Art of War (Barnes & Noble Classics Series)

by Sunzi

  3. One who acts thus is no leader of men, no present help to his sovereign, no master of victory.

  This idea, that the true object of war is peace, has its root in the national temperament of the Chinese. Even so far back as 597 B.C., these memorable words were uttered by Prince Chuang of the Ch’u State: “The character for ‘prowess’ is made up of [the ideographs for] ‘to stay’ and ‘a spear’ (cessation of hostilities). Military prowess is seen in the repression of cruelty, the calling in of weapons, the preservation of the appointment of Heaven, the firm establishment of merit, the bestowal of happiness on the people, putting harmony between the princes, the diffusion of wealth.”

  4. Thus, what enables the wise sovereign and the good general to strike and conquer, and achieve things beyond the reach of ordinary men, is foreknowledge.

  That is, knowledge of the enemy’s dispositions, and what he means to do.

  5. Now this foreknowledge cannot be elicited from spirits;

  “by prayers or sacrifices,” says Chang Yü.

  it cannot be obtained inductively from experience,

  Tu Mu’s note makes the meaning clear… . “[knowledge of the enemy] cannot be gained by reasoning from other analogous cases.”

  nor by any deductive calculation.

  Li Ch’üan says: “Quantities like length, breadth, distance and magnitude, are susceptible of exact mathematical determination; human actions cannot be so calculated.”

  6. Knowledge of the enemy’s dispositions can only be obtained from other men.

  Mei Yao-ch’ên has rather an interesting note: “Knowledge of the spirit-world is to be obtained by divination; information in natural science may be sought by inductive reasoning; the laws of the universe can be verified by mathematical calculation: but the dispositions of an enemy are ascertainable through spies and spies alone.”

  7. Hence the use of spies, of whom there are five classes: (1) Local spies; (2) inward spies; (3) converted spies; (4) doomed spies; (5) surviving spies.

  8. When these five kinds of spy are all at work, none can discover the secret system.

  [The Chinese] is explained by Tu Mu as “the way in which facts leak out and dispositions are revealed.”

  This is called “divine manipulation of the threads.”

  Mei Yao-ch’ên’s paraphrase shows that what is meant is the control of a number of threads.

  It is the sovereign’s most precious faculty.

  [General Baden-Powell writes:] “Cromwell, one of the greatest and most practical of all cavalry leaders, had officers styled ‘scout masters,’ whose business it was to collect all possible information regarding the enemy, through scouts and spies, etc., and much of his success in war was traceable to the previous knowledge of the enemy’s moves thus gained” [Aids to Scouting].

  9. Having local spies means employing the services of the inhabitants of a district.

  Tu Mu says: “In the enemy’s country, win people over by kind treatment, and use them as spies.”

  [General George] Crook realized that no American soldier would be able to compete with the Apache warriors on a man-to-man basis in the field of endurance… . Recognizing the problem, Crook recruited scouts on a scale never before employed in order that he would have fighting troops with the necessary individual endurance and “know how” to fight Indians on their own terms. Navahos, Pimas, and friendly Apaches were hired.

  Lt. Col. Donald V. Rattan, “Antiguerrilla Operations: A Case Study from History”(1960)

  10. Having inward spies, making use of officials of the enemy.

  [The Chinese term] includes both civil and military officials. Tu Mu enumerates the following classes as likely to do good service in this respect: “Worthy men who have been degraded from office, criminals who have undergone punishment; also, favourite concubines who are greedy for gold, men who are aggrieved at being in subordinate positions, or who have been passed over in the distribution of posts, others who are anxious that their side should be defeated in order that they may have a chance of displaying their ability and talents, fickle turncoats who always want to have a foot in each boat.

  “Officials of these several kinds,” he continues, “should be secretly approached and bound to one’s interests by means of rich presents. In this way you will be able to find out the state of affairs in the enemy’s country, ascertain the plans that are being formed against you, and moreover disturb the harmony and create a breach between the sovereign and his ministers.”

  The necessity for extreme caution, however, in dealing with “inward spies,” appears from an historical incident related by Ho Shih: “Lo Shang, Governor of I-chou, sent his general Wei Po to attack the rebel Li Hsiung of Shu in his stronghold at P’i. After each side had experienced a number of victories and defeats, Li Hsiung had recourse to the services of a certain P’o-t’ai, a native of Wu-tu. He began by having him whipped until the blood came, and then sent him off to Lo Shang, whom he was to delude by offering to co-operate with him from inside the city, and to give a fire signal at the right moment for making a general assault. Lo Shang, confiding in these promises, marched out all his best troops, and placed Wei Po and others at their head with orders to attack at P’o-t’ai’s bidding.

  “Meanwhile, Li Hsiung’s general, Li Hsiang, had prepared an ambuscade on their line of march; and P’o-t’ai, having reared long scaling-ladders against the city walls, now lighted the beacon fire. Wei Po’s men raced up on seeing the signal and began climbing the ladders as fast as they could, while others were drawn up by ropes lowered from above. More than a hundred of Lo Shang’s soldiers entered the city in this way, every one of whom was forthwith beheaded. Li Hsiung then charged with all his forces, both inside and outside the city, and routed the enemy completely.” [This happened in 303 A.D.]

  11. Having converted spies, getting hold of the enemy’s spies and using them for our own purposes.

  By means of heavy bribes and liberal promises detaching them from the enemy’s service, and inducing them to carry back false information, as well as to spy in turn on their own countrymen… .

  Ho Shih notes three occasions on which converted spies were used with conspicuous success: (1) by T’ien Tan in his defence of Chi-mo [chapter IX, paragraph 24, note]; (2) by Chao Shê on his march to O-yü [chapter VII, paragraph 4, note]; and (3) by the wily Fan Chü in 260 B.C., when Lien P’o was conducting a defensive campaign against Ch’in: The King of Chao strongly disapproved of Lien P’o’s cautious and dilatory methods, which had been unable to avert a series of minor disasters, and therefore lent a ready ear to the reports of his spies, who had secretly gone over to the enemy and were already in Fan Chü’s pay. They said: “The only thing which causes Ch’in anxiety is lest Chao Kua should be made general. Lien P’o they consider an easy opponent, who is sure to be vanquished in the long run.”

  Now this Chao Kua was a son of the famous Chao Shê From his boyhood, he had been wholly engrossed in the study of war and military matters, until at last he came to believe that there was no commander in the whole Empire who could stand against him. His father was much disquieted by this overweening conceit, and the flippancy with which he spoke of such a serious thing as war, and solemnly declared that if ever Kua were appointed general, he would bring ruin on the armies of Chao. This was the man who, in spite of earnest protests from his own mother and the veteran statesman Lin Hsiang-ju, was now sent to succeed Lien P’o.

  Needless to say, he proved no match for the redoubtable Po Ch’i and the great military power of Ch’in. He fell into a trap by which his army was divided into two and his communications cut; and after a desperate resistance lasting 46 days, during which the famished soldiers devoured one another, he was himself killed by an arrow, and his whole force, amounting it is said, to 400,000 men, ruthlessly put to the sword.

  12. Having doomed spies, doing certain things openly for purposes of deception, and allowing our own spies to know of them and report them to the enemy.

  Tu Yu giv
es the best exposition of the meaning: “We ostentatiously do things calculated to deceive our own spies, who must be led to believe that they have been unwittingly disclosed. Then, when these spies are captured in the enemy’s lines, they will make an entirely false report, and the enemy will take measures accordingly, only to find that we do something quite different. The spies will thereupon be put to death.” …

  As an example of doomed spies, Ho Shih mentions the prisoners released by Pan Ch’ao in his campaign against Yarkand [chapter XI, paragraph 36, note]. He also refers to T’ang Chien, who in 630 A.D. was sent by T’ai Tsung to lull the Turkish Khan Chieh-li into fancied security, until Li Ching was able to deliver a crushing blow against him… .

  Li I-chi played a somewhat similar part in 203 B.C., when sent by the King of Han to open peaceful negotiations with Ch’i. He has certainly more claim to be described as a [doomed spy]; for the King of Ch’i, being subsequently attacked without warning by Han Hsin, and infuriated by what he considered the treachery of Li I-chi, ordered the unfortunate envoy to be boiled alive.

  13. Surviving spies, finally, are those who bring back news from the enemy’s camp.

  This is the ordinary class of spies, properly so called, forming a regular part of the army. Tu Mu says: “Your surviving spy must be a man of keen intellect, though in outward appearance a fool; of shabby exterior, but with a will of iron. He must be active, robust, endowed with physical strength and courage; thoroughly accustomed to all sorts of dirty work, able to endure hunger and cold, and to put up with shame and ignominy.”

  Ho Shih tells the following story of Ta-hsi Wu of the Sui dynasty: “When he was governor of Eastern Ch’in, Shên-wu of Ch’i made a hostile movement upon Sha-yüan. The Emperor T’ai Tsu sent Ta-hsi Wu to spy upon the enemy. He was accompanied by two other men. All three were on horseback and wore the enemy’s uniform. When it was dark, they dismounted a few hundred feet away from the enemy’s camp and stealthily crept up to listen, until they succeeded in catching the passwords used by the army. Then they got on their horses again and boldly passed through the camp under the guise of night-watchmen; and more than once, happening to come across a soldier who was committing some breach of discipline, they actually stopped to give the culprit a sound cudgelling!

  “Thus they managed to return with the fullest possible information about the enemy’s dispositions, and received warm commendation from the Emperor, who in consequence of their report was able to inflict a severe defeat on his adversary.”

  14. Hence it is that with none in the whole army are more intimate relations to be maintained than with spies.

  Tu Mu and Mei Yao-ch’ên point out that the spy is privileged to enter even the general’s private sleeping-tent.

  None should be more liberally rewarded. In no other business should greater secrecy be preserved.

  Tu Mu [says that] all communications with spies should be carried on “mouth-to-ear.” … The following remarks on spies may be quoted from [Marshal] Turenne, who made perhaps larger use of them than any previous commander: “Spies are attached to those who give them most; he who pays them ill is never served. They should never be known to anybody; nor should they know one another. When they propose anything very material, secure their persons, or have in your possession their wives and children as hostages for their fidelity. Never communicate anything to them but what is absolutely necessary that they should know.”

  15. Spies cannot be usefully employed without a certain intuitive sagacity.

  Mei Yao-ch’ên says: “In order to use them, one must know fact from falsehood, and be able to discriminate between honesty and double-dealing.” … Tu Mu strangely refers these attributes to the spies themselves: “Before using spies we must assure ourselves as to their integrity of character and the extent of their experience and skill.” But he continues: “A brazen face and a crafty disposition are more dangerous than mountains or rivers; it takes a man of genius to penetrate such.” So that we are left in some doubt as to his real opinion on the passage.

  And if, to be sure, sometimes you need to conceal a fact with words, do it in such a way that it does not become known, or, if it does become known, that you have a ready and quick defence.

  Niccolò Machiavelli, “Advice to Raffaello Girolami When He Went as Ambassador to the Emperor” (1522)

  16. They cannot be properly managed without benevolence and straightforwardness.

  Chang Yü [interprets the Chinese as] “not grudging them honours and pay”; “showing no distrust of their honesty.” [So that the passage would read:] “When you have attracted them by substantial offers, you must treat them with absolute sincerity; then they will work for you with all their might.”

  17. Without subtle ingenuity of mind, one cannot make certain of the truth of their reports.

  Mei Yao-ch’ên says: “Be on your guard against the possibility of spies going over to the service of the enemy.”

  18. Be subtle! Be subtle! and use your spies for every kind of business.

  19. If a secret piece of news is divulged by a spy before the time is ripe, he must be put to death together with the man to whom the secret was told.

  The Chinese here is so concise and elliptical that some expansion is necessary for the proper understanding of it… . Word for word [it reads]: “If spy matters are heard before [our plans] are carried out,” etc. … The main point of Sun Tzu’s injunction [must surely be that] whereas you kill the spy himself “as a punishment for letting out the secret,” the object of killing the other man is only, as Ch’ên Hao puts it, “to stop his mouth” and prevent the news leaking any further. If it had already been repeated to others, this object would not be gained.

  Either way, Sun Tzu lays himself open to the charge of inhumanity, though Tu Mu tries to defend him by saying that the man deserves to be put to death, for the spy would certainly not have told the secret unless the other had been at pains to worm it out of him.

  Men should either be treated generously or destroyed, because they take revenge for slight injuries—for heavy ones, they cannot.

  Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince (1532)

  20. Whether the object be to crush an army, to storm a city, or to assassinate an individual, it is always necessary to begin by finding out the names of the attendants,

  those who wait on others, servants and retainers generally.

  the aides-de-camp,

  [Tu Yu describes them as] “those whose duty it is to keep the general supplied with information,” which naturally necessitates frequent interviews with him.

  the door-keepers and sentries of the general in command. Our spies must be commissioned to ascertain these.

  As the first step, no doubt, towards finding out if any of these important functionaries can be won over by bribery.

  21. The enemy’s spies who have come to spy on us must be sought out, tempted with bribes, led away and comfortably housed. Thus they will become converted spies and available for our service.

  22. It is through the information brought by the converted spy that we are able to acquire and employ local and inward spies.

  Tu Yu expands this into “through conversion of the enemy’s spies we learn the enemy’s condition.” And Chang Yü says: “We must tempt the converted spy into our service, because it is he that knows which of the local inhabitants are greedy of gain, and which of the officials are open to corruption.”

  23. It is owing to his information, again, that we can cause the doomed spy to carry false tidings to the enemy.

  [Chang Yü puts it thus:] “Because the converted spy knows how the enemy can best be deceived.”

  24. Lastly, it is by his information that the surviving spy can be used on appointed occasions.

  25. The end and aim of spying in all its five varieties is knowledge of the enemy; and this knowledge can only be derived, in the first instance, from the converted spy.

  He not only brings information himself, but makes it possible to use the other kinds
of spy to advantage.

  Hence it is essential that the converted spy be treated with the utmost liberality.

  26. Of old, the rise of the Yin dynasty

  Sun Tzu means the Shang dynasty, founded in 1766 B.C. Its name was changed to Yin by P’an Kêng in 1401.

  was due to I Chih,

  Better known as I Yin, the famous general and statesman who took part in Ch’êng T’ang’s campaign against Chieh Kuei.

  who had served under the Hsia. Likewise, the rise of the Chou dynasty was due to Lü Ya,

  [Lü Ya was also known as] Lü Shang. [He] rose to high office under the tyrant Chou Hsin, whom he afterwards helped to overthrow… . He is said to have composed a treatise on war.

  who had served under the Yin.

  There is less precision in the Chinese than I have thought it well to introduce into my translation, and the commentaries on this passage are by no means explicit. But, having regard to the context, we can hardly doubt that Sun Tzu is holding up I Chih and Lü Ya as illustrious examples of the converted spy, or something closely analogous. His suggestion is, that the Hsia and Yin dynasties were upset owing to the intimate knowledge of their weaknesses and shortcomings which these former ministers were able to impart to the other side. Mei Yao-ch’ên appears to resent any such aspersion on these historic names: “I Yin and Lü Ya,” he says, “were not rebels against the Government. Hsia could not employ the former, hence Yin employed him. Yin could not employ the latter, hence Chou employed him. Their great achievements were all for the good of the people.”

  Ho Shih is also indignant: “How should two divinely inspired men such as I and Lü have acted as common spies? Sun Tzu’s mention of them simply means that the proper use of the five classes of spies is a matter which requires men of the highest mental calibre, like I and Lü, whose wisdom and capacity qualified them for the task. [His] words only emphasize this point.” Ho Shih believes then that the two heroes are mentioned on account of their supposed skill in the use of spies. But this is [a] very weak [interpretation].