As the grandchildren of God, the Nephilim had a covenant with God, in the time of the flood that is
never specifically mentioned, but is alluded to. The covenant is revealed after the flood, when the
giants were not destroyed. Their survival both before and after the flood is found in the statement;
“There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward.” Meaning, before and after the flood.
There are also Rabbinical and Eastern traditions that claim that Og, the Amorite king and giant,
survived the flood by wading next to the ark, with another version stating that Og survived by Moses
feeding him through a hole in the roof of the ark.
The Nephilim or giants are referred to within the Bible as Rephiam, Nephilim, with tribal names of
Amorites, Canaanites, Emmin, Zanzummin, Amalekites, Horim and the Anak. The Emmin that
translates to “terrible men” were an accounted tribe of giants that lived east of the Dead Sea. The
Anakim are defined in “ A Dictionary of the Bible” as “A race of giants, descendants of Arba (Josh.
15:13, 21:11), dwelling in the southern part of Canaan, and particularly at Hebron, which from their progenitor received the name of “city of Arba.” Besides the general designation Anakim, they are
variously called Anak (Num. 13: 33), descendants of Anak (Num. 13: 22) and sons of Anak (Deut. 1:
28). These designations serve to show that we must regard Anak as the name of a race rather than that
of an individual, and this is confirmed by what is said of Arba, their progenitor, that he “was a great
man among the Anakim” (Josh. 15:15).
The most renown of the giants were the Amorites, whose two kings Sihon and Og, who ruled the
rich lands that are described as being bounded by Jabok on the north, the Arnon on the south, Jordan on
the west, and the “wilderness” on the east (Judges 11: 21, 22), this land was noted as the “land of the
Amorites.” Their possessions are distinctly stated to have extended to the foot of Mt. Herman. (Joshua
13:11) Mt. Herman is where the sons of God swore the oath to mate with mortal women.
2000 B.C the Amorites are living with, an allied to Abraham, who was living in Hebron, under the
“oak grove.” The tribes of giants had been subjugated by Chedorlaomer , and rebelled. Genesis 14: 5
“And in the fourteenth year came Chedorlaomer, and the kings were with him, and smote the Rephaims
in Ashteroth in Karnaim, and the Zuzims in Ham, and the Emmins in Shaveh Kiriathaim, (6) And the
Horites in their mount. [...] and smote all the country of the Amelekites, and also the Amorites, that
dwelt in Hazezon-tamar.”
Abraham's alliance with the Amorites is revealed in (14:13) That states he dwelt in the plain of
Mamre the Amorite, and these were confederate with Abram. A little known association of Abraham
with the Sons of God and the Nephilim, was uncovered in Praeparatio Evangelica, The Old Testament
Pseudepigrapha , Charles H. Charlesworth. “ In anonymous works, we find that Abraham traced his
ancestry to the giants. These dwelt in the land of Babylonia. Because of their impiety, they were
destroyed by the gods. One of them, Belos, escaped death and settled in Babylon. He built a tower and
lived in it; the tower was called Belos, after its builder. After Abraham had learned astrology, he went
to Phoenicia and taught it to the Phoenicians.” In Genesis 14:15, God promises Abraham a child to produce the multitudes that would possess the
“promised land.” However, the possession of the “promised land” is delayed by the covenant God had
with his grandchildren, the Amorites. Genesis 15:16 “But in the fourth generation they shall come
hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full.”
The Hebrews can not take possession of the “promised land” because “the inequity of the Amorites is
not yet full.” This has to be interpreted as the “giants,” who were the offspring of the sons of God had
a covenant, that up to this time had not been broken. The mysterious origins of the Amorites is shown
in Ezekiel, chapter 28, in the judgement of the prince of Tyre. Tyre is a Phoenician/Amorite city of
trade on the western shores of the Medeteranean. In the Book of Ezekiel are versus that place the
Amorites within the Garden of Eden, where they were “created.” Is the Bible saying that Amorites who
were of the Cro-Magnon species the first men that inhabited the Garden of Eden? Ezekiel 28:13:
“Thou hast been in Eden, the garden of God. The workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was
prepared in the day that thou was created.” Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set
thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the
stones of fire. Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou was created, till iniquity was found
in thee.”
Iniquity, is defined as a wicked, unjust or unrighteous act. The iniquities the Amorites committed is
explained further in The Book of Enoch, that tells of godlessness the Nephilim-Amorites were engaged
in. The quote acts as a checklist in identifying the Amorites; as the introducer of metals or weapons,
temples constructed to track the sun and the moon, evidence of the use of mathematics in the temples
construction, astrology, the “signs of the earth,” which is the worship of the Earth Mother, and the
identification of sacred springs, hilltops, mountains, boulders, groves, trees and rivers. The knowledge
passed from the sons of God to the Nephilim is as relevant and observable in ancient land of the Amorites, as it is in the British Isles and the Ohio Valley. Enoch 8:1-3: “And Azazel taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and made known to them the metals of the earth and the art of working them, and bracelets, and ornaments, and the use of antimony, and the beautifying of the eyelids and all kinds of costly stones, and all (2) colouring tinctures. And there arose much godlessness, and they committed fornication, and they were led astray, and became corrupt in their ways. Semjaza taught enchantments, and root cuttings, Armoras the resolving of enchantments, Baraqijal taught astrology, Kokabel the constellations, Ezwqeel the knowledge of the clouds, Araqiel the signs of the earth, Shamsiel the signs of the sun, and Sariel the course of the moon.
Azazel “made known,” to the Nephilim metals, and how to fashion them into swords and knives.
This is historically consistent with the beginning of the Bronze Age around 2700 B.C. The Amorites
were mining and trading copper and tin and innovating improved types of knives and swords. It is also
around this time that marks the beginning of the Megalithic building of stone circles, that were used to
track the motions of the sun and moon and to pay homage to those deities.
The secrets taught to the Nephilim by the 8 sons of God are important in identifying the Amorites in
the Levant, the British Isles or in the Ohio Valley. In each location, the Amorites introduced metals
and built open-air stone and earthen temples to worship the Sun and the Earth. The temples were
constructed using complex mathematics and were used as solar celestial observatories. They placed
their dead in burial mounds, where their gigantic skeletons have been uncovered, revealing that they
were an archaic type of human, closely related to the Upper Paleolithic, Cro-Magnon.
H. P. Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled, reveals that the legend of the sons of God mating with the daughters
of man is not isolated to the Torah or the Bible but is widespread in the stories of many ancient texts.
&nbs
p; Isisi Unveiled, A Master Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology, 1877,
“The fables of the mythopœic ages will be found to have but allegorized the the greatest truths of
geology and anthropology. It is in these ridiculously expressed fables that science will have to look for
her “missing links.”
Otherwise, whence such strange “coincidences” in the respective histories of nations and peoples so
widely thrown apart? Whence that identity of primitive conceptions which, fables and legends though they are termed now, contain in them nevertheless the kernel of historical facts, of a truth thickly
overgrown with the husks of popular embellishment, but still a truth? Compare only the verse of
Genesis vi: “And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters
were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took
them wives of all which they chose...There were giants in the earth in those days,” ect., with this part
of the Hindu cosmogony, in the Vedas, which speaks of the descent of the Brahmans. The first
Brahman complains of being alone among all his brethren without a wife. Notwithstanding that the
Eternal advises him to devote his days soley to the study of the Sacred Knowledge (Veda), the first
born of mankind insists. Provoked at such ingratitude, the eternal gave Brahman a wife of the race of
the Daints, or giants, from whom all the Brahmans maternally descend. This the entire Hindu
priesthood is descended, on the one hand, from the superior spirits (the sons of God), and from
Daintany, a daughter of the earthly giants, the primitive men. “And they bare children to them; the
same became mighty men which were of old; men of renown” (Mythologie des Indous)
The same is found in the Scandinavian cosmogonical fragment. In the Eddas is given the description
to Gangler by Har, one of the three informants (Har, Jafuhar, and Tredi) of the first man, called Bur,
“the father of Bor, who took for a wife Besla, a daughter of the giant Bolthara, of the race of the
primitive giants.” The full and interesting narrative may be found in the Prose Edda, sects. 4-8, in
Mallett's Northern Antiquities.
The same groundwork underlies the Grecian fables about Titans; and may be found in the legend of
the Mexicans-four successive races of
Popol-Vuh. It constitutes one of the many ends to be found in
the entangled and seemingly inextricable skein of mankind, viewed as a psychological phenomenon.
To say that it sprang up, and grew and developed throughout the countless ages, without either cause or
at least firm basis to rest upon, but merely as an empty fancy, would be to utter as great an absurdity as the theological doctrine that the universe sprang into creation out of nothing.”
The Amorites
Archaeology and the Bible, George Barton, 1916 “The Amorites belonged to the Indo-European
type, the nose was straight and regular, the forehead high, the cheek bones somewhat prominent. We
find that this was precisely the character of the face of the Mentone and Cro-Magnon skulls. The
Amorites at one time occupied the mountainous regions of Asia Minor from the south-west of the
Caspian to the Aegean Sea. Here they flourished, and for many centuries horde after horde of these
people descended into the rich and fertile plains of Syria and Mesopotamia.”
The Amorites, were the accounted giants of the Bible who possessed the land of Canaan before the
conquest of the Israelites. The Amorites brought with them a new tribal organization, pottery, and
burial customs in the Intermediate Bronze Age. In early Babylonian inscriptions the “land of the
Amorites” consisted of all the “western” lands that included Syria and Canaan.
The artist who ornamented the Egyptian monuments has there illustrated the various people of
Western Asia conquered by Thothmes III, and among them were the Amorites who, we know from
Babylonian records, were a powerful race inhabiting the country north and east of the Dead Sea, as
early as 3800 BC.
Amorite depicted on Egyptian bas-relief, From The Early History of the Hebrews, 1901
Archaeology and the Bible, George Barton, 1916 “We are accustomed to call this Semitic people
Amorites, and it probable that this is right. About 2800 B.C, under a great king named Sargon, a city
of Babylonia called Uru, or Amurru, and Agade conquered all of Babylonia. The dynasty founded by
Sargon was Semitic and ruled Babylonia for 197 years. Even before Sargon conquered Babylonia,
Lugalzaggisi, King of Erech, had penetrated to the Medeteranean coast. Sargon and two of his
successors, Naram-Sin and Shargali-sharri, carried their conquest to the Medeteranean lands. A seal of
the last mentioned king was found in Cyprus. It is probable that the coming of the Amorites began in
the north with the conquests of these kings.
To the east of Lebanon the Princeton expedition found stone structures similar to Babylonian
Ziggurats, which they attribute to the Amorites, and hold to indicate the prevalence of Babylonian
influence in this region.
It is probable that the Amorites slowly worked southward, occupying different cities as they went.
Mr. Macalister estimated that they reached Gezer about 2500 B.C. It is not, therefore, unreasonable,
though they may have arrived there a century earlier than that. This was the beginning of that long
intercourse with Babylonian language and script for the purpose of expressing written thought in
Palestine long after the Egyptians had conquered the country. The intercourse was the more natural
because the Semites who came to Palestine were of the same race as those who were dominant in
Babylonia.
Meantime, the Egyptians had begun to take notice of Palestine, an officer of Pepi I of the sixth
Egyptian dynasty, relates that he crossed the sea in ships to the back of the height of the ridge north of
the “sand-dwellers and punished the inhabitants.” This refers to the coast of Palestine in the
neighborhood of the Phillistine cities of Gezer. This time was between 2600 and 2750 B.C. Egypt was
at this time only anxious to make her own borders secure; she had no desire to occupy this Asiatic land.
Again, between 2300 and 2200 B.C., a fresh migration of Semites, apparently also of the Amorite branch, invaded Babylonia and in time made the city of Babylon the head of a great empire. This race
furnished the first dynasty of Babylon, which ruled from 2210 to 1924 B. C. Its greatest king,
Hammurabi, who gave to Babylon a code of laws in the vernacular language, conquered the “west
land,” which means the Medeteranean coast.
It was probably under his successor, Shamsu-iluna, but certainly under one of the kings of this
period. In this same period there lived in Babylonia an Abraham, the records of some of whose
business documents have come down to us. We also find three men who bore the names Yagubilu
(Jacobel) and Yashubilu (Josephel) and one who was simply called Yagub, or Jacob. Palestinian
evidence from a later time leads us to believe that men bearing all these names migrated during this
period to Palestine and gave their names to cities which they built or occupied.
Egyptians also came to Palestine during this period. There was apparently considerable trade with
Egypt at this time. Men from Palestine often went there for this purpose. Trade with Egypt is also
shown to have existed by the discovery of Egyptian scara
bs of this time of the Middle Kingdom in the
excavation of Gezer, Jericho, Tannach and Meggiddo. As Egypt was nearer and commerce with it
easier, its art affected the art of Palestine during this period more than did the art of Babylon, although
the people were akin to the Babylonians. In the reign of Sesostris III, 1887-1849 B.C., the Egyptian
king sent an expedition into Palestine, and captured a place called in Egyptian Sekmen, which is though
by some to be a misspelling of Shechem. This expedition probably stimulated Egyptian influence in
the country, though the Egyptians established no permanent control of the land at this time.
Between 1800 and 1750 B.C a migration occurred which greatly disturbed all western Asia. There
moved into Babylonia from the east a people called Kassites. They conquered Babylonia and
established a dynasty which reigned for 576 years. Coincident with this movement into Babylonia there
was a migration across the whole of Asia to the westward which caused an invasion of Egypt and the
establishment of the Hykos dynasties there. As pointed out previously, it is possible that this movement, in so far as the leadership of the invasion of Egypt was concerned, was Hittite. In any
event, however, many Semites were involved in it, as the Semitic names in the Egyptian Delta at this
time prove. It is customary to assume that it was in connection with this migration that the Canaanites
came into Palestine. We thus feel sure that there was an increase of population and when next our
written sources reveal to us the location of the nations, the Canaanites were dwelling in Phoenicia. The
Egyptian scribes of a later time called the entire western part of Syria and Palestine “The Canaan.”
Probably, therefore, the Canaanites settled along the sea coast. We, therefore, infer that they came into
this region at this time. With the coming of an increased population, the Amorites appear to have been
in part subjugated and absorbed, and in part forced into narrower limits.”
In Phoenician Origin of the Britons & Scots, 1925, Waddell observed, “ that the old ruling race of
The Nephilim Chronicles: Fallen Angels in the Ohio Valley Page 15
