Book Read Free

Latino America: How America's Most Dynamic Population is Poised to Transform the Politics of the Nation

Page 26

by Matt Barreto, Gary Segura


  Segura, Gary M. 2009. “Identity Research in Latino Politics.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Ontario. September 2–6.

  ______ . 2012. “Latino Public Opinion and Realigning the American Electorate.” Daedalus 141, no. 4 (fall): 98–113.

  Segura, Gary M., Dennis Falcon, and Harry Pachon. 1997. “Dynamics of Latino Partisanship in California: Immigration, Issue Salience, and Their Implications.” Harvard Journal of Hispanic Politics 10: 62–80.

  Segura, Gary M., and Helena Alves Rodrigues. 2006. “Comparative Ethnic Politics in the United States: Beyond Black and White.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 375–395.

  Segura, Gary, and Ali Valenzuela. 2010. “Hope, Tropes, and Dopes: Hispanic and White Racial Animus in the 2008 Election.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 40, no. 3: 497–514.

  Shapley, L. S., and Martin Shubik. 1954. “A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System.” American Political Science Review 48, no. 3: 787–792.

  Silver, Nate. 2012. “Hispanic Voters Less Plentiful in Swing States.” FiveThirtyEight.com. New York Times, June 19.

  Smith, Ben. 2008. “Clinton ‘Nuestra Amiga.’” Politico, January 29.

  ______ . 2008. “McAuliffe: Obama Has Latino ‘Problem.’” Politico, June 1.

  Smith, Raymond A. 2013. “Immigration Reform and the Growing Asian-American Vote.” Washington Monthly, June 12. Available at: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/ten-miles-square/2013/06/immigration_reform_and_the_gro045259.php.

  Stokes-Brown, Atiya Kai. 2009. “The Hidden Politics of Identity: Racial Self-Identification and Latino Political Engagement.” Politics and Policy 37: 1281–1305.

  Stone, Walter J., Ronald Rapoport, and Lonna Rae Atkeson. 1995. “A Simulation Model of Presidential Nomination Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 135–161.

  Taylor, Paul, Rakesh Kochhar, Richard Fry, Gabriel Velasco, and Seth Motel. 2011. “Wealth Gaps Rise to Record Highs between Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, Social and Demographic Trends (July 26). Available at: pewsocialtrends.org/files/2011/07/SDT-Wealth-Report_7-26-11_FINAL.pdf.

  Taylor, Paul, Mark Hugo Lopez, Gabriel Velasco, and Seth Motel. 2012. “Hispanics Say They Have the Worst of a Bad Economy.” Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center (January 26). Available at: http://www.pewhispanic.org/2012/01/26/hispanics-say-they-have-the-worst-of-a-bad-economy.

  Teinowitz, Ira. 2008. “Hispanic Spending in Texas to Surpass $2 Million.” AdAge, February 25.

  TNS Media. 2008. “TNS Media Intelligence/CMAG with Analysis by the Wisconsin Advertising Project.” Madison: University of Wisconsin Advertising Project (October 31).

  Tomás Rivera Policy Institute. 2000. “Statewide Poll of Latino California Voters in 2000.” Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Sol Price School of Public Policy.

  Uhlaner, Carol J., and C. F. Garcia. 2005. “Learning Which Party Fits: Experience, Ethnic Identity, and the Demographic Foundations of Latino Party Identification.” In Diversity in Democracy: Minority Representation in the United States, eds. Gary M. Segura and Shaun Bowler. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

  US Bureau of Labor Statistics 2012. “The African-American Labor Force in the Recovery.” Washington, DC: US Department of Labor. Available at: http://www.dol.gov/_sec/media/reports/blacklaborforce/.

  US Census Bureau. 2012. “The Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 2010.” American Community Survey Reports (May). Available at: www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/acs-19.pdf.

  Vaca, Nicolas C. 2004. The Presumed Alliance: The Unspoken Conflict between Latinos and Blacks and What It Means for America. New York: HarperCollins.

  Vega, Rodolfo, Manuela McDonough, Clancey Bateman, and Jim Maxwell. 2013. “Outreach and Enrollment Strategies for Latinos under the Affordable Care Act.” National Council of La Raza. Available at:

  http://www.nclr.org/images/uploads/pages/Outreach%20&%20Enrollment%20Strategies%20for%20Latinos%20under%20the%20ACA%20-%20NCLR%20and%20JSI.pdf (February 07, 2014).

  Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.

  Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Wals, Sergio C. 2011. “Does What Happens in Los Mochis Stay in Los Mochis? Explaining Postmigration Political Behavior.” Political Research Quarterly 64, no. 3: 600–611.

  Washington Post. 2008. “Hillary Clinton’s Remarks.” February 12.

  Whittaker, Mathew, Gary M. Segura, and Shaun Bowler. 2005. “Racial/Ethnic Group Attitudes toward Environmental Protection in California: Is ‘Environmentalism’ Still a White Phenomenon?” Political Research Quarterly 58: 435–447.

  Wienack, R. M., and N. A. Kraus. 2000. “Racial/Ethnic Differences in Children’s Access to Care.” American Journal of Public Health 90: 1771–1774.

  Williams, Bryan L., and Yvette Florez. 2002. “Do Mexican Americans Perceive Environmental Issues Differently than Caucasians? A Study of Cross-Ethnic Variation in Perceptions Related to Water in Tucson.” Environmental Health Perspectives 110: 303–310.

  Yanez, Alonso. 2008. “Myth of the Latino Vote.” Hispanic Link News, October 29.

  Zeleny, Jeff. 2008. “Richardson Endorses Obama.” New York Times, March 21.

  INDEX

  Abortion, 44–45, 49–50

  Abrajano, Marisa, 44

  Affordable Care Act (ACA), 127

  African Americans

  2012 election, role of in, 166, 167 table 8.4, 168

  environmental attitudes of, 219

  government, views on role of, 37 fig. 3.3, 38 fig. 3.4, 39 fig. 3.5

  group identity of, 103

  Latinos and African Americans, influence of, 166–167, 167 table 8.4, 168, 170

  median age, 57 fig. 4.1

  party mobilization (2008), 59, 60 fig. 4.3

  popular vote share of, 136 table 7.1

  population and voter registration, growth of in California, 178, 178 table 9.2

  self-reliance of minorities, views of, 35 fig. 3.2

  shift in partisan preferences, 232

  as voter mobilization target, 57 fig. 4.1, 59

  voting and registration record of, 53, 54–55

  voting turnout probability, 58–59, 58 fig. 4.2

  Alvarez, Michael, 44

  American Community Survey, 2010, 40

  American National Election Studies (ANES), 36, 46, 49, 50, 59, 99, 103

  The American Voter (Campbell), 148

  The American Voter Revisited (Lewis-Beck), 148

  Angle, Sharron, 142

  Arizona

  Arizona v. United States, 154

  Latino electorate in, 80 table 5.1, 81, 119, 169, 188

  Latino influence in, 123, 146 table 8.1

  mobilization in, 122

  responses to candidate statements on immigration, 159 table 8.3

  SB 1070, 27, 28 fig. 2.5, 29 fig. 2.6, 132–134, 134 fig. 7.3

  Arpaio, Joe, 156

  Asian Americans

  median age, 57 fig. 4.1

  party mobilization (2008), 60 fig. 4.3

  popular vote share of, 136 table 7.1

  population and voter registration, growth of in California, 178, 178 table 9.2

  self-reliance of minorities, views of, 35 fig. 3.2

  as voter mobilization target, 59

  voting turnout probability, 58, 58 fig. 4.2

  Associated Press, on Latino vote in 2008 elections, 109

  Axelrod, David, 129

  Bachmann, Michelle, 197

  Barreto, Matt, 5–7, 179, 207

  Battleground states

  Arizona, as possible addition to, 169

  influence of Black and Latino voters in, 167 table 8.4

  Iraq War, opposition to, 97

  Latino influe
nce in, 124

  Obama, support for in, 99

  outreach to Latinos in, 155

  survey experiment in, 158, 159 table 8.3

  votes cast in 2008, 110

  Bendixen, Sergio, 82, 95, 104

  Bennet, Michael, 141

  Bowker, J. M., 220, 226

  Bowler, Shaun, 57, 180, 181, 182, 219

  Brewer, Jan, 132

  Brown, Jerry, 139–140, 182

  Buck, Ken, 141

  Bush, George W.

  as beneficiary of “moral values” issue, 44

  blame of for economic recession, 41–42, 99, 162

  interest groups, influence of in 2000 election, 109

  Iraq War, misinformation about, 96

  Jesus Christ as most influential philosopher, 48

  Latinos, outreach to, 174–175, 179, 232

  military families, support of by, 95

  percent of Latino vote for, 33, 41, 51

  Bustamante, Cruz, 4

  California

  candidate favorability (2008), 87 table 5.2

  Citizens Redistricting Commission, 184

  Democratic Party in, 176–187, 180 fig. 9.3

  gubernatorial race, 2010, 139–140, 141 fig. 7.5

  House districts, party composition of, 183–184

  Latino electorate in, 80 table 5.1, 81

  Latino influence in, 115 table 6.2, 146 table 8.1

  Latino population in, 20, 20 fig. 2.4

  Legislature, party composition of, 184–187

  population and voter registration, growth in by race/ethnicity, 178, 178 table 9.2

  Proposition 20, 184

  Proposition 187, 140, 177, 180–183

  Proposition 209, 177, 181

  Proposition 227, 177, 181

  Republican Party, decline in, 176–180

  vote choice in 2008 primary, 89, 89 table 5.3

  Campaign competitiveness, 112–113, 120, 120 fig. 6.9, 121 fig. 6.10

  Campaign Media Analysis Group, 122

  Campbell, Angus, 148

  Campbell, Jane, 83

  Carmona, Richard, 169

  Castro, Fidel, 19, 102

  Castro, Joaquin, 169

  Castro, Julian, 169

  Castro, Raoul, 102

  Catholicism, 21

  Central American immigrants, vote choice of in 2008 elections, 102–103

  Chavez, Cesar, 218

  Chico, Gerry, 84

  Cisneros, Henry, 86

  Clinton, Hillary

  advantages of as primary candidate, 81, 88, 89

  favorability ratings of, 84–85, 87 table 5.2, 88–89, 109

  Latino outreach strategies of, 80, 86, 88

  Colombians, percent of Latino population, 23

  Colorado

  gubernatorial race, 2010, 138–139

  Latino electorate in, 80 table 5.1, 110–111, 164

  Latino influence in, 115 table 6.2, 146 table 8.1

  Latinos and African Americans, influence of, 166–167, 167 table 8.4

  responses to candidate statements on immigration, 159 table 8.3

  Senate race, 2010, 141

  shift from Republican- to Democratic-leaning, 190

  Contreras, Raoul, 82

  Cook Political Report, 196

  Cordell, Ken, 220, 226

  Cuban Adjustment Act of 1995, 23

  Cuban Americans

  demographic characteristics of, 21 table 2.2

  distinctiveness of, 23–24

  percent of Latino population, 17, 23

  percent residing in Florida, 20

  as political refugees, 19

  Republican partisanship of, 33, 102

  US population of, 18 table 2.1

  vote choice in 2008 election, 102

  Current Population Surveys, 40, 116

  DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), 152, 154, 162

  Davis, Gray, 180

  Dawson, Michael, 30, 60, 103, 148

  De la Garza, Rodolfo, 109, 114, 124, 164

  Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), 152, 154, 162

  Democratic Party

  in California, 176–187

  constituency of, 137

  environmental issues and, 225

  immigration issues and, 200–201

  Latino vote relative to non-Latino vote, 119 fig. 6.8

  Latino voters and, 4, 31, 33, 43 fig. 3.8, 50, 143, 170, 231

  midterm elections, 2010, 128–132, 135, 136 table 7.1, 137–138

  Democratic primary, 2008

  electorate, Latino voter share of, 91

  ethnic ties, importance of, 90–91

  favorability ratings of candidates, 84–86, 87 table 5.2

  Hillary Clinton, advantages of, 81

  ideological differences of candidates, 81

  Latino outreach strategy, 80, 86, 88

  Latino vote choices, 88–90, 89 table 5.3

  Obama administration, results of inaction by, 129–130

  primary schedule, change in, 80, 111

  racial prejudice, claims of, 82–84

  Demographic trends in US, 1–2

  Denham, Jeff, 184

  Deportation, 147, 150, 151, 152, 154, 162, 202

  DeSipio, Louis, 24, 114, 164

  Dinkins, David, 83

  Dominicans, 17, 18 table 2.1, 19–20, 21 table 2.2, 23

  Dorn, Roosevelt, 83

  Doyle, Patti Solis, 86

  DREAM Act, 134–135, 142, 147, 150, 156

  DREAMers, 151, 162

  Dunlap, Judy, 83

  Economic recession, blame assessment of, 41–42, 42 fig. 3.7, 99, 153, 162

  Elections. See Presidential election 2008; Midterm elections 2010; Presidential election 2012; Midterm elections 2014

  Environmental concerns

  air pollution, 221, 225–227, 228 table 12.1

  climate change, 221–222, 222 fig. 12.1, 223 fig. 12.2, 228 table 12.2

  immediate health threats, 220, 225

  local and global motivators of, 226–227, 229

  partisanship and, 223, 224 fig. 12.3, 227

  support for carbon limits, 228 table 12.3

  Environmental deprivation theory, 219

  Environmental issues, gap between Democrats and Republicans on, 225

  Environmental racism, 217

  Evangelical Christianity, 232

  Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 174

  FiveThirtyEight.com, 113, 164, 196

  Florez, Yvette, 220

  Florida

  Black and Latino voters, influence of, 166–167, 167 table 8.4

  Latino electorate in, 81, 117, 188

  Latino influence in, 110–111, 115 table 6.2, 123–124, 146 table 8.1, 164, 166–168

  Latino population in, 20, 20 fig. 2.4, 23, 80 table 5.1

  Obama, support for in, 99

  Republican Party in, 127

  responses to candidate statements on immigration, 159 table 8.3

  shift from Republican- to Democratic-leaning, 190

  Foley, Elise, 145

  Gallup poll, on repeal of Affordable Care Act, 209

  Gelman, Andrew, 166

  Georgia, 114, 169, 170, 190

  Gerrymandering, 197

  Giannoulias, Alexi, 138

  Gore, Albert, 109

  Graham, Lindsey, 189–190

  Greenberg, Michael, 220, 226

  Guatemalans, 23

  Guerra, Fernando, 6

  Gutierrez, Carlos, 156

  Gutiérrez, Luis, 86, 91, 152

  Hajnal, Zoltan, 99

  Harris, Kamala, 138

  Heck, Joe, 197

  Hickenlooper, John, 138

  Hierarchy of needs (Maslow), 218

  Hispanic Institute, 142

  Hopwood v. Texas (1996), 174

  House districts, comparison of by race/ethnicity, 198–199, 198 fig. 10.5

  House of Representatives, district-level analyses of, 199–200

  HR 4437, 175

  Huerta, Dolores, 86


  Illinois, 80 table 5.1, 81, 83, 122, 138, 164

  Immigration and Customs Enforcement, programs of, 150

  Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, 16

  Immigration issues

  in 2012 campaign, 147–154, 149 table 8.2

  DREAMers, protests by, 152

  enforcement, 150, 154

  importance of, to Latinos, 143 fig. 7.6, 149 table 8.2, 150

  Obama administration and, 150–152

  political parties’ actions, perceptions of, 135, 135 fig. 7.4

  potential attribution of blame, 194 fig. 10.3, 195 fig. 10.4

  Republican Party and, 127–129, 135, 153, 155–157, 162–163, 174–175, 189–195, 194 fig. 10.3, 195 fig. 10.4, 200, 233

  responses to candidate statements on, 159 table 8.3

  Romney’s position on, 153, 155–156

  Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 175–176, 181

  Indiana, 111, 115 table 6.2

  Iowa, 79, 81, 164, 167 table 8.4, 169, 170

  Jackson, Frank, 83

  Johnson, Cassandra, 220, 226

  Jones Act of 1917, 24

  Kaiser Family Foundation, health tracking poll, 211, 212

  Kerry, John, 44, 95, 96, 108, 112

  Kinder, Donald, 34

  Kirk, Mark, 138

  Kirk, Ron, 83

  Kobach, Kris, 156

  Latino agenda, 4–5, 173

  Latino Decisions

  2012 election exit poll, 45

  2010 Latino vote, estimate of, 138

  budget deficit poll, 42–43

  civil union recognition poll, 49

  Democratic primary voters, survey of, 88

  DREAM Act poll, 135

  enthusiasm gap between political parties, poll on, 130

  environmental attitudes, survey of, 220–224, 222 fig. 12.1, 223 fig. 12.2, 224 fig. 12.3

  evolution of Latino views of the Affordable Care Act, 207

  factors in voter turnout, focus groups on, 63–65

  founding of, 6

  gay and lesbian rights poll, 49

  group identity, evidence of, 61

  housing poll, 40

  immigration reform debate, Latino attitudes on, 191

  improvement in enthusiasm for Democratic Party, poll on, 203

  Iraq War poll, 97

  Jerry Brown, estimate of Latino vote for, 139

  Michael Bennet’s votes in 2010, estimate of Latino portion of, 141

  nonparticipation in electoral politics, focus groups on, 55

  Obama’s intentions regarding immigration reform, poll on, 151

  propensity to vote, study of, 67–71

  on Republican vulnerability in California, 183

  SB 1070 polls, 27, 133

  support for President Obama, poll on, 152

 

‹ Prev