Sex, Lies and Handlebar Tape

by Paul Howard

  This eBook is copyright material and must not be copied, reproduced, transferred, distributed, leased, licenced or publicly performed or used in any way except as specifically permitted in writing by the publishers, as allowed under the terms and conditions under which it was purchased or as strictly permitted by applicable copyright law. Any unauthorised distribution or use of this text may be a direct infringement of the author’s and publisher’s rights and those responsible may be liable in law accordingly.

  Epub ISBN: 9781845969615

  Version 1.0

  www.mainstreampublishing.com

  This edition, 2009

  Copyright © Paul Howard, 2008

  All rights reserved

  The moral right of the author has been asserted

  First published in Great Britain in 2008 by

  MAINSTREAM PUBLISHING COMPANY

  (EDINBURGH) LTD

  7 Albany Street

  Edinburgh EH1 3UG

  ISBN 9781845964610

  No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted

  in any form or by any other means without permission

  in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer

  who wishes to quote brief passages in connection

  with a review written for insertion in

  a magazine, newspaper or broadcast

  The author has made every effort to clear all copyright permissions, but

  where this has not been possible and amendments are required,

  the publisher will be pleased to make any necessary arrangements

  at the earliest opportunity

  A catalogue record for this book is available

  from the British Library

  To Lily Franklin, 1918–2006

  Acknowledgements

  NO BOOK, LET ALONE a biography, can be written without considerable help from a number of people. Therefore, this list of acknowledgements is unashamedly extensive, although if it is not comprehensive I ask those inadvertently overlooked to accept my apologies.

  First of all, I must thank Sophie Anquetil, the daughter of Jacques, for her enthusiasm for my idea to write a biography of her father, for her openness in talking about her family life and for the provision of several of the photos that add so much to this book (as well as providing a long-awaited opportunity for me to visit Corsica). I must also thank her for making it possible to speak to her grandmother, her father’s wife, Jeanine – and I would like to thank Jeanine directly for her own contributions.

  Anquetil’s last companion, Dominique, was also generous with her time in talking to me, for which I am grateful, as I am for the time afforded to me by Maurice Dieulois, Richard Marillier, Bernard Hinault, Raymond Poulidor, Guy Ignolin, Georges Groussard (and Mme Groussard for her hospitality and cuisine), Brian Robinson, Vin Denson, Chris Boardman, Jean Milesi, Rudi Altig and Walter Godefroot.

  No cycling biography would be complete without a bike ride, so I extend my gratitude to Joël Hacquet, president of the AC Sottevillais, for arranging my ride in Anquetil’s wheel tracks. I would also like to thank Lionel Fairier and his son Cedric for their hospitality when acting as my guides, and also to Lionel for taking pictures when my own photographic abilities failed me.

  I have also received considerable assistance from various magazines and their archives, most notably L’Équipe and France Dimanche in France and Cycling Weekly in the UK. At L’Équipe, I would like to thank specifically Philippe Brunei for his insight into and knowledge of my subject and Philippe LeMen for his comparable insight into and knowledge of the darker arts of the paper’s archiving system. Simon Richardson and Ed Pickering provided a similar service at Cycling Weekly – my thanks.

  The arduous task of sorting through several thousand pictures was facilitated by Arnaud Jacob at L’Équipe in France, and their actual appearance in the book was made possible by Edd Griffin at Presse Sports/Offside in the UK; I am grateful to Lee Fullarton for creating such an eye-catching cover. My thanks also to Dominic Harman and my wife Catherine for assisting me with the coherence of my first draft, and to the editing skills of Paul Murphy, who reacted to the material submitted to him with great tact and sensitivity.

  Finally, a considerable thank you to the anonymous taxi driver in Marseille who took as many risks as he did short cuts to ensure the late arrival of my plane from the UK didn’t result in me missing the connecting ferry to Corsica – without him, the whole project could have been stillborn.

  Contents

  Prologue

  ONE The ‘Viking’ of Quincampoix

  TWO Look, Dad, No Stabilisers

  THREE The Apprentice – Part I

  FOUR The Apprentice – Part II

  FIVE A Star is Born

  SIX Wounded Pride

  SEVEN Mission: Impossible

  EIGHT Chercher la Femme . . .

  NINE Femme Fatale?

  TEN Italian Job

  ELEVEN The Beginning of an Era

  TWELVE Just Because I’m Paranoid Doesn’t Mean They’re Not out to Get Me

  THIRTEEN An Insatiable Appetite

  FOURTEEN Fourteen Seconds

  FIFTEEN The Curious Incident of the Race in the Night-time

  SIXTEEN Anyone but Poulidor

  SEVENTEEN Don’t Take the P***

  EIGHTEEN Jacques of All Trades

  NINETEEN The Cyclist, the Wife, Her Daughter and His Lover

  TWENTY The Cyclist, the Stepson, His Wife and Her Lover

  TWENTY-ONE Cycling’s James Bond

  Epilogue

  Palmarès

  Bibliography

  Prologue

  IT’S A GREY AUTUMNAL day in Normandy. The keen wind and occasional showers make the weather a perfect match for the subdued mood just outside a small village near Rouen as a coffin begins the slow journey to its last resting place. Inside the coffin is the body of Jacques Anquetil, one of the greatest sports stars of his generation and of his sport, cycling. In his native France, he is still held by many to have been one of the greatest sports stars of all time.

  The coffin and the body start their journey outside Anquetil’s chateau, nicknamed ‘Les Elfes’. Chateau is not too grand a title. There are dozens of rooms, a heated outdoor swimming pool and formal grounds of 28 hectares, not to mention many more of farmland. As befits someone of such stature, a police motorbike leads the procession of hearse and half a dozen cars towards Rouen’s famous cathedral. Two more policemen are required to regulate the traffic around the entrance to the chateau.

  At the cathedral, mourners start to arrive soon after the coffin at midday. Although the funeral service doesn’t start until 2 p.m., the cathedral is soon full; many people have to stand outside. Those squeezed inside further underline Anquetil’s prestige. Here a secretary of state for sport and a former prime minister; there half a dozen winners of the Tour de France, including Eddy Merckx and Bernard Hinault. There are also erstwhile friends and rivals, such as Raymond Poulidor, Anquetil’s would-be nemesis, three former world champions in Rudi Altig, André Darrigade and Jean Stablinski, and former teammates such as Guy Ignolin.

  Pride of place, however, is taken up by his immediate family, the composition of which goes some way to revealing the complex character of Anquetil himself. Alongside his 87-year-old mother can be seen Dominique, his partner at the time of his death, and their 19-month-old son Christopher. Then there is Jeanine, Anquetil’s first wife. Also present are her children: Alain, the former husband of Dominique; and Annie, the estranged mother of Anquetil’s 16-year-old daughter Sophie, who is there by her side.

  Tacitly acknowledging the domestic tribulations that had led to such an unlikely family group, Jean-Marie Leblanc, then a journalist with the
French daily sports newspaper L’Équipe, soon to be director of the Tour de France, records the words of the priest conducting the funeral. After lauding the friendships and fraternity inspired by sport, Father Larcher adds, ‘In the life of a man, there is the good and the less good. It’s not up to us to judge.’

  Certainly, none of the thousands gathered for the service in Rouen, nor the several hundred who accompany the coffin to a private blessing service in Quincampoix at the church where the young Anquetil received his First Communion, are inclined to do so. Another journalist, Anquetil’s close friend Pierre Chany, wrote of the ‘remarkable dignity’ of those present: ‘The sadness of those gathered was immense, and the religiously observed silence was testament to the depth of the emotion.’

  Proceedings are brought to a close when Anquetil is finally laid to rest in the small churchyard beside his father. The coffin is adorned with a single lily-of-the-valley flower and a yellow jersey from André Darrigade. ‘There were many of us, thousand and thousands, who returned home yesterday richer than we arrived, in spite of leaving a part of ourselves in a small patch of Normandy’s rich soil,’ concluded Chany.

  But who was Jacques Anquetil? Who was the man behind the sportsman? What was it about him that inspired such devotion from such a large number of people in spite of an obviously scandalous family life?

  And it certainly was scandalous. The public may not have become aware of the story until after he had died, but even now his domestic arrangements can still inspire shock, even disgust, possibly admiration. First, he seduced the wife of his doctor, at the time not just his physician but also a friend. Then, he lived happily with her for more than ten years, acting for at least part of this time as stepfather to her two children. Once retired from cycling, however, he desired a child – the problem being that his wife could no longer conceive. In an effort to keep the family unit together, his stepdaughter acted as a surrogate mother and bore him a daughter. More than this, though, she also became his mistress, and another dozen years were spent living in a ménage à trois à l’Anquetil. Inevitably, the set-up proved unsustainable. When this unique domestic arrangement eventually collapsed, Anquetil’s final companion was the former wife of his stepson, a woman with whom he then had a son less than two years before he died, at the age of only 53, from cancer of the stomach.

  In case it’s not clear, it should be categorically stated that there was no incest. There may or may not have been an abuse of power – this is considered later in more detail and in the context of the contributions of those directly involved. There was certainly a unique and provocative story, involving a series of events at which even Casanova might have baulked. Had it been scripted as a storyline in either Footballers’ Wives or Desperate Housewives, it would surely have been considered too unrealistic, too risqué even. Yet, as is so often the case, truth is stranger than fiction.

  It was also a truth widely, if not universally, acknowledged. Everyone involved in the Anquetil clan, including friends, among whom were journalists, and Sophie, from whom the truth was never concealed, was aware of the domestic reality. Such attempts as were made to conceal the truth, such deceit as was practised, such lies as are implied by the title of this book, were only for the outside world, that much-feared, dangerous place that wouldn’t understand what was perceived as normal in the Anquetil household.

  Yet it’s precisely because this normality was so at odds with the normality of the rest of society that it’s essential to understand the man if we’re not to be overwhelmed by the scandal. The purpose of this biography is to come to terms not just with the reality of Anquetil’s family life, but also to reveal the man for whom it was all possible. ‘I encourage you to do that, because when you paint the portrait of Anquetil you understand how he could do what he did,’ asserts Philippe Brunel, chief sports writer at L’Équipe and a friend of Anquetil, in his later years, and his daughter Sophie. ‘If you don’t, all you’re left with is the shock.’

  Given Anquetil’s accomplishments, both as a man and as a sportsman, understanding him is an ambitious goal. Yet it is certainly possible to describe him and the things he did, the character traits and achievements that made him into a still-iconic figure. First among these is his career as a cyclist. ‘He’s one of the mythical characters both for cycling, and for France,’ says Bernard Hinault, his most worthy successor in French cycling and godfather to Anquetil’s son Christopher. ‘He was a winner, and I had that in my spirit, so I warmed to him. When I was small, he was for me the champion cyclist. But above all he was a gentleman, as much for his personal qualities as for his sporting achievements. I have always been irritated by the game of comparing champions from different times, but to be compared to him was an honour.’

  Irritating as it may be, comparing champions from different eras is compelling. It’s also the only way for fans brought up on one generation to situate their heroes in the context of those who have gone before. In this light, Anquetil still fares well nearly 40 years after he retired. Of course, Hinault’s irritation comes from it being an inexact science. (It may also come from the fact that Eddy Merckx always comes out on top.) Yet to the extent that it is possible to be objective, Anquetil is almost invariably placed in the top five cyclists ever. Simply being the first man to win the Tour de France five times and the first to win all three major Tours – France, Italy and Spain – gives some measure of his achievements. He was also only the second rider, after Fausto Coppi, to win the Tours of France and Italy in the same year, a feat subsequently achieved only by Eddy Merckx, Bernard Hinault, Stephen Roche, Miguel Indurain and Marco Pantani. Lance Armstrong never attempted it.

  In a league table compiled by L’Équipe after his death, giving a point for each victory in what it defined as the most important races – the world championships, the three grand Tours, the five one-day monuments (Milan–San Remo, Tour of Flanders, Paris–Roubaix, Liège–Bastogne–Liège and the Tour of Lombardy), the Grand Prix des Nations and the hour record – Anquetil was fourth, one point behind Coppi and two behind Hinault, with Merckx an incredible sixteen points clear. If Armstrong’s career had been included in the same table, he would have languished ten points adrift of Anquetil with fewer than half his number of victories.

  In a similar table compiled for the Cycling Hall of Fame website using a more complex points system based on the prestige of different races and on placings, not just victories, Anquetil still finished fourth – not bad for a rider often criticised for being little more than a glorified time-triallist and lacking the breadth of achievement of his rivals. This time he was two places ahead of Armstrong and, once again, Coppi, Hinault and Merckx topped the list. Yet the ranking gives no consideration to his victories in time trials – his nine Grand Prix des Nations victories are overlooked, as are his fifteen other major time-trial triumphs, as well as his hour record. Had these been included and given similar weighting to other one-day races, Anquetil would move into a clear second place.

  None of these comparisons can accurately weigh the significance of these victories, however. Armstrong’s record bears no comparison to that of Merckx, for example, yet his unparalleled Tour de France achievements and his unique story mean he is the first cyclist since the great Belgian to transcend the sport and enter the wider public consciousness. Even on this intangible measure, Anquetil more than holds his own. His famous double victory in the week-long Dauphiné Libéré stage race followed immediately by the 557 kilometres Bordeaux–Paris, the longest one-day race, was voted the greatest sporting achievement of the twentieth century in L’Équipe.

  Anquetil was also awarded France’s highest civilian accolade, the Légion d’honneur, from General de Gaulle. De Gaulle, it is reported, was aghast at the initial absence of Anquetil’s name from the list, an absence explained to him as being due to the cyclist’s outspoken comments about doping. De Gaulle was not impressed: ‘Doping? Don’t know what you’re talking about. Has he made “La Marseillaise” be heard abroad, yes or no?
’

  When Anquetil received the award, his standing was such that the skier Guy Périllat, world champion and Olympic silver medallist, who was receiving the same accolade that day, was more impressed by being able to rub shoulders with the famous cyclist than with his own medal: ‘We received the Légion d’honneur together from General de Gaulle. Receiving it at the same time as him seemed like a consecration. He had always been a sort of hero in my eyes, someone whom I dreamed of imitating in my discipline.’

  Even today, Anquetil’s reputation is still common currency in France. The presidential elections in 2007 saw the ruthlessly efficient victory of Nicolas Sarkozy, which prompted the headline ‘Sarkozy gagne à l’Anquetil’ (‘Sarkozy wins like Anquetil’). Nor is his contemporary relevance limited to the mileage that politicians can make out of being associated with him. His ambivalence towards one-day races was as much to do with the fact that they added little to his contract value as it was that they were subject to the vagaries of fortune and beyond his control. Instead, he focused exclusively on those events that most suited his calculating style and would bring him the greatest rewards in terms of profile and therefore money. Top of the tree, of course, was the Tour de France, victory in which would guarantee his prestige and his income – a single-minded approach echoed and exceeded by Lance Armstrong.

  What’s more, his trenchant views on doping still have an unfortunate and pronounced resonance in today’s cycling. ‘I dope because everyone else dopes’ is an excuse still widely heard, as is the suggestion that so much is demanded of cyclists that a distinction should be drawn between ‘doping’ and expertly administered medical assistance designed to protect riders from themselves and the requirements placed on them. Only his frankness in confronting the issue is at odds with those implicated in today’s drugs scandals. This reveals some of the crucial aspects of his character, notably his openness and his nonconformity, as Brunel points out: ‘After he’d written the articles in which he says, “I dope because everybody dopes,” he was interviewed on television later in the winter with the sports minister who told him off and said to him that declarations like that could lead to confusion. Anquetil replied, “You’re sports minister, and yet you think I rode Bordeaux–Paris using just sugar.” That’s Anquetil’s nonconformity. You must remember that at the time the cachet of a minister was much more than it is now. People still believed in politicians, in the institutions. But Anquetil was very open when it came to the topics he was prepared to broach in conversation. He was a long way ahead of his time. In fact, in general, racers still have a tendency to hide things, but he was open.’