The Source Field Investigations

by Wilcock, David

  Obviously, geometry now appears to have a much more significant role in the growth and development of the earth than we thought. The conventionally accepted model of plate tectonics, or what used to be called continental drift, can be traced all the way back to Dr. Alfred Wegener in 1912—and has remained largely unchanged for almost a century. 19 However, both Karl W. Luckert, professor emeritus of the University of Southern Minnesota,20 and James Maxlow21 -22 have demonstrated clear scientific cases that the earth has been expanding from within since at least 220 million years ago—when the mega-continent Pangaea first separated. Maxlow simply subtracted each stage of expansion that the seafloor went through, worldwide, from the overall volume of the earth’s surface. The results are quite striking, as it appears that all the continents fit perfectly together if you shrink the earth down to 55 to 60 percent of its current size. Maxlow’s work is being taken seriously in certain scientific circles—for example, it was discussed in a 2007 issue of the New Concepts in Global Tectonics newsletter.23 Maxlow and Luckert are just two of many scientists now promoting such models.24 Very few scientists have wanted to touch the Earth Expansion Theory, because it suggests that a massive amount of new matter is being generated within the earth itself. Yet, at the same time, most of them have no problem supporting the Big Bang theory—where allegedly all the matter in the Universe was created in a single, gigantic explosion . . . out of nothing. Maxlow, Luckert and others have conclusively shown that the plate tectonics model is loaded with problems. If we allow the earth to be expanding from within, by a process of continuous matter creation, we have a much more perfect fit with the real-world data that is available. This, of course, means that matter can be spontaneously generated from the Source Field. And best of all, we see that the earth has been expanding through geometric phases along the way.

  GLOBAL EXPANSION TECTONICS:

  Exponential Earth expansion from Early Jurassic to the Present.

  Dr. James Maxlow’s model of the earth’s expansion. Undersea volcanic ridges generate new crust as earth increases in size.

  Earth’s Crystal Core

  So far, this geometry has appeared as either hidden energy patterns or outlines along the surface of the earth, which we can measure by the location of seismic fault lines, mountain ranges and undersea volcanic ridges—all of which could be caused by gravitational stress currents. What about a real, honest-to-God crystal in the earth that is shaped like this? On the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center Web site, a division of Carnegie Mellon/University of Pittsburgh, I found the following revealing quote.

  There’s a giant crystal buried deep within the earth, at the very center, more than three thousand miles down. It may sound like the latest fantasy adventure game or a new Indiana Jones movie, but it happens to be what scientists discovered in 1995 with a sophisticated computer model of earth’s inner core.25

  I was delighted to discover that indeed, the Glatzmaier-Roberts model26 of the earth’s core had a very clear geometric shape—which some scientists called a “hexagonal” pattern.27

  NASA’s Glatzmaier-Roberts model revealed a geometric “crystal” pattern in the earth’s core that fits perfectly into a dodecahedron, as illustrated on the right.

  However, if you pop in a dodecahedron and then tilt it slightly (about 10 degrees), it fits perfectly. No other geometry we have been discussing matches this well. We can also clearly see a spiraling, fluidlike vortex moving through the center of the geometry as well. One study has concluded that some of the earth’s inner core is behaving like a liquid, despite its geometric structure . . . exactly as we might expect, given the fluidlike qualities of the Source Field.28 The American Geophysical Union has openly stated that the angular tilt of the geometric core is not aligned with the earth’s rotation.29 As reported in another mainstream study, “even more surprisingly, [the core] is rotating faster than the rest of the earth.”30 We’ll come back to that point later. Scientists even have admitted that current models cannot fully explain this “crystal” in the center of the earth. As reported in Physics Today Online, “The [geometric] alignment [of the earth’s core] may not result from a single force, such as that due to the electromagnetic stresses, but a combination of forces present in the inner core.”31

  I struggled for years to understand what could be causing all this geometry to appear so obviously in the actual structure and behavior of the earth—not to mention the “tetrahedral geometry” Richard C. Hoagland pointed out on the Sun (sunspot patterns that do not go above 19.5 degrees north or south), Mars (the Olympus Mons shield volcano, three times higher than Mount Everest, at 19.5), Venus (two volcanoes at roughly 19.5), earth (the Hawaiian Islands at 19.5), Jupiter (the Great Red Spot at 19.5) and Neptune (the Great Dark Spot at 19.5).32 -33 Straight lines aren’t supposed to appear in nature—at least not in any conventional mind-set. It took quite some time for me to figure out that gravity was actually responsible for creating these cyclones in the atmosphere and/or volcanic upwellings in the mantle.

  The swirling winds of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot appear to be driven by gravitational forces that naturally circulate in the shape of a tetrahedron. On solid planets, the mantle surges up to form volcanoes at these same vortex points.

  Geometry Naturally Occurs in a Vibrating Fluid

  I was greatly relieved when I found the work of Dr. Hans Jenny (pronounced “yenny”), who found that this geometry appears quite naturally in a fluid—by simply vibrating it. Almost immediately, I realized this was the big piece I had been missing, and I was thrilled.

  In his Cymatics research,34 Dr. Jenny took ordinary water and filled it with tiny, free-floating particles known as colloids. These particles will not sink because they are so small—they are in suspension. When Dr. Jenny then vibrated the water at different frequencies, the particles immediately assembled themselves into clear and beautiful three-dimensional geometries. Each pattern stayed nice and still, maintaining the same shape—but there was a great deal of rotational movement within the shape itself. The particles were always on the move. Long, curving loops were also seen emerging from each point of the geometry, showing a constant particle flow from one area to another—and a curving pattern to contrast with the straight lines in the geometry itself. As long as he didn’t change the shape of the fluid, the same geometric pattern would again reappear each time he played a certain frequency of sound. Thus, you could have the same fluid, with the same particles, show a number of different geometric patterns. Every time you played a certain frequency, the same geometry would return—almost as if by magic.

  Higher-frequency sounds created more complex geometry, and vice versa. Furthermore, when Dr. Jenny vibrated a larger area of water, instead of just seeing one shape emerge, he got multiple copies of the same pattern—all lined up in nice, neat, organized rows. These patterns seemed to resemble a group of atoms forming a larger structure. Was this the big secret to how all of physical matter really formed? It certainly looked that way. It appears that as the frequency of the energy streaming into the earth increases, the complexity of the geometry that is structuring the continents, fault lines and volcanic ridges increases as well—moving from tetrahedron, to cuboctahedron, to our current pattern.

  Dr. Hans Jenny found that particles floating in a liquid naturally arranged into different geometric patterns depending on the frequency of vibration he introduced.

  By 1996, I had already realized that geometry must be the big secret to understanding energy, matter, the mechanisms responsible for biological life, and even consciousness—although I didn’t find the proof in Jenny’s work until later on. If we want to find out exactly what coherence looks like in a fluid, we look no further than these five basic Platonic solids—the tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, icosahedron and dodecahedron. Mathematicians already know these shapes have more symmetry, as in more coherence, than any others. Simply put, each of them will fit perfectly in a sphere, and each point is equidistant from its neighbors. Each side of the geometry has
the same shape, and every internal angle will also be the same.

  Quantum Geometry: The Big Secret

  Physicists were always looking for the missing link that could unify the very large with the very small. Now that there were clear and obvious geometric patterns in the earth, it seemed very likely that if we are truly dealing with a unified field model, the patterns we see on a larger scale would also appear in quantum mechanics. Atoms, rather than being a bunch of seemingly solid particles whirling around a nucleus, could now be reimagined as geometric patterns of flow—within the fluidlike energy of the Source Field. When you increase the frequency of vibration, the geometry becomes more complex. Once we understand how this principle really works, it might also lead to the transmutation of elements—such as the classic alchemist’s dream of turning lead into gold.

  Where do we start, then? In Larson’s model, if we’re looking for geometry within the atom, all we have to do is study the nucleus—as he feels the nucleus is the atom: “In The Case against the Nuclear Atom, Larson . . . points out that, in fact, the ‘size’ of the nucleus . . . is rather the size of the atom itself.”35 Larson’s model did not have geometry in it—but Nehru also admits they haven’t worked all the kinks out yet.

  It is certain that there is a lot more to be done toward enlarging the application of the Reciprocal System to the intrinsic structure of the atom. Perhaps it is time to break new ground in the exploration of the mechanics of the Time Region. . . . Breaking new ground involves some fresh thinking, and leaving no stone unturned.36

  The first scientist I found who had a working quantum physics model, based entirely on geometry, was Rod Johnson—who posted intriguing concepts on Richard C. Hoagland’s discussion forum back in 1996. In the ensuing years, I have interviewed him extensively and published the results on my Web site, Divine Cosmos—and unfortunately he passed away in 2010. I was stunned at how many mysteries of quantum mechanics he could explain with geometry—including Planck’s Constant, the Fine Structure Constant, the ratio between the weak force and the strong force, the structure of the photon, and others.37 Without ever knowing about Larson’s model, Johnson independently developed a similar concept. In Johnson’s model, there was indeed a parallel reality that is constantly intersecting with our own in every atom, at the tiniest level. Every atom had one geometry in our reality, and an opposite, inverse geometry in the parallel reality. The two geometries then counter-rotated inside of each other. Each stage of this process carried you through the different elements. Clearly, Johnson had a great model, although he didn’t have enough specifics to resolve the entire Periodic Table yet—but he felt all the answers could be found in James Carter’s theory of circlons.38

  Later on I found Dr. Robert Moon, who could explain everything in the Periodic Table with geometry. He was one of the key scientists involved in the Manhattan Project, which developed the world’s first controlled thermonuclear fission reaction. He was the second scientist ever to build a cyclotron in the 1930s, and significantly improved the first—which had been built by E. O. Lawrence. In the Manhattan Project, Dr. Moon solved critical problems to make the first atomic pile possible, and built the first scanning X-ray microscope after World War II. From 1974 until his death in 1989, he was a key collaborator with Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.39 A variety of articles on his new quantum physics model can be found at LaRouche’s 21st Century Science and Technology Web site.40

  In 1986, Dr. Moon finally realized that geometry was the key to understanding quantum physics—and it was a geometry in time as well as in space. That means that when you move through space, or time, you must move through geometry. You can’t just move in a nice, smooth, even curve—you have to pop through one quantity of space, or one quantity of time, before you can go to the next one. The scientific word for this kind of movement is that it would be quantized. Dr. Moon outlined his concept that space and time are quantized in a lecture from 1987.

  One interpretation . . . [is] that we have two kinds of time, and [laughs] the secret is that we should have quantization of time for this quantum potential to work. . . . In other words, you have both the quantization of space . . . [and] time. . . . That just struck like a bolt of lightning. Then, the next thing that struck was: Well, if space is going to be quantized, it should be quantized with the highest degree of symmetry. And so that immediately said, well, those are the Platonic solids. And [laughs], so I was pondering over that until the Sun came up. . . . It seemed very obvious how these solids should fit.41

  The Platonic solids, of course, are all the same geometries we’ve been discussing here—the tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, icosahedron and dodecahedron. The details are quite technical, but here’s the gist of what Dr. Moon found: The same geometric shapes we see in the expansion of the earth also appear within the nucleus of the atom. Furthermore, in Moon’s model, more than one geometric form can nest within the nucleus at the same time—each one inside the next. This geometry actually determines how many protons our scientists will find in any one atom. The trick is to count the number of points on each of the so-called Platonic solids. There are eight points on a cube, six on an octahedron, twelve on an icosahedron and twenty on a dodecahedron, for a total of forty-six. In Moon’s model, that’s the first half of the naturally occurring elements in the Periodic Table. Moon knew there are a total of ninety-two elements that appear in nature, or two times forty-six—so he believed that every atom with an atomic weight of forty-seven or higher was a combination of two nests of geometry connected side by side, growing increasingly unstable along the way.42

  You may have noticed Dr. Moon did not include the tetrahedron in this grouping. He feels that since the geometric opposite of the tetrahedron is still a tetrahedron, it plays a different role. Indeed, in Rod Johnson’s model as well as Buckminster Fuller’s earlier model, a photon appears as two tetrahedrons back-to-back—and we have the solid data to prove it in Planck’s Constant.43

  Anyway, some very cool things happen when you use Moon’s model. The first completed shell in the nucleus is the cube, with eight protons. This corresponds to oxygen, which is highly stable—and makes up 62.55 percent of all the atoms in the earth’s crust. It is also interesting that oxygen is one of the single most important elements to sustain life. The second completed shell is the octahedron, with fourteen protons—and now you have silicon, which comes in at 21.22 percent. Although we are considered carbon-based life-forms, silicon is also very important for biological life—and seems to be the key ingredient in the spontaneous generation experiments, such as Dr. Ignacio Pacheco’s work with the silicon in beach sand.

  Dr. Robert Moon discovered that the protons of atoms naturally assemble into the Platonic solids, as seen here. Each proton corresponds to a vertex of the geometry.

  So, between these first two shells alone—oxygen with a cubical nucleus and silicon with an octahedron-shaped nucleus—you have 84 percent of all the atoms in the earth’s crust. Then, when you move up to complete the next shape, the icosahedron, you now have twenty-six protons. This is the iron atom, which is the best metal we have for creating naturally occurring magnetic fields. This hidden geometric symmetry may very well be responsible for iron’s magnetic properties—by acting as a conduit for the Source Field, as we will discuss. Of all the atoms in the earth’s crust, 1.20 percent are iron, but they add up to 5 percent of the total weight. Then, the dodecahedron fills up at forty-six protons, and you now have palladium—which is an unusually symmetrical atom that was used in all the cold fusion experiments. And in case you think cold fusion was all just a waste of time, don’t forget that Dr. Eugene Mallove resigned from his position as the chief editor of MIT’s technical newsletter when he allegedly discovered they were falsifying their own data on cold fusion—as if to say there was no effect.44

  According to a paper by Laurence Hecht, Moon’s model satisfies all sorts of quantum puzzles—including the processes of fission and fusion, the mystery period of fourteen for the rare earth elements, th
e exact number of elements in each row of the Periodic Table, and Maria Goeppert-Mayer’s Magic Numbers, in which the properties of the nucleus tend to suddenly change at certain numbers that curiously reappear—whether you’re looking at protons, neutrons or the mass number. 45 Hecht has continued developing and refining Moon’s model ever since Moon’s death in 1989.46

  Microclusters and Quasi-Crystals

  I was even more impressed when I found out that atoms naturally gather together into these exact same geometric patterns when they are set loose, one at a time, in a given area. These are called microclusters, and they are completely baffling to mainstream scientists. The microcrystals floating in the pineal gland may be similar—albeit larger. A 1989 issue of Scientific American revealed that microclusters do not have characteristics like liquids or gases.

  They belong instead to a new phase of matter, the microcluster. . . . They pose questions that lie at the heart of solid-state physics and chemistry. . . . How might the atoms reconfigure if freed from the influence of the matter that surrounds them?47

  I then found the college textbook Microcluster Physics by Satoru Sugano and Hiroyasu Koizumi, which revealed even more—including compelling images of the geometry.48

  Microclusters can be anywhere between ten to a thousand atoms. The strangest thing about them is that the electrons appear to orbit the center of the cluster, rather than the center of each individual atom. Of course, this weird behavior suggests there are no electrons. Instead, what scientists actually see is geometrically arranged electron clouds, which appear to be where the fluidlike flow of the Source Field enters into the atom. Once some of this stored energy is released from the atom, it turns into a photon—which then looks like a particle. Microclusters are also called “monatomic elements” or “ORMUS elements” in various sources—elegantly summarized in Lawrence Gardner’s Lost Secrets of the Sacred Ark.49 Microclusters appear to display gravitational anomalies, including levitation, under certain circumstances—as well as superconductivity. Ancient peoples believed that ingesting microcluster gold would awaken their pineal glands—and the Egyptians even stored it in cone-shaped cakes.50