Life Without Hope

Home > Other > Life Without Hope > Page 36
Life Without Hope Page 36

by Leo Sullivan


  face was nonchalant and unconcerned; in fact, he was reading the

  sports section of a newspaper.

  I had the nervous jitters as I spoke with my assistant staff, Taya

  Baker and Adrienne Greene, two older women that were instru-

  mental in my educational development, and not just as a lawyer,

  but in sisterhood. At one time they both taught at Spellman

  College and they always invited me to Atlanta to attend their sem-

  inars. This they did for free and paid all my expenses. Needless to

  say, I hired them at $200 an hour apiece.

  “All rise! Court is in session. The Honorable Judge William

  Statford presiding.”

  The judge entered the courtroom. He was short and rotund

  with chubby cheeks and a large round bald head. Once he took his

  seat he placed on a pair of half glasses and began to read from a

  document on his desk.

  “Errr, huh, here … we are here on the matter of United States

  of America versus Life Thugstin.” With that he looked glaring

  down at the defense table as if he wanted us to feel the weight of

  his statement. “Counsel for the defendant, will you please state

  your name for the record?” the judge asked. I rose from my seat in

  unison with my associates. Three Black women taking on the

  most power ful government in the world.

  “Hope Evans, your Honor. Assisting me will be my associates,

  Taya Baker and Adrienne Greene,” I said and watched as prosecu-

  tor David Scandels spoke introducing his staff as I had just done.

  After ward the judge went on to give his lengthy instructions to the

  jury, and admonishing warnings there was to be no talking to the

  media nor was the jury allowed to watch the news or read any

  papers that he felt could influence their decision. He went on to

  explain the nature of each count in order for the defendant to be

  found guilty of the CCE.

  After the judge finished with his instructions to the jury, I

  stood and prepared to give my opening argument. In the back-

  271

  L i f e

  ground all I heard were the soulful melodies of old Black folks

  droning, humming segued with an occasional

  , Thank you Jesus …

  Amen

  . It was all so soft, soft like the wind.

  I spoke to the judge, “Good morning your Honor.”

  Ostensibly I nodded my head at the prosecution’s table, a gallant

  show of courtroom etiquette. Then I went into action. I strode

  right up to the jury box, up close and personal. I had to make a

  profound affect on the jur y, a man’s life depended on it. With a

  manicured hand I caressed the mahogany wood. Let my hand sail

  along its rich smoothness. Just as I rehearsed, I recited each juror’s

  name like I had known them all their lives. Some looked up at me

  in admiration, others in awe.

  “Today, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you will set a prece-

  dence like never before, for it is solely for the betterment of

  mankind, humanity, to cast out the atrocities, injustice that

  besiege all walks of life. Today we’re going to deal with urban life

  and this so-called war on drugs and what it is doing to our Black

  community.” As I talked my passion grew. I thought about not

  just my brother, but also all the brothas in prison that were doing

  life sentences for $20 worth of crack. I saw my girl, Nandi, in the

  front row, as I heard the shrieks of my ancestors’ cries. As old folks

  hummed a mournful dirge it felt like I was in another place,

  another time. The judge cocked his head to the side and frowned

  at the courtroom. I pushed myself for ward like diving off a cliff,

  this was my opening argument. I had to make an impression on

  the jury.

  “Today my client is being charged with CCE. The rule of fed-

  eral law, Title 21 USC 848. It means in essence to run a

  Continuing Criminal Enterprise with five or more persons for a

  12 month period or more. My client is being charged with being

  a kingpin,” I said and suddenly turned and spun on my heels to

  elicit the dramatics. All good lawyers must be good actors first and

  possess a theatrical power to get the jury’s attention. I walked over

  to the prosecutor’s table, felt a million eyes on my face and heard

  a litany of prayers. “This man right here,” I raised my voice with

  272

  L i f e

  a strong cadence, pointed a deft manicured finger in his face.

  Scandels tried to smile, but he looked about as comfortable as a

  man standing in front of a firing squad. “He would like for you to

  believe that my client is the sole reason for the drug epidemic. The

  only problem with that is logic. He would like for you to believe

  that my client is a drug dealer. The only problem with that is, it’s

  merely myth, sprinkled with speculation and false accusations. He

  is the one that is guilty and needs to be placed under the jail.” A

  wave of clamor rose from the courtroom. Judge Statford banged

  his gavel down. I looked over to the elders and senior assistants,

  they both gave me a satisfied nod. Part of our strategy was to rat-

  tle the prosecutor with an aggressive attack.

  The judge arched his eyebrows at me threateningly. “I suggest

  you tone it down.” I continued to stare at Scandels. This was my

  stage, the jury and the media were my audience. “You’re wasting

  the taxpayers’ money, not to mention their patience,” I said as I

  pointed to the jury box and made a face like that man should be

  ashamed of himself. “Today ladies and gentlemen, you will not be

  shown one piece of evidence. Allow me to repeat that,” I said and

  walked up closer and looked each juror in the eye. “You will not

  be shown one piece of evidence. The government’s case is based on

  what is known in the legal academia of law as circumstantial evi-

  dence. To a law professional, it means they have nothing, NADA!”

  I turned around to face the courtroom. I saw Life with his hand

  cupped under his chin watching me intently.

  “Seventy eight witnesses will be paraded before you to testify

  against my client. But you, the jur y, don’t be fooled. I want you to

  think critical, logical, to be rational, as well as objective. Ask your-

  selves, what are these people, so-called friends, associates of the

  defendant getting in return for their testimony? Is their testimony

  sincere? Are they doing this out of the kindness of their hear ts?

  Their need to help justice prevail, or are they getting paid in some

  other way?” With that I walked across the courtroom floor and

  stood in the middle.

  “When I worked as a prosecutor for the government, there

  273

  L i f e

  were people that we referred to as paid informants. Men and

  women that could manufacturer a story as quickly as you could

  recite your phone number. These men and women are known to

  you and I in the real world as rats –”

  “Objection!” Scandels was on his feet, face beet red, fuming

  mad. “Your Honor, Ms. Evans is tr ying to make a caricature of the

  governm
ent’s witnesses, notwithstanding she is outside the scope

  of argument.”

  The judge turned and looked at me with an icy glare.

  “Sustained. The jury is instructed to disregard the last state-

  ment. Ms. Evans you know better than that,” the judge scolded.

  I continued, determined not to let Scandels break my rhythm.

  “As I was saying –” I cut my eyes at Scandels, and turned back to

  the jury, heard the soulful murmur of old Black folks, a chant like

  a solemn hum with an occasional “Thank you Jesus.” I felt the

  hair on the back of my neck rise as the jury looked at me trans-

  fixed. “Today you’ll learn that inmates in federal prison routinely

  buy, sell and steal narcotics, concoct testimonies, then share their

  perjury with federal authorities in exchange for a reduction in

  their sentence. Often, these inmates testify against people they’ve

  never met. They corroborate on crimes they’ve never witnessed.

  They lie with virtual impunity, often with the government’s bless-

  ings. They act as modern day slave catchers in the inhumane bru-

  talization of Black people. These federal agents and prosecutors

  have been accused of helping move the scheme along and in most

  cases they provide convicts with information in order to help them

  fabricate their lies.”

  “Objection! This is ridiculous. The defense is mounting a

  vicious attack on the government and not the case.”

  “Your Honor, I intend to show that the government is also at

  fault and as much a culprit in this case and that is part of my

  defense.”

  “Overruled. The defense is entitled to present its case even if

  it intends to make accusations against the government.”

  I crossed my arms over my chest and shook my head. I had the

  274

  L i f e

  jurors’ attention now. So I plotted deeper.

  “How can you have a drug case based on lies and innuendos,

  rats testifying–oops, excuse me,” I said just as Scandels was about

  to rise from his seat to make another objection. The judge rubbed

  his baldhead in frustration. “The defendant is estimated, by the

  government, to be worth over two hundred million dollars and

  trafficked in the billions of dollars in cocaine, but yet has no real

  evidence. I snapped my finger. “Which raises doubt.” I slammed

  my hand down on the jury box hard. “The law says you have to

  convict him without a shadow of a doubt. If there is an iota of a

  doubt in your mind, you have to set him free. All I ask is that you

  humbly study the evidence, don’t be fooled by the smoke screen of

  lies and deceptions. Make your conclusion based on facts, not fic-

  tion.” With a strong feminine baritone I exhorted, “If the evi-

  dence doesn’t fit, you must acquit.” I repeated over and over as I

  walked up and down in front of the jury box, making sure to

  pound it into each one of their heads. I had to get into their psy-

  che, use words like a chisel to cut away at the stereotypical views

  that all white folks harbor about Blacks and they’re not even con-

  scious of it. I learned a lot from the Rodney King trial. You can

  brainwash a jury into believing what you want them to believe,

  but first you had to get inside their heads. Psychological warfare.

  An hour and twenty minutes later I was finished. The court-

  room was buzzing. I thanked the jury and repeated one more

  time. “If the evidence doesn’t fit ...” I watched as the jury and the

  courtroom returned a chant to my surprise.

  “YOU MUST ACQUIT!” I looked over at the prosecutor’s

  table. Scandels was pissed.

  David Scandels rose from his chair. I could see he was trying

  to mask the shock of my opening argument. He adjusted his tie,

  a tuff of salt and pepper hair hung over his left eye, and gray hair

  ringed his temples. At 55 years old, he still possessed the American

  golden boy image. He represented the epitome of patriotism. He

  served in Nam, was awarded a Purple Heart for being wounded in

  duty, and came home a hero. With his opening statement he went

  275

  L i f e

  straight for the heart with a dagger.

  “What is our country coming to when common criminals,

  thugs come in here and try to derail justice? The defendant here

  today is on trial for being one of the biggest drug lords the state of

  Florida has ever known. He has ties with organized crime. His

  deadly crew of henchmen, known as the Miami Boys, are known

  to be responsible for more than over two dozen assaults and mur-

  ders just within the last two years alone.” Scandels turned to the

  jury and spread his arms as if he were making a plea, “This is sim-

  ply about law justice, equity and fairness. I intend to prove to you

  within the next few months of this trial that the defendant, Life

  Thug-Stin …” Scandels intentionally lisped Life’s name, “is a

  menace to our society and I intend to put him away for the rest of

  his natural life.” In the corner of my eye I saw Life’s body flinch as

  the formidable Scandels’ presence seemed to fill the entire court-

  room. Disturbing quiet set in. It was then that I realized he was

  good, real good and he avoided the main issues, like the govern-

  ment not having any real evidence. At the end of his opening

  argument, Scandels turned to face the courtroom; this was done

  solely for the benefit of the press.

  “There’s a war going on in America, and it’s a war on drugs

  and the people that sell them to our children and family members.

  The defendant Life Thugstin is one of the reasons I’m fighting this

  war, and I intend to win.”

  Forty five minutes later Scandels was finished. I tried to check

  of the pulse of the jurors’, a few were nodding their head in agree-

  ment. That wasn’t a good sign. Taya Baker, my assistant, sat to my

  left with Adrienne Greene next to her. Life Thugstin sat perched

  in the middle of sisterhood.

  “The prosecution calls its first witness, Steven Davis.” Stevey

  D was a diminutive man, barely five feet six, slight in build with

  almond skin. He wore a large gauze bandage on his head that

  strangely resembled an oversized turban.

  “Could you please state your name for the record?” Scandels

  asked and leaned against the witness box resting his arm on top

  276

  L i f e

  like he was about to have a conversation with an old friend. I had

  been observing Stevey D since the bailiff had sworn him in. He

  had a jerky nervous motion about him. I could see Scandels try-

  ing to make him comfortable on the stand. It wasn’t working. His

  beady eyes darted all around the courtroom like he wanted to bolt

  for the door. The bailiffs hovered near by, just in case.

  “My name is Steven Davis,” he said priming his big lips with

  a moistened tongue craning his neck forward tr ying to speak into

  the microphone.

  “Would you mind telling me how you suffered the injury to

  your head?” Scandels asked.

  “I was hit upside da head wit a te
n-pound weight while I was

  doing bench presses on the rec yard.” A slight gasp rushed through

  the cour troom and Scandels played out the moment for what it

  was worth, with a grimace, he shook his head.

  “So you were attacked as you worked out. Is that safe to say?”

  “Yes.”

  “Objection.” My assistant Taya Baker was on her feet, a deep

  chocolate woman with a complexion so smooth it made you want

  to touch her. Her eyes were large and penetrating. With her short

  locks of black hair and slender figure of an athlete it was hard to

  believe the woman was 52 years old and an experienced warrior in

  the courtroom.

  “There is no relevance in this line of questioning. I don’t see

  where the prosecution is headed.”

  “Your Honor, the prosecution intends to show the relation-

  ship between this assault and the hideous acts committed by the

  defendant, to establish a criminal pattern of behavior.”

  “Overruled. Counsel I suggest you make your point and move

  along,” the judge said to Scandels.

  “Mr. Davis do you see the man in this courtroom that assault-

  ed you?” Scandels asked. Stevey D’s arm bolted straight forward

  pointing a finger at Life Thugstin. A slight rustle of noise came

  from the courtroom. I looked at a few jurors’ faces and they

  looked visibly uncomfortable.

  277

  L i f e

  “Bitch ass nigga,” Life said loud enough for the entire court-

  room to hear. I wanted to climb under the table. The judge

  banged the gavel and glared in our direction.

  I reached under the table and squeezed Life’s hand.

  “Shhh,” I whispered under my breath and looked up to see the

  satisfied grin on Scandels’ face. His demeanor shifted like some

  wild animal that was onto the scent of blood, I saw it in his blue

  eyes.

  “Could you tell us about your relationship with the defendant,

  Life Thugstin? Have you ever bought drugs from this man?”

  “Yes,” Stevey D said.

  “How many times?”

  “Two, three hundred times,” Stevey D responded. Looking

  around the courtroom, his fidgeting appeared to be getting worse

  as he folded and unfolded his hands.

 

‹ Prev