Indigo-E.T. Connection

by Marshall Masters

  Our Sun is in a frenzy of the likes of which have never been seen during the last three hundred years of recorded sun spot activity. Also the heliosphere, the bubble in space which is created by the Sun's winds, has expanded dramatically.

  While the debate about global warning on Earth churns on, other planets like Pluto and Mars are also experiencing climatic warming. Other celestial bodies are demonstrating unusual activity as well. For example, the large red spot on Jupiter will disappear within forty years. Meanwhile, the masses remain blind in their belief that the powers they've entrusted to a chosen few will ensure the continuity of their day-to-day lives.

  As the Earth-centric ruling elites use this power to gather and possess this knowledge, their authoritative aim is to deflect the attention of the masses from the magnitude of this knowledge so that they may secretly work to ensure their dominance, well into the post-historic world.

  But when will IT happen? In the cosmic sense: soon. In the human sense, there is still time to surf the channels on your HDTV. After all, the universe has its own clock, and it is certainly not tuned in to the needs of our news media or fickle political cycles.

  Yet when IT does happen, will we enter into a post-historic world that shall indelibly crease the timeline of humanity with a horrific period of great catastrophe and evolution? Are we no better than the dinosaurs? To insist that life as we know it will persist at least into a far future time is nothing more than self-destructive brain candy.

  In the end, the authoritative civilizations will all finally have their rendezvous due to one outcome or another; and after the dust settles, those who survived will walk out of the rubble and say Never again! The real question is, will those who survived the crease in the time line of humanity actually mean it? Those who do will instinctively follow the universal imperative, and thereby demonstrate that they have evolved beyond their ancestor's past failings. In this time, they will understand the purpose for which the universe has trans-humans and they will no longer fear nor abuse Indigos. Rather, they will seek them out.

  This is because, deep within the Indigo soul, the life-defining vision of the universal imperative burns with a bright and inexhaustible flame. What allows this flame to endure? It is fueled by the internal knowledge that has been passed down to each of us by our universe and by our lineage.

  What makes Indigos different from most others, is that they refuse to let the external orthodoxies invented by humankind dim that flame. Consequently, it is from their undiminished flame of internal knowledge that the inherent flames of others can be nourished and rekindled as humanity evolves-once again!

  Why Our External Orthodoxies Fail Us

  The term external orthodoxy has been mentioned several times so far, and while it has been indirectly defined up to this point, it now deserves closer inspection.

  Narrowly defined, the term orthodoxy implies religious faiths such as the Eastern Orthodox Church, or Orthodox Judaism. Broadly defined, it implies any widely held practice, custom, or belief. For now, we'll tackle the narrow theological definition.

  In the modern sense, once could say that the orthodoxies of religion help guide us along the moral pathways towards reunification with whomever we deem as our Creator.

  In the ancient sense, the reason for religion was to explain the world and how we came to be in it. Over time, these stories have become codified into orthodoxies for largely economic reasons. After all, how can a common man tend his field, pay his taxes, and contemplate the creation of life all in the same day? As with all compromises, something would necessarily have to suffer.

  In simpler terms, it is hard to make noodles you can sell, when you're busy using the noodle between your ears to explore the philosophical concepts that you cannot sell quite as easily as the noodles you make with your own two hands.

  It is from that economic realization that all organized religious orthodoxies have grown and prospered. The pact is simple. Instead of everyone using the noodle between their ears to delve into the mysteries of life, society creates an institution for a share of the noodles they make with their own two hands to do it for them. The bottom dollar result is that a handful of holy men do all the heavy intellectual lifting for the noodle-numb thinkers so they can focus their energies into their day-to-day material pursuits.

  This ancient ritual is usually successful at first. Not because of the noodles tossed into the bowls of the holy few by the noodle-numb faithful. Rather it is the manner in which the faithful subscribe to the orthodoxies of their holy men, despite the obvious fact that they are inherently tied to economic motives. Ignorance is bliss!

  However, once noodle-numb thinkers subscribe to one orthodoxy, they set themselves upon a slippery slope and as they slide downward, relinquish more and more of their own responsibility. As they slide away from internal knowledge towards more and more social, economic and political orthodoxies, they continue to a point where they no longer have enough noodles left to feed their own family. Worse yet, when they revolt through rejection they usually miss the point. It was their choice. Consequently, they just exchange one slippery path of external orthodoxies for another.

  However, events sometimes unfurl at their own economic pace.

  An Example of Life as We Know It—Ending

  An example of events unfurling at their own economic pace is what a Roman by the name of Flavius Valerius Constantinus did to Christianity. Born in the year 280, Constantinus believe in the Roman sun god, Sol. He even claimed that he received a vision from Sol in 310, while in a grove of Apollo in Gaul. At the same time he was receiving his vision, the Christians of that day had no earthly idea that Christianity as they knew it would cease to exist after Flavius became Pope Constantine.

  In the hundreds of years before Pope Constantine, Christianity was a home-based religion where women enjoyed great rights and responsibilities. Early Christian husbands usually tended to the economic needs of their families, while their wives taught the faith and led the services, which were usually held in the home. Then along came Pope Constantine and life, as the Christians of that day knew it, ceased to exist-especially for the women.

  The aim here is not to cast aspersions upon the man known as Jesus. While it may sound sacrilegious to some, Jesus was the quintessential Indigo of his day. This is because he unflinchingly drew from the light of his own inner knowledge and in doing so, kindled the flame within thousands of souls, and their many generations to come. He was so masterful in the giving of his inner knowledge that the authoritative imperative of economic sensibilities could never extinguish it.

  For Christians, Jesus is a deity. To the Jews, he is one of the greatest Jewish philosophers to have ever lived. For everyone else, his teachings provide inspiring if not interesting parallels to their own paradigms. Yet regardless of how you see Jesus, one thing cannot be denied. He showed humankind an enlightened path beyond the self-limiting restraints of external orthodoxies. In the process, his unflagging conviction to his own internal knowledge resulted in a fatal rejection of him, by the external religious and sociopolitical orthodoxies of the day.

  But what happens to those who've unquestioningly adopted religious and sociopolitical orthodoxies after an unexpected twist in their life rips away the blinders?

  The inherent problem with all external orthodoxies is that they're external. Therefore, in order to be comfortable with them, we must find a way to internalize them, and some are more palatable than others. Regardless of palatability, all require something called belief, and belief always seems to require some form of valuation. Therefore, if we truly believe in something, then we must be willing to set a price on it. This is why some beliefs are worth dying for and others are only worth suffering for; and these days it seems that all too many are worth making someone else die or suffer for them as well.

  Nonetheless, do not throw your beliefs out the window altogether. After all, there are great truths and they are always easy to recognize, because great truths, by and of necessity, a
re always simple. For example, there is only one true absolute in the universe-change.

  Likewise, we must acknowledge that the only thing worth believing in is our own internal knowledge. When we believe in this, we may remain morally centered no matter how many of humanity's frail external orthodoxies wither and die about us. As for the rest, we must always endeavor to understand-for it just is.

  Our Place in the Scheme of Things

  According to some, the Lisbon earthquake of 1531 was a watershed event for secular science as we know it today. Over 30,000 people perished in that tragic event which also destroyed more than 1500 houses, along with numerous churches and palaces.

  When it came to explaining the world about us, that event ripped the blinders away from the European faithful. After that, believing in God still remained sacred, but a more secular view of how the world worked became tolerable, and the rest as they say, is history. Nevertheless, while modern science stridently differentiates itself from theology, the fact is, both streams of endeavor are still bound up in their own external orthodoxies.

  Many science writers and thinkers today lament what modern science has become. While there are more papers being written than ever before, they are mostly minor variations of one accepted orthodoxy or another.

  Where theologians use the term heresy to describe thoughts that exist outside their walled garden, scientists use the term bad science to describe thoughts that are outside their box. So then, what is the real difference between a theological garden and a scientific box? Semantics, mostly.

  An entrenched scientific orthodoxy that is still defended with the peer-review process is the belief that we (as in ourselves and our planet) are freaks of coincidence, and the chances that another such freakish coincidence could happen elsewhere in the universe is somewhere between nil and next to nil.

  If you are a scientist today, you may or may not agree with this. However, if you want to be popular with your peers, there is pressure to openly believe what you secretly sense to be a flawed external orthodoxy. And if peer pressure is not enough, there is always the Golden Rule: he who has the gold, makes the rules.

  Of course if you are indifferent to peer acceptance and have enough money of your own then you need not elbow your way through to the funding trough. Orthodoxy be damned-you're going to do real science.

  So what do the greatest scientific thinkers of our day happen to think about how all this got started? That is, the ones who happen to be so good at what they do, they need not concern themselves with peer acceptance or having to elbow their way through to the funding troughs. These greatest thinkers are beginning to see our species as a critical and essential part of the great cosmic cycle wheel of creation, if not the very purpose it serves.

  Consider this: humankind is a carbon-based life form and according to the Bible we were created in the image of God. Ergo our creator must likewise be a carbon-based whatever. Yet, carbon was not created by the Big Bang; that momentous instant in time in which our universe was born. Rather, carbon can only be created through the death of the stars which were first created by the Big Bang and continue to be born today in the countless galaxies that span the seemingly limitless reaches of our universe.

  So then, did God cause the Big Bang as theological orthodoxies would seem to suggest? Or did the Big Bang create God as the scientific orthodoxies likewise seem to suggest? Or are they both wasting time with pointless chicken-or-the-egg debates?

  If that one gets your noodle spinning into overdrive, consider this. First, let's start with the assumption that we live in a single universe with a single all-knowing God. So what happens if we one day learn that we actually live in a multiverse? Will that mean that the all-knowing God of our universe is a subordinate god to the greater God of the multiverse?

  If all that doesn't get your noodle spinning then one of two things has happened: either you're a true atheist (which means you've never been in a foxhole during a murderous artillery barrage) or you're praying for lighting to strike the author!

  All kidding aside though, whether we live in a single universe, or are but tiny dwellers in a remote region of a multi-dimensional multiverse that reaches beyond the limits of our comprehension, our very existence is an inescapable and vital part of this grand plan-whatever we may eventually learn it to be.

  To see and to accept this is to define the imperative of our lives in the context of a universal necessity so that we may walk the path of oneness with that which created us. In doing so, we will find harmony within ourselves and that which surrounds us just as ancient indigenous cultures such as the Australian Aborigines and native Indian tribes of the Americas have done before us. Like Jesus, they have also shown us a path and it is why they have walked the Earth for thousands of years longer than the upstart industrial societies who have the audacity to label them as primitives.

  Indigo: strip yourself bare of external orthodoxies and gaze within yourself, so that you may bask in the light of the internal knowledge given to you by those who've walked this Earth before you, and by the living universe that created us all.

  When you have done that, you will be ready for the Indigo-E.T. Connection.

  * * *

  Making the Connection

  Ask any realtor if there is an easy way to spot a home built prior to 1948 and they'll tell you to look for a covered porch, because homes built after 1948 seldom have them. Prior to 1948, Americans spent their evenings sitting out on the porch and kibitzing with their neighbors. After 1948, builders quit offering homes with large comfortable porches (unless ordered by special request) because they knew that their customers would be spending their evenings watching television. Consequently, the whole notion of neighborhoods changed and Americans now spend years if not decades living in close proximity to their neighbors without ever once uttering a single word to each other.

  So, imagine that our lovely blue-green planet is part of a neighborhood where the various inhabitants are likewise preoccupied with their own pursuits, and where there seems to be little time or inclination to be neighborly on a casual basis. At least from our perspective, that is.

  Perhaps our present day situation is one in which we are reclusive inhabitants of our planet and we mostly ignore (or pretend to ignore) our interstellar neighbors as they fly by; and then the unimaginable happens: our house catches fire.

  In sudden gut-wrenching moment, we find ourselves shivering in the cold night air as we huddle together on the sidewalk in our pajamas, waiting for the fire department to arrive. Mortified by the sight of our own disaster, we finally meet our neighbors-those of whom we've lived near to for years without knowing or caring to know-as they greet us with warm blankets and steamy mugs of soothing cocoa.

  Yes, we may have despised them for their noisy lawn mowers, their trees that lean out across our property lines and threaten the roofs of our two-car garages, their dogs that always leave steamy piles on our expensively manicured lawns, and Lord knows what else. But in this moment, they are our friends and they bring much appreciated compassion, assistance, and warmth in a time of disaster.

  Is this burning home analogy just a bit of fanciful thinking, or could it be real?

  Consider this. The legend of the Ant People has endured countless generations of the Hopi people. According to the legend, the Ant People fed and cared for their Native American ancestors during a natural catastrophe so powerful that it drove them to seek safety underground. With the help of the Ant People they later reemerged into the Hopi upper world at Sipapu, in an area we now call the American Southwest.

  At the other end of the scale is the poem, The Hollow Men, [[KT31]] penned by T. S. Eliot in 1925. The last stanza of that now famous but dark and spasmodic poem continues to haunt us to this very day:

  This is the way the world ends

  This is the way the world ends

  This is the way the world ends

  Not with a bang but a whimper.

  For T. S. Eliot, there were no Hopi Ant Peo
ple, just evil human ones. For us living in this modern century and faced with looming manmade and natural disasters, the actual demise of our own civilization could embody all of the whimpers promised by T.S. Eliot or the hope of friendly rescue offered to us through ancient Hopi folklore. To all of this, whether it shall be the final whimpers of our own civilization, or the unconditional aid extended to us by other extraterrestrials in our time of need, we must be open and ready; for who is to know how things will actually progress? After all, it took years for Rome to fall and only days, if not less, for Atlantis to disappear.

  Like humans, no two civilizations ever die in precisely the same manner. Yet, regardless of how it happens, the moment in time when the windows close on our present view of civilization, a door shall creak open to reveal a new future, and it shall be upon that threshold (for better or worse) that the Indigo-E.T. Connection shall finally happen.

  Indigo-E.T. Connection Begins Today

  Indigo, you are a natural-born organic leader. A role you neither relish nor can avoid.

  + You seek not the material rewards of leadership.

  + You seek not the personal comforts and perks of leadership.

  + Your ego abhors the lure aggrandizement offered by positions of authority. You seek neither title nor recognition.

  + Left to you own devices, you would just as soon not be a leader.

  Indigo, your internal knowledge also tells you that if and when the universe comes and taps you on the shoulder, your day of destiny will be unavoidable. Should that momentous day occur and you shirk your responsibility, you will know it deep inside.

  If you blink when your moment of destiny comes, the memory of that failing will haunt you for the rest of your natural born days.

  Perhaps fortune will shine upon you, and by random chance you will happen to be standing on ground zero when that conclusively fatal event overwhelms the internal control mechanisms of our biosphere and civilizations, and triggers the catastrophic failures that will end life, as we know it.