Tales of Sin and Madness

by Brett McBean

  When asked why he thought Deeming had murdered his wife, Oakes stuttered and started preening his moustache. “It had to have been an accident,” Oakes finally answered. “They probably argued, and Deeming accidentally struck his wife and killed her. I’m sure he didn’t mean to do it. I guess he panicked and, not wanting to be caught, buried her under the hearthstone.” Didn’t Mr. Oakes meet up with Deeming in January, only a week or so after Deeming had murdered his wife? “That’s correct. We had a drink at the Baths Hotel in Bourke Street.” I asked Oakes what Deeming’s disposition was like during that meeting. “He seemed like his old self – charming, gay and ever boastful. He riled some of the patrons in the bar with his flamboyant talk and gestures. I thought there was going to be a brawl.” Didn’t he think it strange that a man who had brutally killed his wife only a week before could act so brazenly cheerful? “Maybe it was simply his way of coping. Or maybe he genuinely had no remorse. It’s hard to say. I never saw him again after that. Next time I heard about Albert Williams, they were saying his real name was Frederick Deeming and that he was suspected of killing his wife, Emily. I have to say, that threw me. I still have trouble placing that man with such horrible deeds. And I still can’t believe that body I saw in the morgue was Emily. It didn’t even look human, let alone a lady I knew to be so kind and sweet.” Mr. Oakes got up from his kitchen table then and poured himself a glass of gin. “Poor Emily,” he muttered.

  Poor Emily indeed. The 26-year-old from Rainhill, had no idea about her new husband’s past, nor what he had planned for her. And Fred Deeming certainly had her murder planned. It was no accident, no spur-of-the-moment act of violence that saw her end up buried in concrete under the hearthstone of the bedroom fireplace with her skull smashed and her throat cut.

  It was only two days after landing in the British colony’s second largest city that Fred Deeming went to a local ironmonger and bought all the tools needed to help conceal his wife’s dead body under the house in the hope that the body would never be found – or at least, not discovered until long after he had left Australia.

  The owner of the ironmonger shop in High Street, John Woods, remembers Deeming as both a flamboyant character, and a surly man. “When he first came into my shop, he was a loud, larger-than-life character. He wore lots of expensive-looking jewellery, and spoke with a distinct English accent. Along with his large ginger moustache, he stood out like a fishmonger at the opera. The man, who called himself Drewn, ordered from me cement, sand, a broom, spade, a pan and a trowel. He was pleasant, if a little brusque at times. However, a different man entered my store the next day. He claimed that the tools and materials had never been delivered to his house as ordered. His manner was cold, angry and quite frankly, he unnerved me. His eyes held a kind of blankness, and I could see him spiralling into a rage at a moment’s notice, so I swallowed my pride – I was sure his order had been delivered – and took all the materials he had ordered the previous day personally to his house in Windsor. On the way, Drewn explained to me that he needed the items for work in his yard, however, when I arrived at the house, I noticed that the yard was in no need of work. I made the comment that the yard seemed perfectly fine to me. Drewn looked frazzled, and in a huffy tone, said that it wasn’t the yard that needed work, but a copper boiler. Well, that seemed fine too, but I kept quiet this time. The man was clearly riled up enough already, and I didn’t fancy pressing him. So, after dumping the tools and materials at his house, I left. I was already uncomfortable in the man’s presence, but his strange behaviour regarding the items and their purpose simply compounded my unease. When the police came to me months later to ask me about Drewn and I learnt of the dreadful nature in which Drewn had done away with his missus, I felt ill. To think, it was my materials and tools he used to seal his wife’s body under the fireplace.” Mr. Woods, a slim, middle-aged man with striking black hair and beard, shuddered noticeably as he stood behind the counter in his shop. Though he could not have had any way of knowing the diabolical use that Fred Deeming had for the cement, trowel and other items, the knowledge that he had sold Deeming these things obviously still weighed heavily on his shoulders.

  Mr. Woods isn’t the only person to have feelings of guilt. Though, like Mr. Woods, he couldn’t have known what was to happen, the owner of the Andrew Street house, local butcher John Stamford, regrets letting the house to Mr. Deeming.

  “I was fooled by his air of respectability,” said Mr. Stamford. “Here was this finely-dressed Englishman, wanting to rent my house. How was I to know he was a scoundrel and a cold-blooded murderer? Christ, I didn’t even know the bloke’s name till later, when he came to my shop with a small parcel, telling me he was going to mend some nail holes in the wall of the house. Cement he reckons was in the parcel! Blimey, it was probably the knife he used to do away with his missus.”

  Stamford’s estate agent, Mr. Charles Connop, also admits to being fooled by the Englishman’s noble exterior. “I only met him a couple of times. He seemed like a perfectly reasonable gentleman to me. He paid a month’s rent for the house on Andrew Street, even though he clearly hadn’t planned on staying that long. He must’ve had it all planned out in his head before ever setting foot in Melbourne. I met his wife, too, once. She seemed like a timid creature – pretty, but quiet. What a horrible end she came to.”

  And so, with the house rented and with all the tools necessary to cover up the dastardly deed, Fred Deeming was all set to murder his new bride. He had the madness to carry it out, and the cold cunning to cover the evidence.

  In the next part of this special report, we’ll take a look at the crime itself, speak to those who discovered the ghoulish burial site, as well as neighbours who say they have seen and heard strange things in the Andrew Street house. We’ll also take you inside the murder house, so be forewarned – only the strong of heart need continue reading about this most ghastly of crimes.

  THE ARGUS, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1892

  MAD FRED PART 2

  —♦—

  A MOST HORRIBLE CRIME UNCOVERED

  —

  A TOUR THROUGH THE DEATH HOUSE

  —

  GHOSTLY SIGHTINGS

  57 Andrew Street is a small, unassuming brick cottage. It sits by the side of a narrow, unpaved street in the modest suburb of Windsor, flanked by other modest, but attractive brick and weatherboard houses. Standing outside its front fence, pretty shrubs adorning the front lawn, it’s hard to believe that such a ghastly crime could have been committed inside.

  But on Christmas Eve of last year, a crime the likes Melbourne had never seen was carried out inside the brick cottage. A man by the name of Frederick Bailey Deeming first fractured his wife’s skull with a battle-axe and then slashed her throat with a long-bladed knife. Afterwards, he dumped her naked body beneath the fireplace, filled in the grave with concrete he had mixed himself, and then covered the make-shift grave with the hearthstone. Her body wasn’t discovered for over two months.

  It was the house’s owner, Mr. John Stamford of High Street, who first realised something was amiss.

  “I was showing a prospective tenant through the house that day (3rd March). When we came to the first bedroom, there was a most disagreeable smell in the room. Not surprisingly, the lady left, and upon closer inspection of the room, I found that the hearthstone was raised, like it had been tampered with. I called my agent, and together Mr. Connop and I lifted the hearthstone. The smell grew worse. It was a most repugnant smell; it reminded me of dead flesh. Only this was worse. The smell seemed to burn my nostrils and scald my throat. I told my son to go and fetch the coppers, and once they arrived, it took them a couple of hours to uncover what lay in the concrete casing.”

  Mr. Stamford, a solidly-built man in his forties, shook his head and his face blanched. “It was a sight and smell I’ll never forget.”

  Neither will Constable Webster, one of the policemen who helped dig the body free from the concrete that evening in March. “I had to destroy t
he clothes and uniform I was wearing afterwards, as they were saturated with the stink of decayed flesh. I burnt them in the fireplace, but even that didn’t completely take away the smell. I think the stench will be permanently entrenched in my nose. The smell was so dreadful that I retreated from the house on a number of occasions, and I was still sick even after I arrived home. As for the body itself – well, let’s just say I will never forget its horrible, mummy-like state. I hadn’t seen anything like it before, and dear God I hope to never see anything like it again.”

  “She had been down there for over two months,” Mr. Stamford said. “Two months! Can you imagine what she looked like? Just a mass of decayed flesh. Like one of those Egyptian mummies, only oozing slime. Christ, her hair and scalp came away from her skull while the coppers were digging out the body. The whole thing was just a disgusting, revolting mess.”

  So what of the neighbours? What were their reactions upon hearing the ghastly news, and did they suspect anything strange of their new neighbour?

  “I about fainted when I heard what had happened,” Irish-born Mrs. Fiddymont of 59 Andrew Street said. “My dear Owen had to catch me as I fell. I had never heard anything so dreadful in all my life.” Sitting at her kitchen table in the four-room weatherboard, Mrs. Fiddymont looks like everyone’s grandmother. She has a kind face, though her eyes as she recounts to me her memories take on a distressed look. “I only met Mr. Drewn a couple of times; his wife even less. She generally kept to herself. I met her only once, just after they had moved in. I was out the back hanging up the washing when she wandered outside. The fence separating our properties isn’t very high, so I could see the girl just fine. She had a sad way about her; not that she was upset or crying mind you, but she looked forlorn. I called out to her a couple of times before she turned to me. It was like she was lost in her own world. Anyway, I introduced myself, and asked her if she wanted to come over for some lemonade – it was hotter than the devil’s furnace at that time. She seemed taken aback by the offer, like she wasn’t sure what she should say. Before she answered, Mr. Drewn appeared at the back door and called her inside. That was the last time I saw the poor girl alive.” What of Mr. Deeming, or as she knew him, Mr. Drewn? “Never once did I suspect that the tall, dashing Englishman was capable of such horrible acts,” Mrs. Fiddymont answered with a huff. “He was always immaculately dressed, and polite. Although I do have to say, that on more than one occasion, I heard arguing coming from next door. It never seemed like much to me, just the usual marital spat, but still, I do remember hearing Mr. Drewn make numerous references to his mother, like she was living in the house with them, although I never saw an older woman in or about the premises. That did make me uneasy.”

  Another neighbour, Louisa Atkinson, a washerwoman residing at no. 60 Andrew Street, also heard the couple quarrelling, and was probably the last to see Emily Williams (nee Mather) alive. “I was walking past the house at around 7pm on Christmas Eve, when I heard Mr. and Mrs. Drewn arguing. I stopped to listen – they were, after all, new to the neighbourhood and I was curious. After a few minutes of hearing them fighting, I heard a crash and shortly thereafter Mrs. Drewn came out the back door and started walking up and down the side path, like she was especially nervous. I told Emily that perhaps she should leave this place for a little while, but she simply smiled and said everything will be all right soon. I could tell she was frightened, but I thought it wasn’t any of my business, so I didn’t press the matter any further. I watched Mrs. Drewn return to the house, and that was the last time I saw her.”

  Does Louisa know what they were arguing about? “It was something to do with a letter, that much I know. And about a woman named Kelly. I guess Mrs. Drewn thought her husband was having an affair with a woman named Kelly, or some such thing. I also heard Emily mention the police. I guess she never got around to calling them.”

  When asked whether she was aware that one of the Ripper’s victims had a surname of Kelly, and that it has been alleged that Fred Deeming once corresponded with this lady, Mrs. Atkinson grew extremely pale. “I don’t read much in the way of newspapers,” she said. “I don’t know all that much about the murders in London. I know there was some talk of Mr. Drewn being Jack the Ripper, but I never knew about him corresponding with one of the victims.”

  It was at this point that Mrs. Atkinson severed the interview, saying she needed to lie down.

  Mrs. Fiddymont, however, is fully aware of Saucy Jacky’s crimes and the rumours of Fred Deeming being the notorious murderer. “I admit, I do find the more sordid stories fascinating. My dear Owen used to read to me about the atrocities in Whitechapel on a daily basis. They were so awful, yet so enthralling. To think, such a similarly revolting crime happened only next door to me, and that the man is thought to be the Ripper himself!”

  Does Mrs. Fiddymont believe Deeming was the person responsible for the murders in Whitechapel?

  “I don’t see why not. I wouldn’t have thought a man of such distinguished features could brutally murder his lovely wife and then bury her body under the fireplace; and yet he did. So I now think Mr. Drewn was more than capable of murdering those prostitutes. And Mr. Drewn was always well-dressed, usually in a top hat and long black coat, which is what the Ripper was supposed to have worn. In my view, Drewn was Jack the Ripper.”

  So let’s take a look inside the murder house.

  Though the interior looks like any other – the white-washed walls are clean, the high ceilings smudged with the usual amount of soot that blankets the city during the winter months – there’s a coldness inside, colder even than the weather outside. Not a draught, but a general feeling of unease, of darkness. You can tell immediately that something tragic happened here. Perhaps that’s why the house hasn’t been let since Deeming left on Christmas day last year, leaving behind an empty brandy bottle, a stale loaf of bread, a tin of condensed milk and some half-burnt luggage tickets. Walking down the hallway, the floorboards have an especially hollow sound to them. Yet there is hardly any echo, even though the house is absent of furniture. It’s eerie, and I’m thankful I’m here with the owner of the house.

  I’m first shown the other rooms of the brick house, including the small bathroom and backyard. While there’s nothing overtly different or strange about any of the rooms, there’s still an undeniable presence that lingers like a black cloak over the house. As I walk through the rooms, I think about the tales of ghostly sightings and strange noises witnessed by some of the neighbours, and they don’t seem out of the realms of possibility. In fact, it’s in the small bathroom where I feel a cold wind wash over me and I’m sure I can hear water rushing down the sink.

  “Many nights since Mr. Drewn was hanged I’ve seen a light in the bathroom of no. 57,” Mrs. Fiddymont said. “No other light in the house, just in the bathroom. It’s only a small window, high in the wall, but there’s no mistaking that someone or something is in there with a lantern, and it’s usually quite bright. The first couple of times I went and got my dear Owen, and he saw it, too, so it wasn’t just my imagination running away from me. A few times I’ve been woken during the night by the sound of water rushing down a sink, like someone is emptying a bucket of water, and when I get up and look out the window, I see the light in the bathroom.”

  I’m here during the day and the bathroom spooks me – I wouldn’t want to be in here at night. I imagine Fred Deeming hunched over a bucket filled with water and cleaning his bloody hands, and then tipping the tainted water down the drain. I wonder if Deeming has continued this tradition even after death – washing his hands on two separate occasions, with more to follow?

  “I’ve even seen a shadow inside the bathroom,” Mrs. Fiddymont continued. “A figure wearing a top hat. I see him moving about inside that awful house, and I get chills right up and down my spine.”

  The longer I stay in the house, the more I’m convinced there are sinister forces at play. I ask Mr. Stamford whether he feels a dark presence in the house, and he shakes
his head. He doesn’t like being in here due to what happened, but as far as ghosts and spirits are concerned, he doesn’t believe in any of it.

  I mention Mrs. Fiddymont and the light in the bathroom, and also about another neighbour, a young man by the name of Alfred Spedding, who told me about seeing a dark figure coming and going from no. 57 at night. A dark figure wearing a top hat and cloak. According to young Mr. Spedding, who lives at no. 55, he used to see Mr. and Mrs. Drewn leaving their house wearing evening wear, as if they were heading off into the city to go to the theatre. He said Mr. Drewn would always be wearing a top hat and black coat; his wife a lovely green dress with white trim and an ornate green bonnet. Well, according to Mr. Spedding, as well as the ghostly figure in the top hat and cloak, he had also seen another ghostly figure walking around the property, as if in a daze. Mr. Spedding said that this figure was a lady and she was wearing a green dress and bonnet.

  Then there were the sounds of a lady screaming, a man crying and even the sound of a shovel digging up earth, coming from inside the house.