is that

  implementation guidance for standards issued by the IASB does not form part of those

  standards (unless they are explicitly ‘scoped-in’), and therefore does not contain

  requirements for financial statements. [IAS 8.8]. In contrast, any application guidance

  appended to a standard forms an integral part of that standard.

  Accordingly, the often voluminous implementation guidance accompanying standards

  is not, strictly speaking, part of IFRS. We would generally be surprised, though, at

  entities not following such guidance. The presumption that application of IFRS (with

  any necessary additional disclosure) results in a fair presentation is potentially

  rebuttable, as discussed at 4.1.1.B below.

  A fair presentation also requires an entity to:

  (a) select and apply accounting policies in accordance with IAS 8, which also sets out

  a hierarchy of authoritative guidance that should be considered in the absence of

  an IFRS that specifically applies to an item (see 4.3 below);

  (b) present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides

  relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information; and

 

‹ Prev