A People's History of the Supreme Court

Home > Other > A People's History of the Supreme Court > Page 86
A People's History of the Supreme Court Page 86

by Peter Irons


  41 Franklin, “a point”: Notes, 68.

  41 Madison, “any numerous body”: Notes, 68.

  41 Madison, “who had displayed”: Notes, 112-113.

  42 Madison, “be appointed”: Notes, 316-317.

  42 Madison, “the spirit of compromise”: Notes, 344.

  43 Johnson, “all cases arising”: Notes, 538.

  43 Madison, “whether it was not”: Notes, 539.

  44 Mercer, “disapproved of the doctrine”: Notes, 462.

  44 Dickinson, “strongly impressed”: Notes, 463.

  44 Sherman, “unnecessary”: Notes, 518.

  44 Madison, “He had been”: Notes, 518.

  45 Williamson, “was a waste”: Notes, 518.

  45 Madison, “Mr. Mercer expressed”: Notes, 405.

  45 Gerry, “their exposition”: Notes, 61.

  45 New Jersey Plan: Notes, 118-121.

  46 Paterson, “every act”: Melvin I. Urofsky, The Supreme Court Justices: A Biographical Dictionary, 348.

  CHAPTER 5

  49 Pinckney, “propositions”: Madison; Notes, 485-486, 503.

  49 “The full and entire”: Notes, 626-627.

  49 Mason, “He wished the plan”: Notes, 630.

  49 Gerry, “concurred in the idea”: Notes, 630.

  49 Sherman, “The state Declarations”: Notes, 630.

  49 Mason, “The laws of the United States”: Notes, 630.

  50 Randolph, “dangerous power”: Notes, 650-651.

  50 Mason, “dangerous power”: Notes, 651.

  50 Pinckney, “These declarations”: Notes, 651.

  51 Gerry, “the Power of Congress”: Notes, 652.

  51 Madison, “All the states”: Notes, 652.

  52 Washington, “I wish the Constitution”: Mee, 276; Craig R. Smith, To Form a More Perfect Union, 102.

  52 Franklin, “I confess”: Notes, 652.

  53 Gorham, “of lessening objections”: Notes, 655.

  53 Madison, “On the question”: Notes, 652.

  53 Randolph, “apologized for his refusing”: Notes, 655-656.

  53 Franklin, “He expressed”: Notes, 657.

  53 Randolph, “He repeated”: Notes, 657.

  54 Gerry, “the painful feelings”: Notes, 657-658.

  54 Madison, “The members”: Notes, 659.

  54 Franklin, “I have, said he”: Notes, 659.

  55 Martin, “the people”: Notes, 566.

  55 Beard, “overwhelming majority”: Leonard Levy, Essays on the Making of the Constitution, 6.

  56 Warren, “patriotic sincerity”: id. at 36.

  56 Madison, “should it be adopted”: Mee, 282.

  56 Madison, “Begin with these”: Notes, 650.

  57 Randolph, “a respectable majority”: Notes, 561.

  57 Mason, “preferable”: Notes, 565.

  57 Madison, “the powers given”: Notes, 563.

  57 Madison, “a matter of form”: The Papers of James Madison, Vol. 10, 180-181.

  58 Congress, “be transmitted”: id. at 182.

  58 Madison, “A more direct”: ibid.

  CHAPTER 6

  60 Washington, “if a weak state”: Daniel A. Farber and Suzanna Sherry, A History of the American Constitution, 176.

  61 “Their lodgings”: id. at 176-177; Mee, 286-287.

  61 Centinel, “most perfect system”: Mee, 287-288.

  61 Wilson, “such an idea”: Craig R. Smith, To Form a More Perfect Union, 40-41.

  61 “has always been tainted”: Mee, 289.

  62 Agrippa, “There is no bill”: Farber and Sherry, 183-184.

  62 Singletary, “These lawyers”: Mee, 295.

  63 Smith, “I am a plain man”: id. at 296.

  63 Heath, “ratify the Constitution”: Smith, 64.

  63 Hancock, “hazard a proposition”: id. at 66.

  63 Washington, “The decision”: id. at 67.

  63 Washington’s secretary, “is a man”: id. at 79.

  64 Washington, “The plot”: Smith, 97.

  64 “Both sides”: id. at 99.

  64 Madison, “may depend”: ibid.

  65 Henry, “Who authorized them”: Mee, 300-301.

  65 Henry, “It seems to me”: id. at 303.

  65 Randolph, “I disdain”: ibid.

  65 Henry, “If I shall be”: Farber and Sherry, 217.

  67 Brutus, “it now contains”: id. at 189.

  67 Madison, “A landed interest”: id. at 190-193.

  67 Smith, “Can the liberties”: id. at 206.

  68 Lansing, “no person”: Smith, 120-121.

  68 Smith, “confidence”: id. at 121.

  CHAPTER 7

  69 Jefferson, “I do not like”: id. at 154.

  69 Jefferson, “How it happened”: id. at 154-155.

  70 Jefferson, “a mere thing”: Bernard Schwartz, A History of the Supreme Court, 53.

  70 Jefferson, “There is a remarkable”: Smith, 154-155.

  71 Madison, “never thought”: Levy, 279.

  71 Washington, “decide how far”: Speeches of the American Presidents, 4.

  72 Madison, “mutilate”: Levy, 280.

  72 Madison, “wait with patience”: Farber and Sherry, 226.

  72 Madison, “I am sorry”: id. at 227-231.

  75 Gerry, “What, sir”: Neil H. Cogan, ed., The Complete Bill of Rights, 186.

  75 Madison, “No soldier”: Farber and Sherry, 228.

  76 Livermore, “it is sometimes”: id. at 238.

  76 Madison, “secured in their persons”: id. at 228-229.

  77 Madison, “the nauseous project”: Levy, 284.

  77 Jackson, “we ought not”: Smith, 214.

  77 Madison, “unfriendly to the object”: ibid.

  77 Sherman, “by a very great majority”: id. at 216.

  77 Madison, “compelled to beg”: ibid.

  78 Madison, “begged the House”: Farber and Sherry, 231.

  78 Burke, “not those solid”: Levy, 285.

  78 Vining, “the bill for establishing”: Farber and Sherry, 232.

  78 Sherman, “The Constitution”: ibid.

  78 Madison, “remain uniform”: ibid.

  78 Vining, “an act to amend”: id. at 233.

  79 Senate action: id. at 241-243.

  80 Clinton, “has transacted”: Smith, 161.

  81 Lee and Grayson, “it is with grief”: id. at 157.

  81 Madison, “unnecessary and dangerous”: Julius Goebel, Jr., History of the Supreme Court of the United States: Antecedents and Beginnings to 1801, 425.

  81 Madison, “will kill the opposition”: Levy, 285.

  82 Jackson, “The very purpose”: West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 614, 638 (1943).

  CHAPTER 8

  87 Jay nomination: Abraham, 72; Urofsky, 263-269. />
  87 Jay, “those who own”: Gustavus Myers, History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 37.

  88 Rutledge nomination: Madison, Notes, 507; Abraham, 72-73; Urofsky, 389-390; Maeva Marcus and James R. Perry, eds., The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1789-1800, 813.

  89 Cushing nomination: Abraham, 74-75; Urofsky, 127-129.

  89 Blair nomination: Abraham, 74; Urofsky, 25-27.

  89 Iredell nomination: Abraham, 75; Urofsky, 249-253.

  89 Wilson nomination: Abraham, 73-74; Urofsky, 535-536.

  89 Wilson, “I commit myself”: Marcus and Perry, 613.

  90 Washington, “I presume”: id. at 618-619.

  91 Brailsford case: 2 U.S. 402-408, 415-417 (1792).

  91 Gazette: “Business”: Marcus and Perry, 736.

  91 Johnson, “I cannot resolve”: id. at 740.

  91 Jay, “takes me from”: ibid.

  92 Hayburn’s Case: David P. Currie, The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The First Hundred Years, 1789-1888, 6-9; 2 U.S. 408-414 (1792).

  92 Boudinot, “the first instance”: Leo Pfeffer, This Honorable Court, 48-49.

  93 Chisholm case and reaction: Pfeffer, 50-52; Goebel, 723-741; Currie, 14-20; 2 U.S. 419, 479 (1793).

  95 Ellsworth nomination: Abraham, 77; Urofsky, 155-157.

  CHAPTER 9

  96 Paterson nomination: Abraham, 75-76; Urofsky, 347-350.

  97 Chase nomination: Abraham, 76-77; Urofsky, 107-111; Marcus and Perry, 805, 833-836.

  98 Dwight, “our wives and daughters”: Pfeffer, 61-62.

  98 “as we should”: id. at 62.

  99 Lyon trial: Pfeffer, 64-65; Goebel, 638-639; Urofsky, 348.

  99 Fries trial: Urofsky, 110.

  100 Peters, “I never sat”: ibid.

  100 Washington nomination: Urofsky, 511-513; Marcus and Perry, 868.

  101 Moore nomination: Urofsky, 329; Marcus and Perry, 880, 882.

  102 Marshall nomination: Abraham, 81-84; Urofsky, 301-306; Marcus and Perry, 904, 918-924.

  105 Marbury case: Pfeffer, 66-67; Currie, 66-74; 5 U.S. 137, 152-180 (1803).

  CHAPTER 10

  108 Chase impeachment and trial: Urofsky, 110; Schwartz, 57; Pfeffer, 87.

  110 Republican leader, “there should be”: Pfeffer, 88.

  110 Jefferson, “impeachment will not”: ibid.

  110 Jefferson, “judiciary of the United States”: id. at 93.

  110 Johnson, “I found”: Urofsky, 273.

  111 Worcester case: Currie, 181-183; 31 U.S. 515, 535-597 (1832).

  112 “Trail of Tears”: Zinn, 135-140.

  112 Madison, “In the internal”: Madison, Notes, 15.

  112 Fletcher case: Myers, 181-187, 260-261; Pfeffer, 99; Currie, 128-136; 10 U.S. 87, 124-146.

  115 Duvall nomination: Abraham, 90; Urofsky, 153-154.

  115 Story nomination: Abraham, 89-90; Urofsky, 435-444.

  115 Martin case: Myers, 23-28, 229-239, 270-281; Currie, 91-96; 14 U.S. 304, 323-362 (1816).

  119 Cohens case: Currie, 96-102; 19 U.S. 264, 373-428 (1821).

  CHAPTER 11

  121 McCulloch case: Melvin I. Urofsky, A March of Liberty: A Constitutional History of the United States (cited below as Urofsky, March of Liberty), 211-215; Farber and Sherry, 198-199; Currie, 160-168; 17 U.S. 316 (1819).

  126 Dartmouth College case: Pfeffer, 106-109; Myers, 286-293; Currie, 141-145; 17 U.S. 518 (1819).

  130 Sturges case: Urofsky, March of Liberty, 240; Currie, 145-150; 17 U.S. 122 (1819).

  131 Gibbons case: Pfeffer, 114-116; Urofsky, March of Liberty, 216-219; Currie, 168-176; 22 U.S. 1 (1824).

  133 Thompson nomination: Abraham, 91-92; Urofsky, 477.

  133 Trimble nomination: Abraham, 92-93; Urofsky, 483.

  133 Ogden case: Urofsky, March of Liberty, 241-242; Currie, 150-156; 25 U.S. 213 (1827).

  134 Barron case: Currie, 189-193; 3 U.S. 243 (1833).

  CHAPTER 12

  137 Missouri Compromise: Urofsky, March of Liberty, 350-352.

  138 Tallmadge, “If a dissolution”: Louis Filler, Crusade Against Slavery, 27-28.

  138 Cobb, “We have kindled”: id. at 28.

  138 Marshall, “nothing portends”: Jean Edward Smith, John Marshall, 489.

  138 Marshall, “removal of our”: id. at 489-490.

  138 The Antelope case: 23 U.S. 66, 68-132 (1825).

  140 Marshall’s death and reaction: Jean Edward Smith, John Marshall, 523-524.

  142 Story, “The reign”: R. Kent Newmyer, Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story, 158.

  142 McLean nomination: Abraham, 95-96; Urofsky, 293-295.

  142 Baldwin nomination: Abraham, 96-97; Urofsky, 1-2.

  143 Wayne nomination: Abraham, 98; Urofsky, 515-516.

  143 Taney nomination: Abraham, 98-99; Urofsky, 465-473.

  143 Barbour nomination: Abraham, 99-100; Urofsky, 3-4.

  144 Webster, “Judge Story”: Abraham 100.

  144 Charles River Bridge case: Pfeffer, 123-124; Stanley Kutler, Privilege and Creative Destruction; Currie, 209-211; 36 U.S. 420 (1837).

  148 Garrison, “monstrous evil”: Louis Filler, The Crusade Against Slavery, 1830-1860, 55-62.

  148 Calhoun, “Abolition and the Union”: Don Fehrenbacher, Slavery, Law, and Politics: The Dred Scott Case in Historical Perspective, 57.

  150 Amistad case: Paul Finkelman, Slavery in Court, 222-239; Howard Jones, Mutiny on the Amistad ; 40 U.S. 592-597 (1841).

  151 Prigg case: Finkelman, 60-64; Currie, 241-245; 41 U.S. 536-672 (1842).

  153 Latimer Law: Finkelman, 64-65.

  153 Anthony Burns arrest and trial: Finkelman, 107-119; Albert J. Von Frank, The Trials of Anthony Burns.

  153 Garrison, “a covenant”: Filler, 215-216.

  154 “rivals Dred Scott ”: Fehrenbacher, 21-22.

  154 Brightly, “resulted in the passage”: 41 U.S. 541-542 (1842).

  CHAPTER 13

  159 Background of Dred Scott case: Fehrenbacher, 122, 129, 295.

  160 Strader case: Finkelman, 35-38; 51 U.S. 82 (1850).

  161 Missouri court decision: Fehrenbacher, 128-139.

  162 Federal court decision: id. at 140-146.

  162 Scott, “I have no money”: id. at 147-148.

  163 Catron nomination: Abraham, 101-102; Urofsky, 95-99.

  163 Daniel nomination: Abraham, 104; Urofsky, 131-134.

  163 Nelson nomination: Abraham, 106; Urofsky, 337-338.

  164 Grier nomination: Abraham, 108-109; Urofsky, 203-204.

  164 Curtis nomination: Abraham, 109-110; Urofsky, 125-126.

  164 Campbell nomination: Abraham, 111-112; Urofsky, 89-90.

  165 Blair, “emancipated”: Fehrenbacher, 152.

  166 Scott arguments: id. at 153.

  166 Curtis, “will not decide”: id. at 153-154.

  CHAPTER 14

  168 Scott arguments: Fehrenbacher, 156-163.

  170 Grier-Buchanan corresponden
ce: id. at 163-169.

  171 Dred Scott decision: 60 U.S. 393 (1857).

  172 “to grounds agreed”: id. at 176.

  173 Blackstone, “a slave or negro”: Urofsky, March of Liberty, 354.

  175 American Insurance decision: Fehrenbacher, 203-204; 26 U.S. 511 (1828).

  176 “an argument”: Fehrenbacher, 209.

  177 New York Tribune, “mean and skulking”: id. at 230.

  177 Constitutionalist, “is now the supreme”: ibid.

  177 Cheever, “If the people”: id. at 232.

  177 “The right of property”: id. at 247.

  178 Hale, “to carry out”: id. at 251.

  178 Seward, “whisperings”: ibid.

  178 Benjamin, “principles”: id. at 251-252.

  178 Johnson, “mad and reckless”: ibid.

  CHAPTER 15

  179 Lincoln, “we will submit”: Philip van Doren Stern, ed., The Life and Writings of Abraham Lincoln, 399.

  179 Lincoln, “the Dred Scott decision”: id. at 418.

  179 Douglas, “warfare”: Fehrenbacher, 260.

  179 Lincoln, “conspiracy”: Stern, 456.

  180 Lincoln, “set the niggers”: id. at 468.

  180 Lincoln, “I am not”: id. at 492, 494.

  180 Lincoln, “Douglas had the ingenuity”: id. at 536.

  180 “The Dred Scott decision”: Fehrenbacher, 268.

  182 Lincoln’s inaugural address: Stern, 646-657.

  182 Lincoln, “the power in me”: id. at 660.

  182 Clifford nomination: Abraham, 113; Urofsky, 123-124.

  183 Swayne nomination: Abraham, 116-117; Urofsky, 455-456.

  183 Miller nomination: Abraham, 117-118; Urofsky, 317-322.

  183 Davis nomination: Abraham, 118-119; Urofsky, 135-137.

  183 Field nomination: Abraham, 119-120; Urofsky, 159-167.

 

‹ Prev