Slave Species of god

by Michael Tellinger

  The Sanskrit Rig Veda, a collection of religious texts still revered by modern Hindus, carry enigmatic records of such events. This is another perfect example of how historians have scrambled our brains over time, because suddenly we have mythological gods clashing with actual historic people. Hindus see this as history, while others have described it as mythology. So if the invading ‘Aryan gods’ were mythological, who are the Vedic poems referring to? Who was actually invading the Indian lands? Or were they just imagining that too? How can you have a situation where half of the historic records is deemed to be acceptable, but the other half is ‘just a figment of their imagination, because they had nothing better to do’? These events surrounding the Aryan invasion of Indus are of paramount importance to the credibility of the ancient ‘gods’. Because there is no other time and place in history where we have such detailed description of historic interaction between gods and men, outlining the superiority of the gods and the subservience which was forced upon the humans. In the following extract from a Vedic poem (Rig Veda 1.53) the local people were referred to as the Dasyus.

  ARYAN INVASION

  “Indra (Norse-Thor, Celtic-Taranis) has torn open the fortresses of the Dasyus, which in their wombs hid the black people. He created land and water for Manu (Aryan man); Lower than all besides, hast thou, O Indra, cast down the Dasyus, abject tribes of Dasas; After slaying the Dasyus, let Indra with his white friends win land, let him win the sun and water; Indra subdued the Dasyus colour and drove it into hiding." With all-outstripping chariot-wheel, O Indra, Thou, far-famed, hast overthrown the twice ten kings ...Thou goest from fight to fight, intrepidly destroying castle after castle here with strength.” (RV 1.53)

  The Aryans were remarkably expansionist and almost everywhere they went they conquered and subjugated the indigenous peoples, imposing their languages and their religious beliefs on the natives. In turn, they received contributions from the people whom they conquered. The Aryans had very strong links to the Essenes sect of Hebrews, to which Joseph and Jesus belonged. There is some evidence that it was the Aryans who sponsored Jesus to travel the East and learn the cultures. Aryan invasions had been going on for millennia, as far back as 4000 BC and probably even further back, when they first began to conquer Europe. Most of the contemporary inhabitants of Europe, along with their respective early national cultures, are the result of interaction between successive waves of white Aryan invaders and their culture. Therefore almost all modern European languages are members of the Western branch of the Indo-European family tree.

  The birth of a European culture predates the arrival of the Indo-Europeans. The descendants of the biblical ‘Nefilim’ and their earthling children moved away from Sumer according to the clay tablets. They settled in distant lands which can only be identified as prehistoric Europe. They were also white and more technologically advanced because they possessed some of the Anunnaki’s genetic pool and influence. This means that the coming together of the Old Europeans and the Aryans, actually brought together two opposite sides of the advanced white Anunnaki children who had interbred with Earthling females, as is so eloquently outlined in Genesis. The cave art of Lascaux, which some have identified as the first flowering of Western man's creative genius, was the work of Old Europeans. Stonehenge in the North and the Minoan Palace culture of Crete in the South are other examples. A pan-European religious symbolism had already evolved but once again much of it was later incorporated into IE mythologies, including various regional adaptations of European reverence for the Mother Goddess. Many of the principal figures in Greek mythology predate the arrival of the Aryans, which means they must have arrived with the Nefilim from Sumer. This would have been the other group of Anunnaki offspring, who married earthling females and started a whole new race of humans; a white and domineering race. During the course of ancient history, Old European religious beliefs and practices continually reasserted themselves, such as the image of the Minoan snake goddess, from the Palace of Minos, circa 1600 BC, but it probably has much older origins.

  Europe is European because the conquerors and the conquered were members of the same white race, different branches on the same family tree. One came in from the South-West while the others, mainly Aryans, arrived from the North East. India is a morass of poverty because the bulk of the conquered, with whom the Indo-Aryans eventually intermarried, were non-white Veddoids. The lesson is obvious. Even today high-caste Hindus can still be identified by their Caucasian features and light skin, and the poorest and most ‘backward’ parts of India are generally the darkest. Were the Aryans the original promoters of ‘apartheid’? It certainly looks like it. Where else would modern Europeans have got it from? Everything we have and we know was handed down to us by our ancient ancestors, the Sumerians, who were taught everything they knew by the Anunnaki gods. If we extrapolate this timeline a little further back in time to the point of the creation of ‘Adamu’ and we analyse how the whole human race issue was handled by the gods for thousands of years right up to the rapid expansion and globalisation by the Anunnaki under the leadership of Marduk, which included the Igigi, who were actually the Aryans, we arrive at the conclusion that ‘god’ our maker, was the first racist. It is very disturbing to discover that the wise Anunnaki gods who settled on this planet with all their knowledge could allow such disorganised chaos to evolve. But maybe that is exactly what they had in mind – divide and rule. Keep the slave species subjugated at all cost. Recent genetic studies have indicated that the Basques of Aquitaine and the Pyrenees are probably the purest form of Old European as they existed prior to the arrival of Indo-European invaders. They evidently emerged from the invasions of Europe unconquered, and they remained sufficiently isolated to retain their own unique, non-IE language.

  Now that we have dealt with the very important issue of the Aryans, we can return to the Hindus and their religious and cultural development before and after the influence of the Aryans. While many believe that Hinduism is a polytheistic religion which worships many gods, the basis of Hinduism is the belief in the unity of everything. This totality is called Brahman. The purpose of life is to realise that we are part of God, and that by doing so, we can leave this plane of existence and rejoin with God. This enlightenment can only be achieved by going through cycles of rebirth, life and death known as ‘samsara’. And yet the major part of this religious practice is to worship the god Vishnu, who seems to be the prominent god; or Shiva or the goddess Shakti; or their many other incarnations, aspects, spouses or progeny.

  In Hinduism, one’s progress towards enlightenment is measured by one’s karma, which is the accumulation of all one’s good and bad deeds, and which determines the person’s next reincarnation. Selfless acts and thoughts as well as devotion to God, will help one to be reborn at a higher level in the caste system. Bad acts and thoughts will cause one to be born at a lower level, as a person or possibly even as an animal. Hindus follow a strict system called ‘caste’, which determines the social importance or standing of each person. The caste which one is born into is the result of the karma from their previous life. Only members of the highest caste, the Brahmins, may perform the Hindu religious rituals and hold positions of authority within the temples. The earliest cultures in Mesopotamia were building many temples to the different gods presiding over individual villages. It is curious that historians refer to those as ‘mythology’ and yet, the Hindu sects are still practising this form of religious worship today. But in India it is called a religion and nobody will dare to call their gods mythological figures. Just as the gods in the Sumerian tablets had various towns or villages to look after, and were worshipped as such, so are Hindu gods still worshipped today – different gods in different villages. Hindus join a sect by undergoing initiation and learning the sacred ‘mantra’ of that sect, which is presented to them by the ‘guru’. The mantra is in the form of an ‘Om’ homage to the god which the sect belongs to and is normally the god of that village.

  But the entire vast H
indu family of sects and offshoots emerged from the proto-Hindu culture known as the Veda, which originated in the Indus Valley. The Rig Veda is the oldest of the collection of Vedic hymns and is the oldest living religious literature in the world, predating the Bible by thousands of years. The total collection of Vedic poems or hymns consists of 1,028 hymns to the Vedic deities. The origin of these can be traced back to around 8000 BC according to some scholars. Incredibly they survived for thousands of years by being handed down in the oral tradition until they were finally written down.

  The Vedas are the most sacred scriptures of Hinduism. According to tradition, “when God creates the worlds, He reveals the Vedas for the welfare of the worlds and when He ends the creation, He takes them back again”. Some people say that all human knowledge is available in the Vedas in symbolic form and that the knowledge of all our discoveries and inventions is already contained in the Vedas. It is true that the Vedas are not mere books of some magical chants but they are loaded with ancient historical knowledge from a time before time, which reveals itself step by step. They are Rig Veda; Sama Veda; Yajur Veda and Atharva Veda.

  The Atharva Veda is different from the other three Veda collections, in that it contains spells and incantations for medicinal purposes, magical aids to victory in battle and so on. The Vedic collections are complemented by a series of works called the Brahmanas, which are devoted to the explanation of the hymns, their ritual applications and their mythology. It is the Vedic books called the Aranyakas and Upanishads which push the religion towards a monistic philosophy. It is only in the pages of the Upanishads that we first find references to death and rebirth of the soul, and not in the much older Vedas. It seems as if the Aryans had a lot to do with the writing of these scriptures, most likely for the purpose of enslaving the locals with religious dogma. The rather strange and ‘non-Hindu’ contents of the Upanishads resembles the assertions of the followers of Marduk, promising humans an eternal afterlife, but only if they behaved themselves, and followed god's commands. They did this very successfully in Egypt with the Pharaohs, but in the Indus Valley they added a very juicy twist... if you do not obey god's commands, you will be reborn as a dirty animal. This was actually a brilliant form of mental torture. The people were already experiencing hardship on Earth, waiting to escape it. There could be nothing more horrific than the thought of having to return to this realm to live in harsher conditions than before. And so these descendants of the Sumerian gods were on the move, conquering and subjugating humans in their path.

  There are so many rituals and different cultural applications by the various sects of Hinduism, that it would take up the rest of this book and much more to begin to capture it all. The fascinating thing about Hinduism, is its murky origin in distant prehistory, where the Vedic poems originated. Every single poem deals with one or more ancient gods in various ways. Either praising him or her, exalting them, worshipping, asking for favour, wisdom, wealth, courage and thousands of other human needs. It seems as if the people of those early days had a very different relationship with their gods when compared to the modern Hindus. What is even more interesting, is that those early Vedic gods resembled the ancient Sumerian gods to perfection. They had similar functions, denominations, characters and personalities and all other aspects of their being. They liked their material offerings of gold and food, just like their Sumerian counterpart gods, and they could be equally brutal in dispensing punishment to unlucky followers. And yet on different occasions they would reward their obedient followers with material wealth. According to the Sumerian clay tablets it was the talented goddess of love, Inanna, who was given this Asian domain to look after. Is it not strange that her high sexual appetite and love for poetry and music, turned out to be the cultural centrepiece of the Indian people? But it goes even further. There is a plethora of references to the gods of Sumer, mirrored in the Vedic poems. We see them riding in sky chariots, displaying all kinds of fierce weapons, slaying their foes with ease by using weapons that closely resemble both the biblical descriptions, and those of the Sumerian tablets. During excavation in Harappa, one of the largest ancient Indus cities, the predominant effigies, statues and references found were to the “Great Mother Goddess”. The same Mother Goddess who was very active in Old European civilisations. Little statues and figurines of this celestial deity were scattered all over the Indus Valley, Western Asia and even the Aegean. I am of the firm belief that these statues represented the goddess of love and war, Inanna or Ishtar as she was known to her Anunnaki godly family.

  A most fascinating link to the creation of Humankind comes to us in the Laws of Manu. This ‘revealed scripture’ comprises 2,684 verses, divided into 12 chapters presenting the norms of domestic, social, and religious life in India. There is some disagreement among scholars about the exact date when these scriptures were first penned. Some scholars date it back as far as 1500 BC, others place it at 500 BC and some say that it is a copy of much earlier writings only captured around 200 AD. Regardless of the date, the Laws of Manu or ‘Manava Dharma Shastra’ is one of the standard books in the Hindu canon, and a basic text for all gurus to base their teachings on. It is fundamental to the understanding of ancient Indian society and traditionally accepted as one of the supplementary arms of the Vedas. But what interests me most are verses 16 - 29 of Chapter 1. As you will see below, the description of the ‘creation of mankind’ is uncannily close to the descriptions in the Sumerian tablets. How is that possible, unless there was a very close link to the Sumerian gods by one of their representatives in the Indus Valley. There were many gods in the valley organising the rise of that civilisation from thousands of years BC. So it should not surprise us to see this kind of sharing of knowledge. Manu's text clearly suggests some kind of genetic engineering, DNA splicing and other biological manipulation by the gods when they were creating mankind. This is an extract from Chapter 1 - The Laws of Manu translated by G. Buhler:

  “16. But, joining minute particles even of those six, which possess measureless power, with particles of himself, he created all beings.

  17. Because those six (kinds of) minute particles, which form the (creator's) frame, enter (a-sri) these (creatures), therefore the wise call his frame sarira, (the body).

  18. That the great elements enter, together with their functions and the mind, through its minute parts the framer of all beings, the imperishable one.

  19. But from minute body (framing) particles of these seven very powerful Purushas springs this (world), the perishable from the imperishable.

  20. Among them each succeeding (element) acquires the quality of the preceding one, and whatever place (in the sequence) each of them occupies, even so many qualities it is declared to possess.

  21. But in the beginning he assigned their several names, actions, and conditions to all (created beings) even according to the words of the Veda.

  22. He, the Lord, also created the class of the gods, who are endowed with life, and whose nature is action; and the subtile class of the Sadhyas, and the eternal sacrifice.

  29. Whatever he assigned to each at the (first) creation, noxiousness or harmlessness, gentleness or ferocity, virtue or sin, truth or falsehood, that clung (afterwards) spontaneously to it.” (Were the seven Purushas the same seven Sumerian birth-mothers that gave birth to the first Homo sapiens?)

  Much has been written about the origins of writing in the world. One of the strongly argued topics is the origin of the Vedic scripts. While most will contest with all their might that they cannot have existed in written form all those thousands of years ago, long before writing was invented, there are some strong arguments in favour of such a possibility. Is it at all possible that over 1,000 Vedic poems could have survived thousands of years without having been written down? It seems highly unlikely. But Humankind only started to write around 4000 BC in the Near East, and 3400 BC in the Indus Valley. How could the Vedic poems have been written down if human kind could not write yet? Just because no writing material had been ex
cavated in India does not mean that they could not write.

  Ellie Crystal from the remarkable www.crystalinks.com website has presented a very strong argument showing that it may actually be possible for the Vedic literature to have been written down long before the time of the accepted emergence of writing in the world. Rig Veda is accepted as the oldest existing literature available to humans. It seems to be older than the Ramayan of at least 5500 BC and some internal proto-Hindu evidence takes it as far back as 23,000 BC. Other scholars place it at around 8000 BC. The point is that they must have written all that literature down in some way, because it is highly improbable that they could have memorised such a vast amount of work. There are a number of references which allude to the art of writing in the Rig Veda. Some of the references state that the seers “inscribed or engraved” words on certain materials, suggesting that they knew how to write. The Rig Veda 1-164-39 states that “In the letters (akshara) of the verses of the Veda...”.

  The Rig Vedic texts consists of a large number of compositional ‘chandas’, which are very specific spatial arrangements of the lines in a metre, and to complicate it even more, a specific number of words per line. It would take a tremendous amount of mental effort to compose and memorise so much material with all the specific intricacies involved. So unless these were reduced to writing and given a specific concrete shape, it would not have been possible to transfer it orally.

  Yet another verse of Rig Veda 10-62-7 mentions how cows were marked “by an 8-eight” which clearly shows that the ancients possessed the knowledge of writing.