The practice of lending to an enemy was “as a means of destroying him” (Jno. H. Kimmons, Usury: What Is It, and Does the Law of God Forbid It?).
The term “Jew,” said the Abbé Maury, did not denote a religious sect, but a nation, one which had laws which it had always followed and by which it wished to continue to abide.
“To proclaim the Jews citizens would be as if to say that, without letters of naturalization and without ceasing to be English or Danish, Englishmen and Danes could become Frenchmen.” But Maury’s chief argument was of a moral and social order. The Jews were inherently undesirable, socially as well as economically. They had been chased out of France, and then recalled, no less than seven times – chased out by avarice, as Voltaire had rightly put it, readmitted by avarice once more, but in foolishness as well. (David Vital, A People Apart Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 43-45)
***
“The Jews,” said the Abbé Maury, “have traversed seventeen centuries without mingling with the other nations. They have never engaged in anything but trade with money, they have been the scourge of agricultural provinces, not one of them has known how to ennoble his hands by guiding the plough.” (N. Webster, idem, p.258)
Their laws leave them no time for agriculture; the Sabbath apart, they celebrate fifty-six more festivals than the Christians in each year. In Poland they possess an entire province. Well, then! While the sweat of Christian slaves waters the furrows in which the Jews’ opulence germinates, they themselves, as their fields are cultivated, engage in weighing their ducats and calculating how much they can shave off the coinage without exposing themselves to legal penalties.
They have never been labourers, Maury continued, not even under David and Solomon. And even then they were notorious for their laziness. Their sole concern was commerce... The Jews held 12 million mortgages in Alsace alone, he informed his colleagues. Within a month of their being granted citizenship they would own half the province outright. In ten years’ time they would have “conquered” all of it, reducing it to nothing more than a Jewish colony – upon which the hatred the people of Alsace already bore for the Jews would explode. (Vital, idem 43-45)
***
Then, during another session, the lawyer Godard burst into the chamber with fifty armed “patriots” dressed in costumes of the national guard with three-coloured cockades. They were fifty Jews who, naturally provided with money, had made the rounds of the sections of the Paris Commune and of the wards of the town of Paris, talking about recruiting partisans of equality for the Jews. This had its effect. Out of the sixty sections of Paris fifty-nine declared themselves for equality (only the quartier des Halles abstained). Then the Commune addressed the National Assembly with an appeal signed by the Abbés Mulot, Bertoliot, Fauchet and other members, demanding that equality be immediately given to the Jews.
However, even after that, the National Assembly hesitated in declaring itself in the manner provided. Then, on September 27, the day of the penultimate session of the Assembly before its dissolution, the Jacobin deputy Adrien Duport posed the question of equality for the Jews in a categorical fashion. The Assembly knew Adrien Duport’s personality perfectly. It knew that in a secret meeting of the chiefs of Freemasonry which preceded the revolution, he had insisted on the necessity of resort to a system of terror. The Assembly yielded. There followed a decree signed by Louis XVI granting French Jews full and complete equality of rights… (General A. Nechvolodov, L’Empéreur Nicolas II et les Juifs/ »Emperor Nicholas II and the Jews », Paris, 1924, pp. 216-220).
***
The first stage of the Revolution, from 1789 to 1791, was dominated by the Masons, whose numbers had grown at an astonishing rate in the pre-revolutionary years. Adam Zamoyski writes that “there were 104 lodges in France in 1772, 198 by 1776, and a staggering 629 by 1789. Their membership included virtually every grandee, writer, artist, lawyer, soldier or other professional in the country, as well as notable foreigners such as Franklin and Jefferson – some 30,000 people.” Zamoyski, Holy Madness: Romantics, Patriots and Revolutionaries, 1776-1871, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1999, p. 51.
***
Between 800 and 900 Masonic lodges were founded in France between 1732 and 1793, two-thirds of them after 1760. Between 1773 and 1779 well over 20,000 members were recruited. Few towns of any consequence were without one or more lodges by the 1780s and, despite several papal condemnations of a deistic cult that had originated in Protestant England, the élite of society flocked to join. Voltaire was drafted in on his last visit to Paris, and it was before the assembled brethren of the Nine Sisters Lodge that he exchanged symbolic embraces with Franklin. (William Doyle The Oxford History of the French Revolution, Oxford University Press, 1990, pp. 64-65)
***
The Montagnards (Jacobins) stood for disposing of the king as soon as possible; the Girondins wanted a referendum of the whole people to decide. The Montagnard Saint-Just said that a trial was unnecessary; the people had already judged the king on August 10; it remained only to punish him. For “there is no innocent reign… every King is a rebel and a usurper.”
Robespierre had voted against the death penalty in the Assembly, but now he said that “Louis must die that the country may live” – an unconscious echo of the words of Caiaphas about Christ: “It is expedient for us that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not” (John 11:50). And he agreed with Saint-Just:
“Louis cannot be judged, he has already been judged. He has been condemned, or else the Republic is not blameless. To suggest putting Louis XVI on trial, in whatever way, is a step back towards royal and constitutional despotism; it is a counter-revolutionary idea; because it puts the Revolution itself in the dock. After all, if Louis can still be put on trial, Louis can be acquitted; he might be innocent. Or rather, he is presumed to be until he is found guilty. But if Louis can be presumed innocent, what becomes of the Revolution?” (idem p.195)
***
There was a certain logic in these words: since the Revolution undermined all the foundations of the ancien régime, the possibility that the head of that regime might be innocent implied that the Revolution might be guilty. So “revolutionary justice” required straight execution rather than a trial; it could not afford to question the foundations of the Revolution itself. It was the same logic that led to the execution without trial of Tsar Nicholas II in 1918.
But the majority of the deputies were not yet as “advanced” in their thinking as Robespierre. During the third week of January 1793, the Convention voted four times on the issue. A resolution finding Louis guilty of treason, and rejecting the idea of an appeal to the people by a plebiscite [so much for Rousseauist democracy!], was carried by 426 votes to 278; the decision to impose the death penalty was carried by 387 to 314. Philippe Egalité [the Duke of Orléans and cousin of the king who became Grand Master of the Masons, then a Jacobin, renouncing his title for the name “Philippe Egalité”] voted to convict Louis and for the death penalty. A deputy then proposed that the question of what to do with Louis should be postponed indefinitely. This was defeated by 361 to 360, a single vote. Philippe Egalité voted against the proposal, so his vote decided the issue. On 20 January a resolution that the death sentence should be immediately carried out was passed by 380 to 310, and Louis was guillotined the next day. (Ridley, The Freemasons, London: Constable, 1999, pp. 136-137)
***
The murders began under Rothschild’s red banner and the llluminist slogans: “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity!” and “Freedom or Death!” In Lyon the “enemies of the people” were shot down with cannons, in Nantes, following the slaughter of 500 children, 144 seamstresses were drowned in old barges on the Loire River. Their “crime”: they had sewn shirts for the army. People were executed without trial, despite the ostensible introduction of so-called revolutionary tribunals in September 1789. One of the judges presiding at these tribunals was the perverted Marquis Donatien Alphonse Francois de Sade, who had bee
n brought straight from a mental hospital. De Sade was responsible for giving the concept “sadism” a name. He also died in a mental hospital.
The llluminist coup in France brought none of the improvements that corrupt historians try to make us believe in; instead it resulted in an orgy of violence and intrigue.
To make the killing more efficient, the “revolutionaries” began using the guillotine in April 1792. The idea originally came from Joseph-lgnace Guillotin, a professor in anatomy. The doctor and freemason Antoine Louis constructed the killing machine. The record of Henri Samson, the chief executioner, was 21 heads in 38 minutes.
The real reign of terror, however, began on the 10th of August 1792, which was a Yahweh day when the monarchy was abolished and the Paris commune was established (N.B. “the day when Yahweh would intervene to put Israel at the head of the nations, irrespective of Israel’s faithfulness to Him”-- Wikipedia). The commune leadership included 288 llluminati headed by Chaumette, Danton and Robespierre. The leaders of the Jacobins and especially of the Enraged (Les Enrages) wanted to destroy all who had shown any misgivings about the “revolution.” Georges Jacques Danton, infamous as a rogue, became minister of justice. He wanted every suspect imprisoned. Many priests and relatives of emigrants were also incarcerated. In this way the leaders of the revolution gained access to enormous assets. Danton himself became incredibly rich. Earlier, he had taken large bribes from those wishing to save their lives. In the beginning of September 1792, Danton encouraged the mobs to massacre the “enemies of the people.” (Juri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion p.49)
***
Nothing was said about guilty peasants and workers but it was mainly they who suffered from the “revolutionary” punishments. Marat wanted 100,000 people guillotined to scare the enemies of the “revolution.” Saint- Just promised in the name of the republic to eliminate all adversaries. The Jacobins’ (llluminati’s) terrorism claimed 300,000 human lives, according to Nesta Webster (World Revolution, London, 1921, p. 47).
***
The historian Rene Sedillot, in his book “The Cost of the French Revolution,” calculates that the “revolution,” on account of the terrorism and the civil war, claimed at least 600,000 victims. Charlotte Corday murdered the powerful and bloodthirsty freemason Marat on the 13th of July 1793. Less than one in ten of those guillotined were aristocrats. This was revealed just before the 200th anniversary of the revolution. This information is based on the protocols of the revolutionary tribunals, which include the names of all those executed. Nine per cent of the decapitated “enemies of the people” were nobles, 28 per cent peasants and 30 per cent workers. The rest were servants. (Dagens Nyheter, 1st July 1989.)
In other words, those killed were quite ordinary people. In Paris alone, 30 people were executed every day. The Jacobin executioners usually preferred blonde victims.
In 1903, Lenin proclaimed: “A Russian social democrat must be a Jacobin.” (ibid. p. 50)
It was these fiercer elements, true disciples of the Illuminati, who were to sweep away the visionary Masons dreaming of equality and brotherhood. Yet faithfully as the Terrorists carried out the plan of the Illuminati, it would seem that they themselves were not initiated into the innermost secrets of the conspiracy. Behind the Convention, behind the clubs, behind the Revolutionary Tribunal, there existed, says Lombard de Langres, that “most secret convention” [convention sécrétissime] which directed everything after May 31, an occult and terrible power of which the other Convention became the slave and which was composed of the prime initiates of Illuminism. This power was above Robespierre and the committees of the government, … it was this occult power which appropriated to itself the treasures of the nation and distributed them to the brothers and friends who had helped on the great work. (N. Webster, ibid. pp. 256)
***
...the appalling thing in the French Revolution is not the tumult but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of calculating organization. The managers remain studiously concealed and masked; but there is no doubt about their presence from the first. (Lord Acton, Lectures on the French Revolution, p. 97)
Illuminism penetrated into all the Lodges of Grand Orient Freemasonry in France, being backed by organised cabbalistic Jews. (E.) According to F, Vol. I., p. 184, the Jewish financiers behind the 1789 Revolution were as follows:
Daniel Itzig, 1722-1799, Berlin, Court Jew to Frederick William II.
David Friedlander, 1750-1834, Berlin, his son-in-law.
Herz Cerfbeer, 1730-1793, Alsace.
Benjamin Goldsmid, 1755-1808, London, William Pitt’s (the younger) financier.
Abraham Goldsmid, 1756-1810, London, his brother.
Moses Mocatta, 1768-1857, London, partner of a brother of the two Goldsmids, and uncle of Sir Moses Montefiore. (Arnold Leese, Gentile Folly: The Rothschilds, 1940)
What was the aim of this occult power? Was it merely the plan of destruction that had originated in the brain of a Bavarian professor twenty years earlier, or was it something far older, a live and terrible force that had lain dormant through the centuries, that Weishaupt and his allies had not created but only loosed upon the world? The Reign of Terror, like the outbreak of Satanism in the Middle Ages, can be explained by no material causes – the orgy of hatred, lust and cruelty directed not only against the rich but still more against the poor and defenceless, the destruction of science, art, and beauty, the desecration of the churches, the organized campaign against all that was noble, all that was sacred, all that humanity holds dear, what was this but Satanism? (N. Webster, ibid, p. 257)
***
We are god’s chosen people . . . Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer -- so I wasn’t lying -- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive. (Harold Wallace Rosenthal interview, see below)
Memo from today: Goodwill courtesy of Lucifer. Who could object to “goodwill”? But maybe the ubiquitous Gutmensch/goody-goody is not as benignly silly as he may appear. Founded in 1932, recognized by the United Nations as an NGO, World Goodwill works directly with the “world federalists,” and is part of the work to “Externalize the Hierarchy” of “Illumined Minds,” which will usher in an “Age of Maitreya.” World Goodwill is an international group with headquarters in Geneva, London and New York. Its parent is the Lucis Trust (founded 1922), which is run through an international board of trustees whose membership may have included: John D. Rockefeller, Norman Cousins, Robert S. McNamara, Thomas Watson, Jr. (IBM, former U.S. Ambassador to Moscow), Henry Clausen, Grand Commander of the Supreme Council, 33rd Degree, Southern District Scottish Rite, and Henry Kissinger. Lucis Trust is a powerful institution that enjoys “Consultative Status” with the United Nations, which permits it to have a close working relationship with the U.N., including a seat on the weekly sessions, but most importantly, influence with powerful business and national leaders throughout the world.
The Lucis Trust is aggressively involved in promoting a globalist ideology, which it refers to as “goodwill.” Its “World Goodwill” organization is closely connected to international elitist circles. (Patrick J. Miron, Behold the Lamb of God: A Treasury of Catholic Truths, Teachings and Traditions, p. 93).
The Lucis Trust website proclaims: “The United Nations has declared 2015 the International Year of Light.” World Goodwill at the UN: “Mainstreaming Youth in the Post-2015 Development Agenda.” “BEYOND 2015: A GOODWILL VISION.” “Wielding the Healing Power of Light.”
The stated purposes of World Goodwill, according to its sponsoring organization, the Lucis Trust, are:
To help mobilise the energy of goodwill; To cooperate in the work of preparation for the reappearance of the Christ; To educate public opinion on the causes of the major world problems and to help create the thoughtform of solution.
For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Ther
efore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the minsters of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works. (II Corinthians, 11: 13-15)
***
No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation. (David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations. American spiritual philosopher and self-described “practical mystic.” (Wikipedia)
Also associated with the Findhorn Community, where they channel God to grow “exceptionally large vegetables.”
Harmless loonies?
Findhorn Ecovillage... regularly holds seminars of “CIFAL Findhorn,” a United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR), affiliated training centre for Northern Europe. “Moray to be base for UN training, BBC News, 22 September 2006” (Wikipedia). (See fellow New Age loony Barbara Marx Hubbard, p.263.)
Of course the United Nations is just as much of a Trojan horse as was its predecessor, the League of Nations: “The League of Nations is a Jewish idea and Jerusalem some day will become the capital of the world’s peace. The League has recognized our rights to our ancient home. We Jews throughout the world will make the League’s struggle our own and will not rest until there is ultimate victory.” (Dr. Nakum Sokolow, at the Zionist Congress in Carlsbad, California, New York Times, August 27, 1921, “Jews of the World will back League”)
In the desires of a terrible and formidable sect, you have only reached the first stages of the plans it has formed for that general Revolution which is to overthrow all thrones, all altars, annihilate all property, efface all law, and end by dissolving all society. (Abbé Barruel (1797) writing on the “Anti-Christian Conspiracy”)
Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil Page 26
