The Cone Gatherers

by Robin Jenkins

  To

  John Currie

  who gathered many cones

  Contents

  Title Page

  Dedication

  Introduction by Paul Giamatti

  Chapter One

  Chapter Two

  Chapter Three

  Chapter Four

  Chapter Five

  Chapter Six

  Chapter Seven

  Chapter eight

  Chapter Nine

  Chapter Ten

  Chapter Eleven

  Chapter Twelve

  Chapter Thirteen

  Chapter Fourteen

  Chapter Fifteen

  Chapter Sixteen

  Copyright

  Introduction

  by Paul Giamatti

  Since I was a boy I have had a fascination with Scotland, particularly its literature. Stevenson, Scott and Buchan satisfied my yearning for lochs, castles and lonely outlaw warriors. As I grew up, the misty, Celtic-dream Scotland of my youth, land of mystery, adventure and legend, gave way to a more complex, more real Scotland.

  But I am still romantic – or naïve – enough to believe that the instinctive visions of childhood are connected to something essential and primal in us. They are pure in their inarticulate expression of prehistoric, truly existential mystery. The book you have before you, this agonised, funny and terribly sad book, is a mature expression of those childhood instincts. It is a profound exploration of the loneliness, fear and heroism hidden in the ancient heart of Man.

  I first read this book twenty-two years ago in Seattle in the Pacific Northwest, another somber landscape of mountains and drizzly lakes. Like many of the books that I have loved in my life, I vividly remember the experience: the queer little warren of a used bookstore that I bought it in, a labyrinth of overstuffed shelves; the squinting and silent old man who sold it to me (he grunted his approval of my purchase). And I remember the soft semi-collapsed armchair I read it in. I went clean through it in one long day’s sitting.

  I was trying to be a more mature reader, and I had been lucky: I had just read Lanark by Alasdair Gray, a challenging, astounding book, and I was looking for more of this darker, literary Scotland. I took up this book next. Good heavens, what a duo! I was deeply grieved by The Cone-Gatherers, moved by the simple story and the clean prose that reminded me at times of Joseph Conrad. I remember being struck by the line that ends chapter 13, ‘By being born therefore, or even conceived, one became involved’, a notion Conradian in its concision and sentiment. Re-reading the book now, many years later, it is even greater than I remembered. I am awed by it.

  The story is simple: two outsiders – Neil and his younger brother Calum, an angelic hunchbacked dwarf – are hired to gather cones on the soon-to-be deforested estate of Lady Runcie Campbell. Most of the men of the estate have left to fight in the Second World War, leaving only those too old to fight, including the pathological gamekeeper Mr Duror. The story follows the course of his irrational and increasingly violent envy of the cone-gatherers – Calum in particular. Mr Duror resists his own madness, and it makes him as tragic a figure as the cone-gatherers themselves.

  I used the word agonised before, and that calls to mind the ancient Greek concept of the agon and the dire, dramatic struggle at the heart of this book. There is a quality of Greek tragedy here, an elemental drama simply presented: an Arcadian setting, a few characters and a terrifying inevitability. We know from the beginning how this drama is going to end: Calum must die and Duror must kill him. But Robin Jenkins is an artist of such power that he maintains a sense of suspense even in the face of fate. He keeps moments of the tragedy truly obscene, in the original sense of the word, ‘offstage’: we never know what Duror does to his unfortunate wife in front of Lady Runcie Campbell, but it is literally unspeakable, and all the more disturbing for it.

  The Cone-Gatherers is Shakespearean in scope, in its tragedy and even in its comedy (the Forest of Arden is our novel’s forest, too). In a masterful stroke near the awful climax of the story, Jenkins stops the drama and sends in the wonderful, sardonic clown Graham, and we suddenly find ourselves in the company of a character not at all unlike the Porter in Macbeth. The horror is deferred and we are offered some small relief before the passion and violence and blood explode.

  The novel is also steeped in Christian imagery, and situated in a Judeo Christian world: we are in Eden, not only Arcadia. It is the tough, fibrous Christianity of Scottish history, of inescapable sin and damnation – Calvinist, I suppose. But I think this remarkable writer is peering more deeply into the history of the human soul, into the pagan and primitive past that is common to us all.

  The source of Duror’s rage and rot lies far back in the blackness of Time; we will never find it. His malice is provoked, in part, by the literal and emotional displacement of the horrifying modern war that provides the backdrop to this tale, but the evil that possesses Duror is unfathomable, ancient and enigmatic. It is the motiveless evil of Iago, the rage of Ajax, the suffering of Philoctetes (another man left out of a war he desperately wanted to fight). He reminds me of the demon-men who materialise in so many works of Scottish literature, in Stevenson and in James Hogg’s The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner; the kind of demon-men that haunted even a gentler novelist like Sir Walter Scott. He becomes the devil of folktale, the smooth-faced fellow met in the woods. Like a twisted Green Man, he is both an integral part of nature and horribly apart from it. He leaves his hoof print on a rock; he is a presence that cannot be articulated, a pre-Christian devil. That .Devil. The real one.

  Yet perhaps Mr Duror is merely an actor in an extraordinary tragedy, cast in a role he hardly understands, a role he is surprised to find himself playing so comfortably. I don’t think evil wins at the end of this tale. Jenkins is too sophisticated an artist for that. The Christ, The King, Calum, must die, must be sacrificed, but the demon of the tale has the humanity to kill himself, to blow his own face off, to take off his mask. The stage is left to the conflicted, confused and very human Lady. The possible future is in her hands.

  Robin Jenkins was a great artist and a great man, and he has given us a kind of fable: a true fable. It is a dark tale, brutal and truthful, and yet it is also delicate and lovely. It glows darkly. And, after all, it ends mercifully, with these very necessary words:

  Pity, hope, joy and heart.

  CHAPTER ONE

  It was a good tree by the sea-loch, with many cones and much sunshine; it was homely too, with rests among its topmost branches as comfortable as chairs.

  For hours the two men had worked in silence there, a hundred feet from the earth, closer, it seemed, to the blue sky round which they had watched the sun slip. Misted in the morning, the loch had gone through many shades of blue and now was mauve, like the low hills on its far side. Seals that had been playing tag in and out of the seaweed under the surface had disappeared round the point, like children gone home for tea. A destroyer had steamed seawards, with a sailor singing cheerfully. More sudden and swifter than hawks, and roaring louder than waterfalls, aeroplanes had shot down from the sky over the wood, whose autumnal colours they seemed to have copied for camouflage. In the silence that had followed gunshots had cracked far off in the wood.

  From the tall larch could be glimpsed, across the various-tinted crowns of the trees, the chimneys of the mansion behind its private fence of giant silver firs. Neil, the elder of the brothers, had often paused, his hand stretched out from its ragged sleeve to pluck the sweet resinous cones, and gazed at the great house with a calm yet bitter intentness and anticipation, as if, having put a spell on it, he was waiting for it to change. He never said what he expected or why he watched; nor did his brot
her ever ask.

  For Calum the tree-top was interest enough; in it he was as indigenous as squirrel or bird. His black curly hair was speckled with orange needles; his torn jacket was stained green, as was his left knee visible through a hole rubbed in his trousers. Chaffinches fluttered round him, ignoring his brother; now and then one would alight on his head or shoulder. He kept chuckling to them, and his sunburnt face was alert and beautiful with trust. Yet he was a much faster gatherer than his brother, and reached far out to where the brittle branches drooped and creaked under his weight. Neil would sometimes glance across to call out: ‘Careful.’ It was the only word spoken in the past two hours.

  The time came when, thrilling as a pipe lament across the water, daylight announced it must go: there was a last blaze of light, an uncanny clarity, a splendour and puissance; and then the abdication began. Single stars appeared, glittering in a sky pale and austere. Dusk like a breathing drifted in among the trees and crept over the loch. Slowly the mottled yellow of the chestnuts, the bronze of beech, the saffron of birches, all the magnificent sombre harmonies of decay, became indistinguishable. Owls hooted. A fox barked.

  It was past time to climb down and go home. The path to the earth was unfamiliar; in the dark it might be dangerous. Once safely down, they would have to find their way like ghosts to their hut in the heart of the wood. Yet Neil did not give the word to go down. It was not zeal to fill the bags that made him linger, for he had given up gathering. He just sat, motionless and silent; and his brother, accustomed to these trances, waited in sympathy: he was sure that even at midnight he could climb down any tree, and help Neil to climb down too. He did not know what Neil was thinking, and never asked; even if told he would not understand. It was enough that they were together.

  For about half an hour they sat there, no longer working. The scent of the tree seemed to strengthen with the darkness, until Calum fancied he was resting in the heart of an enormous flower. As he breathed in the fragrance, he stroked the branches, and to his gentle hands they were as soft as petals. More owls cried. Listening, as if he was an owl himself, he saw in imagination the birds huddled on branches far lower than this one on which he sat. He became an owl himself, he rose and fanned his wings, flew close to the ground, and then swooped, to rise again with vole or shrew squeaking in his talons. Part-bird then, part-man, he suffered in the ineluctable predicament of necessary pain and death. The owl could not be blamed; it lived according to its nature; but its victim must be pitied. This was the terrifying mystery, why creatures he loved should kill one another. He had been told that all over the world in the war now being fought men, women, and children were being slaughtered in thousands; cities were being burnt down. He could not understand it, and so he tried, with success, to forget it.

  ‘Well, we’d better make for down,’ said Neil at last, with a heavy sigh.

  ‘I could sit up here all night, Neil,’ his brother assured him eagerly.

  Neil was angry, though he did not raise his voice. ‘Are you a monkey to want to spend all your life in a tree?’

  ‘No, Neil.’

  ‘What would you eat up here? The cones?’

  Calum laughed. ‘I don’t think so, Neil. They’re not good.’

  ‘Don’t tell me you’ve tried them?’

  This time Calum’s laughter was a confession.

  Neil would not see it as a joke.

  ‘No wonder they come and stare up at you, as if you were a monkey,’ he said.

  Calum knew he was referring to the boy and girl who lived in the big house. They had only come once, and he had not minded their admiration.

  Neil was silent for nearly a minute.

  ‘But why shouldn’t we be called monkeys?’ he muttered. ‘Don’t we spend most of our lives in trees? And don’t we live in a box fit for monkeys?’

  Calum became sad: he liked their tiny hut.

  ‘Yonder’s a house with fifty rooms,’ went on Neil, ‘every one of them three times the size of our hut, and nearly all of them empty.’

  ‘But we couldn’t live in the big house, Neil.’

  ‘Why couldn’t we? We’re human beings just like them. We need space to live and breathe in.’

  ‘We get lots of space in the trees, Neil, and on the hills.’

  ‘Like birds and animals, you mean?’

  ‘We’re just simple folk, Neil. I want us just to be simple folk.’

  Neil yielded to the appeal in his brother’s voice, and also to the uselessness of complaint.

  ‘I ken you do, Calum,’ he said. ‘And I ken too that, though you’re simple, you’re better than any of them. Is to be always happy a crime? Is it daft never to be angry or jealous or full of spite? You’re better and wiser than any of them.’

  Calum smiled, scarcely knowing what the words meant.

  ‘But it wouldn’t have hurt them to let us stay in the summer-house,’ cried Neil, with another burst of passion, ‘for all the time we’ll be here. No, we would soil it for them; and as soon as the war’s over it’s to be knocked down anyway. It just wouldn’t do for us to be using what the grand folk once used.’

  He paused, and sighed again.

  ‘What’s the matter with me these days, Calum?’ he asked. ‘Is it I’m getting too old? Am I frightened at something? It just comes over me. Sometimes I think it must be the war. There seems to be death in the air.’

  Calum shivered: he knew and feared death.

  ‘This wood,’ said Neil, ‘it’s to be cut down in the spring.’

  ‘I ken that,’ whimpered Calum.

  ‘There’s no sense in being sorry for trees,’ said his brother, ‘when there are more men than trees being struck down. You can make use of a tree, but what use is a dead man? Trees can be replaced in time. Aren’t we ourselves picking the cones for seed? Can you replace dead men?’

  He knew that the answer was: yes, the dead men would be replaced. After a war the population of the world increased. But none would be replaced by him. To look after his brother, he had never got married, though once he had come very near it: that memory often revived to turn his heart melancholy.

  ‘We’d better get down,’ he muttered. ‘You lead the way, Calum, as usual.’

  ‘Sure, I’ll lead the way, Neil.’

  Delighted to be out of this bondage of talk, Calum set his bag of cones firmly round his shoulders, and with consummate confidence and grace began the descent through the inner night of the great tree. Not once, all the long way down, was he at a loss. He seemed to find holds by instinct, and patiently guided his brother’s feet on to them. Alone, Neil would have been in trouble; he was as dependent on his brother as if he was blind; and Calum made no attempt to make his superiority as climber compensate for his inferiority as talker. Every time he caught his brother’s foot and set it on a safe branch it was an act of love. Once, when Neil slid down quicker than he meant and stamped on Calum’s fingers, the latter uttered no complaint but smiled in the dark and sucked the bruise.

  It was different as soon as they were on the ground. Neil immediately strode out, and Calum, hurrying to keep close behind, often stumbled. Gone were the balance and sureness he had shown in the tree. If there was a hollow or a stone or a stick, he would trip over it. He never grumbled at such mishaps, but scrambled up at once, anxious only not to be a hindrance to his brother.

  When they reached the beginning of the ride that divided a cluster of Norway spruces, Neil threw over his shoulder the usual warning: to leave the snares alone, whether there were rabbits in them half throttled or hungry or frantic; and Calum gave the usual sad guilty promise.

  During their very first day in the wood they had got into trouble with the gamekeeper. Calum had released two rabbits from snares. Neil had been angry and had prophesied trouble. It had come next evening when Duror, the big keeper, had been waiting for them outside their hut. His rage had been quiet but intimidating. Neil had said little in reply, but had faced up to the gun raised once or twice to emphasise threats. Cal
um, demoralised as always by hatred, had cowered against the hut, hiding his face.

  Duror had sworn that he would seize the first chance to hound them out of the wood; they were in it, he said, sore against his wish. Neil therefore had made Calum swear by an oath which he didn’t understand but which to Neil was the most sacred on earth: by their dead mother, he had to swear never again to interfere with the snares. He could not remember his mother, who had died soon after he was born.

  Now this evening, as he trotted down the ride, he prayed by a bright star above that there would be no rabbits squealing in pain. If there were, he could not help them; he would have to rush past, tears in his eyes, fingers in his ears.

  Several rabbits were caught, all dead except one; it pounded on the grass and made choking noises. Neil had passed it without noticing. Calum moaned in dismay at this dilemma of either displeasing his brother or forsaking a hurt creature. He remembered his solemn promise; he remembered too the cold hatred of the gamekeeper; he knew that the penalty for interfering might be expulsion from this wood where he loved to work; but above all he shared the suffering of the rabbit.

  When he bent down to rescue it, he had not decided in terms of right and wrong, humanity and cruelty; he had merely yielded to instinct. Accordingly he was baffled when, with one hand firmly but tenderly gripping its ears, he felt with the other to find where the wire noose held it, and discovered that both front paws were not only caught but were also broken. If he freed it, it would not be able to run; it would have to push itself along on its belly, at the mercy of its many enemies. No creature on earth would help it; other rabbits would attack it because it was crippled.

  As he knelt, sobbing in his quandary, the rabbit’s squeals brought Neil rushing back.

  ‘Are you daft right enough?’ shouted Neil, dragging him to his feet. His voice, with its anger, sounded forlorn amidst the tall dark trees. ‘Didn’t you promise to leave them alone?’