International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Home > Other > International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards > Page 599
International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 599

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  [IAS 7.14].

  The requirement to classify payments for such property, plant and equipment held for

  rental under operating cash flows is intended to avoid initial expenditure on purchases

  of assets being classified as investing activities, while inflows from sales are recorded

  within operating activities. However, this means that management will need to

  determine, at the time of acquisition or manufacture, which of the assets that it intends

  to rent out will be ultimately held for sale in the ordinary course of business.

  4.4.6 Cash flows for service concession arrangements

  Because a cash flow is only classified in investing activities if it results in a recognised

  asset in the statement of financial position, a question arises regarding the classification

  of the cash inflows and outflows of the operator of a service concession arrangement

  that is within the scope of IFRIC 12 – Service Concession Arrangements.

  IFRIC 12 features two possible accounting models – the intangible asset model or the

  financial asset model. Under both models, the service element relating to the

  construction of the infrastructure asset is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 15 –

  Revenue from Contracts with Customers – and the revenue recognised gives rise to an

  intangible or a financial asset, in the form of a receivable, respectively. It is unclear

  whether cash flows incurred in the construction or upgrade phase should always be

  regarded as operating cash flows because they relate to the provision of construction

  services; or whether they are more accurately classified as investing activities, as they

  reflect cash outflows that result in the recognition of an intangible asset.

  In the case of an arrangement under the intangible asset model, the cash flows incurred

  during construction or upgrading could be classified in investing activities as they relate

  to the acquisition of an intangible that will generate future income and cash flows. Once

  the operating phase is reached, the inflows received would be most appropriately

  classified in operating activities as most operating and maintenance costs are likely to

  be executory and will be accounted for as incurred.

  On the other hand, when the financial asset model applies, cash inflows may

  considered to be deferred payments and therefore represent the provision of

  Statement of cash flows 3021

  financing to the grantor. In a corollary of the discussion on deferred payments at 5.4

  below, where the time value of money is significant to the transaction, the transaction

  may be tantamount to providing a loan, and the repayment of such an instrument

  would be considered an investing cash flow (or potentially split between investing and

  operating cash flows for the capital and interest components respectively, depending

  on the policy of the entity).

  Since there is no specific guidance relating to the classification of cash flows for service

  concession arrangements, current practice is mixed and therefore either treatment can

  be applied. IFRIC 12 is discussed in more detail in Chapter 26.

  4.4.7 Treasury

  shares

  Treasury shares are an entity’s own equity instruments that are acquired and held by

  the entity, a subsidiary or other members of the consolidated group. The consideration

  paid or received for treasury shares is recognised directly in equity and not as a

  movement in investments. [IAS 32.33]. As such, it should be clear that payments and

  receipts to acquire or dispose of treasury shares should be classified within financing

  activities. [IAS 7.17]. Even where such treasury shares are acquired by the entity as part

  of an equity-settled share-based payment transaction, the cash outflow should be

  classified under financing activities. Whilst cash payments to and on behalf of

  employees are classified under operating activities, [IAS 7.14], the acquisition of treasury

  shares does not settle a transaction between the entity and its employees. An equity-

  settled share-based payment transaction is completed when the entity transfers its

  equity instruments to employees in consideration for the services received.

  When a cash payment is made by a subsidiary to its parent or a trust that holds treasury

  shares as part of an equity-settled share-based payment arrangement, the payment

  should be accounted for as a deduction from equity in the separate financial statements

  of the subsidiary, on the grounds that the payment does not settle the transaction with

  the employees, but is effectively a distribution to the parent or the trust (see Chapter 30

  at 12.4.3 and 12.5.3). Having regarded this as a distribution, it follows that the cash flow

  should be classified as either operating or financing, according to the entity’s policy on

  dividends as discussed at 4.4.1 above.

  4.4.8

  Cash flows related to the costs of a share issue

  Costs directly related to the issue of shares are required to be deducted from equity.

  [IAS 32.35]. As the costs reduce the amount of the proceeds received from the share issue,

  they should be classified as a financing cash flow. [IAS 7.17(a)]. However, where a

  proposed share issue is cancelled, there would be no proceeds from the issue to record

  and the related expenses would be included in profit and loss rather than equity. As

  such, the definition of a financing cash flow would not be met, and the transaction costs

  would be classified in operating cash flows.

  4.4.9

  Cash flows on derivative contracts

  Payments and receipts relating to derivative contracts can be classified within operating,

  investing or financing in different circumstances. Where the contract is held for dealing

  or trading purposes, the cash flows are classified under operating activities. [IAS 7.14]. IAS 7

  requires that payments for, and receipts from, futures contracts, forward contracts, option

  3022 Chapter 36

  contracts and swap contracts are classified as cash flows from investing activities, except

  when the contracts are held for dealing or trading purposes, or the cash flows are classified

  as financing activities. [IAS 7.16].

  The standard adds that when a contract is accounted for as a hedge of an identifiable

  position, the cash flows of the contract are classified under the same heading as the cash

  flows of the position being hedged. [IAS 7.16]. An example is an interest rate swap. An

  entity wishing to convert an existing fixed rate borrowing into a floating rate equivalent

  could enter into an interest rate swap under which it receives interest at fixed rates and

  pays at floating rates. All the cash flows under the swap should be reported under the

  same cash flow heading as interest paid (i.e. as financing activities or operating activities,

  in accordance with the entity’s determined policy, as discussed at 4.4.1 above), because

  they are equivalent to interest or are hedges of interest payments.

  The standard suggests that receipts and payments on contracts might be included in

  financing cash flows; but, except for the text on contracts accounted for as hedges of an

  identifiable position, gives no indication of the circumstances under which such a

  classification would be appropriate. [IAS 7.16].

  So how should an entity classify the cash flows from a derivative contract that is<
br />
  considered by management as part of a hedging relationship, but for which the entity

  elects not to apply hedge accounting (taking all movements to profit or loss) or for which

  hedge accounting is not permitted under IFRS 9? Consider the following example.

  Example 36.1: Cash flows from derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

  Company A has the euro as its functional currency. On 1 January 2018, it sells goods to a US customer for

  which it charges US$1,000,000. The spot exchange rate on this date is 1:1 and it recognises revenue of

  €1,000,000. Payment is due to be received on 30 June 2018. A enters into a forward contract to exchange

  US$1,000,000 for €1,095,000 on 30 June 2018. It does not designate it as a hedge because the effects of

  movements on the contract and those of retranslating the receivable will already offset in profit or loss. On

  30 June 2018 the exchange rate is such that A receives the equivalent of €1,200,000 from its customer and

  pays €105,000 on the forward contract.

  Taken literally, IAS 7 would suggest that the receipt from the customer of €1,200,000 is classified as an

  operating cash inflow; but, because the forward contract is not held for dealing or trading purposes and is not

  accounted for as a hedge of an identifiable position, the €105,000 cash outflow on the forward contract cannot

  be classified under operating activities. As such, the €105,000 would have to appear in investing or possibly

  financing cash flows. However, had the entity elected to apply hedge accounting, the standard would require

  the €105,000 to be included in operating cash flows.

  This example highlights a current deficiency in IAS 7; its terminology was never updated

  or refined when the IASB issued guidance on hedge accounting. This deficiency is

  acknowledged by the IASB when it discusses, in the implementation guidance to IFRS 9,

  the classification of cash flows from hedging instruments. [IFRS 9.IG.G.2]. Therefore, in our

  opinion, since the IASB has not reflected the requirements of IFRS 9 in the text of IAS 7,

  it does not require the treatment of cash flows ‘when a contract is accounted for as a

  hedge of an identifiable position’, [IAS 7.16], to be restricted only to those hedging

  relationships that either are designated as hedges under IFRS 9, or would otherwise

  qualify for hedge accounting had they been so designated. Accordingly, in Example 36.1

  above, entity A would include the payment on the forward contract in cash flows from

  operating activities.

  Statement of cash flows 3023

  4.4.10

  Classification of cash flows – future developments

  As part of their Better Communication in Financial Reporting project, the IASB is

  currently exploring targeted improvements to the structure and content of the primary

  financial statements, including the statement of cash flows. In this research project the

  IASB is considering whether it can reduce presentation choices for items in the

  statement of financial performance and statement of cash flows to make it easier for

  investors to compare companies’ performances and future prospects. The IASB has

  taken a number of tentative decisions in relation to IAS 7.

  In November 2017, the IASB tentatively decided to clarify the current description of

  ‘financing activities’ in IAS 7 by indicating that a financing activity involves:

  • the receipt or use of a resource from a provider of finance (or the provision of credit);

  • the expectation that the resource will be returned to the provider of finance; and

  • the expectation that the provider of finance will be appropriately compensated

  through the payment of a finance charge. The finance charge being dependent on

  both the amount of the credit and its duration.10

  In December 2017, the IASB tentatively decided to remove from IAS 7 options for the

  classification of interest and dividends paid and interest and dividends received, and to

  prescribe a single classification for each of these items, clarifying that:

  • cash flows arising from interest incurred on financing activities should be classified

  as financing cash flows;

  • cash flows arising from interest paid that is capitalised as part of the cost of an asset

  should be classified as financing cash flows;

  • cash flows arising from dividends paid should be classified as financing cash flows;

  and

  • interest and dividends received should be classified as investing cash flows and that

  the definition of ‘investing activities’ in IAS 7 should be amended to make that clear.11

  In addition, the IASB tentatively decided to require a consistent subtotal as the starting

  point for the indirect reconciliation of cash flows from operating activities, that subtotal

  being profit before investing, financing and income tax.12

  In February 2018, the IASB tentatively decided to propose:

  • separate presentation of (i) the cash flows that arise between an entity and its

  integral associates and joint ventures and (ii) the cash flows that arise between an

  entity and its non-integral associates and joint ventures. The split being the same

  as that used in the proposed format for the statement of financial performance; and

  • the separate presentation of the investing cash flows of integral and non-integral

  associates and joint ventures should be within the investing section of the

  statement of cash flows.

  The IASB will continue its discussions on the Primary Financial Statements project

  throughout 2018 with a view to publishing either a Discussion Paper or an Exposure

  Draft in 2019. The project is discussed further in Chapter 3 at 6.3.2.

  3024 Chapter 36

  5.

  OTHER CASH FLOW PRESENTATION ISSUES

  5.1

  Exceptional and other material cash flows

  IAS 1 prohibits the presentation of extraordinary items either on the face of the

  statement of comprehensive income, the separate income statement (if presented) or in

  the notes. [IAS 1.87]. Consequently, IAS 7 does not refer to extraordinary items.

  As regards exceptional and other material cash flows, IAS 1 requires the nature and

  amount of material items of income and expense to be disclosed separately. [IAS 1.97]. It

  also requires additional line items, headings and sub-totals to be presented on the face

  of the statement of financial position when this is relevant to an understanding of the

  entity’s financial position. [IAS 1.55]. Therefore, although IAS 7 is silent on the matter, it

  would be appropriate for material cash flows or cash flows relating to material items in

  the statement of comprehensive income to be presented as separate line items on the

  face of the statement of cash flows, provided that they remain classified according to

  their nature as either operating, investing or financing cash flows.

  If items are described as ‘exceptional’ cash flows, the entity’s statement of accounting

  policies should explain the circumstances under which an item would be classified as

  exceptional and the notes to the financial statements should include an appropriate

  description of the nature of the amounts so treated.

  5.2

  Gross or net presentation of cash flows

  In general, major classes of gross receipts and gross payments should be reported

  separately. [IAS 7.21]. Operating, inve
sting or financing cash flows can be reported on a

  net basis if they arise from:

  (a) cash flows that reflect the activities of customers rather than those of the entity

  and are thereby made on behalf of customers; or

  (b) cash flows that relate to items in which the turnover is quick, the amounts are large,

  and the maturities are short. [IAS 7.22].

  Examples of cash receipts and payments that reflect the activities of customers rather

  than those of the entity include the acceptance and repayment of demand deposits by

  a bank, funds held for customers by an investment company and rents collected on

  behalf of, and paid over to, the owners of properties. [IAS 7.23]. Other transactions

  where the entity is acting as an agent or collector for another party would be included

  in this category, such as the treatment of cash receipts and payments relating to

  concession sales.

  Examples of cash receipts and payments in which turnover is quick, the amounts are

  large and the maturities are short include advances made for and the repayment of:

  (a) principal amounts relating to credit card customers;

  (b) the purchase and sale of investments; and

  (c) other short-term borrowings, such as those with a maturity on draw down of three

  months or less. [IAS 7.23A].

  An example noted in IAS 20 – Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of

  Government Assistance – where gross presentation is deemed appropriate for major

  Statement of cash flows 3025

  classes of cash flows is the receipt of government grants, which ‘are often disclosed as

  separate items in the statement of cash flows regardless of whether or not the grant is

  deducted from the related asset for presentation purposes in the statement of financial

  position’. [IAS 20.28].

  See 7.2 below for the gross or net presentation of cash flows for financial institutions.

  5.3

  Foreign currency cash flows

  IAS 21 – The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates – excludes from its scope

  the translation of cash flows of a foreign operation and the presentation of foreign

  currency cash flows in a statement of cash flows. [IAS 21.7]. Nevertheless, IAS 7 requires

  foreign currency cash flows to be reported in a manner consistent with IAS 21. [IAS 7.27].

 

‹ Prev