B008257PJY EBOK

by Worth, Sandra

  One question I have been asked with some frequency regards Anne’s vegetarianism. It may come as a surprise to many that there were, indeed, vegetarians in the fifteenth century. This fact is documented by John Stowe in Stowe’s Survey of London, which has been regarded as the prime authority on the history of London from its initial publication in 1598. (4) Stowe reports that at a Christmas feast in the ninth year of Henry VII’s reign, sixty dishes were served to the queen, Elizabeth of York, none of which were “fish or flesh.”

  Other facts may prove of interest. The garden Richard installed for his ailing wife survives at Warwick Castle, as does the window at Barnard’s Castle (described in The Rose of York: Love & War) and Richard’s book, Tristan. Richard’s breakdown at Anne’s funeral is well documented, and Anne Neville and Elizabeth of York did appear in the same gown on that last Christmas of Richard’s life, giving rise to rumours of an illicit love affair. An emotional involvement is suggested by Elizabeth’s mysterious motto, sans removyr, “Without changing”—never used by her again—inserted into Richard’s book, Tristan, below his ex libris. (5)

  The death of Richard’s son and heir, Prince Edward, came a year to the day of King Edward IV’s own death. This uncanny coincidence, coupled with the fact that it was sudden, of a belly ache accompanied by great pain, lends credence to the contemporary rumours of poison, and might explain Richard’s desperate attempt at Bosworth to engage Tudor personally.

  As to whether Richard had a deformity: no one who knew him during his lifetime ever mentioned one. The Countess of Desmond, who danced with Richard at a banquet, is reported to have said that he was the handsomest young man in the room besides his brother the King, and a German ambassador who visited England in 1484 left a detailed description of his visit and of Richard III himself, describing him as “two fingers taller” than himself. Shakespeare’s immortal image of the limping hunchback with the withered arm shouting, “A horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse!” is also disputed by Richard’s surviving portrait (6) and the tributes awarded him for his valour at Bosworth. Even Henry Tudor’s hired historian admits that Richard was killed fighting bravely in the thickest press of his enemies.

  After every conflict the victor rewrites history, and Henry Tudor was no exception. Having won the throne by right of battle, he set a dangerous precedent for his own future. The legend of the hideous, villainous monster was deliberately initiated during his reign in order to justify his usurpation. He hired an Italian historian, Polydore Vergil, to paint his predecessor as evil and forge his propaganda into history, and Sir Thomas More absorbed the Tudor version from Richard’s old enemy, Bishop Morton, in whose household he was reared as a child. More’s account of Richard’s reign, unfinished and broken off in mid-sentence, was published posthumously and taken up by the Tudor historians Hall and Holinshed. Shakespeare’s play sealed the legend. As soon as the last Tudor was dead, the people of the North rallied to right the injustice done to Richard’s memory. George Buck was the first, then came Horace Walpole. With Historic Doubts, Walpole created a debate that rages to this day and includes both historians and novelists.

  While much is known about the historical figures of this era, some major gaps exist. Of Anne, little has survived beyond the tragic outlines of her brief life, but if a wife influences the man her husband becomes, then it is possible to glimpse Anne’s essence in the great works Richard effected. Perhaps her influence extended even to her dear friend Elizabeth of York, who may have emulated her both in her humanitarian acts, and by touching “neither flesh nor fish.” This is how I derived her character. No information exists, however, on the identity of the woman, or women, who might have borne Richard’s two illegitimate children. I have taken Rosemary Horrox’s suggestion that it was Katherine Haute. (7) It is known that the children came to live with Richard at an early age, and when I came across a reference to his vast, and puzzling, generosity to the Benedictine nunnery of St. Mary in Barking, Essex, I became convinced of the reason. (8)

  Francis Lovell is not known to have had a club foot, but in view of his noble birth, his training, and his relationship with Richard, Francis’ knighthood was conferred strangely late in life, and by Richard, not King Edward, so an impediment of some kind may have been present. Francis is not known for deeds of arms, and this makes his survival of both Bosworth and Stoke even more curious, unless he had reason not to participate in the fighting (see below).

  A final question remains: were the princes murdered, or did they survive?

  Henry Tudor was as plagued by rumours that the boys were alive as Richard was by rumours that they were dead. Did Richard murder them? Volumes have been written on the subject and for those who wish to delve deeper, I provide a list of reading suggestions below. In the absence of surviving evidence, however, it is important to keep in mind that it is impossible to resolve some of the contradictions, and all accounts of Richard’s reign ultimately dissolve into interpretation. As such, they are subject to dispute. Documents that could exonerate Richard, such as Perkin Warbeck’s letter of identity, or Edward IV’s royal order to Bishop Stillington to perform a ceremony of marriage with Lady Eleanor Butler, may have existed, but apparently failed to survive. This is not surprising. Both Stillington and Perkin Warbeck were imprisoned and at Tudor’s mercy, and it is known that Perkin Warbeck was subjected to torture. Henry VII pursued the destruction of any documents unfavourable to his own version of events, including the Titulus Regius. It is indeed fortunate for posterity that one obscure copy was overlooked.

  Though the Tudors were anxious for history to believe the princes were murdered and that Richard III committed the deed, there are some compelling pieces of evidence in favour of Richard’s innocence. A fact often overlooked is that Richard had three little nephews who were legally barred from the throne. The Tudors would have us believe he murdered two of them, but not the third—Clarence’s orphaned son, Edward Earl of Warwick. Richard brought this child to live with him in his household, and as soon as Richard was slain, Henry Tudor imprisoned the boy, then eleven, in the Tower of London. Thirteen years later, he beheaded young Warwick on a pretext of treason, so that his son, Prince Arthur, could inherit a throne unchallenged by a rightful heir and marry Catherine of Aragon.

  The treatment of young Warwick alone speaks volumes about the difference in character between these two kings. And in the actions of Elizabeth Woodville and her daughter, Elizabeth of York, it is possible to find further evidence of Richard’s innocence.

  Elizabeth Woodville must have believed Richard didn’t murder her boys since she came out of Sanctuary and wrote her son Dorset that all was well and to return to England. A year into Henry Tudor’s reign, she suddenly incurred Tudor’s disfavour and was locked away in an abbey where she was held virtually incommunicado until her death. She must have lent her support to the rebellion, but was it because she’d learned her son, Richard of York, was alive, or was it because she’d learned that Henry Tudor, or his mother, Margaret Beaufort, was responsible for the death of her boys? And why did Henry Tudor, who defiled Richard’s body and his reputation so brutally, never formally accuse Richard of the murder of the boys? Was it because he knew Richard was innocent?

  As Henry VII’s queen, Elizabeth of York won the hearts of her people with her charity and generosity, much as Anne Neville had done. It is unlikely that such a woman could have loved a man she knew to be the murderer of her brothers, yet a case can be made that love him, she did.

  Another consideration may lend weight to the theory that at least one of the princes escaped with his life. Francis survived both the Battles of Bosworth and of Stoke. As Richard’s devoted friend, we would expect to find him at Richard’s side at Bosworth—unless there were good reasons why he could not participate in Richard’s suicidal charge. At Stoke, the fighting was fierce and everyone fell to the last man. Either Francis stayed on the sidelines in both battles, for a higher purpose as I have outlined in this novel, or he was greatly skilled in arm
s, which is unlikely, for the reasons explained above.

  For some, the most convincing evidence that the princes died in Richard’s reign is the fact that no one ever saw them after July 1483. However, in Richard of England (Kensal Press, 1992) Diana Kleyn makes a compelling case that Perkin Warbeck was indeed who he said he was. For those interested in pursuing the topic further, Audrey Williamson’s The Mystery of the Princes also provides an intriguing, and authoritative, analysis.

  Finally, I would like to make certain acknowledgements. Richard’s “I hate war” comment to Francis on the eve of battle is taken from the National World War II Memorial in Washington, DC, as spoken by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

  The reference to the lark on page 47 is purposely drawn from Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. My intent in so doing was to suggest a certain similarity between Richard and Anne’s love affair depicted in The Rose of York: Love & War, and Shakespeare’s most romantic play, written a hundred years later. It is not known for certain where Shakespeare found his inspiration for his Romeo and Juliet (just as it is not known for a fact whether Shakespeare wrote his own plays) but perhaps it was in these two young lovers, torn apart by war and brought together by love. During the course of my research I was struck by a remarkable coincidence: Shakespeare used Richard and Anne’s time period for his Romeo and Juliet tragedy and a title belonging to Anne’s family, viz. Montagu. As his drama is set in Verona, Italy, it is curious that he would choose to call his protagonist by a name that is clearly not Italian.

  Richard III bequeathed us a precious legacy of rights in the two short years he was King, yet his memory has been defiled and many believe him to be Shakespeare’s embodiment of evil. History has taken from Richard his good name, for which he sacrificed so much while he lived, and denied him the presumption of innocence that was one of his gifts to us. In this context, the words of Richard’s father, the Duke of York, spoken before his death in 1460, acquire a poignant significance. Let us hope the Duke was right when he prophesied that the truth shall not perish.

  S.W.

  Endnotes

  It is thought that Richard’s sister Anne may have died before 1483, but this is not known for certain.

  Edwards, Rhoda, The Itinerary of King Richard III 1483–1485, Alan Sutton Publishing for the Richard III Society, 1983.

  This information was kindly calculated for me by Bruce Green, 1997 doctoral candidate at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. His computer program established that the moon on the night of August 21, 1485, was as described.

  Stowe’s Survey of London, (Introduction by H.E. Wheatley); Everyman’s Library, Dutton, New York, p.415

  At least on the part of Elizabeth. For Tristan, signed by Richard III, and by Elizabeth of York, see the British Library Manuscript Harleian 49, f. 155. An intriguing discussion of this subject has been undertaken by Livia Fisser-Fuchs in The Ricardian, No. 122, Sept. 1993, pp. 469–473. Also see Anne E. Sutton and Livia Visser-Fuchs, Richard III’s Books, Sutton Publishing, Great Britain, 1997.

  There is evidence that his only surviving portrait was doctored to give Richard uneven shoulders.

  Rosemary Horrox, Richard III: A Study of Service; Cambridge University Press, 1989, p.81

  Charles Ross, Richard III, University of California Press, 1981, p.130

  Bibliography

  Non-Fiction

  Armstrong, C. A. J; England, France, and Burgundy in the Fifteenth Century; Hambledon Press

  Barber, Richard; The Paston Letters; The Folio Society, London 1981

  Bennet, H. S.; The Pastons and their England

  Bennet, Michael; The Battle of Bosworth;

  Blake, N. F.; Caxton and His World

  Brooks, F.W.; The Council of the North; Published for the Historical Society by George Phili[ & Son, Ltd, 1953

  Campbell, Lord John; The Lives of the Lord Chancellors and Keepers of the Great Seal of England; vol. 1, John Murray, London, 1848

  Cheetham, Anthony; The Life and Times of Richard III; Shooting Star Press, 1992

  Chrimes, S.B.; Henry VII, London 1975

  Chrimes, S. B.; Fifteenth Century England

  Chrimes, S. B.; Lancastrians, Yorkists, and Henry VII; St. Martin;s Press, 1964

  Clive, Mary; This Sun of York: A Biography of Edward IV; Sphere Books, London, 1975

  Cornwallis, William; Encomium of Richard The Third; ed. A.N. Kinkaid, 1977

  Dockray, Keith.; Richard III: A Reader in History; Alan Sutton, London, 1988

  Druitt, Richard; The Trial of Richard III

  Edwards, Rhoda; Itinerary of Richard III, 1483-1485; Alan Sutton Publishing for the Richard III Society, 1983

  Fields, Bertram; Royal Blood: Richard III and the Mystery of the Princes; Regan Books, New York, 1998

  Flenley, R. ed.; Six Town Chronicles of London; Oxford, 1911

  Foss, Peter; The Field of Redemore: The Battle of Bosworth, 1485; Rosalba Press, Leeds.

  Gairdner, J.; Richard III; Cambridge University Press, 1898

  Gillingham, John, ed.; Richard III: A Medieval Kingship; A History Today Book, Collins & Brown Ltd., London, 1993

  Green, Mary Ann; Lives of the Princesses of England; New Haven, Connecticut Research Publication 1975

  Gairdner, J.; The Historical Collections of a Citizen of London in the Fifteenth Century. (Containing William Gregory’s Chronicle of London). Camden Society Publications, new series 17; London; 1876

  Griffiths, R. A.; The Making of the Tudor Dynasty; St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1993

  Griffiths, R. A.; The Reign of King Henry VI; Sutton Publishing Limited, Great Britain; 1998

  Griffiths, R. A.; “Local Rivalries and National Politics: The Percies and the Nevilles and the Dukes of Exeter 1452-1455” Speculum, vol. 43 (1968) pp.589-632

  Hammond, P. W.; Edward of Middleham, Prince of Wales; Gloucester Group Publications, 2nd Edition, 1973

  Hammond, P. W. and Anne Sutton, ed.; The Road to Bosworth Field; Constable and Company Ltd., London, 1985

  Hammond, P. W., ed.; Richard III: Loyalty, Lordship And Law; Alan Sutton Publishing and Yorkist History Trust; London, 1984

  Hammond, P. W. and Anne Sutton, ed.; The Coronation of Richard III: The Extant Documents; Alan Sutton Publishing, London, 1983

  Hanham, Alison; Richard III And His Early Historians 1483-1535; Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975

  Hicks, Michael. A.; False Fleeting Perjur’d Clarence: George, Duke of Clarence; Alan Sutton Publishing, London, 1980

  Hicks, Michael.A.; Richard III And His Rivals: Magnates and Their Motives; Hambledon Press, London

  Hicks, M.ichael A.; Richard III: The Man Behind the Myth; Collins and Brown, London, 1991

  Hicks, Michael A.; Who’s Who in Late Medieval England (1272-1485); Shepheard-Walwyn

  Horrox, Rosemary; Richard III: A Study in Service; Cambridge University Press, 1989

  Jesse, John Heneage; Memoirs of King Richard the Third and Some of His Contemporaries;

  F. A. Jesse, John Heneage; The Last War of the Roses; Nicholls, Boston (Rice University Microfilm)

  Jenkins, Elizabeth; The Princes in the Tower; Coward, McCann & Geoghegan, Inc. New York, 1978

  Jones, Michael K., and Malcolm Underwood; The King’s Mother: Lady Margaret Beaufort, Countess of Richmond and Derby; Cambridge University Press, 1992

  Johnson, P.A.; Richard Duke of York 1411-1460; Oxford University Press, 1988

  Kendall, Paul Murray; The Yorkist Age: Daily Life During the Wars of the Roses; W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 1970

  Kendall, Paul Murray; Richard The Third; W. W. Norton & Co., New York, 1956

  Kendall, Paul Murray, ed.; Richard III: The Great Debate; W.W. Norton & Co., New York, 1992

  Kendall, Paul Murray; Warwick The Kingmaker; W.W. Norton & Co., New York, 1957

  Kendall, Paul Murray; The Universal Spider: The Life of Louis XI by Philippe de Commynes, trans. and ed. by Paul Murray Kendall; London Folio Society, 1973

  Kleyn, Diana; Richard of England; the Ke
nsal Press, Oxford, England; 1990

  Lamb, V.B.; The Betrayal of Richard III; Alan Sutton Publishing Inc., U.S,A.; 1991

  Lancelott, Francis; The Queens of England And Their Times; From Mathilda, Queen of William The Conqueror to Adelaide, Queen of William The Fourth; D. Appleton & Company, New York, 1848

  Lamb, V. B.; The Betrayal of Richard III: An Introduction to the Controversy; Alan Sutton, New York, 1991

  MacGibbon, David; Elizabeth Woodville; Arthur Barker Ltd., London 1938

  Mancini, Domici: The Usurpation of Richard III; translated by C.A. J. Armstrong, ed.; Alan Sutton, London, 1989

  Maurer, Helen; Margaret of Anjou; Boydell Press, Great Britain; 2003

  Meyers, Alec; England in the Late Middle Ages

  Meyers, Alec. R.; English Historical Documents; Eyre & Spottiswoode, London, 1969

  Mitchell, R.J.; John Tiptoft, Earl of Worcester; Longmans, Green and Co., London 1938

  Murph, Roxane; Richard III: The Making of a Legend; Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, N.J., 1977

  Nicholls, John; Richard The Third

  Pollard, A. J.; Richard III and the Princes in the Tower; Alan Sutton Publishing, London, 1995

  Petre, J.; Richard III: Crown And People;

  The Ricardian: Journal of the Richard III Society, Nos. 83-145

  Rawliffe, Carole; The Staffords, Earls of Stafford and Dukes of Buckingham 1394-1521; Cambridge University Press, 1978