Book Read Free

International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Page 596

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  circumstances change. The evaluation will involve consideration of factors such as the

  maturity of the underlying investments of the fund; the credit rating of the fund; the

  nature of the investments held by the fund (i.e. not subject to volatility); the extent of

  diversification in the portfolio (which is expected to be very high); the investment policy

  of the fund; and any mechanisms by the fund to guarantee returns (for example by

  reference to short-term money market interest rates).

  Investments are often held for purposes other than to act as a ready store of value that

  can be quickly converted into cash when needed to meet short-term cash commitments.

  It is therefore important, even where the criteria above are met, to understand why the

  entity has invested in a particular money market fund. Where an investment otherwise

  satisfies the criteria in paragraph 6 of IAS 7, but is not held by the entity for the purpose

  of satisfying short-term cash commitments, it should not be classified as a cash equivalent.

  3006 Chapter 36

  Substantial judgement may be required in assessing whether an investment in money

  market funds can be classified as a cash equivalent. Therefore appropriate disclosure is

  essential. As noted at 3.1 above, entities are required to disclose the policies adopted in

  determining the composition of cash equivalents and, where relevant, this should

  include the policy applied and significant judgements made in classifying investments in

  money market funds.

  3.2.3

  Investments with maturities greater than three months

  The longer the term of the investment, the greater the risk that a change in market

  conditions (such as interest rates) can have an effect on its value that is other than

  insignificant. For this reason, IAS 7 excludes most equity investments from cash

  equivalents and restricts the inclusion of other investments to those with a short

  maturity of, say, three months or less from the date of their acquisition by the entity.

  [IAS 7.7].

  Similarly, an investment with a term on acquisition of, say, nine months is not

  reclassified as a cash equivalent from the date on which there is less than three months

  remaining to its maturity. If such reclassifications were permitted, the statement of cash

  flows would have to reflect movements between investments and cash equivalents. This

  would be misleading because no actual cash flows would have occurred.

  The criteria explained above are guidelines, not rules, and a degree of common sense

  should be used in their application. In the final analysis, cash equivalents are held for

  the purpose of meeting short-term cash commitments and amounts should be included

  in cash equivalents only if they can be regarded as being nearly as accessible as cash and

  essentially as free from exposure to changes in value as cash.

  For example, an entity might justify including in cash equivalents a fixed deposit with

  an original term longer than three months if it effectively functions like a demand

  deposit. Typically, a fixed deposit will carry a penalty charge for withdrawal prior to

  maturity. A penalty will usually indicate that the investment is held for investment

  purposes rather than the purpose of meeting short-term cash needs. However, some

  fixed deposits still offer interest at a prevailing demand deposit rate in the event of

  early withdrawal, with any penalty limited to the entity being required to forego the

  incremental higher interest that it would have received if the deposit were held to

  maturity. In this case, it may be arguable that there is effectively no significant penalty

  for early withdrawal, as the entity receives at least the same return that it otherwise

  would have in a demand deposit arrangement. Where an entity does assert that this

  type of investment is held for meeting short-term cash needs and classifies the

  investment as a cash equivalent, the accrual of interest receivable should be on a

  consistent basis. In this example, the entity is asserting that it is likely to withdraw

  the deposit should the need arise, and therefore should consider accruing interest

  receivable at the demand deposit rate, as this reflects the extent to which the receipt

  of revenue is probable.

  3.2.4 Bank

  overdrafts

  Although bank borrowings are generally considered to be financing activities, there are

  circumstances in which bank overdrafts repayable on demand are included as a

  Statement of cash flows 3007

  component of cash and cash equivalents. This is in cases where the use of short-term

  overdrafts forms an integral part of an entity’s cash management practices. Evidence

  supporting such an assertion would be that the bank balance often fluctuates from being

  positive to overdrawn. [IAS 7.8].

  The Interpretations Committee confirmed that where overdrafts do not often fluctuate

  from being negative to positive, this is an indicator that the arrangement does not form

  part of an entity’s cash management and, instead, represents a form of financing.2

  3.3

  Reconciliation with items in the statement of financial position

  The amount shown alongside the caption in the statement of financial position for ‘cash

  and cash equivalents’ will not always be a reliable guide for IAS 7 purposes. Many

  entities present the components of cash and cash equivalents separately on the face of

  the statement of financial position, such as ‘cash and bank balances’ and ‘short-term

  bank deposits’. Additionally, some entities may include bank overdrafts in cash and cash

  equivalents for cash flow purposes, but, if no legal right of set-off exists, will present

  bank overdrafts separate from cash in the statement of financial position as financial

  liabilities. [IAS 32.42].

  The standard requires an entity to disclose the components of cash and cash equivalents

  and to present a reconciliation to the statement of financial position, [IAS 7.45], which

  means that any difference between ‘cash and cash equivalents’ for IAS 7 purposes and

  presentation in the statement of financial position will be evident in the notes to the

  financial statements.

  Schiphol Group provides a reconciliation of the components of cash and cash

  equivalents, which includes cash held for sale.

  Extract 36.3: Royal Schiphol Group N.V. (2017)

  Consolidated statement of cash flow for 2017 [extract]

  (in thousands of euros)

  2017

  2016

  Cash from continuing operations

  170,370

  238,691

  Cash held for sale

  –

  12,076

  170,370

  250,767

  3.4

  Restrictions on the use of cash and cash equivalents

  The amount of significant cash and cash equivalent balances that is not available for

  use by the group should be disclosed, together with a commentary by management

  to explain the circumstances of the restriction. [IAS 7.48]. Examples include cash and

  cash equivalents held by a subsidiary operating under exchange controls or other

  legal restrictions that prevent their general use by the parent or other subsidiaries.

  [IAS 7.49].

  The nature of the restriction must also be assessed to determine if the balance is
<
br />   ineligible for inclusion in cash equivalents because the restriction results in the

  investment ceasing to be highly liquid or readily convertible. For example, where an

  3008 Chapter 36

  entity covenants to maintain a minimum level of cash or deposits as security for

  certain short-term obligations, and provided that no amounts are required to be

  designated for that specific purpose, such balances could still be regarded as cash

  equivalents, albeit subject to restrictions, as part of a policy of managing resources to

  meet short-term commitments.

  However, an entity may be required formally to set aside cash, for example as a

  result of a regulated minimum cash balance or by way of a deposit into an escrow

  account, as part of a specific project or transaction, such as the acquisition or

  construction of a property or as conditions of a bond issue. In such circumstances,

  it is necessary to consider the terms and conditions relating to the account and the

  conditions relating to both the entity’s and the counterparty’s access to the funds

  within it to determine whether it is appropriate for the deposit to be classified in

  cash equivalents.

  In Extract 36.4 below, Lloyds Banking Group has various restricted cash balances. The

  Bank is required to exclude from cash and cash equivalents the mandatory reserve

  deposits held with local central banks because these amounts are not available to

  finance the entity’s day-to-day operations. Conversely, certain balances held by its life

  fund subsidiaries do still meet the definition of cash and cash equivalents, and the Group

  is only required to disclose the restrictions thereon.

  Extract 36.4: Lloyds Banking Group plc (2017)

  Notes to the consolidated financial statements [extract]

  Note 52:

  Consolidated Cash Flow Statement [extract]

  (D)

  Analysis of cash and cash equivalents as shown in the balance sheet

  2017

  2016

  2015

  £m

  £m

  £m

  Cash and balances at central banks

  58,521

  47,452 58,417

  Less: mandatory reserve deposits1

  (957)

  (914)

  (941)

  57,564

  46,538 57,476

  Loans and advances to banks

  6,611

  26,902 25,117

  Less: amounts with a maturity of three months or more

  (3,193)

  (11,052) (10,640)

  3,418

  15,850 14,477

  Total cash and cash equivalents

  60,982

  62,388 71,953

  1

  Mandatory reserve deposits are held with local central banks in accordance with statutory requirements; these

  deposits are not available to finance the Group’s day-to-day operations.

  Included within cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 2017 is £2,322 million: (2016: £14,475 million;

  2015: £13,545 million) held within the Group’s long-term insurance and investments businesses, which is not

  immediately available for use in the business.

  Similarly, in the following extract, InterContinental Hotels Group includes certain

  amounts of restricted cash, which are pledged as collateral to insurance companies for

  risks retained by the group, in loans and receivables within ‘Other financial assets’ on

  the statement of financial position, rather than in cash and cash equivalents.

  Statement of cash flows 3009

  Extract 36.5: InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (2017)

  Notes to the Group Financial Statements [extract]

  15.

  Other financial assets [extract]

  Trade deposits and loans include deposits of $66m made to a hotel owner in connection with a portfolio of

  management contracts. The deposits are non-interest-bearing and repayable at the end of the management contract

  terms, and are therefore held at a discounted value of $28m (2016: $19m); the discount unwinds to the income

  statement within ‘financial income’ over the period to repayment.

  Restricted funds comprise cash ring-fenced to satisfy insurance claims.

  The bank accounts pledged as security (£31m) are subject to a charge in favour of the members of the UK

  unfunded pension arrangement (see note 25).

  In the exposure draft ED/2014/6 – Disclosure Initiative – Proposed amendments to

  IAS 7, issued in December 2014, the IASB noted that additional restrictions, such as

  financial disincentives to utilising certain cash balances, or other considerations may be

  relevant to understanding the liquidity of the entity, as they affect the decision to utilise

  cash and cash equivalents. The example is given of tax liabilities that would arise on the

  repatriation of foreign cash and cash equivalent balances. The exposure draft proposed

  that where such matters exist, they should be disclosed. However, the IASB decided not

  to take these proposals forward and use the work done to date to inform the post

  implementation review of IFRS 12 – Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities.3

  Nevertheless, entities might want to consider making additional disclosures where such

  restrictions or disincentives exist.

  4

  CLASSIFICATION IN THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

  The statement of cash flows reports inflows and outflows of cash and cash equivalents

  during the period classified under:

  • operating activities;

  • investing activities; and

  • financing activities. [IAS 7.10].

  This classification is intended to allow users to assess the impact of these three types

  of activity on the financial position of the entity and the amount of its cash and cash

  equivalents. Whilst not stated explicitly in the standard, the presentation of

  operating, investing and financing cash flows usually follows this sequence in

  practice, and a total net cash flow for each standard heading should be shown.

  Comparative figures are required for all items in the statement of cash flows and the

  related notes. [IAS 1.38].

  The components of cash flows are classified as operating, investing or financing

  activities in a manner which is most appropriate to the business of the entity. [IAS 7.11].

  For example, the purchase of investments is likely to be classified as an operating cash

  flow for a financial institution, but as an investing cash flow for a manufacturer.

  Additionally, a single transaction may comprise elements of differently classified cash

  flows. For example, when repayments on a loan include both interest and capital, the

  element reflecting the interest expense may be included in either operating activities or

  3010 Chapter 36

  financing activities (see 4.4.1 below) whereas the capital repayment must be classified

  as a financing cash flow. [IAS 7.12].

  The format of the statement of cash flows is illustrated in Extract 36.6. As permitted by

  the standard, AstraZeneca has included interest paid under operating activities, interest

  received under investing activities and dividends paid under financing activities.

  Extract 36.6: AstraZeneca PLC (2017)

  Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

  for the year ended 31 December

  2017

  2016 2015

  Notes

  $m

  $m $m

  Cash flows from
operating activities

  Profit before tax

  2,227

  3,552 3,069

  Finance income and expense

  3

  1,395

  1,317 1,029

  Share of after tax losses of associates and joint

  ventures 10

  55

  33 16

  Depreciation, amortisation and impairment

  3,036

  2,357 2,852

  Decrease in trade and other receivables

  83

  1,610 152

  Increase in inventories

  (548)

  (343) (315)

  Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables and

  provisions

  415

  (341) 114

  Gains on disposal of intangible assets

  2

  (1,518)

  (1,301) (961)

  Fair value movements on contingent consideration

  arising from business combinations

  18

  109

  (1,158) (432)

  Non-cash and other movements

  16

  (524)

  (492) (350)

  Cash generated from operations

  4,730

  5,234 5,174

  Interest paid

  (698)

  (677) (496)

  Tax paid

  (454)

  (412) (1,354)

  Net cash inflow from operating activities

  3,578

  4,145 3,324

 

‹ Prev