ZetaTalk: Government

by Nancy Lieder

  the White House via Supreme Court fiat was clear. Bush and his crowd wanted to dominate the

  world, in particular the oil fields, planting the US military there to defend this position and force the

  rest of the world into a type of oil slavery, at their knees. We have stated that 911 was not primarily

  at the hand of Bin Laden, who was assisted both within and without the US by those wanting to

  impose martial law in the US and by those wanting Bush to take a less arrogant stance in the world.

  These are mixed agendas, but not the first time odd bedfellows joined forces. The Bush crowd

  simultaneously wanted an excuse to invade Iraq, and wished to stand up to those in Europe who

  were furious with his arrogant claim to being master of the world. Thus, ignoring warnings on 911

  served his purposes. As is obvious from the OKC bombing, where a military boot were found

  without a body among the wreckage, and TWA800, which was downed by a missile, an incite to

  Martial Law has long been desired among the ultra right in the US. Thus, the many inferences that

  al Qaeda was being trained in the US, this fact known by the FBI, who turned a deaf ear. The

  Martial Law crowd has many fans and supporters, deep within the federal bureaucracy.

  Why, at this point in time, would Bush and Blair allow or encourage a bombing of their own

  civilians? For the Bush crowd, who care not one iota for the common man, it was never an issue.

  Bush's only desire going into 911 was to get on with occupation of oil fields and becoming dictator

  for life within the US. Where does he sit now? The media, under the influence of the Puppet Master

  who is infuriated with Bush for destabilizing the world, is promoting one expose after another, not

  hard to do when the field is so fertile with crimes and treason. The War in Iraq is dropping in the

  polls like a stone, and support for Bush vaporizing. Blair is on the ropes, will be unseated if matters

  go on as they are today with the trend of eroding support for his war efforts, and the London

  bombings are just the shot in the arm needed. We have stated that we, the Zetas, and other benign

  aliens have stopped innumerable attempts to create faked terrorism incidences in the US, as this

  would have frozen support for Bush with the current situation never arriving. This interference,

  allowed as an exception by the Council of Worlds, had at its base encouraging discussion of the

  coming pole shift in the media, which Bush has been fighting with national security orders to the

  media. However horrific it may seem to humans wanting benign aliens to save them from every

  distress, there is no such nexus in Britain. The hands of man, the bloody hands of Bush and Blair,

  were allowed to be exposed for what they are, by their acts.

  What will result from this new horror, man's inhumanity to man, in London, is yet to be sorted out, as it is very much

  in the hands of man. Spain sorted it out quickly enough, saving the lives of their soldiers and Iraqis in the process. We

  have high hopes for the British people.

  Signs of the Times #1478

  http://www.thesimon.com/ 'There is no reason for terrorist groups to attack England. As recently as

  this week, the Ministry of Defense announced that plans were being drafted that would pull British

  armed forces from the quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan. With the British effectively admitting

  they're throwing in the towel, the only motivation to stay could come from an attack that compels the

  forces to stay and fight global terrorism.' [and from another source]

  http://www.propagandamatrix.com/ 'The similarities with the Madrid bombing [where] the so called

  perpetrators were quickly linked to an Al Qaeda cell in Europe but later as we reported were linked

  to the Spanish Security service.'

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta232.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:04 AM]

  ZetaTalk: London Bombing

  Signs of the Times #1477

  Toll From London Bombing

  Raised Above 50 [Jul 8] 'Police

  on Friday raised the death toll

  to more than 50 from London's

  terrorist bombings but said they

  hadn't yet been able to reach all

  of the dead. Commuters

  reluctantly returned to the

  Underground, but buses and

  subways carried fewer riders

  than normal in the aftermath of four rush-hour blasts. No evidence suggested that the attacks

  involved suicide bombers but that officials hadn't ruled out the possibility. The bombs were placed

  on the floors of the three subway cars that were hit. Based on evidence recovered from the rubble,

  investigators believe some of the bombs were on timers.'

  [and from another source] Report: Israel Was Warned Ahead of First Blast [Jul 8] 'Army Radio

  quoting unconfirmed reliable sources reported a short time ago that Scotland Yard had intelligence

  warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred. The Israeli Embassy in London was

  notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel

  room.' [and from another source] An Insight from London http://urbansurvival.com/week.htm

  'There's a lingering question about who was behind the attacks. Noting unusual selling of the British

  Pound vs. to Dollar a full five hours ahead of the attack, specifically at 2245 hours EST on July 6th.'

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta232.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:04 AM]

  ZetaTalk: UK Car Bombs

  Mail this Pageto a Friend.

  ZetaTalk: UK Car Bombs

  written Jun 30, 2007

  Nightclub Bomb Alert Issued Two Weeks Ago [Jun 30]

  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/ Nightclubs across Britain were warned they

  could be terrorist targets just days before yesterday's attempted double

  car-bomb attack in London. Two cars packed with petrol, nails and "patio

  gas" canisters were left primed to wreak destruction among London

  clubbers making their way home after a Thursday night out. One car, a

  pale green Mercedes, had been left outside the Tiger Tiger nightclub in

  Haymarket. A second, a blue Mercedes, was left a few hundred yards away

  in Cockspur Street, a busy thoroughfare close to Trafalgar Square. This

  vehicle was towed away at 3:30am on Friday to a car pound on Park Lane by unsuspecting parking

  officials. Had either device gone off it would have generated a huge fireball and a shockwave spreading

  over 400 yards in all directions. [and from another] Clear CCTV Film of Driver [Jun 30]

  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/ One of the suspects may be an associate of a jailed al-Qaeda operative,

  Dhiren Barot, who plotted to kill "hundreds if not thousands" of people using limousines packed with

  explosives. According to reports last night, "crystal clear" CCTV footage of the driver of the Mercedes left

  outside Tiger Tiger showed a "close resemblance" to the man. The US station ABC, quoting British

  authorities, also reported that mobile phones in both cars failed to detonate the bombs, though each was

  called twice. [and from another] Small Bomb Goes Off at Spanish Airport [Jun 30]

  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19520954/ A small bomb exploded at Spain's Ibiza airport on Saturday,

  after it had been evacuated. The airport had been cleared after a telephoned bomb warning in the name of

  the Basque separatist movement ETA. [and from another] Car on Fire Crashes into Airport [Jun 30]

  http://news.bbc.co.uk/ A car on fire has been driven at the main terminal building at Glasgo
w Airport.

  Eyewitnesses have described a Jeep Cherokee being driven at speed towards the building with flames

  coming out from underneath.

  Are these terrorist attacks related? Or is it, as the establishment would have you believe, just coincidental that Europe,

  and in particular Britain, are being attacked by various terrorist groups? We have stated that the 77 attack in London

  was not by Muslims, but arranged by Bush and Blair, to further their interests. What has happened in Britain just

  recently for both these men to want a repeat of the 77 incident? Blair was forced out of office, his legacy the Iraq War,

  so unpopular in Britain. His goal would be to be proved correct, in retrospect. Brown, his replacement, is not the Bush

  hugger that Blair was, and allies with the British people rather than Bush. So having terrorism land on his doorstep just

  as he takes office, would, so Bush hopes, force him to change his stance and declare the War on Terror his top priority,

  including remaining in Iraq as part of the coalition. All these attacks have the same base, including the attack on Spain

  which was thrown in just to make it look like Britain was not the only victim. That the CCTV cameras, an intrusion on

  privacy, were central to supposedly identifying the driver of one of the London car bombs is also not an accident, as

  Bush hopes to point to this attack as justification of his own invasion of civil rights in the US. Bush is currently fearful

  of investigations by Congress into his illegal acts, for which he could potentially be impeached. Just the thing for these

  types of steps to be proven as helpful in actual terrorist attacks in London! Was the attack in Scotland intended to be a

  suicide attack? The intention was to ram the car into the terminal and then escape just ahead of the explosion, but this

  attack, like the London attacks, was stymied.

  It is being reported that the cell phones to be used to ignite the London car bombs failed to work as expected, and this

  no accident. Likewise the failure at Glasgow, which caused the drivers to be caught, rather than escape in the

  confusion following the planned blast. Investigations into the background of these drivers will prove interesting, and

  not all in the UK are in line with Blair's thinking, that all these false flag operations should be postured as true

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta382.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:05 AM]

  ZetaTalk: UK Car Bombs

  terrorism to further Bush's plans for Martial Law and world takeover of the oii fields. Is this a change from the 77

  attack on London, which was allowed to proceed without benign intervention from the Council of Worlds? Yes, as due

  to Bush's determined drive to declare Martial Law in the US, he is to be given no excuse to claim terrorism can only

  be countered by such means. Thus, what has occurred in the UK and in Spain looks like the work of bumbling idiots,

  relatively easily countered, rather than a real threat to the safety of the nation.

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta382.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:05 AM]

  ZetaTalk: Bush Knew

  Mail this Pageto a Friend.

  ZetaTalk: Bush Knew

  Note: written during the May 25, 2002 IRC Session

  The Bush Administration was being warned, well outside of the published FBI reports and previous knowledge about

  planned terrorist activities. As we stated after the Attack on America, they were being warned by their allies in the UK

  and Europe that the arrogance they were showing, the disregard for other nations fortunes, would not be tolerated. This

  is not so much a threat put into writing, as private chat and innuendoes. Thus, they were hardly going to warn the

  public, as they were too focused on acting normal. The very lack of warning, the decision to say nothing, indicates they were working under a cover-up of the true agendas in operation. As we stated when the entire state of Arizona, in

  1997, viewed a mother ship in the skies. It was not the sighting that was impressive, and proof of a cover-up, it was the

  delay in reporting! A 3 month delay occurred before several major media outlets reported it. Why the coordinated

  delay? This stood as proof of a cover-up, and the cover-up stood as proof of the alien presence. In like manner, the

  evidence pointing to the fact that Bush knew shows not that they were simply incompetent, but were so focused on

  hiding the threats they were receiving, determined to tough it out and not let the public know why allies would be upset

  with them, that they covered up too closely!

  All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g150.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:05 AM]

  ZetaTalk: Insiders

  Mail this Pageto a Friend.

  ZetaTalk: Insiders

  Note: written on May 15, 2002

  Conspiracy theorists have noted that during the World Trade Center attacks, explosions occurred almost immediately in

  floors below the strike area, or in the case of the Pentagon, above. The theory is floated that these plane strikes were

  assisted by insiders, wanting to create the climate that the Bush Administration has been all too happy to take

  advantage of - civil rights limited, the military beefed up, and no questions asked as it's all National Security.

  A plane crashing into the side of a tall building does not just break windows, it creates a minor earthquake in the

  structure, snapping plumbing, as well as rupturing the fuel tanks. Fuel dropping into a ventilation shaft, mixing

  with air, is an ideal explosive mix, and would drop down into the shaft to the floors below. This is what occurred

  in the World Trade Center.

  Likewise, where a plane crashes into the lower floor of a building, such as the Pentagon, the fuel will not go

  down, but spew upward along any avenue it has. Stairwells, for instance, carry not only fuel but fumes, and

  mixing with the air and having an updraft handy, this is likewise the direction an explosion would take. The

  Pentagon experienced severe fires, an inferno with no place to go. The World Trade Center fires had all four

  directions available to them, up, down, and sideways. The Pentagon had the fuel mix going up, creating a heat

  barrier so the heat of the burning plane itself could not dissipate upward. Like a blast furnace, encased, this

  creates super high heat, which melts many objects otherwise remaining. It is an untrue statement that there were

  no plane remains, just not what was expected, and thus rumors abound.

  Thus, where those wanting to incite Martial Law in the United States with Oklahoma City and TWA800 and Waco

  incidents did not succeed, they were handed an unexpected opportunity in the 911 events. In that these New World

  Order types seem delighted to take advantage of these opportunities, the public is rightfully suspicious, but 911 was not

  their plan in any manner or degree. Martial Law requires a number of steps outside of what has occurred. The reaction

  of the United States public to the restrictions that have been attempted have convinced the architects that full blown

  Martial Law would be a mistake. They will rather use the excuse of Homeland Security to the max, and watch the line

  so they do not cross it and reveal their true wishes. The constant warning of terrorist acts about to happen are to keep

  this sense alive, even though most of these warnings are without basis.

  Note: below added during the Jul 13, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.

  The rumor that the Mosad are behind Palestinian terrorist attacks is like the many rumors that spread about the US 911.

  Where there is some truth to it, 95% of the actions are otherwise. In the main, thes
e attacks are a shock, not wanted.

  They would like to control these attacks, but cannot. The occasional true rumor gets thus blown out of proportion. We

  are saying that those in the US wishing Martial Law caused Oklahoma City and TWA800 and the like, and lost. They

  did not cause 911, but take advantage of it. In like manner, Mosad is dealing in terror tactics.

  All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g147.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:06 AM]

  ZetaTalk: On Point re 911

  Mail this Pageto a Friend.

  ZetaTalk: On Point re 911

  written Apr 8, 2006, during the live GLP Saturday night radio broadcast.

  At the time of the 911 attack on America we stated that the attack was primarily a financial punishment against Bush, as the target was JP Morgan, a prime player in the US bond market and an insider working with the US government.

  We mentioned that 'several unlikely bedfellows crawled into bed with each other, each for their own ends', but did not

  name the factions. This omission was deliberate. We mentioned that the White House, the Bush administration, was

  aware of the threat, the specific threat, and thus the lack of warning was fear of admitting that such threats were even possible. The lack of warning was proof that they knew, were being threatened, and were attempting to call the bluff.

  Did this mean that insiders within the Bush administration or the agencies were not involved? This was not stated, only

  that Bush and those in a position to warn the public chose not to do so. The omission of any detail on who might have

  facilitated the attack was deliberate, on our part. A few months later, when discussion on the evidence showing many

  hands behind the scenes, many assists given, to effect the attacks, we commented on the analysis of the evidence. We

  made disconnected statements that were true in and of themselves, such as commenting upon how jet fuel can fall

  down ventilation shafts and mix with air, exploding at lower levels, or rise up a stairwell if the impact is on the ground

  level, creating a blast furnace in the stairwells. These statements, in and of themselves, are not untrue, they just aren't