Book Read Free

International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Page 234

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  financial statements. [IAS 29.10]. The requirements of the standard look deceptively

  straightforward but their application may represent a considerable challenge. These

  difficulties and other aspects of the practical application of the IAS 29 method of

  accounting for hyperinflation are discussed below.

  2.2 Scope

  IAS 29 shall be applied by all entities whose functional currency is the currency of a

  hyperinflationary economy. [IAS 29.1].

  The standard should be applied in an entity’s separate financial statements (if prepared)

  and its consolidated financial statements, as well as by parents that include such an

  entity in their consolidated financial statements.

  If an entity whose functional currency is that of a hyperinflationary economy

  wishes to present the financial statements in a different presentation currency, or

  if their parent has a different presentation currency, the financial statements of the

  entity first have to be restated under IAS 29. Only then, can the financial statements

  be translated under IAS 21 – The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates

  (see 11 below).

  Almost all entities operating in hyperinflationary economies will be subject to the

  accounting regime of IAS 29, unless they can legitimately argue that the local

  hyperinflationary currency is not their functional currency as defined by IAS 21 (see

  Chapter 15 at 4). [IAS 21.14].

  2.3 Definition

  of

  hyperinflation

  Determining whether an economy is hyperinflationary in accordance with IAS 29

  requires judgement. The standard does not establish an absolute inflation rate at

  which hyperinflation is deemed to arise. Instead, it considers the following

  characteristics of the economic environment of a country to be strong indicators of

  the existence of hyperinflation:

  (a) the general population prefers to keep its wealth in non-monetary assets or in a

  relatively stable foreign currency. Amounts of local currency held are immediately

  invested to maintain purchasing power;

  (b) the general population regards monetary amounts not in terms of the local

  currency but in terms of a relatively stable foreign currency. Prices may be quoted

  in that currency;

  Hyperinflation

  1181

  (c) sales and purchases on credit take place at prices that compensate for the expected

  loss of purchasing power during the credit period, even if the period is short;

  (d) interest rates, wages and prices are linked to a price index; and

  (e) the cumulative inflation rate over three years is approaching, or exceeds, 100%. [IAS 29.3].

  The above list is not exhaustive and there may be other indicators that an economy is

  hyperinflationary, such as the existence of price controls and restrictive exchange

  controls. In determining whether an economy is hyperinflationary, condition (e) is

  quantitatively measurable while the other indicators require reliance on more

  qualitative evidence.

  IAS 29 expresses a preference that all entities that report in the currency of the same

  hyperinflationary economy apply this Standard from the same date. Nevertheless, once

  an entity has identified the existence of hyperinflation, it should apply IAS 29 from the

  beginning of the reporting period in which it identified the existence of hyperinflation.

  [IAS 29.4].

  Identifying when a currency becomes hyperinflationary, and, just as importantly, when

  it ceases to be so, is not easy in practice and is frequently hampered by a lack of reliable

  statistics. The consideration of trends and the application of common sense is important

  in this judgement, as are consistency of measurement and of presentation. As discussed

  at 1.2 above, the IPTF monitors hyperinflationary countries for US GAAP and this may

  be useful for IFRS reporters. Transition into and out of hyperinflationary economies

  are discussed further at 10 below.

  2.4

  The IAS 29 restatement process

  Restatement of financial statements in accordance with IAS 29 can be seen as a process

  comprising the following steps:

  (a) selection of a general price index (see 3 below);

  (b) analysis and restatement of the statement of financial position (see 4 below);

  (c) restatement of the statement of changes in equity (see 5 below);

  (d) restatement of the statement of profit and loss and other comprehensive income

  (see 6 below);

  (e) calculation of the gain or loss on the net monetary position (see 6.2 below);

  (f) restatement of the statement of cash flows (see 7 below); and

  (g) restatement of comparative figures (see 8 below).

  3

  SELECTION OF A GENERAL PRICE INDEX

  The standard requires entities to use a general price index that reflects changes in

  general purchasing power. Ideally all entities that report in the same hyperinflationary

  currency should use the same price index. [IAS 29.37].

  3.1

  Selecting a general price index

  It is generally accepted practice to use a Consumer Price Index (CPI) for this purpose,

  unless that index is clearly flawed. National statistical offices in most countries issue

  1182 Chapter 16

  several price indices that potentially could be used for the purposes of IAS 29.

  Important characteristics of a good general price index include the following:

  • a wide range of goods and services has been included in the price index;

  • continuity and consistency of measurement techniques and underlying assumptions;

  • free from bias;

  • frequently updated; and

  • available for a long period.

  The entity should use the above criteria to choose the most reliable and most readily

  available general price index and use that index consistently. It is important that the

  index selected is representative of the real position of the hyperinflationary

  currency concerned.

  3.2

  General price index not available for all periods

  IAS 29 requires an entity to make an estimate of the price index if the general price

  index is not available for all periods for which the restatement of long-lived assets is

  required. The entity could base the estimate, for example, on the movements in the

  exchange rate between the functional currency and a relatively stable foreign currency.

  [IAS 29.17]. It should be noted that this method is only appropriate if the currency of the

  hyperinflationary economy is freely exchangeable, i.e. not subject to currency controls

  and ‘official’ exchange rates. Entities should also be mindful that, especially in the short

  term, the exchange rate may fluctuate significantly in response to factors other than

  changes in the domestic price level.

  Entities could use a similar approach when they cannot find a general price index that

  meets the minimum criteria for reliability (e.g. because the national statistical office in

  the hyperinflationary economy may be subject to significant political bias). However,

  this would only be acceptable if there was a widespread consensus that all available

  general price indices are fatally flawed.

  4

  ANALYSIS AND RESTATEMENT OF THE STATEMENT OF

  FINANCIAL POSITION

  A broad outline of the process
to restate assets and liabilities in the statement of

  financial position in accordance with the requirements of IAS 29 is shown in the

  diagram below:

  Hyperinflation

  1183

  Start

  Yes

  Is the statement of financial

  No

  position item non-monetary?

  Non-monetary

  Monetary assets

  assets and liabilities

  and liabilities

  Are the assets

  valued on a

  Is the monetary

  historical or

  item index linked?

  current cost basis?

  Historical cost basis

  Current cost basis

  Yes

  No

  Restate

  non-monetary

  No restatement

  Restatement of the

  assets and

  required

  index linked item

  liabilities

  Remove

  capitalised interest

  Perform an

  impairment test*

  Statement of financial position adjusted for the effects of hyperinflation

  * IAS 29 requires the restated amount of a non-monetary item to be reduced in accordance with the

  appropriate IFRS when the restated amount exceeds its recoverable amount. [IAS 29.19].

  The above flowchart does not illustrate the restatement of investees and subsidiaries

  (see 4.3 below), deferred taxation (see 4.4 below) and equity (see 5 below).

  4.1

  Monetary and non-monetary items

  4.1.1

  Monetary or non-monetary distinction

  Monetary items are not restated as they are already expressed in the measurement

  unit current at the end of the reporting period. Therefore an entity needs to determine

  whether or not an item is monetary in nature. Most statement of financial position

  items are readily classified as either monetary or non-monetary as is shown in the

  table below:

  1184 Chapter 16

  Monetary items

  Non-monetary items

  Assets Assets

  Cash and cash equivalents

  Property, plant and equipment

  Debt securities

  Intangible assets

  Loans

  Investments in equity securities

  Trade and other receivables

  Assets held for sale

  Inventories

  Construction contract work-in-progress

  Prepaid costs

  Investment properties

  Liabilities

  Liabilities

  Trade and other payables

  Deferred income

  Borrowings

  Tax payable

  However, there are instances where classification of items as either monetary or non-

  monetary is not always straightforward. IAS 29 defines monetary items as ‘money held

  and items to be received or paid in money’. [IAS 29.12]. IAS 21 expands on this definition

  by defining monetary items as ‘units of currency held and assets and liabilities to be

  received or paid in a fixed or determinable number of units of currency’. [IAS 21.8].

  IAS 21 further states that the essential feature of a monetary item is a right to receive

  (or an obligation to deliver) a fixed or determinable number of units of currency.

  Examples given by IAS 21 are pensions and other employee benefits to be paid in cash,

  provisions that are to be settled in cash and cash dividends that are recognised as a

  liability. [IAS 21.16]. More obvious examples are cash and bank balances, trade

  receivables and payables, and loan receivables and payables.

  IAS 21 also states that ‘a contract to receive (or deliver) a variable number of the entity’s

  own equity instruments or a variable amount of assets in which the fair value to be received

  (or delivered) equals a fixed or determinable number of units of currency is a monetary

  item.’ [IAS 21.16]. Although no examples of such contracts are given in IAS 21, it should

  include those contracts settled in the entity’s own equity shares that would be presented

  as financial assets or liabilities under IAS 32 – Financial Instruments: Presentation.

  Conversely, the essential feature of a non-monetary item is the absence of a right to

  receive (or an obligation to deliver) a fixed or determinable number of units of currency.

  Examples given by IAS 21 are amounts prepaid for goods and services (e.g. prepaid

  rent); goodwill; intangible assets; inventories; property, plant and equipment; and

  provisions that are to be settled by the delivery of a non-monetary asset. [IAS 21.16].

  IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments – states that all equity instruments are non-monetary.

  [IFRS 9.B5.7.3]. Therefore, equity investments in subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures

  would also be considered non-monetary items. IAS 29 provides separate rules on

  restatement of such investees (see 4.3 below).

  Even with this guidance there may be situations where the distinction is not clear.

  Certain assets and liabilities may require careful analysis before they can be

  classified. Examples of items that are not easily classified as either monetary or non-

  monetary include:

  Hyperinflation

  1185

  (a) provisions: these can be monetary, non-monetary or partly monetary. For

  example, a warranty provision would be:

  (i) entirely monetary when customers only have a right to return the product

  and obtain a cash refund equal to the amount they originally paid;

  (ii) non-monetary when customers have the right to have any defective product

  replaced; and

  (iii) partly monetary if customers can choose between a refund and a replacement

  of the defective product.

  Classification as either a monetary or a non-monetary item is not acceptable in (iii)

  above. To meet the requirements of IAS 29, part of the provision should be treated

  as a non-monetary item and the remainder as a monetary item;

  (b) deferred tax assets and liabilities: characterising these as monetary or non-

  monetary can be difficult as explained in 4.4 below;

  (c) associates and joint ventures: IAS 29 provides separate rules on restatement of

  investees that do not rely on the distinction between monetary and non-monetary

  items (see 4.3 below);

  (d) deposits or progress payments paid or received: if the payments made are regarded

  as prepayments or as progress payments then the amounts should be treated as

  non-monetary items. However, if the payments made are in effect refundable

  deposits then the amounts should probably be treated as monetary items; and

  (e) index-linked assets and liabilities: classification is particularly difficult when

  interest rates, lease payments or prices are linked to a price index.

  In summary, the practical application of the monetary/non-monetary distinction can be

  complex and will require judgement on the part of preparers of financial statements.

  Further examples of problem areas in the application of the monetary/non-monetary

  distinction are discussed in Chapter 15 at 5.4.

  4.1.2 Monetary

  items

  Generally, monetary items are not restated to reflect the effect of inflation, because

  they already reflect their purchasing power at the end of the reporting period. However,

  monetary assets and liabilities linked by agreement to changes in prices, such as i
ndex-

  linked bonds and loans, should be adjusted in accordance with the terms of the

  underlying agreement to show the repayment obligation at the end of the reporting

  period. [IAS 29.13]. This adjustment should be offset against the gain or loss on the net

  monetary position (see 6.2 below). [IAS 29.28].

  This type of restatement is not a hyperinflation accounting adjustment, but rather a gain

  or loss on a financial instrument. Accounting for inflation linked bonds and loans under

  or IFRS 9 may well lead to complexity in financial reporting. Depending on the specific

  wording of the inflation adjustment clause, such contracts may give rise to embedded

  derivatives and gains or losses will have to be recorded either in profit or loss or other

  comprehensive income depending on how the instrument is classified under IFRS 9

  (see Chapter 44 at 6.3.5).

  1186 Chapter 16

  4.1.3

  Non-monetary items carried at current cost

  Non-monetary items carried at current cost are not restated because they are already

  expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period.

  [IAS 29.29]. Current cost is not defined by the standard, but the IASB’s Conceptual

  Framework provides the following definition: ‘Assets are carried at the amount of cash

  or cash equivalents that would have to be paid if the same or an equivalent asset was

  acquired currently. Liabilities are carried at the undiscounted amount of cash or cash

  equivalents that would be required to settle the obligation currently’. [CF(2010) 4.55(b)].

  IAS 29 expands this definition by including net realisable value and fair value into the

  concept of ‘amounts current at the end of the reporting period’. [IAS 29.14]. In summary,

  this would include items carried at a value that reflects purchasing power at the balance

  sheet date.

  It is important to note that non-monetary items that were revalued at some earlier date

  are not necessarily carried at current cost, and need to be restated from the date of their

  latest revaluation. [IAS 29.18].

  In many hyperinflationary economies, national legislation may require entities to adjust

  historical cost based financial information in a way that is not in accordance with IAS 29

  (for example, national legislation may require entities to adjust the carrying amount of

  tangible fixed assets by applying a multiplier). Though financial information adjusted in

 

‹ Prev